Connect with us

Technology

Water cyberattack hits at least 7 states

Published

on

Water cyberattack hits at least 7 states

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

You probably never think about the computer systems behind your kitchen faucet. You turn the handle and expect clean water. That familiar routine suddenly felt far less certain in Minnesota and six other states.

A coordinated cyberattack targeted operational technology at more than 30 community water systems on Sunday, July 26, and Monday, July 27. Minnesota IT Services, known as MNIT, activated the state’s cybersecurity response and brought in federal agencies to help investigate.

One water plant temporarily went offline. Meanwhile, other communities reported problems involving automated controls or communications equipment. Workers switched to manual operations or used backup procedures to keep essential services running. Fortunately, state officials reported no active requests for residents to reduce or change their drinking water use.

The FBI has since said that water or wastewater utility companies in seven states have been affected.

“Some of that activity degraded water operations,” the bureau said.

Advertisement

This water cyberattack raises an uncomfortable question for towns across America. How many local utilities could keep operating if hackers gained access to the computers controlling their equipment?

INVESTIGATORS BELIEVE IRANIAN HACKERS ARE LIKELY BEHIND CYBERATTACK ON MINNESOTA WATER SYSTEMS: REPORT

CyberGuy Live: Missed “Sick of Spam?” Get the replay and checklist

Our free CyberGuy Live class, “Sick of Spam?,” has ended, but you can still watch the full replay and download our spam-stopping checklist. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson walks you step by step through simple ways to reduce robocalls, spam texts, junk email and unwanted messages. You’ll also learn how to curb political texts, clean up your inbox and spot messages that could put your personal information at risk.

Get the free replay and checklist now at CyberGuyLive.com.

Advertisement

A water tower is seen Thursday, July 30, 2026, in Plymouth, Minn. A cyberattack targeted operating technology at more than 30 water systems in Minnesota, including Plymouth’s, earlier this week, state officials said. (Ellen Schmidt/AP)

What happened in the Minnesota water cyberattack

The attack targeted operational technology, commonly called OT. These systems control physical equipment such as pumps, valves and treatment machinery. In Braham, city officials initially reported that the water plant had gone offline for an unknown reason. Crews restored the facility within hours and said it was again filtering and treating water as expected.

Officials later blamed the outage on a malicious cyberattack against computerized operating systems. The city relied on water already stored in its tower while crews worked on the problem. Plymouth reported communications problems involving two water towers and several wastewater lift stations. However, officials said water levels and water quality remained unaffected.

South St. Paul also identified a cybersecurity incident involving automated water utility controls. Public Works employees used established contingency procedures to maintain normal water and wastewater operations. Maple Plain publicly confirmed that its water utility technology had also been targeted.

In total, four communities have publicly described specific effects, although MNIT says attackers targeted more than 30 systems statewide. That difference is important. Being targeted does not mean every system suffered a shutdown. However, it shows that someone tried to reach a large number of local utilities within a short period.

Advertisement

Who may be behind the Minnesota water cyberattack

Officials have not announced a definitive attribution. However, a July 30 report from The New York Times says investigators preliminarily believe Iranian hackers were probably responsible. The report cited U.S. and state officials familiar with the investigation, but President Donald Trump said he rejected the suggestion that Iran was behind the breaches.

Those officials cautioned that the assessment could change as investigators collect more technical evidence. They also have not ruled out the possibility that attackers tried to make the activity appear Iranian. Therefore, Iran should be described as the leading preliminary suspicion rather than the confirmed attacker.

The timing has drawn attention because CISA warned in April that Iranian-affiliated hackers were targeting internet-exposed programmable logic controllers. These devices help control machinery and other equipment at water systems and additional critical infrastructure facilities. CISA initially highlighted certain Rockwell Automation and Allen-Bradley controllers. On July 22, the agency expanded its warning to include equipment from Schneider Electric, Siemens and potentially other manufacturers.

Still, federal officials have not publicly tied that campaign to the Minnesota incidents. CyberGuy has previously examined Iran’s expanding cyber threat to U.S. critical infrastructure. Water systems remain attractive targets because even a limited disruption can create fear far beyond the equipment involved.

IRAN-LINKED HACKERS TARGET US MEDICAL TECH COMPANY

Advertisement

A coordinated cyberattack reached operational technology at dozens of Minnesota water systems, exposing security risks for smaller utilities nationwide. (City of St. Cloud)

Why water system cyberattacks threaten U.S. communities

Minnesota’s experience could happen in any state. The United States has close to 170,000 drinking water and wastewater systems. Many now connect physical equipment to internet-enabled technology so workers can monitor facilities from a distance. That remote access helps utilities manage equipment spread across wide service areas. However, it may also give an attacker a route into vital controls when operators fail to secure the connection.

Smaller communities often face the greatest challenge. The Government Accountability Office says water systems have widely different cybersecurity capabilities. Many also use older technology that can be difficult to update. At the same time, utilities must stretch limited budgets across essential repairs and regulatory requirements. Cybersecurity upgrades may compete with work that residents can see, such as replacing aging equipment.

A large utility may employ dedicated security professionals. A small town may rely on plant operators who already handle daily operations and after-hours problems. As a result, the communities with fewer resources may also have less ability to monitor suspicious activity around the clock.

Foreign governments have already shown interest in those weak spots. CyberGuy previously reported how Chinese hackers gained access to critical American systems, including infrastructure connected to water and energy. The attacker may change. The underlying weakness often looks familiar: exposed equipment, outdated technology or remote access that lacks strong protection.

Advertisement

Could a cyberattack make drinking water unsafe?

A cyberattack against a water utility does not automatically mean the water has been contaminated. In Minnesota, officials reported no known impact on drinking water quality. They also told residents in publicly identified communities that normal water use could continue.

However, a successful attack can cause more serious consequences. The EPA warns that hackers could disrupt treatment or damage equipment. In a worst-case situation, attackers might also interfere with processes that protect water quality.

Manual operations can provide an important safety net. Minnesota workers used those procedures to keep systems running while investigators examined affected technology. Still, a manual backup only helps when employees know how to use it. Utilities need to test those procedures before screens go dark and alarms stop reporting correctly.

How CISA says water utilities should strengthen security

CISA published new international guidance on July 28 called “CI Fortify: Advice for Isolating Vital Systems.” The guidance urges critical infrastructure operators to separate vital operational technology from less trusted networks. That isolation can help an essential service continue operating when another part of the organization becomes compromised.

CISA released the guidance on the same day MNIT publicly announced the statewide attack. However, the agency has not said it created the document in response to Minnesota. For water utilities, stronger protection may begin with removing unnecessary internet exposure. When remote access remains necessary, CISA advises placing security controls in front of programmable controllers.

Advertisement

Utilities should also change factory passwords and give employees separate login credentials. EPA inspectors have found water systems that continued using default passwords. Inspectors also discovered shared staff accounts or access that remained active after employees left.

Another EPA finding needs careful context. The agency says more than 70% of inspected systems violated basic federal risk assessment or emergency response planning requirements. That figure does not mean 70% had confirmed cybersecurity breaches. However, inspectors found serious digital security weaknesses at some of those facilities.

TRUMP REJECTS IRAN BLAME FOR MINNESOTA CYBERATTACK, POINTS FINGER AT ‘CORRUPT’ POLITICAL FOE

Hackers targeted computerized controls at more than 30 Minnesota water systems, forcing some utilities to use manual operations and backup procedures. (Tony Webster/Wikimedia Commons)

What to do if your water utility reports a cyberattack

Residents cannot secure a municipal treatment plant themselves. However, a few steps can help you receive reliable information and avoid scams during an incident.

Advertisement

1) Follow official local instructions

Check your city, county health department or water utility website for updates. Officials will tell you whether you need to reduce water use or boil tap water. Avoid making decisions based on an unverified neighborhood post.

2) Do not assume the water is contaminated

A cyberattack may affect communications or automated equipment without changing water quality. Continue normal use unless local officials provide different instructions. However, follow any boil-water notice immediately if one appears.

3) Make sure emergency alerts are enabled

Your city may use text messages, automated calls or government phone alerts during a service disruption. Take a moment to check the emergency alert settings on your iPhone or Android. Also, sign up for your city’s local notification system if one is available.

4) Keep a small emergency water supply

A backup supply can help during any water interruption, whether it begins with a cyberattack or equipment failure. The CDC recommends storing at least one gallon of water per person each day for three days. Households may need more for pets or people with medical needs.

5) Watch for fake utility messages

Scammers often take advantage of outages and breaking news. You may receive a message claiming that your water bill failed or that your service will be disconnected. Another message may offer bottled water assistance through a payment link. Do not use the phone number or link inside an unexpected message. Instead, contact the utility through its official website or the number printed on your bill. CyberGuy has also explained how scammers impersonate water and other utility companies by spoofing familiar phone numbers.

Advertisement

Kurt’s key takeaways

Minnesota contained a troubling attack without a known drinking water emergency. Workers restored Braham’s plant while other utilities relied on manual controls or contingency procedures. However, the number of systems targeted should get the attention of every governor and mayor in America. Hackers apparently found a way to reach dozens of local utilities during the same two-day period. The preliminary suspicion involving Iranian hackers also raises the stakes. Still, investigators need more evidence before anyone treats that attribution as settled. Every community should know which water controls face the internet and whether workers can operate essential equipment manually. States should also help smaller towns that cannot afford their own cybersecurity teams.

How confident are you that your community could handle a cyberattack on its water system, and what would you want local officials to tell you first? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Technology

Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook

Published

on

Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook

It’s the hot new thing in tech, and it’s where all the jobs are. Students who don’t learn to use it fall behind. And to help them catch up in time, its creators are graciously providing the resources and curriculum for learning it, often pro bono.

That’s the narrative AI companies are pitching schools on right now, but according to New York Times education technology reporter Natasha Singer, it’s also how the tech industry has built its influence in classrooms for the past 15 years.

In a new book, Coding Kids, Singer details how tech companies took a central role in promoting computers and coding skills in education, promising computer science skills were the ticket to high-paying jobs. But by the time many of those students entered the workforce, new technologies had thrown that promise into question. Meanwhile, the companies got schools to help them create a new class of would-be workers, and trained students on using their products and software, making them likely future customers.

“I worry we have collective amnesia”

Advertisement

Now, the AI industry is pitching itself to schools with similar force. “I worry we have collective amnesia,” Singer told me on a recent episode of The Vergecast. “Have we learned any lessons from these past tech cycles in schools that are going to inform the rollout of AI, make sure that it benefits education, and put in the safeguards now — not a decade from now?” Fortunately, in some ways, she believes the answer is yes.

Singer’s book recounts how more than a decade ago, the country’s largest tech companies embedded themselves directly into school curricula through courses for Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classes. Apple and Microsoft each created their own curricula, featuring their own tools like Apple’s Swift or Microsoft’s Minecraft. “What’s striking about this is you can imagine that parents would not want, say, Pfizer AP Biology, or Northrop Grumman AP Physics, or ExxonMobil Environmental Science AP,” Singer says. She found that those in the medical field would likely understand why — medical students who are trained by a company on how to implant their proprietary device, one expert told her as an example, rarely choose to try another.

Google has also made itself a dominant force in education through its distribution of low-cost laptops called Chromebooks. Singer tracked their ubiquitous adoption across schools through the 2010s, which she says was accelerated even further during the school shutdowns of the covid-19 pandemic. Google also introduced its Classroom app to help teachers communicate things like assignments and grades. By the time generative AI took off, Singer writes, Google was already a key platform provider for many schools, and well-positioned to promote it.

Even when companies weren’t directly involved in education, they backed nonprofit groups like Code.org. Code.org kicked off its viral education campaign with a splashy celebrity-laden video that included tech moguls like Microsoft founder Bill Gates and then-Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, urging kids to learn to code. Code.org founder Hadi Partovi took a startup-style approach to promoting computer science education, and had little planned for how to capitalize on the attention of the video once it took off, Singer writes. He ultimately funneled that attention into a similarly splashy “Hour of Code” campaign across the country, urging schools to engage in entertaining hour-long courses introducing kids to coding building blocks.

At the time, there wasn’t much pushback, Singer found — though there were some attempts at alternatives. One group of academics engaged in a more traditional, methodological approach to testing and rolling out their own computer science curriculum. It had the express goal of diversifying the kinds of students enrolled in such courses, and taught students to think about big questions around the internet and technology, and scrutinize builders’ motivations.

Advertisement

Eventually, backlash arrived. Some recent graduates say they feel let down that they were told to code their whole lives, just to find such entry-level jobs to be diminishing, Singer told me. Some schools are getting rid of ubiquitous Google Chromebooks, and research around the world is finding that adding technology to the classroom often doesn’t have a significant impact on actual learning.

“Most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech”

“I’m not arguing against tech education or tech in schools,” Singer says. “But what I am saying is most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech. They want kids to learn how to be informed citizens in a democracy, and they want kids to figure out what their passions are and who they are and what their beliefs are… And so if we let the tech industry dictate or even heavily influence what happens in schools, then the question we’re asking is, how can we get AI into schools faster? Which is a product question, and not, ‘What are the most important things we want kids to learn?’”

While the AI industry of the 2020s may be pulling from the 2010s playbook, there already appears to be one distinct difference: Parents and school districts are pushing back. Just last week, the nation’s largest school system, New York City, banned elementary and middle schools from letting students use AI in the classroom for the coming school year. A day later, Los Angeles announced an even broader restriction that included high schoolers. And unlike the few-and-far-between critiques Singer documented in the early days of tech’s coding push, there appears to be a vibrant grassroots movement fighting the screen- and AI-ification of the classroom among parents and teachers alike.

“I think schools are beginning to figure it out,” says Singer, who’s “optimistic” that teachers and students are looking for a broader kind of tech education. That curriculum could teach kids “to ask deep questions about how companies are steering us with their technology, how software and AI are designed to affect our choices, and what role students have to use the tools productively. But also to push back if they like, and to not feel like they’re in a world where AI is driving them.”

Advertisement
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading

Technology

Floating solar panels could save cities millions. Is your town next?

Published

on

Floating solar panels could save cities millions. Is your town next?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

What if your town could build a solar farm without giving up acres of valuable land? Lima, Ohio, is trying something different. The city has completed a 2-megawatt solar array that floats on the Twin Lakes Reservoir, its primary drinking water source.

More than 3,000 solar panels now sit on the water and feed electricity to the nearby water treatment plant. The city projects the system will save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over its lifetime. That kind of savings could get the attention of cities far beyond Ohio.

So, could floating solar panels eventually show up on a reservoir near you? Here’s how the technology works, why cities are interested and what it could mean for your community.

Missed CyberGuy LIVE? Watch the Protect Your Money replay

Our free CyberGuy LIVE class, Protect Your Money From Today’s Biggest Threats, has ended, but you can still watch the full replay and download our financial protection checklist. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson walks you through five simple ways to help defend yourself against AI scams, fraud, identity theft and financial hacks. You’ll learn how to set up bank alerts, strengthen your account logins, protect your phone number, freeze your credit and help secure your retirement savings against unauthorized transfers. No technical experience is needed.

Advertisement

Get the free replay and checklist now at CyberGuyLive.com

WHO PAYS FOR US POWER BOOM? BLUE, RED STATES OFFER STARKLY DIFFERENT WAYS TO LOWER UTILITY BILLS AMID AI SURGE

An Ohio city is using floating solar panels on its drinking water reservoir to power its water treatment plant and cut millions in projected energy costs. (D3Energy)

Ohio puts 3,120 solar panels on a drinking water reservoir

Lima officially celebrated the completion of its Twin Lakes Floating Solar Project on Aug. 12. The final system includes 3,120 solar panels spread across about 3.6 acres of water, according to developer D3Energy. The 2-megawatt array sits on Lima’s primary drinking water reservoir. That reservoir serves roughly 35,000 residents.

Next door, the city’s water treatment plant processes about 14 million gallons of water each day. It also consumes more electricity than any other city facility. That makes the plant an obvious place to look for energy savings. Lima projects the floating solar system will save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over its lifetime. Earlier city estimates put first-year savings at roughly $200,000. For a city utility, that is serious money. Actual lifetime savings will depend on factors including future electricity prices and how the system performs over time.

Advertisement

How floating solar panels work

Instead of attaching panels to racks planted in the ground, engineers mount them on floating platforms. Anchors and mooring lines keep the array in position.

Lima uses Ciel & Terre’s Hydrelio floating system. Its anchoring setup connects to the banks and reservoir bottom. The design also allows the array to move as water levels change. The project uses bifacial solar panels, which can capture light on both sides.

Electricity travels from the array to eight inverters onshore. From there, the electricity helps power the water treatment plant. The result looks a bit like a traditional solar farm that traded grass for water.

Why cities may want solar panels floating on water

Here is where the idea gets particularly interesting. Land costs money. It also competes with housing, businesses, agriculture and other development. Reservoirs already occupy space. Lima’s floating array covers about four acres.

A land-based system producing the same amount of electricity would reportedly need at least 10 acres. That could make floating solar attractive to cities with limited open space. The panels can also sit near the facilities that need the electricity. In Lima, the water treatment plant sits right beside the reservoir. That reduces the need to find a distant solar site and then figure out how to move the electricity where the city needs it.

Advertisement

Researchers have also studied whether floating solar can help reduce evaporation by shading portions of the water surface. Of course, every reservoir comes with different conditions. Water depth, changing levels and recreational use can affect whether a project makes sense. Federal researchers also consider existing dam operations when evaluating potential sites.

LAWMAKERS TARGET ENERGY AFFORDABILITY THROUGH SWEEPING PERMITTING OVERHAUL IN NEW HOUSE BILL

Floating solar could help cities generate clean energy without using valuable land, but questions remain about long-term costs and water safety. (D3Energy)

What about putting solar panels on drinking water?

This was one of my first questions. These panels are floating on the same reservoir that provides drinking water to about 35,000 people. Lima’s system uses Ciel & Terre Hydrelio floats made from high-density polyethylene, or HDPE.

Ciel & Terre says its floating system complies with the BS 6920:2000 standard for nonmetallic materials that come into contact with water intended for human consumption. Still, communities considering floating solar have more to evaluate than whether the structure can float safely.

Advertisement

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has examined environmental and regulatory questions surrounding floating solar. Its research notes that projects can affect water bodies differently depending on the location. That means a system that works well on one reservoir may require a different design somewhere else.

The project cost millions before it could save millions

There is another number worth paying attention to. The Lima project cost about $5.3 million. Federal support played a substantial role in making the numbers work. The city received a $2.4 million Department of Energy grant. Combined with almost $900,000 in federal direct-pay tax credits, that support helped offset roughly half of the project’s cost.

Those incentives covered a significant share of the upfront expense. That context is important when another city looks at Lima’s projected $10 million in savings. A town considering floating solar would need to look at construction costs, financing and expected electricity production. Available incentives could change the calculation as well.

Lima began considering the project years before crews put panels on the water. City Council approved moving forward with the project in 2023. Construction began in 2025 before the system came online this August.

Could floating solar panels spread across America?

Lima may look unusual today, but floating solar has substantial room to grow. Ohio already has more than one project. D3Energy and ARP Solar completed a 1.5-megawatt floating array for Del-Co Water in Delaware, Ohio, in 2024. A 6-megawatt system in Monroeville is expected to come online before the end of 2026.

Advertisement

The bigger opportunity stretches far beyond Ohio. National Renewable Energy Laboratory researchers studied federally owned or regulated reservoirs across the U.S. They estimated those reservoirs have technical potential for 861 to 1,042 gigawatts of floating solar capacity.

That figure represents technical potential rather than a prediction that thousands of reservoirs will soon disappear under solar panels. Plenty of locations would never make sense.

Still, the scale helps explain why energy developers and local governments are taking a closer look at water. CyberGuy has covered this idea before on a much larger scale. India’s Omkareshwar project showed how enormous floating solar installations can become. We have also seen developers rethink the shape of solar installations on land. One Texas company is building vertical solar towers designed to produce more power from a smaller footprint.

AMERICA’S BROKEN PERMITTING SYSTEM IS QUIETLY RAISING YOUR COST OF LIVING

Cities across the U.S. are exploring floating solar as a way to reduce utility costs while making use of existing reservoirs. (D3Energy)

Advertisement

Will floating solar panels lower your utility bill?

Here is the part I would keep an eye on. Lima expects to save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over the project’s lifetime. But that does not mean residents will suddenly see a cheaper water bill. The city could use those savings in different ways. Lower energy costs could help cover other expenses, pay for infrastructure upgrades or ease pressure on future rate increases.

So, if a floating solar project comes to your town, there is one question worth asking: Will any of those savings eventually make their way back to you? That answer could determine how much this technology really helps the people paying the bills.

What this means to you

You probably do not spend much time thinking about how much electricity your local water plant consumes. Yet you ultimately help pay for that electricity through taxes, utility rates or both. Floating solar gives cities another way to attack that expense without buying a huge parcel of land.

It also raises questions you should ask before cheering on a project. How much will it cost? How much electricity will it realistically generate? What happens to the savings? You should also ask what testing and monitoring will protect the water supply. Those answers will tell you whether a floating solar project makes financial sense for your community.

Kurt’s key takeaways

What I like about Lima’s floating solar project is how practical the idea feels. The city already owns the reservoir, and its water treatment plant right next door uses a huge amount of electricity. So instead of finding another piece of land for solar panels, Lima put them on the water. Then there is the projected $10 million in savings. That certainly gets my attention. I want to see whether those savings hold up over time and, more importantly, whether residents eventually benefit from them. Lima also gives other cities something real to look at. We are seeing communities experiment with new ways to generate and store energy, from floating solar to massive battery projects. And who knows? The next solar project in your town may end up floating right on the water.

Advertisement

Would you be comfortable with thousands of solar panels floating on your town’s drinking water reservoir if officials said the project could save millions, or would you need to see more long-term evidence first? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

Slack can now vibe-code interactive charts and reports inside chats

Published

on

Slack can now vibe-code interactive charts and reports inside chats

A new feature coming to Slack will allow you to build interactive reports, polls, dashboards, presentations, microsites, and other tools directly inside a chat. With Slackforce Surfaces, you can describe to Slackbot what you need, and it will use AI to gather information from relevant conversations and connected apps, like Google Drive or Salesforce, to create it.

Once Slackbot creates a Surface, you can share it with colleagues and pin it to channels, allowing other people to view it, interact with it, and leave comments. In one example shared by Slack, a user asks Slackbot for help creating an arcade-themed visualization of AI token usage. The AI assistant then generates an interactive dashboard showing token usage across different divisions, such as sales, design, and engineering.

“You’re not exporting your data to some other tool to make sense of it, you’re asking Slackbot to build the dashboard, the deck, the report right where the conversation already is, and your whole team can act on it together,” Ryan Gavin, Slack’s chief marketing officer, tells The Verge in an email.

It seems like there are many other ways to use Surfaces, too, like building a live dashboard for a customer support queue that other workers can view, or creating a weather-themed financial forecast that pulls in data from connected apps. Slack notes that the feature will only pull information that you’ve given its AI tools permission to access.

Advertisement

Slackforce Surfaces is available to all customers — including those who use it for free — with Slackbot enabled in their workspace. You’ll be able to use it with live data starting in October.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending