Connect with us

Politics

Why House Democrats Have Fallen in Line and Republicans Haven’t

Published

on

Why House Democrats Have Fallen in Line and Republicans Haven’t

Within the expectations recreation that’s American politics, shedding is the brand new profitable.

Republicans are placing their would-be Home speaker, Consultant Kevin McCarthy of California, via a grueling sequence of public checks, along with his final destiny unsure. Up to now, no less than 5 Republicans have stated they may oppose McCarthy’s bid when it comes up for a vote of the complete Home in January. He wants 218 votes.

In contrast, Home Democrats have all however anointed their new leaders, a triumvirate of Representatives Hakeem Jeffries of New York, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts and Pete Aguilar of California.

By the top of a course of that happened largely in personal, over the course of months, the three lawmakers quietly secured overwhelming help and boxed out doable rivals, like Representatives Adam Schiff of California and Pramila Jayapal of Washington. If the election or the management transition uncovered any main ideological cracks within the Democratic firmament of the Home, they aren’t evident but.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi stepped apart, as did her lieutenants, Steny Hoyer of Maryland and James Clyburn of South Carolina. Assuming all goes as deliberate, the common age of the Democrats’ Home management trio will plummet from 82 to 51 years previous.

Advertisement

To unpack why Democrats have fallen in line whereas Republicans haven’t, I chatted with Julie Hirschfeld Davis, the congressional editor at The New York Occasions. Here’s what she stated:

Democrats appear to have stage-managed their transition to new Home leaders with as little drama as doable, whereas Republicans could also be in for a rocky few weeks. What explains the distinction?

You must have a look at how completely different the personalities and political conditions of the 2 events are proper now.

Republicans are coming off a traditionally disappointing midterm election that delivered them a really slim majority and just one chamber of Congress, so they’re in finger-pointing and recrimination mode, and that all the time exacerbates divisions.

Democrats, then again, are celebrating a significantly better than anticipated end result that enables them to keep up management of the Senate and a powerful sufficient minority within the Home to truly make life fairly onerous for Republicans if they will maintain collectively — and even to doubtlessly get some stuff carried out that they need — and now they’ve actual incentive to try this.

Advertisement

Then you have got these two leaders who couldn’t be much less comparable. McCarthy, the Republican nominee for speaker, has been in a fairly precarious place in his social gathering for a while now. He’s needed to stroll this tough stability between being a mainstream conservative chief and catering to the intense proper of his convention, which views him with suspicion and has actually grown in affect and now feels very emboldened to form what the brand new Republican majority goes to seem like. He has by no means been the kind of chief to have the ability to train any actual self-discipline over his folks, and definitely isn’t able to take action now.

Distinction that with Pelosi, who’s principally on the peak of her energy regardless that her social gathering simply misplaced the bulk. She has been extraordinarily efficient in controlling her caucus, together with discovering methods to handle a fairly restive progressive left, and has put plenty of time and power and negotiating through the years into orchestrating precisely the result she desires and thinks is greatest for her social gathering.

Additionally keep in mind that Pelosi’s critics within the Democratic ranks have been clamoring for a very long time now for her to lastly let go of the reins and permit one other technology of leaders to ascend, so Democrats have the additional advantage of plenty of pent-up urge for food for this to occur.

That’s one more reason you noticed the opposite two leaders under her, Hoyer and Clyburn, step apart comparatively simply. They knew that even when they didn’t need to comply with Pelosi out of management, the rank and file actually wished this alteration. With out her freezing all the things in place, as she has for a few years, they weren’t going to have the ability to push towards that tide.

Jeffries has massive footwear to fill. Are there any indicators to date that he intends to run the Democratic caucus otherwise than Pelosi did?

Advertisement

It’s onerous to think about anybody operating the Democratic Caucus fairly like Pelosi did, and she or he and Jeffries are fairly completely different.

He doesn’t have wherever close to the observe file that she has, both in shepherding main, advanced items of laws via the Home or in elevating the sort of cash Pelosi has, so there’s going to be a reasonably steep studying curve on each of these issues. Jeffries additionally got here up in politics in New York Metropolis as an rebel attempting to shake up the machine, so he’s much less of a celebration boss sort than Pelosi is, and he’ll be below some stress from the rank and file to run issues in a much less top-down sort of a method.

That stated, he has had a front-row seat to Pelosi’s fairly masterly command of her folks and the dividends that may pay at important instances, so there shall be a temptation to attempt to emulate a few of that. Will he be capable of? Unclear.

Pelosi has stated that she doesn’t intend to be doling out unsolicited recommendation, regardless that she hasn’t resigned her seat. Are Democrats proud of that uncommon association, or is there any concern that she’ll overshadow the brand new crew?

I feel most Democrats take her at her phrase that she desires to step method again, however it will likely be attention-grabbing to see what that appears like. These of us who’ve lined Pelosi intently through the years have a tough time imagining her as a backbencher. This isn’t a lady who likes to cede management.

Advertisement

However a part of what we noticed final week was a frontrunner who’s now very centered on having a sleek exit, on not being seen as clinging to energy after she is now not wished, and on utilizing her remaining time in public life to burnish her legacy. So my guess is she is going to work out a approach to grasp again and be a presence, however not an awesome one.

Life within the Home minority could be fairly dispiriting. Are Democrats extra in a mind-set to battle Republicans and take again energy or to attempt to discover methods to work with them over the subsequent two years?

I feel it is dependent upon whom you ask. There are plenty of moderates who acknowledge that with a really small Republican majority there is a chance for Democrats to doubtlessly get issues carried out and to play a fairly pivotal function, since their votes shall be wanted to compensate for the hard-right votes on the Republican aspect that merely gained’t be there for many main laws.

And within the Senate, there’s a actual need to do as a lot of that as Republicans are prepared to, although it’s not clear how a lot political house there shall be for that sort of cooperation.

However I’d additionally say there are a good variety of Democrats who shall be very reluctant to work with members of a celebration that they take into account fully excessive and irredeemable, and who shall be doing no matter they will to battle the Republican agenda.

Advertisement

Thanks for studying On Politics, and for being a subscriber to The New York Occasions. — Blake

Learn previous editions of the publication right here.

In the event you’re having fun with what you’re studying, please take into account recommending it to others. They will enroll right here. Browse all of our subscriber-only newsletters right here.

Have suggestions? Concepts for protection? We’d love to listen to from you. E mail us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Advertisement

Politics

Gold bars stashed in Dem senator’s home recovered after 2013 violent robbery

Published

on

Gold bars stashed in Dem senator’s home recovered after 2013 violent robbery

Several gold bars discovered by federal agents in Democratic New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez’s residence as part of a high-profile bribery investigation can be traced to a violent robbery a decade ago.

According to a sprawling indictment unsealed by federal prosecutors in September, Menendez and his wife allegedly played a role in a years-long bribery scheme that involved the Egyptian government and local businessmen including Fred Daibes, a wealthy New Jersey real estate developer. Prosecutors revealed they retrieved multiple gold bars from Menendez’s home which were allegedly used as payment in the scheme.

At least four of the gold bars discovered by investigators can be linked to Daibes, both because of their unique engraved serial numbers and thanks to court documents related to a 2013 robbery which Daibes was a victim of, an NBC New York investigation revealed Monday. In November 2013, four assailants beat and robbed Daibes at gunpoint in his Edgewater, New Jersey, apartment, stealing 22 gold bars, jewelry and cash.

“Each gold bar has its own serial number,” Daibes told local investigators in a 2014 transcript obtained by NBC New York. “They’re all stamped … you’ll never see two stamped the same way.”

5 EXPLOSIVE REVELATIONS FROM DEM SEN BOB MENENDEZ’S BOMBSHELL FEDERAL INDICTMENT

Advertisement

An evidence photo published in the September federal indictment of Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., shows a gold bar with the serial number “590005.” The same gold bar was stolen in a 2013 robbery. (United States District Court )

Photographs released by the Department of Justice in September showing the gold bars discovered at Menendez’s home, for example, reveal one of the bars has a serial number of “590005.” Daibes reported a gold bar with that same serial number stolen during the 2013 heist, NBC New York reported.

And the federal indictment notes that the serial numbers on the gold bars indicate they had previously been possessed by Daibes.

MSNBC’S ALICIA MENENDEZ ADDRESSES FATHER’S INDICTMENT: COLLEAGUES HAVE ‘AGGRESSIVELY’ COVERED

“A court-authorized search of the residence of Robert Menendez and Nadine Menendez, a/k/a ‘Nadine Arslanian,’ the defendants, revealed, among other things, approximately two one-kilogram gold bars and nine one-ounce gold bars that had serial numbers indicating they had previously been possessed by Fred Daibes, the defendant,” the indictment states.

Advertisement

In addition, when Daibes reported the robbery to police in 2013, he said 22 gold bars had been taken. Similarly, the September indictment states that Daibes sold 22 gold bars to Wael Hana, another defendant allegedly implicated in the bribery scheme.

Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., was indicted on bribery charges in September. He has since repeatedly claimed he is innocent of any wrongdoing.  (Getty Images | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)

Police ultimately arrested and charged four individuals for robbing Daibes in 2013, according to local media reports. Then, in September 2015, the suspects all pled guilty and were ultimately sentenced to several months in prison.

Meanwhile, since the federal bribery indictment was unsealed earlier this year, Menendez has repeatedly asserted his innocence and remained in the Senate.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The allegations leveled against me are just that, allegations,” Menendez said Sept. 25. “For anyone who has known me throughout my 50 years of public service, they know I have always fought for what is right. My advocacy has always been grounded. And what I learned from growing up as the son of Cuban refugees, especially my mom, my hero, Evangelina Menendez. Everything I accomplished, I worked for despite the nay sayers and everyone who has underestimated me.

Advertisement

“I firmly believe that when all the facts are presented, not only will I be exonerated, but I still will be New Jersey’s senior senator,” he added.  “The court of public opinion is no substitute for our revered justice system. We cannot set aside the presumption of innocence for political expediency when the harm is irrevocable.”

Continue Reading

Politics

George Santos movie in development at HBO from the makers of ‘Veep’ and ‘Succession’

Published

on

George Santos movie in development at HBO from the makers of ‘Veep’ and ‘Succession’

Former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) is getting the movie treatment at HBO after getting booted from Congress last week.

The Warner Bros. Discovery-owned premium cable giant confirmed Monday that it has optioned the rights to author Mark Chiusano’s nonfiction book “The Fabulist: The Lying, Hustling, Stealing, and Very American Legend of George Santos.”

Frank Rich, known for his work as an executive producer on the Emmy-winning TV satires “Veep” and “Succession,” is executive producing the film adaptation, but in a non-writing capacity, according to the company.

The studio has tapped “Bad Education” screenwriter Mike Makowsky to write and executive produce the picture.

HBO’s announcement comes less than a week after Santos was expelled from the House of Representatives, becoming the sixth lawmaker ever to be forced out of the legislative chamber.

Advertisement

The politician was ousted by his colleagues after a House Ethics Committee report determined that he had lied about his background, defrauded donors and used campaign money to fund an extravagant lifestyle that included Botox injections, personal travel and subscriptions on OnlyFans.

The ex-lawmaker has also been indicted on felony counts of wire fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds and making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. He has denied wrongdoing and criticized the move to expel him before his case goes to trial.

Billed as a “forensic and darkly comic” dramatization of Santos’ bid for Congress, the HBO film will chronicle “the Gatsby-esque journey of a man from nowhere who exploited the system, waged war on truth and swindled one of the wealthiest districts in the country to achieve his American dream,” according to the project’s official logline.

This isn’t the first time Hollywood has mined Santos’ highly publicized saga for entertainment. The latest installment of “Saturday Night Live” opened with a humorous farewell to Santos — or rather, to cast member Bowen Yang’s beloved portrayal of him.

“This entire country has been bullying me just because I’m a proud, gay thief,” Yang’s Santos said during the sketch. “But what else is new? America hates to see a Latina queen winning.”

Advertisement

Times staff writer Erin B. Logan contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Video: White House Urges Congress to Approve More Funding for Ukraine

Published

on

Video: White House Urges Congress to Approve More Funding for Ukraine

new video loaded: White House Urges Congress to Approve More Funding for Ukraine

transcript

transcript

White House Urges Congress to Approve More Funding for Ukraine

Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser, said that improper funding would jeopardize Ukraine’s ability to defend itself against Russia.

Without congressional action, the administration will run out of resources by the end of the year to procure more weapons and equipment for Ukraine, and to provide equipment from U.S. military stocks without impacting our own military readiness. The resources Congress has provided for Ukraine and other national security needs have halted Russia’s advances in Ukraine, helped Ukraine achieve significant military victories, including taking back more than 50 percent of the territory that Russia had previously occupied. And by revitalizing our own defense industrial base, jumpstarting and expanding production lines and supporting good-paying jobs across the country. Now it’s up to Congress. Congress has to decide whether to continue to support the fight for freedom in Ukraine as part of the 50-nation coalition that President Biden has built, or whether Congress will ignore the lessons we’ve learned from history and let Putin prevail. It is that simple. It is that stark a choice. And we hope that Congress on a bipartisan basis, will make the right choice.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Ukraine Crisis

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending