Connect with us

Arizona

Heading to Arizona Check out the Super Bowl Experience.

Published

on

Heading to Arizona Check out the Super Bowl Experience.


Heading to Arizona Take a look at the Tremendous Bowl Expertise. – CBS Philadelphia


Watch CBS News


We’re just one week away from game day and attractions for football fans are now opening in Arizona.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Southern Arizona rancher trial sees closing arguments on Thursday

Published

on

Southern Arizona rancher trial sees closing arguments on Thursday


NOGALES, Ariz. (AP) — The trial of a southern Arizona rancher charged with fatally shooting an unarmed migrant on his property near the U.S.-Mexico border went to the jury Thursday.

Jurors did not immediately reach a verdict and will resume deliberations Friday morning.

In closing arguments earlier Thursday, lawyers debated the actions of 75-year-old George Alan Kelly, who is accused of second-degree murder in the January 30, 2023, shooting of Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea.

Cuen-Buitimea, 48, lived just south of the border in Nogales, Mexico. Court records show Cuen-Buitimea had previously entered the U.S. illegally several times and was deported, most recently in 2016

Advertisement

Trial of southern Arizona rancher draws national attention

The case has attracted national attention as border security continues to be a top issue this election year and garnered sympathy for the rancher from some on the political right.

Cuen-Buitimea was in a group of men that Kelly encountered on his property. Prosecutor Mike Jette said Kelly recklessly fired an AK-47 rifle toward the group that was about 100 yards (90 meters) away.

Kelly said he fired warning shots in the air, but he didn’t shoot directly at anyone, explaining that he feared for his safety and that of his wife and property.

What did the attorneys say in their closing arguments?

“He says he shot 100 yards over their heads. But he never told law enforcement that he was in fear of his life,” Jette said in closing arguments.

Kelly fired nine shots toward the group, according to Jette, who said Cuen-Buitimea suffered three broken ribs and a severed aorta.

Advertisement

Jette encouraged jurors to find Kelly guilty of reckless manslaughter or negligent homicide if they can’t convict him on the murder charge.

Defense attorney Brenna Larkin, in her closing argument, said Kelly “was in a life or death situation” that was “a terrifying scenario” for him.

“He was confronted with a threat right outside his home,” Larkin said. “He would have been absolutely justified to use deadly force, but he did not.”

She urged jurors to return a “not guilty” verdict, saying the state didn’t prove its case.

What happened to the other people on the southern Arizona rancher’s land?

The other migrants on Kelly’s ranch in 2023 weren’t injured and managed to escape back to Mexico.

Advertisement

Larkin has characterized groups of migrants crossing through Kelly’s property as an increasing concern over the years, prompting him to arm himself for protection.

The trial that started March 22 included jurors visiting Kelly’s nearly 170-acre (69-hectare) cattle ranch in Nogales, Arizona.

Earlier in proceedings, Kelly rejected an agreement with prosecutors that would have reduced the charge to one count of negligent homicide if he pleaded guilty.

Kelly was also charged with aggravated assault against another person in the group of about eight people, including a man from Honduras who was living in Mexico and who testified during the trial that he was seeking work in the U.S. that day.

___

Advertisement

This story has been corrected to show that Kelly fired nine shots toward a group that included Cuen-Buitimea, according to the prosecution, not that Cuen-Buitimea was shot nine times.

We want to hear from you.

Have a story idea or tip? Pass it along to the KTAR News team here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Austin Smith drops reelection campaign amid accusations of petition signature fraud

Published

on

Austin Smith drops reelection campaign amid accusations of petition signature fraud


Republican state Rep. Austin Smith has dropped his reelection bid after being accused of personally forging more than 100 petition signatures to get on the 2024 ballot. 

And he’s facing a possible criminal investigation into his signatures after state elections officials forwarded his petition signatures to the Arizona Attorney General’s Office.

Smith is first-term representative from Surprise, a member of Arizona’s far-right Arizona Freedom Caucus and a top official at Turning Point Action, the campaign arm of the far-right Turning Point USA, which is aimed at young Republicans and run by Charlie Kirk. 

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Ironically, Smith is also a member of the House’s Municipal Oversight and Elections Committee, where he decried unproven election fraud in Maricopa County, and has even made jokes accusing county officials of mail-in ballot signature fraud on social media. 

Advertisement

“Signature verification in Maricopa County is a joke,” Smith wrote on Twitter in May 2023. 

But Smith’s own petition to get on the July 30 Republican primary ballot was filled with more than 100 signatures, along with corresponding addresses, that obviously look like they were all written by the same person. And two of his supposed petition signers told the court, in statements submitted along with a lawsuit challenging his nominating petitions, that they never signed the petition. 

Smith announced that he was dropping out of the race on Thursday, just days after the signature challenge was filed by Democratic precinct committeeman Jim Ashurst. 

In the announcement, Smith called the allegations against him “ludicrous” and accused Democrats of creating a “coordinated attack” against him with press releases and social media posts about the legal challenge to his candidacy. 

“If they could convince a judge that any one signature was forged, all of my signatures would be invalidated and I would get kicked off the ballot,” Smith wrote. “And as per Arizona law, I would also be banned from seeking office for five years.” 

Advertisement

Smith took no accountability for the allegedly fraudulent signatures and said that he didn’t want to spend tens of thousands defending himself in the civil elections challenge — as well as a possible criminal case for forgery — because he didn’t want that to impact his new wife. 

“We have our plans and aspirations, and none of them involve starting out tens of thousands of dollars in debt as a once of being involved in public service,” he wrote. 

But Republican Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer Tweeted on Thursday that, if the signatures were valid, the county would put out a report saying so, costing Smith nothing. 

Smith went on to say that, when he runs for office in the future, he’ll exclusively use the online petition signature system, so that “no one can make up any stories.” 

Advertisement

But while Smith was excoriated by the Arizona Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, they were not the only ones who went after him for his alleged behavior. 

Maricopa County Supervisor Clint Hickman, a Republican, called Smith out in a Thursday statement, saying he should resign his seat in the House of Representatives immediately and calling for an investigation into Smith’s signatures. 

“An investigation will reveal the truth, but this episode tells us something about those who have spread falsehoods with such ease since the 2020 Election,” Hickman wrote. “They can’t comprehend that most Americans and Arizonans are honest people. They accuse others of dishonesty so easily because they have no qualms about lying to win a political race or a business deal. Well, I will always tell people the truth… and Austin Smith should leave public service now.”

Smith was one of the many Arizona Republicans who claimed that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from former President Donald Trump and says on his campaign site that he was involved in the partisan audit of the race, which never uncovered any fraud. 

Advertisement

“What happened on November 3rd, 2020 in Maricopa County continues to be a national disgrace and embarrassment,” Smith wrote on his website. “Not only that, Austin believes it was criminal and will fight every day in the State Legislature to hold those responsible to account.”

The Arizona Secretary of State, Democrat Adrian Fontes, has already forwarded the allegations of forgery and fraud against Smith to the Attorney General’s Office, along with 12 other election petition signature cases. 

Shortly after Smith announced he was dropping out of the race, the ADLCC criticized him for his decision not to defend his actions in court. 

“Arizona voters deserve the same accountability, transparency, and elections integrity that Smith has long claimed to champion,” Democratic Sen. Priya Sundareshan, co-chair of the ADLCC said in a statement.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

My husband accidentally cut off a truck. What happened next was totally unnecessary

Published

on

My husband accidentally cut off a truck. What happened next was totally unnecessary



Letter to the editor: Why do Arizona drivers become so angry behind the wheel?

play

On our way to the Diamondbacks/Yankees baseball game, on the Loop 202, my husband went to switch lanes from the HOV lane to the fast lane. He looked but did not see a blue pickup truck in his blind spot.

Advertisement

The male in the blue truck blew his horn.

I asked my husband if he had cut that driver off and he responded that he hadn’t meant to, but he had not seen the truck. He was grateful that the driver was able to respond and not hit us.

But suddenly, the driver of the blue truck went around us on the left, cut in front of my husband and brake checked us twice. He then moved over to the HOV lane and slowed down, apparently waiting for us to catch up to him on his right.

As we went by, he threw something at our vehicle.

Red light cameras: Are a necessary pain in Arizona

Advertisement

Thank goodness no damage was done to our vehicle, and thank goodness he did not have a gun.

My question is why do some become so angry when they are behind the wheel? I have been cut off many times while driving and I let it go.

I just wish that when people are behind the wheel of a vehicle, they offer a bit of grace to other drivers. Being cut off is not the end of the world, and is not meant to be an affront to you.

Let it go and move on to drive another day.

Marchea Sovde, Mesa

Advertisement

What’s on your mind? Send us a letter to the editor online or via email at opinions@arizonarepublic.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending