Connect with us

Technology

New York school pauses humanoid classroom robot pilot program

Published

on

New York school pauses humanoid classroom robot pilot program

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

A lifelike humanoid robot was expected to take a seat inside a New York high school classroom. Those plans are now on hold. The planned robot is reportedly stationary, with silicone skin and long brown hair.

Realbotix and Salamanca City Central School District had announced a limited pilot program for fall 2026 involving Optio, an artificial intelligence-powered  educational assistant, and one new Realbotix M-Series humanoid unit.

On July 24, the district announced that the pilot program had been paused while it works through enhanced student data privacy agreements with the New York State Education Department.

The district is also continuing discussions with community members and other stakeholders before moving forward. It has not announced a new date for the pilot program. The technology was intended to support AI and robotics lessons while teachers remained in control. Still, putting a humanlike machine in front of students raises questions about privacy and how quickly students may trust it.

CyberGuy Live: Missed “Sick of Spam?” Get the replay and checklist

Advertisement

Our free CyberGuy Live class, “Sick of Spam?”, has ended, but you can still watch the full replay and download our spam-stopping checklist. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson walks you step by step through simple ways to reduce robocalls, spam texts, junk email and unwanted messages. You’ll also learn how to curb political texts, clean up your inbox and spot messages that could put your personal information at risk.

Get the free replay and checklist now at CyberGuyLive.com.

FOREIGN ROBOT BAN TARGETS CHINA OVER SECURITY FEARS

Salamanca City Central School District will pilot Realbotix’s Optio platform and a purpose-built M-Series humanoid robot in AI and robotics courses. (Jim Shannon/Connecticut Post/Getty Images)

Why Salamanca is testing a humanoid robot in the classroom

Salamanca City Central School District is located in western New York on Seneca Nation territory. The district had planned to introduce Optio to high school students enrolled in Woz ED AI and Robotics courses.

Advertisement

Realbotix previously described this as a limited fall 2026 pilot involving its digital assistant and one physical robot. The district has since placed the project on hold while it addresses student privacy agreements and gathers additional community input. Realbotix told CyberGuy, “The partnership also gives educators an opportunity to evaluate these technologies in a controlled classroom environment under district oversight.”

The district reportedly paid $57,590 for the robot and AI program, according to the school board contract. Realbotix reportedly discounted the package from the M-Series robot’s listed starting price of $95,000. The initial Optio rollout had been expected to expand to approximately 500 high school students during the fall semester. That planned expansion would have applied to the AI platform and student avatars rather than 500 physical robots.

How the Realbotix classroom robot could work if the pilot resumes

The proposed project includes two connected parts. Optio is the digital AI educational assistant that students can access through personalized avatars. The M-Series robot would give that technology a physical presence in the classroom. Realbotix told CyberGuy, “Its technology combines conversational AI with a physical humanoid platform capable of natural interaction and lifelike expressions.”

The company says its humanoid platform can use natural conversation and facial expressions during real-time interactions. The robot is designed to give students hands-on exposure to AI and robotics rather than limiting the lesson to a laptop screen.

The robot was expected to remain seated while using upper-body movements and facial expressions. The school reportedly requested a Western New York accent. However, Realbotix told CyberGuy, “The physical unit has not yet been deployed. Additional details regarding its implementation will be determined in coordination with the district.”

Advertisement

That means some details reported about the robot may reflect the planned design rather than the finished classroom robot. The district had said the system would use school-approved curriculum instead of searching the open internet. When the technology lacked an answer, it was trained to say, “I don’t know,” rather than inventing information.

EDUCATORS WARN AI DEBATE HAS FOCUSED TOO MUCH ON CHEATING, NOT ENOUGH ON STUDENT LEARNING

The $57,590 pilot program could give about 500 high school students access to AI-powered avatars, while one physical humanoid robot serves as a classroom learning tool. (iStock)

What Optio could do for students and teachers

Realbotix designed Optio as an AI educational assistant and an at-home tutor. Students will interact with avatars trained on district curriculum. The platform is designed to reinforce concepts and provide individual tutoring outside regular school hours. Realbotix says it can also offer homework support across multiple languages.

Students reportedly may be able to upload photos of homework for feedback. They could also request lessons based on their interests or receive real-time translations. Teachers may use Optio for lesson planning and curriculum adjustments. The physical robot could also provide prompts based on material already loaded into the system.

Advertisement

Realbotix told CyberGuy, “The program is intended to complement, not replace, teachers by giving students supervised access to emerging AI and robotics tools as part of the district’s existing STEM curriculum.” The company added, “Realbotix’s products are designed to support human engagement and expand access to information and services while complementing the work of educators and other professionals.”

How Salamanca plans to protect student privacy

The district has paused the pilot program while it works through enhanced student data privacy agreements with the New York State Education Department. It says appropriate privacy protections and community input are important parts of the process. The district has not said when those agreements could be completed or when the pilot might resume.

If the program moves forward, it would operate under district oversight with education-specific safeguards. Realbotix says those guardrails are designed to block inappropriate responses and reduce unreliable outputs. The robot and avatar would reportedly operate through a closed system without an open internet connection. The district also said Realbotix will lack access to personally identifiable student information.

The classroom robot would reportedly lack facial recognition and recording features found in some other Realbotix models. However, personalized learning requires the system to remember some information. Students will use unique identification codes when interacting with the technology. Those codes will allow Optio to retrieve learning information and continue earlier conversations without relying on a student’s name.

What Realbotix says about its corporate structure

Several media reports connected the school project to an adult-products business under the same parent company. Realbotix disputes the way some reports characterized that relationship.

Advertisement

Realbotix provided this clarification to CyberGuy:

“For clarity, some media reports have falsely connected the Salamanca project to an adult product or adult-products business. The Salamanca robot is a newly manufactured, purpose-built educational unit; no existing product or hardware is being modified or repurposed for the school.” The company continued, “Realbotix LLC focuses exclusively on non-adult commercial applications, including healthcare and education. No adult-products company has any involvement in the Salamanca project or in any product or project developed by Realbotix LLC. Separate companies.”

Realbotix Corp. describes itself as a holding company with two separately operated businesses. Realbotix LLC develops humanoid robots for commercial uses, while Intima LLC operates in the adult wellness and companionship market. The company says the subsidiaries maintain separate employees and facilities. It also says they do not share products, inventory, manufacturing resources or technology. Realbotix told CyberGuy, “The Salamanca robot is a newly manufactured, purpose-built educational unit; no existing product or hardware is being modified or repurposed for the school.”

STUDY FINDS MORE AI PRAISE FOR BLACK STUDENTS, SOFTER TREATMENT OF FEMALES

A New York high school plans to test an AI educational assistant and a lifelike humanoid robot under teacher supervision in fall 2026. (Jeffrey Basinger/Newsday RM via Getty Images))

Advertisement

What this means to you

Most students and teachers will not see a humanoid robot in the classroom anytime soon. Still, Salamanca’s paused pilot shows where school technology may eventually be heading. Giving AI a face and a voice could make lessons more engaging. It could also lead students to trust the technology more quickly than they would trust a typical computer program.

Parents should pay close attention to what Optio remembers and who can access that information. Teacher oversight will also be important when the system gives an answer that sounds confident but may be wrong. A closed system would give the district more control than an open chatbot. Even so, students, teachers and parents deserve clear rules about student data and how the robot will be used.

The physical unit has yet to enter the school, and the district has not announced a new start date. Before moving forward, Salamanca says it will work through enhanced student data privacy agreements with the New York State Education Department and continue engaging with community members and other stakeholders. Many key questions will remain unanswered until those protections are finalized and students and teachers begin using the system in a real classroom.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Pausing the pilot program makes sense while the district works through student privacy agreements. The robot could make AI lessons more engaging, but families still need clear answers about what Optio remembers, who can access that data and when the district deletes it. The real test will come if the district restarts the pilot and shows that the technology can support learning without putting student privacy at risk.

Would you feel comfortable with a lifelike robot helping in your child’s classroom, or does this take school technology too far? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Technology

Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook

Published

on

Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook

It’s the hot new thing in tech, and it’s where all the jobs are. Students who don’t learn to use it fall behind. And to help them catch up in time, its creators are graciously providing the resources and curriculum for learning it, often pro bono.

That’s the narrative AI companies are pitching schools on right now, but according to New York Times education technology reporter Natasha Singer, it’s also how the tech industry has built its influence in classrooms for the past 15 years.

In a new book, Coding Kids, Singer details how tech companies took a central role in promoting computers and coding skills in education, promising computer science skills were the ticket to high-paying jobs. But by the time many of those students entered the workforce, new technologies had thrown that promise into question. Meanwhile, the companies got schools to help them create a new class of would-be workers, and trained students on using their products and software, making them likely future customers.

“I worry we have collective amnesia”

Advertisement

Now, the AI industry is pitching itself to schools with similar force. “I worry we have collective amnesia,” Singer told me on a recent episode of The Vergecast. “Have we learned any lessons from these past tech cycles in schools that are going to inform the rollout of AI, make sure that it benefits education, and put in the safeguards now — not a decade from now?” Fortunately, in some ways, she believes the answer is yes.

Singer’s book recounts how more than a decade ago, the country’s largest tech companies embedded themselves directly into school curricula through courses for Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classes. Apple and Microsoft each created their own curricula, featuring their own tools like Apple’s Swift or Microsoft’s Minecraft. “What’s striking about this is you can imagine that parents would not want, say, Pfizer AP Biology, or Northrop Grumman AP Physics, or ExxonMobil Environmental Science AP,” Singer says. She found that those in the medical field would likely understand why — medical students who are trained by a company on how to implant their proprietary device, one expert told her as an example, rarely choose to try another.

Google has also made itself a dominant force in education through its distribution of low-cost laptops called Chromebooks. Singer tracked their ubiquitous adoption across schools through the 2010s, which she says was accelerated even further during the school shutdowns of the covid-19 pandemic. Google also introduced its Classroom app to help teachers communicate things like assignments and grades. By the time generative AI took off, Singer writes, Google was already a key platform provider for many schools, and well-positioned to promote it.

Even when companies weren’t directly involved in education, they backed nonprofit groups like Code.org. Code.org kicked off its viral education campaign with a splashy celebrity-laden video that included tech moguls like Microsoft founder Bill Gates and then-Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, urging kids to learn to code. Code.org founder Hadi Partovi took a startup-style approach to promoting computer science education, and had little planned for how to capitalize on the attention of the video once it took off, Singer writes. He ultimately funneled that attention into a similarly splashy “Hour of Code” campaign across the country, urging schools to engage in entertaining hour-long courses introducing kids to coding building blocks.

At the time, there wasn’t much pushback, Singer found — though there were some attempts at alternatives. One group of academics engaged in a more traditional, methodological approach to testing and rolling out their own computer science curriculum. It had the express goal of diversifying the kinds of students enrolled in such courses, and taught students to think about big questions around the internet and technology, and scrutinize builders’ motivations.

Advertisement

Eventually, backlash arrived. Some recent graduates say they feel let down that they were told to code their whole lives, just to find such entry-level jobs to be diminishing, Singer told me. Some schools are getting rid of ubiquitous Google Chromebooks, and research around the world is finding that adding technology to the classroom often doesn’t have a significant impact on actual learning.

“Most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech”

“I’m not arguing against tech education or tech in schools,” Singer says. “But what I am saying is most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech. They want kids to learn how to be informed citizens in a democracy, and they want kids to figure out what their passions are and who they are and what their beliefs are… And so if we let the tech industry dictate or even heavily influence what happens in schools, then the question we’re asking is, how can we get AI into schools faster? Which is a product question, and not, ‘What are the most important things we want kids to learn?’”

While the AI industry of the 2020s may be pulling from the 2010s playbook, there already appears to be one distinct difference: Parents and school districts are pushing back. Just last week, the nation’s largest school system, New York City, banned elementary and middle schools from letting students use AI in the classroom for the coming school year. A day later, Los Angeles announced an even broader restriction that included high schoolers. And unlike the few-and-far-between critiques Singer documented in the early days of tech’s coding push, there appears to be a vibrant grassroots movement fighting the screen- and AI-ification of the classroom among parents and teachers alike.

“I think schools are beginning to figure it out,” says Singer, who’s “optimistic” that teachers and students are looking for a broader kind of tech education. That curriculum could teach kids “to ask deep questions about how companies are steering us with their technology, how software and AI are designed to affect our choices, and what role students have to use the tools productively. But also to push back if they like, and to not feel like they’re in a world where AI is driving them.”

Advertisement
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading

Technology

Floating solar panels could save cities millions. Is your town next?

Published

on

Floating solar panels could save cities millions. Is your town next?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

What if your town could build a solar farm without giving up acres of valuable land? Lima, Ohio, is trying something different. The city has completed a 2-megawatt solar array that floats on the Twin Lakes Reservoir, its primary drinking water source.

More than 3,000 solar panels now sit on the water and feed electricity to the nearby water treatment plant. The city projects the system will save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over its lifetime. That kind of savings could get the attention of cities far beyond Ohio.

So, could floating solar panels eventually show up on a reservoir near you? Here’s how the technology works, why cities are interested and what it could mean for your community.

Missed CyberGuy LIVE? Watch the Protect Your Money replay

Our free CyberGuy LIVE class, Protect Your Money From Today’s Biggest Threats, has ended, but you can still watch the full replay and download our financial protection checklist. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson walks you through five simple ways to help defend yourself against AI scams, fraud, identity theft and financial hacks. You’ll learn how to set up bank alerts, strengthen your account logins, protect your phone number, freeze your credit and help secure your retirement savings against unauthorized transfers. No technical experience is needed.

Advertisement

Get the free replay and checklist now at CyberGuyLive.com

WHO PAYS FOR US POWER BOOM? BLUE, RED STATES OFFER STARKLY DIFFERENT WAYS TO LOWER UTILITY BILLS AMID AI SURGE

An Ohio city is using floating solar panels on its drinking water reservoir to power its water treatment plant and cut millions in projected energy costs. (D3Energy)

Ohio puts 3,120 solar panels on a drinking water reservoir

Lima officially celebrated the completion of its Twin Lakes Floating Solar Project on Aug. 12. The final system includes 3,120 solar panels spread across about 3.6 acres of water, according to developer D3Energy. The 2-megawatt array sits on Lima’s primary drinking water reservoir. That reservoir serves roughly 35,000 residents.

Next door, the city’s water treatment plant processes about 14 million gallons of water each day. It also consumes more electricity than any other city facility. That makes the plant an obvious place to look for energy savings. Lima projects the floating solar system will save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over its lifetime. Earlier city estimates put first-year savings at roughly $200,000. For a city utility, that is serious money. Actual lifetime savings will depend on factors including future electricity prices and how the system performs over time.

Advertisement

How floating solar panels work

Instead of attaching panels to racks planted in the ground, engineers mount them on floating platforms. Anchors and mooring lines keep the array in position.

Lima uses Ciel & Terre’s Hydrelio floating system. Its anchoring setup connects to the banks and reservoir bottom. The design also allows the array to move as water levels change. The project uses bifacial solar panels, which can capture light on both sides.

Electricity travels from the array to eight inverters onshore. From there, the electricity helps power the water treatment plant. The result looks a bit like a traditional solar farm that traded grass for water.

Why cities may want solar panels floating on water

Here is where the idea gets particularly interesting. Land costs money. It also competes with housing, businesses, agriculture and other development. Reservoirs already occupy space. Lima’s floating array covers about four acres.

A land-based system producing the same amount of electricity would reportedly need at least 10 acres. That could make floating solar attractive to cities with limited open space. The panels can also sit near the facilities that need the electricity. In Lima, the water treatment plant sits right beside the reservoir. That reduces the need to find a distant solar site and then figure out how to move the electricity where the city needs it.

Advertisement

Researchers have also studied whether floating solar can help reduce evaporation by shading portions of the water surface. Of course, every reservoir comes with different conditions. Water depth, changing levels and recreational use can affect whether a project makes sense. Federal researchers also consider existing dam operations when evaluating potential sites.

LAWMAKERS TARGET ENERGY AFFORDABILITY THROUGH SWEEPING PERMITTING OVERHAUL IN NEW HOUSE BILL

Floating solar could help cities generate clean energy without using valuable land, but questions remain about long-term costs and water safety. (D3Energy)

What about putting solar panels on drinking water?

This was one of my first questions. These panels are floating on the same reservoir that provides drinking water to about 35,000 people. Lima’s system uses Ciel & Terre Hydrelio floats made from high-density polyethylene, or HDPE.

Ciel & Terre says its floating system complies with the BS 6920:2000 standard for nonmetallic materials that come into contact with water intended for human consumption. Still, communities considering floating solar have more to evaluate than whether the structure can float safely.

Advertisement

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has examined environmental and regulatory questions surrounding floating solar. Its research notes that projects can affect water bodies differently depending on the location. That means a system that works well on one reservoir may require a different design somewhere else.

The project cost millions before it could save millions

There is another number worth paying attention to. The Lima project cost about $5.3 million. Federal support played a substantial role in making the numbers work. The city received a $2.4 million Department of Energy grant. Combined with almost $900,000 in federal direct-pay tax credits, that support helped offset roughly half of the project’s cost.

Those incentives covered a significant share of the upfront expense. That context is important when another city looks at Lima’s projected $10 million in savings. A town considering floating solar would need to look at construction costs, financing and expected electricity production. Available incentives could change the calculation as well.

Lima began considering the project years before crews put panels on the water. City Council approved moving forward with the project in 2023. Construction began in 2025 before the system came online this August.

Could floating solar panels spread across America?

Lima may look unusual today, but floating solar has substantial room to grow. Ohio already has more than one project. D3Energy and ARP Solar completed a 1.5-megawatt floating array for Del-Co Water in Delaware, Ohio, in 2024. A 6-megawatt system in Monroeville is expected to come online before the end of 2026.

Advertisement

The bigger opportunity stretches far beyond Ohio. National Renewable Energy Laboratory researchers studied federally owned or regulated reservoirs across the U.S. They estimated those reservoirs have technical potential for 861 to 1,042 gigawatts of floating solar capacity.

That figure represents technical potential rather than a prediction that thousands of reservoirs will soon disappear under solar panels. Plenty of locations would never make sense.

Still, the scale helps explain why energy developers and local governments are taking a closer look at water. CyberGuy has covered this idea before on a much larger scale. India’s Omkareshwar project showed how enormous floating solar installations can become. We have also seen developers rethink the shape of solar installations on land. One Texas company is building vertical solar towers designed to produce more power from a smaller footprint.

AMERICA’S BROKEN PERMITTING SYSTEM IS QUIETLY RAISING YOUR COST OF LIVING

Cities across the U.S. are exploring floating solar as a way to reduce utility costs while making use of existing reservoirs. (D3Energy)

Advertisement

Will floating solar panels lower your utility bill?

Here is the part I would keep an eye on. Lima expects to save nearly $10 million in electricity costs over the project’s lifetime. But that does not mean residents will suddenly see a cheaper water bill. The city could use those savings in different ways. Lower energy costs could help cover other expenses, pay for infrastructure upgrades or ease pressure on future rate increases.

So, if a floating solar project comes to your town, there is one question worth asking: Will any of those savings eventually make their way back to you? That answer could determine how much this technology really helps the people paying the bills.

What this means to you

You probably do not spend much time thinking about how much electricity your local water plant consumes. Yet you ultimately help pay for that electricity through taxes, utility rates or both. Floating solar gives cities another way to attack that expense without buying a huge parcel of land.

It also raises questions you should ask before cheering on a project. How much will it cost? How much electricity will it realistically generate? What happens to the savings? You should also ask what testing and monitoring will protect the water supply. Those answers will tell you whether a floating solar project makes financial sense for your community.

Kurt’s key takeaways

What I like about Lima’s floating solar project is how practical the idea feels. The city already owns the reservoir, and its water treatment plant right next door uses a huge amount of electricity. So instead of finding another piece of land for solar panels, Lima put them on the water. Then there is the projected $10 million in savings. That certainly gets my attention. I want to see whether those savings hold up over time and, more importantly, whether residents eventually benefit from them. Lima also gives other cities something real to look at. We are seeing communities experiment with new ways to generate and store energy, from floating solar to massive battery projects. And who knows? The next solar project in your town may end up floating right on the water.

Advertisement

Would you be comfortable with thousands of solar panels floating on your town’s drinking water reservoir if officials said the project could save millions, or would you need to see more long-term evidence first? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

Slack can now vibe-code interactive charts and reports inside chats

Published

on

Slack can now vibe-code interactive charts and reports inside chats

A new feature coming to Slack will allow you to build interactive reports, polls, dashboards, presentations, microsites, and other tools directly inside a chat. With Slackforce Surfaces, you can describe to Slackbot what you need, and it will use AI to gather information from relevant conversations and connected apps, like Google Drive or Salesforce, to create it.

Once Slackbot creates a Surface, you can share it with colleagues and pin it to channels, allowing other people to view it, interact with it, and leave comments. In one example shared by Slack, a user asks Slackbot for help creating an arcade-themed visualization of AI token usage. The AI assistant then generates an interactive dashboard showing token usage across different divisions, such as sales, design, and engineering.

“You’re not exporting your data to some other tool to make sense of it, you’re asking Slackbot to build the dashboard, the deck, the report right where the conversation already is, and your whole team can act on it together,” Ryan Gavin, Slack’s chief marketing officer, tells The Verge in an email.

It seems like there are many other ways to use Surfaces, too, like building a live dashboard for a customer support queue that other workers can view, or creating a weather-themed financial forecast that pulls in data from connected apps. Slack notes that the feature will only pull information that you’ve given its AI tools permission to access.

Advertisement

Slackforce Surfaces is available to all customers — including those who use it for free — with Slackbot enabled in their workspace. You’ll be able to use it with live data starting in October.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending