Connect with us

Montana

Montana electric linemen ready to help in natural disasters

Published

on

Montana electric linemen ready to help in natural disasters


Pure disasters typically occasions assist convey groups collectively that will not work with one another on a standard foundation.

Whereas many Montana electrical firms won’t be heading to Florida this time round resulting from distance, they’re all the time keen to reply the decision.

Electrical firms and co-operatives in Montana haven’t acquired the request.

However they’ve seen it in Montana earlier than with crews from in state and out of state serving to to get electrical energy again.

Advertisement

Whereas no linemen are on their method to Florida but, they’ve a great sense about how mutual help or mutual assist will work in Florida.

When states undergo extreme energy outages like these anticipated within the Sunshine State, native electrical firms and co-ops typically name for assist from across the nation.

“It is a standing mutual assist settlement,” stated Brandon Wittman, Yellowstone Valley Electrical Cooperative C.E.O. & basic supervisor. “Makes it extra environment friendly to there isn’t any haggling over what is the worth for this alignment from this co-op versus this co-op and that form of factor.”

Wittman has expertise as a lineman in emergency conditions.

“You get all palms on deck and all people actually begins pulling the rope in the identical path,” Wittman stated. “And there is a whole lot of camaraderie and guys simply actually wish to assist people get lights again on briefly order.”

Advertisement

Lately, crews from cooperatives have responded to emergencies brought on by flooding in Carbon, Stillwater and Massive Horn counties.

“Lineman’s a brotherhood,” stated Ryan Corridor, Montana Electrical Cooperatives Affiliation communications director. “You will hear them say that quite a bit. And particularly inside subsets like cooperatives with them doing the identical coaching and similar courses. Numerous these guys know one another and are acquainted with one another. And once more, mutual assist has occurred sufficient, a number of of them have seen one another earlier than.”

Corridor stated the affiliation is made up of 25 co-ops, together with Yellowstone Valley.

“As of proper now I’ve heard again from over half of our managers and none of them have acquired a name or request for help,” Corridor stated.

However he does say many can be comfortable to reply the decision if wanted.

Advertisement

Beartooth Electrical Co-op has additionally not despatched any staff to Florida.

Wittman says it is best for crews inside 500 miles to reply.

Requests to co-ops would come by the Nationwide Electrical Cooperative Affiliation.

NorthWestern Power additionally has not acquired a request.

Jo Dee Black, NorthWestern public relations specialist, says that request would come from Edison Electrical Institute (EEI).

Advertisement

She despatched a written assertion:

“Our ideas are with all these impacted by Hurricane Ian, a harmful and highly effective storm. NorthWestern Power is monitoring the mutual help wants. Primarily based on the extent of the wants of the vitality firms in that space for harm restoration, NorthWestern Power will consider sending our crews or releasing contractors from work for NorthWestern Power to help the efforts to restore harm brought on by Hurricane Ian and restore vitality service. Mutual help is a trademark of the vitality business.”

“There is a sense of serving to your neighbor,” Corridor stated.

“Simply that spirit of attempting to assist is fairly spectacular,” Wittman stated.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

FWP to repeal rule requiring liaison with nonprofits

Published

on

FWP to repeal rule requiring liaison with nonprofits


Laura Lundquist

(Missoula Current) Partly due to an ongoing lawsuit, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks wants to eliminate a decades-old rule requiring the department to consult with citizen organizations on its projects and responsibilities.

On Friday, FWP will take verbal comment on the elimination of a rule that requires the department to maintain liaison with citizen organizations active in wildlife and sportsmen’s issues.

Written in 1976, the rule says staff will participate formally or informally with various groups, including “Montana Wildlife Federation, Montana Wilderness Association, Audubon Society, Ducks Unlimited, Trout Unlimited, Sierra Club, Environmental Information Center, Northern Rockies Action Group, various state and local outfitter and guide organizations, local unaffiliated rod and gun clubs, or any other citizen organization.”

Advertisement

The Feb. 8 release announcing Friday’s meeting said FWP wants to repeal the rule, because “it is archaic and no longer reflects how the commission or the department engages with the public in decision-making processes.”

At first blush, the repeal might appear to be an attempt to reduce public participation in the department’s decisions.

Jim Vashro, a retired FWP regional fisheries manager, said FWP manages a public trust – wildlife – for all citizens, so it needs all the communication tools it can get. He sees the rule as important to maintaining the exchange of ideas with the various groups and building understanding and support for proposals from both sides.

“It’s critical that (FWP staff) engage with the people who use the resource,” Vashro said. “Communication is always key. The department would probably still do communication (if the rule is repealed), but it’s nice having that ARM rule just in case something happens.”

During the past few years, there have been several examples of proposals that the department had to walk back because it didn’t ask for input from sportsmen first. For example, the commission had to reverse a 2022 decision to put a daily limit on the number of kokanee caught in Georgetown Lake after fishermen protested.

Advertisement

Another example was when hunters pushed back against a December 2021 proposal to reduce by half the number of special either-sex elk permits and restrict them to public land in eight elk districts in eastern Montana that are over population objectives. During the commission meeting, more than 40 hunters from various groups spoke against the proposal, which many suspected had a connection to the United Property Owners of Montana, a small but deep-pocketed private-property-rights group.

Some concerns about limited public information and input were validated when, during an October 2023 court settlement of a lawsuit alleging that the FWP commission lacked transparency, FWP attorneys acknowledged that the commission’s secretive practices constituted constitutional violations of public participation and the public’s right to know.

The final decree required the commission to attend training on open-meeting laws, post all public comments on proposals, and use only public-issued email addresses and telephones for commission business.

“It just shows that people care about how decisions are made. Without the rule, (FWP) could merely listen to one group, just make a decision, and there’d be no recourse for the other groups,” Vashro said. “Now I agree that, more and more, they use online resources, and in many cases, that’s a good way to meet. But it doesn’t promote good conversation – it’s kind of a one-sided deal.”

But some sportsmen’s groups are not so sure that the rule is still needed. Some say that the rule doesn’t keep FWP from listening to just one group. And now, there are so many more organizations and diverse demands in Montana than what existed in 1976 that interacting with them all is almost impossible. But one group in particular has complained that FWP violated the rule because it hasn’t interacted with them: the United Property Owners of Montana.

Advertisement

Following the previously mentioned December 2021 meeting where resident hunters helped defeat the elk tag proposal, the United Property Owners of Montana sued FWP and the FWP commission in April 2022. They alleged that FWP has failed to keep the elk population under control and that the FWP commission made an unlawful decision in February 2022 when it voted to maintain a limit on the number of hunting permits in nine eastern Montana hunting districts, all of which surround the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument.

In June 2022, a coalition of Montana hunting and conservation groups filed to intervene on behalf of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks against the United Property Owners of Montana. The coalition includes Missoula’s Hellgate Hunters and Anglers, Helena Hunters and Anglers, Montana Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, Montana Bowhunters Association, Montana Wildlife Federation, Public Land Water Access Association and Skyline Sportsmen.

The case has moved slowly since then, although oral arguments are finally slated for the end of the month in Fergus County. One of the claims that the United Property Owners of Montana has made in the lawsuit is that FWP staff have never attended one of their meetings, therefore it violated the rule.

If the rule is repealed, that claim becomes moot. And it avoids the risk that other groups would challenge the department with similar claims. Some sportsmen see value in that and dismiss concerns about any loss of communication, saying that groups can still reach out to department staff or submit public comments, as long as FWP adheres to Montana’s public participation laws. Only time would tell if the department or Montanans would notice a difference.

FWP did not respond to requests for comment. FWP paralegal Regina Reynolds has been scheduled to conduct the online hearing on Friday at 10 a.m.  FWP will accept written comments until March 25.

Advertisement

Contact reporter Laura Lundquist at lundquist@missoulacurrent.com.





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana State faces Grambling in First 4 matchup

Published

on

Montana State faces Grambling in First 4 matchup


Grambling Tigers (20-14, 17-4 SWAC) vs. Montana State Bobcats (17-17, 12-9 Big Sky)

Dayton, Ohio; Wednesday, 6:40 p.m. EDT

FANDUEL SPORTSBOOK LINE: Bobcats -4; over/under is 134.5

BOTTOM LINE: Montana State plays Grambling in the First Four round of the NCAA Tournament.

Advertisement

The Bobcats have gone 12-9 against Big Sky opponents, with a 5-8 record in non-conference play. Montana State ranks fifth in the Big Sky with 13.1 assists per game led by Eddie Turner III averaging 3.7.

The Tigers’ record in SWAC action is 17-4. Grambling gives up 69.0 points to opponents while being outscored by 1.4 points per game.

Montana State averages 75.1 points, 6.1 more per game than the 69.0 Grambling allows. Grambling’s 44.0% shooting percentage from the field this season is 2.5 percentage points lower than Montana State has given up to its opponents (46.5%).

TOP PERFORMERS: Robert Ford III averages 2.3 made 3-pointers per game for the Bobcats, scoring 15.9 points while shooting 42.6% from beyond the arc. Turner is shooting 44.3% and averaging 13.3 points over the past 10 games.

Tra’Michael Moton is averaging 11.8 points and 1.7 steals for the Tigers. Jourdan Smith is averaging 11.7 points and 4.6 rebounds while shooting 52.1% over the last 10 games.

Advertisement

LAST 10 GAMES: Bobcats: 6-4, averaging 76.7 points, 31.1 rebounds, 12.7 assists, 8.0 steals and 3.0 blocks per game while shooting 47.6% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 74.0 points per game.

Tigers: 9-1, averaging 71.0 points, 33.3 rebounds, 11.0 assists, 6.7 steals and 3.7 blocks per game while shooting 47.2% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 65.1 points.

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Grambling vs. Montana State Predictions & Picks – NCAA Tournament First Four

Published

on

Grambling vs. Montana State Predictions & Picks – NCAA Tournament First Four


Wednesday’s game features the Montana State Bobcats (17-17) and the Grambling Tigers (20-14) clashing at UD Arena in what should be a close matchup, with a projected 71-70 win for Montana State according to our computer prediction. Game time is at 6:40 PM ET on March 20.

According to our computer prediction, Grambling is projected to cover the point spread (3.5) against Montana State. The two sides are projected to exceed the 135.5 total.

Watch live college basketball games from all over the country, plus ESPN originals and more NCAA hoops content on ESPN+!

Advertisement

Sportsbook Promo Codes

Click here for the best sportsbook promo codes in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & sports betting FAQ

Grambling vs. Montana State Game Info & Odds

  • Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024
  • Time: 6:40 PM ET
  • TV: truTV
  • Where: Dayton, Ohio
  • Venue: UD Arena
  • Line: Montana State -3.5
  • Point Total: 135.5
  • Moneyline (To Win): Montana State -185, Grambling +150

Place your bets on any college basketball matchup at BetMGM, and sign up with our link for a first-time deposit bonus!

Grambling vs. Montana State Score Prediction

  • Prediction:
    Montana State 71, Grambling 70

Spread & Total Prediction for Grambling vs. Montana State

  • Pick ATS: Grambling (+3.5)
  • Pick OU: Over (135.5)

Montana State’s record against the spread so far this season is 16-15-0, while Grambling’s is 16-14-0. In terms of going over the point total, games involving the Bobcats are 17-14-0 and the Tigers are 15-15-0. The two teams score an average of 142.7 points per game, 7.2 more points than this matchup’s total. Over the last 10 contests, Montana State has a 6-4 record against the spread while going 6-4 overall. Grambling has gone 7-3 against the spread and 9-1 overall in its last 10 matches.

Bet on this or any college basketball matchup at BetMGM

Grambling Performance Insights

  • The Tigers’ -49 scoring differential (being outscored by 1.4 points per game) is a result of putting up 67.6 points per game (318th in college basketball) while allowing 69 per outing (85th in college basketball).
  • Grambling ranks 332nd in college basketball at 32.2 rebounds per game. That’s similar to the 33.2 its opponents average.
  • Grambling connects on 5.2 three-pointers per game (346th in college basketball) at a 33.9% rate (186th in college basketball), compared to the 6.5 per outing its opponents make, shooting 33.9% from deep.
  • Grambling and its opponents have been mostly even in the turnover battle. The Tigers commit 12.4 per game (292nd in college basketball) and force 12.3 (92nd in college basketball).

Subscribe to Max and get the B/R Sports Add-On to watch March Madness this year!

Rep your team with officially licensed college basketball gear! Head to Fanatics to find jerseys, shirts, and much more.

Best Sportsbook Promo Codes in Louisiana

Not all offers available in all states, please visit BetMGM for the latest promotions for your area. Must be 21+ to gamble, please wager responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact 1-800-GAMBLER.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending