Connect with us

Alaska

Arctic and non-Arctic countries share their views on Arctic security

Published

on

Arctic and non-Arctic countries share their views on Arctic security


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Quite a few worldwide panelists gathered Thursday for the session “Geopolitics, Local weather and Russia: Safety in a Altering Arctic” on the Arctic Encounter Symposium on the Dena’ina Heart.

The panel dialogue was led by the Ted Stevens Heart for Arctic Safety Research (TSCASS) and introduced collectively panelists from Poland, Denmark, Estonia, the UK and the USA.

“Nicely, actually the dialog was about worldwide safety and the slightly tenuous scenario that we face each from a local weather perspective, within the quickly altering surroundings, each out and in of the Arctic — but in addition the safety scenario in Europe in mild of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,” mentioned Matt Hickey, TSCASS Affiliate Director for Strategic Engagement.

Panelists shared their views on how the Russia-Ukraine Struggle has impacted their respective nations along with sharing how they need to handle the rising tensions. The array of voices on Thursday, Hickey shared, highlights how the Arctic is changing into a worldwide centerpiece of debate.

Advertisement

“That is actually a global story and the contributions from throughout the board, from NATO nations, non-Arctic NATO nations and non-Arctic nations around the globe are going to contribute to the options of preserving a free and affluent Arctic area,” Hickey mentioned.

“I feel the takeaway in the present day is that nations each share and have totally different opinions on what the way forward for the Arctic appear like,” Hickey mentioned. “The divergence revolves round the place and when to probably — at the very least their taking about — re-engaging with Russia. That’s one space the place we see a distinction in opinions.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Rats off! Alaska’s St. Paul Island remains vigilant in search for rats

Published

on

Rats off! Alaska’s St. Paul Island remains vigilant in search for rats


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Never mind the old idiom “to smell a rat,” a resident of St. Paul Island thinks they might have seen a rat and it’s not being taken lightly.

Located in the central Bering Sea, St. Paul Island is part of the Pribilof Island group in the Aleutians West Census Area in Alaska. In addition to being the home to a community of roughly 350 people, it’s also the home of rich wildlife, with over 300 recorded species of birds.

That’s why Lauren Divine, director of the Aleut Community of St. Paul Island’s ecosystem conservation office said the remote island community is ultimately “responsible forever” to keep the island rodent-free.

“It’s critical that we keep it rodent-free to maintain our diverse wildlife populations,” Divine said. “Just the threat of a rat — realized or unconfirmed — has to be taken seriously and acted upon until we are confident that there is no longer a threat, because an infestation and invasion can completely decimate our island so quickly.”

Advertisement

The resident reported the potential sighting last June, and while no sightings have been reported since, the anxiety lingers on.

After receiving word that a rat might have moved to town, wildlife officials were quick to arrive at the resident’s apartment complex to give a thorough examination, looking for the slightest indication of tracks, chew marks, or droppings.

Traps were baited with peanut butter with strategically placed blocks of wax made with ultraviolet material in hopes of using black lights to detect glowing droppings to light the way. Trail cameras have even been brought in to aid in the search, but still, no confirmed sightings as of now.

Tribal President for the Aleut Community of St. Paul John Melovidov said with any luck, it will stay that way.

“We’re crossing our fingers,” he said. “We’re hoping that it was just maybe a false reporting, but we’re absolutely taking it as if it is a real report.”

Advertisement

Melovidov has grown up on the island, being active with the tribe since around the age of five. He said in the 30-plus years he’s lived on St. Paul, he can only recall the threat of a rat sighting maybe a total of three times.

Despite it being a fairly uncommon occurrence, St. Paul has long since implemented a surveillance program that consists of setting rat traps around the airport as well as around the waterfront areas where vessels will dock.

“Our main concerns are the harbor in the airport,” Melovidov said. “We’re really heavy on traps and monitoring there. The most likely chance of getting a rat out here would be on one of our cargo ships or on our cargo plane.”

The last known rat sighting on the island was back in 2019 and it took nearly a year before it finally turned up dead inside a warehouse, all the more stressing the importance of a persistent search, Divine said, no matter the cost.

“While it’s true that our biosecurity vigilance is not cheap — and we have to assume those costs continuously — the costs of eradication would be infinitely more expensive, and perhaps never 100% successful,” she said.

Advertisement

The community is so concerned about wildlife conservation that Divine said dogs have even been federally prohibited from the Pribilofs Islands since 1976 to prevent interactions with northern fur seals.

However, in response to this most recent potential rat sighting, Melovidov said they’re currently seeking permission to have the U.S. Department of Agriculture temporarily bring a canine to the island to assist in the search.

“That’s going to cost about $12,000 to bring them out,” he said. “If we get that regulation waived, we’re hoping for November, but if it gets cold a little early, we may have to wait until spring, but really, I want to get this done as as soon as possible.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Climate change destroyed a Southwest Alaska village. Its residents are starting over in a new town.

Published

on

Climate change destroyed a Southwest Alaska village. Its residents are starting over in a new town.


MERTARVIK — Growing up along the banks of the Ninglick River in Southwest Alaska, Ashley Tom would look out of her window after strong storms from the Bering Sea hit her village and notice something unsettling: the riverbank was creeping ever closer.

It was in that home, in the village of Newtok, where Tom’s great-grandmother had taught her to sew and crochet on the sofa, skills she used at school when students crafted headdresses, mittens and baby booties using seal or otter fur. It’s also where her grandmother taught her the intricate art of grass basket weaving and how to speak the Yupik language.

Today, erosion and melting permafrost have just about destroyed Newtok, eating about 70 feet of land every year. All that’s left are some dilapidated and largely abandoned gray homes scraped bare of paint by salt darting in on the winds of storms.

Advertisement

“Living with my great-grandmother was all I could remember from Newtok, and it was one of the first houses to be demolished,” said Tom.

In the next few weeks, the last 71 residents will load their possessions onto boats to move to Mertarvik, rejoining 230 residents who began moving away in 2019. They will become one of the first Alaska Native villages to complete a large-scale relocation because of climate change.

Newtok village leaders began searching for a new townsite more than two decades ago, ultimately swapping land with the federal government for a place 9 miles away on the stable volcanic underpinnings of Nelson Island in the Bering Strait.

But the move has been slow, leaving Newtok a split village. Even after most residents shifted to Mertarvik, the grocery store and school remained in Newtok, leaving some teachers and students separated from their families for the school year.

Calvin Tom, the tribal administrator and Ashley’s uncle, called Newtok “not a place to live anymore.” Erosion has tilted power poles precariously, and a single good storm this fall will knock out power for good, he said.

Advertisement

For now, the rush is on to get 18 temporary homes that arrived in Mertarvik on a barge set up before winter sets in.

Alaska is warming two to three times faster than the global average. Some villages dotting the usually frigid North Slope, Alaska’s prodigious oil field, had their warmest temperatures on record in August, prompting some of Ashley Tom’s friends living there to don bikinis and head to Arctic Ocean beaches.

It’s the same story across the Arctic, with permafrost degradation damaging roads, railroad tracks, pipes and buildings for 4 million people across the top of the world, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Arctic Institute. In the Russian Arctic, Indigenous people are being moved to cities instead of having their eroding villages relocated and across Scandinavia, reindeer herders are finding the land constantly shifting and new bodies of water appearing, the institute said.

About 85% of Alaska’s land lies atop permafrost, so named because it’s supposed to be permanently frozen ground. It holds a lot of water, and when it thaws or when warmer coastal water hits it, its melting causes further erosion. Another issue with warming: less sea ice to act as natural barriers that protect coastal communities from the dangerous waves of ocean storms.

The Yupik have a word for the catastrophic threats of erosion, flooding and thawing permafrost: “usteq,” which means “surface caves in.” The changes are usually slow — until all of a sudden they aren’t, as when a riverbank sloughs off or a huge hole opens up, said Rick Thoman, a climate specialist with the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Advertisement

There are 114 Alaska Native communities that face some degree of infrastructure damage from erosion, flooding or permafrost melt, according to a report in January from the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. Six of them — Kivalina, Koyukuk, Newtok, Shaktoolik, Shishmaref and Unalakleet — were deemed imminently threatened in a Government Accountability Office report more than two decades ago.

Communities have three options based on the severity of their situations: Securing protection to stay where they are; staging a managed retreat, moving back from erosion threats; or a complete relocation.

Moving is hard, starting with finding a place to go. Communities typically need to swap with the federal government, which owns about 60% of Alaska’s land. But Congress has to approve swaps, and that’s only after negotiations that can drag on: Newtok, for example, began pursuing the Nelson Island land in 1996 and didn’t wrap up until late 2003.

“That’s way too long,” said Jackie Qatalina Schaeffer, the director of planning initiatives at the Alaska Native Travel Health Consortium.

“If we look back a decade at what’s happened as far as climate change in Alaska, we’re out of time,” she said. “We need to find a better way to help communities secure land for relocation.”

Kivalina last year completed a master plan for relocation and is negotiating with an Alaska Native regional corporation for the land, a process that could take three to five years, Schaeffer said.

Advertisement

Another big hurdle is cost. Newtok has spent decades and about $160 million in today’s dollars on its move. Estimates to relocate Kivalina vary from $100 million to $400 million and rising, and there’s currently no federal funding for relocation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has disaster funding and programs, Schaeffer said, but that comes only after a disaster declaration.

In 2018, a resource for Alaska communities identified 60 federal funding sources for relocation, but according to the Unmet Needs report, only a few have been successfully used to address environmental threats. But an infusion of funding into these existing programs by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act could provide benefits to threatened Alaska communities, the report said.

About $4.3 billion in 2020 dollars will be needed to mitigate infrastructure damage over the next 50 years, the health consortium report says. It called for Congress to close an $80 million annual gap by providing a single committed source to assist communities.

“Alaska Native economic, social, and cultural ways of being, which have served so well for millennia, are now under extreme threat due to accelerated environmental change,” the report said. “In jeopardy are not just buildings, but the sustainability of entire communities and cultures.”

After five years of separation and split lives, the residents of Newtok and Mertarvik will be one again. The school in Newtok closed and classes started in August for the first time in a temporary location in Mertarvik. A new school building should be ready in 2026. The Newtok grocery recently moved to Mertarvik, and there’s plans for a second grocery and a church, Calvin Tom said.

Advertisement

The new village site has huge benefits, including better health, Tom said. For now, most of the people of Mertarvik are still using a “honey bucket” system rather than toilets. But that method of manually dumping plastic buckets of waste should be replaced by piped water and sewer within the next few years. The new homes in Mertarvik are also free of black mold that crept into some Newtok homes on moisture brought by the remnants of Typhoon Merbok two years ago.

Tom said there’s talk of someday renaming the relocated town Newtok. Whatever the name, the relocation offers assurance that culture and traditions from the old place will continue. An Indigenous drum and dance group is practicing at the temporary school, and subsistence hunting opportunities — moose, musk ox, black bear, brown bear — abound.

A pod of belugas that comes by every fall should arrive soon, and that hunt will help residents fill their freezers for the harsh winter ahead.

Ashley Tom is excited by the arrival of the last Newtok residents in Mertarvik. Although their home will be different from what they’ve known for most of their lives, she’s confident they will come to appreciate it as she has.

Advertisement

“I really love this this new area, and I just feel whole here,” she said.

___

Thiessen reported from Anchorage.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

US Energy Costs Would ‘Go Down Substantially’ If Alaska’s Resources Were Fully Tapped, State Revenue Chief Says

Published

on

US Energy Costs Would ‘Go Down Substantially’ If Alaska’s Resources Were Fully Tapped, State Revenue Chief Says


Energy costs across the U.S. “would probably go down substantially” if the U.S. sharply increased mining and production of Alaska’s natural resources, according to Adam Crum, commissioner for the Alaska Department of Revenue. 

Geographically, Alaska is by far the largest U.S. state at more than 663,000 square miles. It is also among the most natural resource-dense states in the nation. 

Alaska became a state in 1959, and under its Statehood Act, it is “mandated that the mineral resources and the subsurface rights were collectivized by the state so that the state could actually collect the royalties and production taxes off of that to fund the government,” Crum explains on “The Daily Signal Podcast.”

While other states, such as Texas and North Dakota, can have “individual farmers who actually have mineral rights, nobody has that in Alaska,” he said, explaining that his state was “set up to be a resource-development state since inception.” 

Advertisement

One of the world’s largest zinc and lead mines can be found in northwest Alaska and has now “been producing for over 40 years and has provided very extensive jobs,” according to Crum. 

The mine has allowed the local indigenous population in northern Alaska to “not only have an economy to stay there, but you have this town now, it’s about 4,000, 5,000 people of primarily Inupiat Eskimos living up there. They get to benefit from this, and they can still get to live a subsistence lifestyle,” Crum explains. 

Asked about the environmental effects of mining and drilling in Alaska, the revenue commissioner said life expectancy has increased in native communities where natural resources are being extracted as industry has strengthened local economies and increased the quality of life. 

Crum joins “The Daily Signal Podcast” to discuss the vast natural resources Alaska has to offer. 

Alaska House of Representatives Speaker Cathy Tilton joins the show after the conversation with Crum to discuss the greatest challenges facing America’s most northern state, and to share some of Alaska’s best-kept secrets. 

Advertisement

Listen to both conversation on the podcast below: 





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending