Connect with us

California

What is on the ballot in California in 2022?

Published

on

What is on the ballot in California in 2022?


County election workplaces have already begun mailing out ballots for the upcoming California normal election, which is just below a month away.

On November 8, Californians will contemplate seven poll propositions and resolve who represents the Golden State within the U.S. Senate, and fill different statewide workplaces together with, governor, legal professional normal, superintendent of public instruction, and chief of justice.

Advertisement

Along with statewide candidates and measures, there are some key native races, from San Francisco district legal professional to Oakland and San Jose mayoral races.

SEE ALSO: What to learn about voting in California

California propositions

Proposition 1: This is able to amend the state structure to ensure a proper to an abortion and contraceptives. Proposition 1 would depart little doubt that abortion is authorized in California.

Advertisement

Proposition 26: This prop would legalize in-person roulette, cube video games, and sports activities wagering on tribal lands. Prop 26 would additionally enable sports activities betting at sure horseracing tracks, together with Golden Gate Fields. A portion of a ten% tax would assist pay for the enforcement of playing legal guidelines and applications to assist people who find themselves addicted. 

Proposition 27: That is one other sports activities betting proposition, however this measure would legalize on-line and cellular sports activities betting. A tax would first pay for regulatory prices, whereas 85% of what’s left over would go to homelessness applications whereas the remaining 15% would go to nonparticipating Native American tribes.

Advertisement

Proposition 28: This is able to require lawmakers to make use of 1% of all state funding for public and constitution colleges for music and humanities education schemes. 

Proposition 29: The proposition would require a health care provider, nurse practitioner or doctor’s assistant to be current throughout remedy at an outpatient kidney dialysis clinic.

Proposition 30: This measure would elevate taxes on high-income earners and use the cash for wildfire prevention applications and incentives to assist individuals purchase electrical automobiles to cut back greenhouse fuel emissions. 

Advertisement

Proposition 31: The initiative asks voters whether or not a 2020 regulation that outlawed the sale of sure flavored tobacco merchandise in California ought to take impact or be overturned.

Sustain with the information by subscribing to our e-newsletter.

Advertisement

U.S. Senate

In the united statesSenate race, Democratic incumbent Alex Padilla seems on the poll twice as he seeks to finish the ultimate few months of his predecessor Vice President Kamala Harris’ time period which expires on January 3, 2023. Padilla can also be working to fill the common full six-year time period, which begins on the high of the brand new 12 months. Gov. Newsom appointed Padilla to fill Harris’ void on the finish of 2020.

In each contests, Padilla is up in opposition to Republican legal professional Mark Meuser. Since 2017, Meuser has labored for the right-leaning Dhillon Regulation Group, which launched 22 lawsuits in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom claiming he overstepped his authority in imposing coronavirus restrictions.

Advertisement

California statewide workplace

Governor: California Gov. Gavin Newsom cruised to a straightforward victory within the June main, not even a 12 months after serving a recall try, advancing to the November normal election the place he is up in opposition to Republican state senator Brian Dahle. 

Dahle, who represents a sprawling district that runs from Sacramento County to the Oregon border, has faulted Newsom for an unchecked homelessness disaster, rising crime charges, hefty taxes and a decaying high quality of life.

Advertisement

Lawyer Common: California Lawyer Common Rob Bonta is working in his first statewide election after he was appointed to the state’s high regulation enforcement put up final 12 months by Newsom. Bonta, a Yale Regulation Faculty graduate who served as deputy metropolis legal professional for San Francisco, got here up as one of many Legislature’s most progressive Democrats, dubbing himself “the individuals’s legal professional.”

Advertisement

His competitor, Nathan Hochman, hopes to capitalize on voters’ anger over rising crime and homelessness. Hochman, a former federal prosecutor, protection lawyer, and former assistant U.S. legal professional normal, argues that Bonta’s workplace hasn’t sufficient to struggle not solely these points, however human trafficking and opioid deaths.

Bonta stated he views public security as “job one, two and three for us. … However that’s definitely not the one difficulty, though it’s a important one, that Californians care about.”

San Francisco races

Advertisement

San Francisco District Lawyer: Three candidates are vying to unseat District Lawyer Brook Jenkins, who was appointed to the put up by Mayor London Breed after the recall of Chesa Boudin.

Jenkins labored for Boudin’s workplace, however stop in 2021 to guide the recall marketing campaign in opposition to him. 

The prosecutor hopes to serve the remainder of Boudin’s time period by way of 2023.

Advertisement

Additionally within the race is Joe Alioto Veronese, a civil rights legal professional and grandson of former San Francisco Mayor Joseph Alioto.

Advertisement

Former San Francisco police commissioner John Hamasaki additionally seems on the poll alongside attorney Maurice Chenier, who is not any stranger to the district legal professional race. Chenier ran in opposition to then-incumbent Kamala Harris in 2007.

San Francisco Board of Training: Six candidates are working to fill three seats on the San Francisco Board of Training that had been left vacant after a February recall. Alida Fischer, Ann Hsu, Motamedi, Lainie, Karen Fleshman, Lisa Weissman-Ward, and Gabriela Lopez.

Advertisement

Alameda County races

Oakland Mayor: Town has been affected by gun violence, already as much as greater than 100 homicides. Oakland’s leaders and residents, alike, have been begging and pleading for the wave of violence to subside.

With Mayor Libby Schaaf ending out her final time period, 10 mayoral candidates are hoping to usher in a brand new period. Ignacio De La Fuente, Gregory Hodge, Tyron C. Jordan, Peter Y. Liu, Treva D. Reid, John Reimann, Seneca Scott, Loren Manuel Taylor, Sheng Thao, and Allyssa Victory Villanueva make up the crowded mayoral race. 

Advertisement

Gun violence is not the one woe Oakland’s subsequent mayor will inherit. Town can also be grappling with a booming homeless inhabitants and a scarcity of inexpensive housing.

Alameda County District Lawyer: Two candidates are vying to succeed Alameda County District Lawyer Nancy O’Malley. Civil rights legal professional Pamela Value and Chief Assistant District Lawyer Terry Wiley are working for the function of high cop.

The race is historic as it will likely be the primary time Alameda has a Black district legal professional.

Advertisement

San Jose mayor’s race

Advertisement

San Jose Mayor: Supervisor Cindy Chavez and Councilmen Matt Mahan need to exchange outgoing Mayor Sam Liccardo. Chavez gained the endorsements of District 6 Council member Dev Davis and Pam Foley of District 9. 

Mahan garnered the assist of Liccardo and three former San Jose mayors. Chavez and Mahan had been the highest two finishers in a June main.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

What's in store for California's new water year? Experts say 'extremes are getting more extreme'

Published

on

What's in store for California's new water year? Experts say 'extremes are getting more extreme'


LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Extreme weather and our changing climate means that forecasting has become even more important.

To help you become more climate-ready, ABC News and the ABC Owned Television Stations have teamed up to help you navigate this new reality.

What’s in store for California’s water year?

The state’s water year begins October 12 and ends September 30 of next year.

Typically, fall rain starts in October then the bulk of California’s rain falls from December to February. April is when we see peak snowpack. So what will this year look like? Climate experts are warning to be ready for some extremes.

Advertisement

“What we’re seeing in the forecast right now is that we’re likely off to another late start to the wet season,” said Dr. Michael Anderson, who serves as the official State Climatologist for California. “Meaning, the dry conditions continuing and certainly still seeing the above-normal temperatures.”

High pressure is also in the mix, meaning rainfall could be delayed this year.

“That can happen as high pressure kind of keeps things, pushing storms to the north and we’re seeing that right now with almost all the [precipitation] activity hitting the very southern end of Alaska and northern British Columbia,” said Anderson.

But when it arrives, forecasters are urging people to be ready seeing as to we could see more extreme rain events during dry seasons.

“The one constant we are seeing is that extremes are getting more extreme,” said Jason Ince with the California Department of Water Resources. “Our droughts are getting longer and hotter, our big storms are getting stronger since warmer air can hold more moisture.”

Advertisement

Forecasters are also on the lookout for Santa Ana and Diablo wind events this fall and the potential for decaying tropical systems to cause thunderstorms, which are both concerning for fire crews.

“We end up with some pretty good [precipitation] events sometimes with some thunderstorms, but those thunderstorms, if they’re dry can be fire starters which can be a problem,” said Anderson.

Our water demand is the highest from May to August but remember, this September started out dangerously hot in California so were still on the tail end of this season. Well finish this water year end of September. To learn more on the new water year, click here.

Copyright © 2024 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

New California law will force companies to admit you don't own digital content

Published

on

New California law will force companies to admit you don't own digital content


California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed AB 2426, a new law that requires digital marketplaces to make clearer to customers when they are only purchasing a license to access media. The law will not apply to cases of permanent offline downloads, only to the all-too-common situation of buying digital copies of video games, music, movies, TV shows or ebooks from an online storefront. spotted the development, which could see marketplaces facing fines for false advertising in the state if they don’t use clear language to explain the limitations of what access entails. In other words, you won’t be seeing language like “buy” or “purchase” once the law takes effect in 2025.

The move to digital storefronts has raised new parallel concerns about ownership and preservation for media in the modern age. Ubisoft’s move to after the game’s servers shuttered is one of the most recent examples of how customers can suddenly lose access to media they felt they owned. The new California law won’t stop situations like The Crew‘s disappearance from happening, and it won’t stop those losses from hurting. But it does make clearer that ownership is a pretty rare and intangible thing for digital media.

Governor Newsom is having a busy week. He also signed the state’s “” bill yesterday and last week signed two bills with protections against , both living and deceased.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Letters to the Editor: Prop. 36 is a sensible response to theft and addiction in California

Published

on

Letters to the Editor: Prop. 36 is a sensible response to theft and addiction in California


To the editor: I was disappointed to read The Times’ editorial opposing Proposition 36, a ballot measure that would reclassify some misdemeanors as felonies and would also create a new category of crime called a “treatment-mandated felony.”

For full disclosure, I am the assistant CEO of the California District Attorneys Assn., which is one of the sponsors of Proposition 36.

Proposition 36 is a measured approach to the horrible situation we find ourselves in. It makes smart and surgical modifications to Proposition 47, a well-intended but problematic measure passed 10 years ago. I hope your readers take a look at the editorial by the San Jose Mercury News saying that Proposition 36 is a “smart response” to crime, addiction and homelessness.

Advertisement

A recent highly respected poll found that 71% of likely California voters were in favor of the ballot measure. Among these are people who have lost loved ones to fentanyl and are tired of going to CVS and seeing socks and razors under lock and key.

Contrary to rhetoric of Proposition 36 opponents, nobody wants to go back to the days of disparately locking up brown and Black people. The goal is to make us more safe and help those living with addiction, mental illness and homelessness.

Proposition 36 will not solve the problem, but it will be one small step in the right direction.

Jonathan Raven, Davis, Calif.

..

Advertisement

To the editor: The choices we make have consequences. When people make poor choices, like committing a third misdemeanor theft, those people should receive negative consequences.

California politicians have created policies and a culture that have resulted in a lack of appropriate negative consequences for people who make poor choices. Instead, those consequences land on society.

Unhoused people who break the law and refuse help are allowed to go on destroying themselves and our communities, while consequences such as fires and hazardous waste plague the rest of us. Thieves who steal everything from detergent to copper wiring go largely unpunished, while the rest of us wait for the keys to store cabinets and walk on unsafe, dark sidewalks.

The editorial board’s opposition to Proposition 36 shows its disconnect from reality. A kindergartner learns that choices have consequences. We Angelenos have learned what happens when our leaders and law enforcement officials fail to hold people accountable for their actions.

Progressive leniency has resulted in the filthy city we have today. We must hold everyone accountable to the same legal standards and consequences. Don’t steal the pizza.

Advertisement

Victoria Mordecai, San Marino



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending