Connect with us

Science

U.S. gives final clearance to COVID-19 shots for kids 5 to 11

Published

on

U.S. gives final clearance to COVID-19 shots for kids 5 to 11

The Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention on Tuesday fired the beginning gun on a marketing campaign to inoculate the nation’s 28 million elementary-school-age youngsters towards COVID-19, recommending the broad use of kid-size doses of the vaccine made by Pfizer and BioNTech.

Pictures into little arms are anticipated to start this week. Pfizer already is delivery the primary orders, that includes vials with distinctive orange caps, to states and pharmacies throughout the nation.

Kids between the ages of 5 and 11 will get two photographs of vaccine — at one-third the dosage of photographs for teenagers and adults — administered three weeks aside.

The CDC estimates that if the vaccine is extensively used, 600,000 new coronavirus infections might be prevented between now and subsequent March, and the present decline in new circumstances would speed up.

Advertisement

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC director, stated she was thrilled to increase the safety already loved by 193 million Individuals to a gaggle whose lives have been upended by the 20-month pandemic.

“We all know hundreds of thousands of oldsters are desperate to get their youngsters vaccinated,” Walensky stated, including that Tuesday will go down as “a monumental day in the middle of the pandemic.”

The CDC’s suggestion applies universally to 5- to 11-year-olds, no matter whether or not they’ve had a earlier coronavirus an infection or have an underlying medical situation that may put them at heightened threat for a severe case of COVID-19.

Advertisement

“As a mother, I encourage mother and father with questions to speak to their pediatrician, college nurse or native pharmacist to be taught extra concerning the vaccine and the significance of getting their youngsters vaccinated,” Walensky stated.

In California, the photographs received’t be out there till they’re cleared in an extra evaluation by the Western States Scientific Security Evaluate Workgroup, a coalition of public well being consultants from California, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. Which may take an extra day to finish.

The CDC motion got here simply hours after a panel of unbiased advisors issued a full-throated endorsement of the Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine for younger youngsters. After briefings that forged the vaccine as greater than 90% efficient in stopping COVID-19 in 5- to 11-year-olds, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted unanimously to suggest its use in all youngsters in that age group.

“Primarily based on our experience and the data that we now have, we’re all very enthusiastic,” stated committee member Dr. Beth Bell, a professor of worldwide well being on the College of Washington.

After the votes had been in, a number of members of the panel stated they had been desperate to vaccinate children of their households.

Advertisement

“I’m going to take my baby to get this,” stated Veronica McNally, an lawyer in West Bloomfield, Mich.

Dr. Sarah S. Lengthy, a pediatric infectious-disease specialist at Drexel College, stated the CDC motion makes three of her 9 grandchildren eligible for the vaccine. “By this time subsequent week,” she famous, solely her youngest grandchild can be unvaccinated.

“I’m very supportive of this suggestion to its fullest extent as a ‘ought to’ — not a ‘perhaps’ — for all youngsters on this age group,” she added.

Whereas youngsters are a lot much less seemingly than adults to develop into severely in poor health from a coronavirus an infection, the pandemic has taken a heavy toll on this age group.

Theirs is the group most definitely to be hospitalized with multisystem inflammatory syndrome, or MIS-C, wherein the immune system responds to a SARS-CoV-2 an infection by attacking wholesome tissue. By early October, a complete of two,316 elementary-school-age children within the U.S. had been hospitalized with MIS-C.

Advertisement

In all, 8,300 5- to 11-year-olds have been hospitalized with COVID-19, and 94 have died, in line with the CDC. Roughly two-thirds of those that have landed within the hospital had some power well being situation that put them at increased threat, corresponding to bronchial asthma, weight problems, coronary heart issues or a compromised immune system. However one-third had been completely wholesome earlier than their bout with extreme COVID-19.

And after a difficult college yr marked by distance studying and modified classroom protocols, the summer season noticed issues worsen. Throughout a six-week interval between late June and mid-August, because the Delta variant established itself throughout the U.S., COVID-19 hospitalizations amongst youngsters and adolescents elevated five-fold.

Even after gentle infections, a minimum of 7% of youngsters on this age group seem to undergo from lengthy COVID — a mysterious situation wherein signs — together with cough, muscle aches, respiration issues and problem concentrating — can linger for months.

Kids have performed an vital function in spreading the virus as a result of they’ll carry and transmit it even when they don’t have signs. The CDC estimates that if latest transmission tendencies proceed, the vaccination of simply 9 youngsters on this age group would stop one new an infection, and vaccinating 2,213 would spare one baby from hospitalization.

With its vote Tuesday, the CDC’s advisory panel brushed apart considerations over circumstances of vaccine-related myocarditis, an irritation of the center muscle. The situation is uncommon — it has been detected in 877 U.S. residents youthful than 30 who acquired the Pfizer vaccine or an identical one made by Moderna, out of 86 million doses administered to folks in that age group. The situation usually resolves with over-the-counter medicines and relaxation, and not one of the circumstances have been deadly.

Advertisement

Final week, nonetheless, considerations over how this uncommon vaccine aspect impact would have an effect on a cohort of prepubescent youngsters precipitated a number of advisors to the Meals and Drug Administration to recommend {that a} extra restricted rollout of the vaccine can be a safer wager.

Pfizer’s scientific trials in 5- to 11-year-olds picked up loads of circumstances of fatigue, headache and sore arms. However they didn’t detect indicators of myocarditis — and had been unlikely to take action, given their restricted dimension.

Dr. Matthew Oster, a pediatric heart specialist at Kids’s Healthcare of Atlanta, informed members of the CDC panel he believed myocarditis was “much less seemingly” to be seen in youthful youngsters after vaccination than it has been in teenagers and younger adults. “Basic” myocarditis, which typically develops within the wake of an an infection, is never seen in prepubescent youngsters, suggesting that hormonal adjustments could play a job, he stated.

No matter a affected person’s age or gender, Oster added, “getting COVID is way riskier to the center” than getting vaccinated to stop it. Requested whether or not the advantages of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine outweigh its dangers for younger youngsters, his reply was unambiguous.

“In my view, sure,” Oster stated.

Advertisement

Because the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine begins to roll into docs’ places of work and pharmacies, monitoring programs arrange by the CDC and FDA will scour medical information and hotline reviews to observe for any uptick in myocarditis amongst newly vaccinated children. A number of CDC advisors stated they had been reassured by consultants’ evolving view of myocarditis, in addition to the federal authorities’s vigilance in monitoring it.

“We do perceive that individuals have official considerations, and so they have plenty of questions,” Bell stated. She inspired these with lingering doubts to debate the problems with their pediatricians or different trusted advisors and “do what they should do to really feel snug with their choices.”

In a survey performed in September for the CDC, 35% of oldsters of 5- to 11-year-olds stated they might “undoubtedly” get their baby vaccinated as soon as the photographs had been out there, and 26% stated they might “in all probability” accomplish that.

Amongst mother and father who had been uncertain, 45% expressed considerations about long-term negative effects, 28% had been nervous about cardiac negative effects particularly, and roughly 25% stated they merely don’t belief COVID-19 vaccines. As well as, 1 in 10 stated they didn’t view COVID-19 as a risk.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

Published

on

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.

The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.

The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.

Advertisement

The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.

After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.

As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.

Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.

The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.

Advertisement

Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.

Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.

The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.

Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.

While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.

Advertisement

Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.

Continue Reading

Science

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

Published

on

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.

“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”

Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.

Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.

The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.

Advertisement

That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.

In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.

“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”

Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).

The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.

Advertisement

For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.

Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.

“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.

Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.

There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.

Advertisement

“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.

Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.

“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”

That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.

Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.

Advertisement

“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”

Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.

“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”

On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”

“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.

Advertisement

Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.

The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.

“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.

“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”

That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.

Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.

“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”

Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.

“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.

Advertisement

The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”

“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”

Continue Reading

Science

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

Published

on

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending