Connect with us

Southwest

Arizona Democrat latest official to try tying Roe v. Wade to the economy

Published

on

Arizona Democrat latest official to try tying Roe v. Wade to the economy

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

FIRST ON FOX: An Arizona congressman is the newest Home Democrat attempting to tie Roe v. Wade to the economic system.

Rep. Greg Stanton, D-Ariz., claimed the Supreme Courtroom choice legalizing abortion nationwide made the most important impression on the development of girls within the office in a video of him throughout a Jewish Democrats Week Of Motion digital convention solely obtained by Fox Information Digital.

Within the video, Stanton referred to as Roe v. Wade “a monumentally necessary authorized choice” earlier than claiming that the ruling was what ensured girls have been in a position to rise via the workforce, which impacted the economic system.

“I imply, has something achieved extra to assist girls achieve the footing within the office and advance skilled careers?” Stanton claimed. “That development which has been nice for the American economic system.”

Advertisement

“Roe v. Wade has benefited everybody in America, whether or not they realize it or not,” the Arizona Democrat continued. “Whether or not they recognize it or not.”

“As a result of it’s a part of the feminist motion that made it clear that we’d like the expertise of girls within the office,” he claimed. “And that has been an incredible profit to our complete nation and our complete economic system.”

Some of the influential elements of girls rising within the workforce was World Warfare II.

Wartime participation within the workforce confirmed American girls that they might be a part of the labor pressure and gave them the talents to take action, though many ladies have been fired from their jobs after the conclusion of the battle as male troopers returned residence.

Within the years following World Warfare II, a torrent of girls entered the workforce, particularly through the second-wave feminist motion starting within the Nineteen Sixties that noticed the enlargement of girls’s roles and protections within the workforce.

Advertisement

Rosie the Riveter
(Getty Photos)

Moreover, on the time of the rise of girls within the workforce, abortion was unlawful in most states.

In 1973, nearly 30 years after the tip of World Warfare II, the Supreme Courtroom dominated in Roe v. Wade that state legal guidelines banning abortion have been unconstitutional. On the time of the choice, almost each state in America had some form of ban on abortion.

Stanton will not be the one rank-and-file congressional Democrat to make claims tying abortion to the economic system.

Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif., claimed on MSNBC final week that financial inflation reinforces the necessity for abortions, arguing larger costs of meals, gas, and different requirements” is strictly why folks want to have the ability to be in control of what number of mouths they’re going to need to feed.”

Advertisement

REP. KATIE PORTER CLAIMS INFLATION ‘REINFORCES’ THE NEED FOR ABORTION ON MSNBC

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 9: Reps. Katie Porter, D-Calif., center, Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., left, and Deb Haaland, D-N.M., attend a House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing in Rayburn Building titled Reaching Hard-to-Count Communities in the 2020 Census, on Thursday, January 9, 2020. 

UNITED STATES – JANUARY 9: Reps. Katie Porter, D-Calif., middle, Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., left, and Deb Haaland, D-N.M., attend a Home Oversight and Reform Committee listening to in Rayburn Constructing titled Reaching Arduous-to-Rely Communities within the 2020 Census, on Thursday, January 9, 2020. 
(Photograph By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc through Getty Photos)

“Properly, I don’t assume they evaluate, I believe they really reinforce one another,” Porter stated. “So the truth that issues like inflation can occur, and it may well grow to be dearer to feed your children and to gas your automobile, is strictly why folks want to have the ability to be in control of what number of mouths they’re going to need to feed.”

“So I believe the truth that we’re seeing this bounce in bills, that we’re seeing folks having to pay extra within the grocery retailer, pay extra on the pump, pay extra for housing, is a motive that individuals are saying, ‘I want to have the ability to make my very own choices about when and if to start out a household,’” she continued.

“So I don’t assume we’re going to see them, I don’t assume it’s like about evaluating them or contrasting them, I believe they reinforce for folks simply how huge of a duty it’s to deal with a household,” the California Democrat added.

Porter is an outspoken abortion advocate and referred to as for abortion to not be restricted or restricted at an abortion rally final week.

Advertisement

The California congresswoman additionally claimed that “restrictions on abortions are restrictions on our economic system” and that ladies “is not going to have financial rights with out reproductive rights.”

Reps. Annie Kuster, D-N.H., and Lauren Underwood, D-Sick., have additionally argued that overturning Roe v. Wade can be detrimental to the economic system. 

“This choice might gravely threaten to destabilize the financial, instructional, and societal development towards equality girls have made over the past 50 years,” Underwood tweeted earlier this month. 

Management within the Biden administration has tried to tie abortion to the economic system, as effectively.

Advertisement

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen claimed that the potential overturn of Roe v. Wade might damage the U.S. economic system.

Neither Stanton’s or Porter’s campaigns responded to Fox Information Digital’s request for remark.



Learn the total article from Here

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southwest

Arizona homeschooling moms say state imposing burdensome regulations with policy change: 'Feels deliberate'

Published

on

Arizona homeschooling moms say state imposing burdensome regulations with policy change: 'Feels deliberate'

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Arizona homeschooling parents are accusing the state of imposing burdensome regulations on families after Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes cracked down on the state’s voucher program requirements this summer.

Homeschooling moms Velia Aguirre and Rosemary McAtee are plaintiffs in a new lawsuit, filed by The Goldwater Institute, against the state of Arizona, Arizona Department of Education and Superintendent Thomas Horne. Aguirre and McAtee participate in the school’s Empowerment Scholarship Account “ESA,” which gives homeschooling families 90% of state taxpayer dollars that would otherwise go to the public school district or charter schools to purchase educational materials, including books and supplemental materials, for their children’s schooling.

Advertisement

The suit alleges that in July, AG Mayes issued “legal threats” to the Department of Education to make sure every ESA purchase had a curriculum tied to it. Goldwater says that the education department is now rejecting reimbursement requests from ESA families for the purchase of “basic educational materials,” including things like pencils and erasers, “unless parents could provide an explicit ‘curricular’ document justifying the use of each specific book title or material for their child.” 

“It’s very hard. Because I’m spending several hours a week developing curriculum for things I’ve never had to develop curriculum for when I was a district employee or being in the program for four years,” Aguirre told Fox News Digital. 

“So it’s cumbersome. It’s really time-consuming. It’s burdensome,” she added. “It feels like I have to present this false narrative of developing a curriculum for erasers or pencils or colored markers.”

Arizona homeschooling parents Velia Aguirre, left, and Rosemary McAtee, right, are suing the state of Arizona and Department of Education over new requirements to the state’s Empowerment Scholarship Account “ESA” program that they say imposes burdensome regulations on parents. (The Goldwater Institute)

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT RULES 98,000 PEOPLE WHOSE CITIZENSHIP IS UNCONFIRMED CAN VOTE IN PIVOTAL ELECTION

Advertisement

“It’s just odd because the attorney general just seems to lack a lot of knowledge with the whole ESA program entirely. It’s really causing strain, and it feels deliberate, being imposed on families that already have it hard educating children with developmental delays,” Aguirre said.

Aguirre teaches her three boys with special needs at home and draws on her experience as a former public school Special Education teacher to develop lessons, activities and goals tailored to each of her children’s specific needs. But the lawsuit says when she submitted receipts for several educational materials, including the classic novel, “Where the Red Fern Grows;” a periodic table of elements; math and spelling activity books; and pencils and erasers to the department in August, her reimbursement request was denied.

Parents are already required to submit expense receipts for every item purchased with the scholarship funds, the suit says. It alleges the new requirement imposes a burden on parents that “violates state law and state regulations” while adding to the “backlog of tens of thousands of purchase orders awaiting review” and puts a “senseless burden” on parents.

The second plaintiff, Rosemary McAtee, has homeschooled seven of her nine children with funding from the ESA program since 2019. She also had her purchases denied by the state after she bought four books, including the children’s classic “Brown Bear, Brown, Bear What Do You See?,” and a Catholic Encyclopedia for Children. 

Both moms appealed these denials, the suit shows, but the Board of Education denied them, citing the need to provide a formal curriculum that includes these books.

Advertisement
homeschooling a child

Arizona homeschooling parents in the suit say the state has made their jobs much tougher with new regulations. (iStock)

WEST COAST EXODUS DRIVING SURGE IN HOMESCHOOLING IN DEEP RED STATE CALLED ‘FREEST’ IN NATION

“I honestly am kind of afraid to buy anything now because if they can change the rules at the drop of a hat, and break the law, – it does break the law that the legislature put in 2020 — it just leaves me with a question mark of, ‘Am I going to be stuck carrying thousands of dollars that I’m waiting to be reimbursed on, and then they’re going to deny me, even if it meets my contract to my curriculum?’” McAtee told Fox News Digital.

According to Goldwater, Arizona lawmakers added clarifying language in 2020 to the law ensuring supplemental material that is not explicitly tied to a curriculum would not be denied to families in the ESA program. Additionally, they say the State Board of Education has also “approved rules for the program explicitly permitting the purchase of these materials without additional documentation.”

A spokesman for Attorney General Kris Mayes’ office told Fox News Digital that they are simply enforcing the law and the requirement is meant to encourage transparency and accountability in how taxpayer dollars are spent.

“The Attorney General has simply stated what is required by law. The law doesn’t prevent parents from purchasing paper and pencils, but it does require that materials purchased with ESA funds be used for a child’s education. With instances of voucher dollars being spent on things like ski passes, luxury car driving lessons, and grand pianos, it’s clear that providing documentation on spending is essential to prevent the misuse of taxpayer funds. Attorney General Mayes believes Arizonans deserve full transparency and accountability in how their tax dollars are used and will continue to fight for accountability and oversight in the voucher program,” the spokesperson said.

Advertisement

The AG’s July letter came after local news investigations found ESA funds were used by some families for karate lessons, golf gear and even passes to a ski resort. 

Five adults, three of whom were former employees of the Arizona Department of Education, were also indicted in February for using fraudulent documents to obtain funds from the ESA program. 

Aguirre said these reports have “fueled” negative stereotypes she said are wrong about the majority of homeschooling families enrolled in ESAs. 

When reached for comment, the Arizona Department of Education provided the following statement from Superintendent Tom Horne:

“The Department of Education concedes the argument of the Goldwater Institute. When this issue first arose in July, my concern was that the Attorney General could force Empowerment Scholarship Account holders to return funds if they did not comply with her office’s interpretation of the law. This lawsuit will settle the issue in court and my sincere hope is that the arguments made by Goldwater will prevail,” Horne said.

Advertisement

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Los Angeles, Ca

Inland Empire community alerted after 'overly friendly' strangers snatch necklace

Published

on

Inland Empire community alerted after 'overly friendly' strangers snatch necklace

Residents in one San Bernardino County neighborhood are being urged to remain vigilant after a pair of “overly friendly” strangers snatched a necklace from the neck of one victim.

Two incidents involving the suspects were reported about a mile apart Thursday morning in Chino Hills.

Deputies first responded to Calle San Marcos Park, in Chino Hills, around 9:30 a.m. regarding suspicious activity, the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department stated in a news release.

“A male and female contacted the reporting party in public. They wanted to shake the reporting party’s hand and appeared overly friendly. The reporting party believed the suspects intended to steal jewelry from his person,” the Sherrif’s Department stated.

Advertisement

The man and woman were located and stopped by a deputy but during the traffic stop another service call was made from a victim who had a necklace stolen from his neck earlier in the morning in the 3200 block of Skyview Ridge.

Investigators determined the same suspects, identified as Washington residents Dorian Stanescu, 31, and Laura Ghiocel, 34, were involved in both incidents.

Stanescu and Ghiocel were arrested for grand theft from a person and were booked at the West Valley Detention Center, the Sheriff’s Department stated.

Deputies later urged Chino Hills community members to remain vigilant when strangers approach in public spaces.

“Recently, incidents have increased where individuals, often posing as friendly or helpful, distract victims to steal valuable items, particularly jewelry,” the Sheriff’s Department stated.

Advertisement

Deputies said the thieves often try to divert the victim’s attention away from their belongings.

Anyone with information regarding Thursday’s incidents was asked to call the Chino Hills Police Department at 909-364-2000. Those who prefer to remain anonymous can contact the We-Tip Hotline at 800-782-7463.

Continue Reading

Southwest

Harris heads to southern border looking to flip script on immigration criticisms

Published

on

Harris heads to southern border looking to flip script on immigration criticisms

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Vice President Harris stops in battleground Arizona on Friday to hold a campaign event along the U.S. southern border with Mexico as the Democrat presidential nominee works to turn the issue of immigration and border security from a negative into a positive.

Harris has faced frequent attacks from her Republican opponent, former President Trump, and his allies who argue she’s weak on border security, an issue that many Republicans see as the vice president’s political Achilles’ heel. Harris has faced intense criticism over the surge of migrants across the nation’s southern border during the first three years of President Biden’s administration.

Advertisement

The Trump campaign, on the eve of Harris’ first border visit as a presidential nominee, called it a “political ploy.”

But Harris, with a stop in Douglas, Arizona, aims to show that she’s better prepared than Trump to tackle the combustible issue of immigration and what Republicans have spotlighted as the crisis at the southern border.

HARRIS LEANS IN ON BORDER SECURITY AND TRUMP RELISHES THE FIGHT

Vice President Harris, the Democrat presidential nominee, is shown at a rally in Glendale, Ariz., on Aug. 9, 2024. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The vice president is expected to speak about how she is pushing what she describes as the toughest bipartisan border security plan in a generation, a measure that includes new border agents and technologies to stop fentanyl trafficking.

Advertisement

And she’s expected to reiterate her argument that Trump “has been talking a big game about securing our border, but he does not walk the walk.”

CHECK OUT THE LATEST FOX NEWS POWER RANKINGS IN THE 2024 ELECTION

She has repeatedly pointed to a border security bill with some bipartisan support that had been making its way through Congress this year before Republicans turned against the measure after prompting from Trump.

Harris has said that the former president “tanked the bipartisan deal because he thought it would help him win an election” and has pledged that “as the president, I will bring back the border security bill that Donald Trump killed.”

Candidate and former President Donald Trump

Former President Trump speaks at the U.S.-Mexico border on Aug. 22, 2024, south of Sierra Vista, Ariz. (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

Since replacing Biden atop the Democrats’ 2024 ticket more than two months ago, Harris has described herself as a former “border state prosecutor” who took on international gangs and criminal organizations behind illegal drug, gun and human trafficking across the border.

Advertisement

The description comes as Harris and her campaign have also spotlighted a tougher stance on border security while still pushing for a pathway to citizenship for some migrants.

“We need a comprehensive plan,” Harris said Wednesday in an interview with MSNBC. “That includes what we need to do to fortify not only our border but deal with the fact that we also need to create pathways for people to earn citizenship.”

Biden tasked Harris in 2021 with leading the diplomatic outreach to tackle the “root causes” of migration in Central American countries. It led to her being dubbed the “border czar” both by the media and some Republicans, although the White House has rejected that description. And the vice president has been pilloried over her role as “Biden’s border czar” by Trump and his allies.

Trump, as he runs to win back his old job in the White House, is calling for a major crackdown at the U.S.-Mexico border and has suggested using police and the military to carry out mass deportations of undocumented migrants.

Advertisement

Speaking at a campaign event in North Carolina on Wednesday, Trump said Harris was traveling to the southern border for “political reasons.”

“When Kamala speaks about the border, her credibility is less than zero,” Trump said. “I hope you’re going to remember that on Friday. When she tells you about the border, ask her just one simple question: ‘Why didn’t you do it four years ago?’”

And Trump has said the policies of the Biden-Harris administration have allowed millions of people to enter the U.S. illegally.

In June, after the collapse of the bipartisan border security bill, Biden announced rules that bar migrants from being granted asylum when U.S. officials say the U.S.-Mexico border is overwhelmed. Following the implementation of the new rules through executive orders, arrests for illegal border crossings have plummeted.

Polls indicate that immigration and abortion are two of the top issues on the minds of American voters, following the economy and inflation.

Advertisement

And public opinion surveys, including those from Fox News, indicate that by double digits Americans believe Trump would do a better job than Harris handling the issue.

Trump last visited the border during a stop last month in Arizona, which is one of the seven crucial battleground states that will likely determine the winner of the presidential election.

Fox News’ Adam Shaw contributed to this report.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub. 

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending