Politics
Why Ketanji Brown Jackson and Kamala Harris idolize civil rights lawyers like Constance Baker Motley
As Kamala Harris made historical past in her speech accepting the vice presidential nomination in 2020, she broke right into a broad grin as she invoked the identify of her hero: Constance Baker Motley, the primary Black girl to function a federal decide.
Eighteen months later, Motley’s reminiscence was summoned once more, this time by Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson upon her nomination to the Supreme Courtroom.
The parallels are hardly coincidental. Motley, a path-breaking lawyer and jurist, is a pure inspiration to be shared by Harris, a former prosecutor who turned the primary Black and South Asian girl to be vice chairman and Brown, who’s poised to be the primary Black feminine justice of the nation’s highest court docket. The ascension of each to their historic posts is a mirrored image of the outsize and enduring affect of Motley and a handful of fellow civil rights legal professionals like Thurgood Marshall and Charles Hamilton Houston.
“While you see them, you see the technology of Black legal professionals earlier than them, a lot of them who’ve largely gone unheralded,” mentioned Nicole Holley-Walker, dean of the Howard College Faculty of Regulation. As members of the primary technology to comply with the civil rights motion, she mentioned, “all of us had quite common function fashions as a result of there weren’t very many individuals earlier than us.”
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on Jackson’s affirmation on Monday and can probably impasse, though Democrats will nonetheless be capable to advance her nomination to the total Senate for last approval.
The legal professionals most frequently cited by Jackson, 50, and Harris, 57, had been all concerned with the landmark Brown vs. Board of Training case, by which the Supreme Courtroom struck down the doctrine of “separate however equal” in public faculties. Marshall, the lead lawyer, later turned the primary Black Supreme Courtroom justice. Houston was Marshall’s mentor and key architect of the technique to chip away at legalized segregation within the run-up to Brown. Motley, a protege of Marshall’s, was the primary Black girl to argue earlier than the Courtroom and was appointed to the federal judiciary in 1966.
The frequent mentions of those authorized icons have served Harris and Jackson in a number of methods. Each girls level to their function fashions to clarify their very own motivations for public service and the way they strategy their present jobs. The decision-outs provide studying alternatives for audiences that don’t know these legal professionals, and function a sort of shorthand for people who do.
For Jackson, Motley’s legacy has been a recurring motif within the nomination course of. In her first speech as President Biden’s nominee, she took pains to notice that she was born 49 years to the day after Motley. She found that truth in legislation faculty when, she later mentioned, “secretly at that time, I used to be considering possibly I’d wish to be a decide.”
Motley’s identify got here up a dozen occasions within the Senate Judiciary Committee affirmation hearings, evoked by Jackson and pleasant Democratic senators.
Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal, wanting to tout that Motley was a daughter of his house state of Connecticut, remarked, “She was very predominantly answerable for Brown versus Board of Training. Thurgood Marshall obtained a lot of the credit score, however she did a whole lot of the work. Most likely sounds acquainted to you.”
Motley is certainly much less well-known than different civil rights figures, however for the ladies of Jackson’s technology, she was a star.
“I imagine each little Black woman who desires to be a lawyer knew about Constance Baker Motley,” mentioned Njeri Mathis Rutledge, who was mates with Jackson after they had been undergraduates at Harvard College and now teaches legislation on the South Texas School of Regulation. “I vividly bear in mind wanting as much as and admiring her, and feeling like if she might do it, I might do it.”
Even when Motley and her cohort weren’t talked about by identify, their legacy loomed giant within the hearings, together with in a number of the extra antagonistic moments. Republicans used Jackson’s historical past as a public defender to insinuate she was tender on crime, a cost additionally levied towards Marshall, the final justice to have had substantial expertise representing legal defendants.
And 55 years after Mississippi Sen. James Eastland bluntly requested Marshall, “Are you prejudiced towards white folks within the South?” Jackson confronted equally provocative questions on race — most notoriously, from Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, about an anti-racist kids’s e book, “Do you agree with this e book that’s being taught with youngsters that the infants are racist?”
When Jackson was repeatedly pressed to explain her judicial philosophy, observers detected the affect of her civil rights predecessors in her reply.
“When she explains how she views the legislation, it’s very a lot on this custom of understanding the instruments the legislation provides you, understanding the info of the case … coming from a impartial place,” mentioned Holley-Walker, including that Jackson’s emphasis on the authorized fundamentals remembers the Brown vs. Board legal professionals who had been “critical technicians within the legislation.”
Harris, in the meantime, refers to her idols as a set of three, repeating it so typically it’s nearly like a mantra: Thurgood Marshall, Charles Hamilton Houston, Constance Baker Motley. They had been talked about in each of her memoirs, and in numerous marketing campaign speeches, as her inspiration for finding out legislation.
“It tells me she is aware of her historical past — the historical past of the civil rights motion,” mentioned Tomiko Brown-Nagin, a Harvard Regulation professor and writer of “Civil Rights Queen,” a newly launched biography of Motley.
Harris has proven specific reverence for Marshall; she was sworn in as vice chairman on a Bible that when belonged to him, and shows a bust of the late justice in her ceremonial workplace.
However usually she speaks of the trio of attorneys who had been the “heroes of my youth,” Harris informed the Detroit chapter of the NAACP in a 2019 speech. “These people who had the ability to translate the fervour from the streets to the courtrooms of our nation.”
She casts that admiration as a necessary through-line of her biography, particularly after she arrived as an undergraduate at Howard College, the traditionally Black establishment the place Houston as soon as led the legislation faculty and Marshall was a most revered alumnus.
“They had been talked about continuously by way of the legacy of Howard,” mentioned Lita Rosario, a classmate who recruited Harris to hitch the college debate workforce. “The symbolism of somebody like Thurgood Marshall [was] that is who you could be in the event you keep. … It’s a journey of excellence and you need to stay as much as that commonplace.”
The atmosphere was starkly totally different when Harris moved on to legislation faculty in San Francisco at UC Hastings, which on the time had the popularity of an elite previous boys membership, and minority legislation college students typically confronted alienation.
“All of us felt that stage of tradition shock,” mentioned Diane Matsuda, a legislation faculty pal of Harris who’s now an lawyer in San Francisco. “It was the primary time I actually felt that racism.”
Shauna Marshall, who taught Maya Harris, the vice chairman’s youthful sibling, at Stanford Regulation, mentioned the transition was probably particularly abrupt for Harris.
“Hailing from Howard, you’re instilled with a way of you belong in all places,” mentioned Marshall, who later labored on a pilot anti-recidivism program with Harris, then the San Francisco district lawyer. “I’m positive these function fashions and luminaries had been actually instrumental in [Harris] sustaining her eyes on the prize.”
Their affect on her carried over to her early years as a front-line prosecutor, mentioned Darryl Stallworth, who labored with Harris as newly-minted legal professionals within the Alameda County District Legal professional’s workplace.
“We had quite a few conversations after we had been speaking in regards to the legacy and the duty of passing the torch — the alternatives we had based mostly on all the pieces our ancestors had achieved,” mentioned Stallworth, now a legal protection lawyer in Oakland. He mentioned they shared a perception that one of the best ways to alter the legal justice system was to reform it from the within.
Harris has typically cited these attorneys as a part of her determination to grow to be a prosecutor — a transfer that she mentioned was met with skepticism from her household. Not one of the three legal professionals she typically references had been prosecutors themselves, however Brown-Nagin mentioned Harris probably obtained inspiration from their work exposing abuses within the legal justice system.
Her legislation enforcement expertise later brought about friction with some Democratic major voters, and Harris at occasions appeared not sure of find out how to speak about it. She relied on the references to these civil rights figures as a rhetorical gadget, particularly for Black audiences.
“There’s a approach by which you need to telegraph that ‘Sure, I’m on this place of energy. Sure, I’ve to typically make laborious trade-offs. However my North Star continues to be the North Star of my folks,’” mentioned Marshall, who’s now a legislation professor at UC Hastings. “That’s a good way of conveying it by simply naming these folks.”
Harris would intentionally name-check the legal professionals in entrance of largely white audiences as properly.
“She was making an attempt to elevate them out of obscurity a bit of bit,” mentioned Sean Clegg, a former senior advisor. “Lots of occasions — all the time with curiosity and assist — a whole lot of white folks discovered themselves Googling these names. That’s constructive. That’s factor.”
After many years of drawing on the legacy of Black authorized trailblazers, Harris is now a part of the administration that’s set so as to add a brand new identify to that checklist of “firsts.” Jackson is predicted to be confirmed with votes from your entire Democratic caucus and at the least one Republican, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. The ultimate vote within the Senate holds the potential of a second wealthy in symbolic symmetry: the primary Black feminine vice chairman presiding as the primary Black girl is confirmed to the Supreme Courtroom.
“There’s folks like Charles Hamilton Houston and Thurgood Marshall that we’ve appeared as much as all these years. And now it’s our flip,” mentioned Rosario, Harris’ Howard classmate who’s now an leisure lawyer in Washington.
“Kamala is standing in these footwear,” she added. “Choose Jackson is standing in these footwear.”
Politics
Dem leader condemns Thanksgiving bomb threats against liberal lawmakers after Team Trump targeted
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries condemned several threats, mostly focused on lawmakers from Connecticut, targeting members of his caucus, just days after numerous threats were made against President-elect Trump’s cabinet selections.
Jeffries, D-N.Y., confirmed in a statement Friday that several Democrats were targeted with threats ranging from pipe bombs in their mailboxes to “swatting” — or filing a false police report on another person’s behalf that often results in a SWAT team being dispatched.
All of the threatening messages were signed “MAGA,” Jeffries said, adding law enforcement found no ordnance at any of the targeted lawmakers’ homes.
“America is a democracy. Threats of violence against elected officials are unacceptable, unconscionable and have no place in a civilized society. All perpetrators of political violence directed at any party must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law,” he said.
TOP DEM: ‘UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRATION’ IS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY
“House Democrats will not be deterred or intimidated from serving the people by violent threats. We have been in close communication with the Sergeant at Arms office and it is imperative that Congress provide maximum protection for all Members and their families moving forward.”
After Jeffries spoke out, Rep. Seth Magaziner, a Democrat from neighboring Rhode Island, announced on Friday afternoon that his home had been targeted, as well. Magaziner said Providence police responded quickly and no one was harmed.
Sen. Christopher Murphy, D-Conn., had his home targeted by a bomb threat. A spokesperson said it appeared to be part of a “coordinated effort.”
Five other Democrats from the Constitution State received similar threats, including Reps. Joe Courtney, John Larson, Rosa DeLauro, Jahana Hayes and James Himes.
CT DEM SAYS IT’S CLEAR HUNTER BIDEN BROKE THE LAW
“There is no place for political violence in this country, and I hope that we may all continue through the holiday season with peace and civility,” said Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee who replaced Sen.-elect Adam Schiff, D-Calif.
Prior to that spate of threats, Trump’s U.N. ambassador-designate Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., said she was traveling home to her North Country district for Thanksgiving when she was informed of a threat against her home.
Former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. — Trump’s initial choice for attorney general — also received a threat.
Former Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y. — Trump’s nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency — said his home was subjected to a “pro-Palestinian-themed” pipe bomb threat. Zeldin is Jewish.
Former Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, R-Ore., whom the president-elect tapped for Labor secretary, said her Oregon home was targeted, as was that of former San Diego Chargers cornerback Scott Turner, whom Trump named to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Trump nominees including Cantor-Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick, America First Policy Institute President Brooke Rollins and former Fox News host Pete Hegseth also received threats.
In a statement, the FBI said it is aware of “numerous bomb threats and swatting incidents targeting incoming administration nominees and appointees, and we are working with our law enforcement partners.”
“We take all potential threats seriously and, as always, encourage members of the public to immediately report anything they consider suspicious to law enforcement,” it said.
Fox News’ Kevin Ward contributed to this report.
Politics
Capitol rioter's defamation suit against Fox News is dismissed
A Delaware court judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit against Fox News filed by a Jan. 6 rioter who said the network falsely identified him as an FBI informant.
U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Hall granted Fox News’ motion to dismiss the suit filed last year by Ray Epps.
Now based in Utah, Epps alleged his life was upended after former Fox host Tucker Carlson repeatedly described him as a federal agent who helped instigate the attack on the Capitol, which was an attempt to stop the certification of the election of Joe Biden.
Carlson described Epps as a principal in a false flag operation in which the government incited the Jan. 6 riot, an unfounded conspiracy theory. He made the false comments about Epps on his program over a period of nearly two years and in a series called “Patriot Purge” that streamed on Fox Nation in 2022.
In her remarks from the bench, Hall said Carlson did not act with malicious intent.
Fox News welcomed the judge’s decision, which is the third consecutive defamation case to be decided in favor of the network after the record $787-million settlement it paid to Dominion Voting Systems in April 2024.
Dominion said its business was damaged by false claims Fox News presented regarding voting fraud in the 2020 election. Fox News chose to settle the case rather than have its executives and on-air talent take the witness stand in a trial.
A separate defamation suit filed by Nina Jankowicz, the former head of the federal Disinformation Governance Board, was dismissed in July. Another case brought by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, was thrown out on Tuesday.
“Fox News is pleased with these back-to-back decisions from federal courts preserving the press freedoms of the First Amendment,” the network said in a statement.
Epps was at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and pleaded guilty in January to a misdemeanor charge for his role in the riot.
Epps testified under oath to the House committee investigating the attack that he had no involvement with the FBI, which has also stated publicly that he had no association with the bureau.
The lawsuit claimed Epps and his wife received threatening voice mails, emails and text messages because of Carlson‘s comments. Epps told the CBS news magazine “60 Minutes” that the lies ruined his Arizona-based business and led to death threats.
Carlson’s prime-time program was pulled from the Fox News lineup on April 24, 2023, the day after Epps appeared on “60 Minutes.”
Politics
Political betting markets still have plenty of action despite end of election season
The end of the election season does not mean the end of political betting, with many platforms allowing users to place wagers on everything from the 2028 election to who will be confirmed to President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet.
“Some people will be amazed by this, but people are already betting on 2026 and 2028,” Maxim Lott, the founder of ElectionBettingOdds.com, told Fox News Digital. “There’s been about a quarter million dollars bet already.”
The comments come after the 2024 election produced plenty of betting action, with users across multiple platforms wagering over $2 billion on the outcome of the latest race.
WHAT ARE ELECTION BETTING ODDS? EXPERT EXPLAINS WHY TRUMP IS CURRENT FAVORITE
While mega sporting events, such as the Super Bowl and the recent Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul fight, gives gamblers plenty to wager on after the election, those looking for something political to bet on will still have plenty of options.
One of the most popular topics is who will be the nominees for both major parties in 2028, with ElectionBettingOdds.com showing California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Vice President-elect JD Vance being the current leaders for Democrats and Republicans, respectively.
Other names with a significant amount of attention for betters include Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for the Democratic nomination, while Vance is trailed by names like entrepreneur and future head of the new Department of Government Efficiency Vivek Ramaswamy and Donald Trump Jr. on the Republican side.
“The big Democratic governors are favored to be the next nominee,” Lott said, noting that Vance currently holds a sizable lead over other options on the GOP side.
TRUMP OPENS UP LARGEST BETTING LEAD SINCE DAYS AFTER BIDEN’S DROPOUT
Vance is also the current betting leader on who will win the 2028 presidential election, ElectionBettingOdds.com shows, followed by Newson and Shapiro as the next two likely options.
However, Lott warned it is still too early to tell what the future holds, noting that the markets will start to provide more clarity as more information becomes known over the next few years.
“As the future becomes clearer… as we get closer to 2026, 2028, these odds will change,” Lott said. “So if the Trump administration is doing really well, the economy is booming, inflation is not out of control, wars are ending, Vance’s odds will certainly go up.”
Bettors also are not limited to wagering on elections, with platforms such as Polymarket allowing users to place bets on Trump’s picks to serve in his Cabinet and whether they will be confirmed. Bettors can also place wagers on questions such as if they believe the war in Ukraine will end in Trump’s first 90 days or if there will be a cease-fire in Gaza in 2024.
According to Lott, taking a look at the current betting odds for many scenarios can help inform you about what is going on in the world, even if you do not place bets yourself.
“People often ask… is there any value to this… it’s just gambling. It’s silly,” Lott said. “But actually it’s very useful… if you want to know what’s going to happen in 2028 or if the Trump administration is going to be a success, you could read 100 news articles on it. Some will misinform you. Or, you can just go to the prediction markets and see… is Vance a 20% chance of becoming the next Republican nominee or is he a 90% chance? That tells you a lot.”
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Health6 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
Health4 days ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World
-
Science3 days ago
Despite warnings from bird flu experts, it's business as usual in California dairy country
-
Science1 week ago
Alameda County child believed to be latest case of bird flu; source unknown
-
Technology3 days ago
Lost access? Here’s how to reclaim your Facebook account
-
Sports1 week ago
Behind Comcast's big TV deal: a bleak picture for once mighty cable industry
-
Entertainment2 days ago
Review: A tense household becomes a metaphor for Iran's divisions in 'The Seed of the Sacred Fig'