West Virginia
EPA Administrator Regan Issues Statement on West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency | US EPA
Right now, in response to the Supreme Court docket ruling in West Virginia v. Environmental Safety Company, EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan issued the next assertion:
“As a public well being company, EPA’s primary duty is to guard folks’s well being, particularly those that are on the entrance strains of environmental air pollution. Make no mistake: we are going to by no means waver from that duty.
Whereas I’m deeply dissatisfied by the Supreme Court docket’s resolution, we’re dedicated to utilizing the complete scope of EPA’s authorities to guard communities and scale back the air pollution that’s driving local weather change. We’ll transfer ahead to supply certainty and transparency for the vitality sector, which is able to assist the business’s ongoing efforts to develop our clear vitality economic system.
At this second, when the impacts of the local weather disaster have gotten ever extra disruptive, costing billions of {dollars} yearly from floods, wildfires, droughts and sea degree rise, and jeopardizing the protection of thousands and thousands of Individuals, the Court docket’s ruling is disheartening.
Bold local weather motion presents a singular alternative to make sure U.S. international competitiveness, create jobs, decrease prices for households, and defend folks’s well being and wellbeing, particularly those that’ve lengthy suffered the burden of inaction. EPA will transfer ahead with lawfully setting and implementing environmental requirements that meet our obligation to guard all folks and all communities from environmental hurt.”