Connect with us

Politics

Republicans Push Crackdown on Crime Wave That Doesn’t Exist: Voter Fraud

Published

on

The Florida Legislature final week created a regulation enforcement company — informally referred to as the election police — to deal with what Gov. Ron DeSantis and different Republicans have declared an pressing downside: the roughly 0.000677 % of voters suspected of committing voter fraud.

In Georgia, Republicans within the Home handed a regulation on Tuesday handing new powers to police personnel who examine allegations of election-related crimes.

And in Texas, the Republican legal professional common already has created an “election integrity unit” charged solely with investigating unlawful voting.

Voter fraud is exceedingly uncommon — and infrequently unintended. Nonetheless, formidable Republicans throughout the nation are making a present of cracking down on voter crime this election 12 months. Legislators in a number of states have moved to reorganize and rebrand regulation enforcement businesses whereas stiffening penalties for voting-related crimes. Republican district attorneys and state attorneys common are selling their aggressive prosecutions, in some circumstances making felony circumstances out of conditions that previously might need been categorised as sincere errors.

It’s a new section of the Republican marketing campaign to tighten voting legal guidelines that began after former President Donald J. Trump started making false claims of fraud following the 2020 election. The trouble, which resulted in a wave of recent state legal guidelines final 12 months, has now shifted to courthouses, elevating concern amongst voting rights activists that concern of prosecution might maintain some voters from casting ballots.

Advertisement

“As myths about widespread voter fraud develop into central to political campaigns and discourse, we’re seeing extra of the high-profile makes an attempt to make examples of people,” stated Wendy Weiser, the vp for democracy on the Brennan Heart.

It’s practically unimaginable to evaluate whether or not the discuss of getting powerful on voter crime is leading to a rise in prosecutions. There is no such thing as a nationwide knowledge on how many individuals have been charged with voter fraud in 2020 or in earlier elections, and state knowledge is commonly incomplete. The state numbers which might be accessible present there have been only a few examples of potential circumstances in 2020 and few prosecutions.

Florida election officers made simply 75 referrals to regulation enforcement businesses concerning potential fraud through the 2020 election, out of greater than 11 million votes solid, in accordance with knowledge from the Florida secretary of state’s workplace. Of these investigations, solely 4 circumstances have been prosecuted as voter fraud within the state from the 2020 election.

In Texas, the place Lawyer Common Ken Paxton introduced his new “election integrity unit” in October to research election crimes, The Houston Chronicle reported that the six-prosecutor unit had spent $2.2 million and had closed three circumstances.

And in Wisconsin, the place a swath of Republicans, together with one candidate for governor, are looking for to decertify the state’s 2020 presidential election outcomes on the idea of false claims of fraud, a report launched final week by the Wisconsin Election Fee stated that the state had referred to native prosecutors 95 situations of felons’ voting in 2020 after they weren’t allowed to. From amongst these circumstances, district attorneys have filed fees towards 16 individuals.

Advertisement

“The underlying degree of precise criminality, I don’t suppose that’s modified in any respect,” stated Lorraine Minnite, a Rutgers College political science professor who has collected years of information on election fraud in America. “In an election of 130 million or 140 million individuals, it’s near zero. The reality will not be a precedence; what’s a precedence is the political use of this concern.”

The political incentives to attract consideration to the enforcement of voting legal guidelines are clear. A Monmouth College ballot in January discovered that 62 % of Republicans and simply 19 % of Democrats believed voter fraud was a serious downside.

Which will imply the percentages of being charged with voter fraud may be linked to the political affiliation of the native prosecutor.

In Fond du Lac County, Wis., District Lawyer Eric Toney was in workplace for 9 years with out prosecuting a voter fraud case. However after he began his marketing campaign for legal professional common in 2021, Mr. Toney, a Republican, obtained a letter from a Wisconsin man who had acquired copies of tens of millions of ballots in an try to conduct his personal evaluate of the 2020 election. The letter cited 5 Fond du Lac County voters whose registrations listed their dwelling addresses at a UPS Retailer, a violation of a state regulation that requires voters to register the place they reside.

Mr. Toney charged all 5 with felony voter fraud.

Advertisement

“We get suggestions from group members of individuals breaking the regulation by means of the 12 months, and we take them critically, particularly if it’s an election regulation violation,” Mr. Toney stated in an interview. “Legislation enforcement takes it critically. I take it critically as a district legal professional.”

One of many voters charged, Jamie Wells, instructed investigators that the UPS Retailer was her “dwelling base.” She stated she lived in a cell dwelling and cut up time between a close-by campground and Louisiana. Ms. Wells didn’t reply to telephone or e mail messages. If convicted, she stands to serve as much as three and a half years in jail — although she would probably obtain a a lot shorter sentence.

In La Crosse County, Wis., District Lawyer Tim Gruenke, a Democrat, obtained the same referral: 23 individuals registered to vote with addresses from an area UPS Retailer, and 16 of them voted in 2020. However Mr. Gruenke stated he had concluded that there was no try at fraud. As a substitute of felony fees, the native clerk despatched the voters a letter giving them 30 days to vary their registrations to an deal with the place they lived.

“It didn’t appear to me there was any try to defraud,” Mr. Gruenke stated. “It could be a felony cost, and I believed that might be too heavy for what amounted to a typo or clerical error.”

Mr. Toney linked his choice to his views in regards to the 2020 election in Wisconsin, which the Democratic candidate, Joseph R. Biden Jr., gained by greater than 20,682 votes out of three.3 million solid.

Advertisement

Whereas he had by no means challenged Mr. Biden’s win, he stated he believed that “there isn’t any dispute that Wisconsin election legal guidelines weren’t adopted and fraud occurred.”

“I assist figuring out any fraud or election legal guidelines not adopted to make sure it by no means occurs once more, as a result of elections are the cornerstone of our democracy,” Mr. Toney stated.

(Ms. Wells, one of many voters Mr. Toney has charged, additionally stated she believed one thing was amiss within the 2020 election. “They took it away from Trump,” she instructed investigators.)

Mr. DeSantis in Florida is probably the best-known politician who’s selling efforts to bolster prison enforcement of voting-related legal guidelines. The governor, who’s up for re-election in November, made the brand new police company a prime legislative precedence. .

The unit, referred to as the Workplace of Election Crimes and Safety, takes on work already accomplished by the secretary of state’s workplace, however stories on to the governor.

Advertisement

“Florida goes to be on the reducing fringe of this,” stated Jessica Anderson, the chief director of Heritage Motion, a conservative advocacy group that helps the invoice.

Mr. DeSantis isn’t alone. In Arizona, State Senator Wendy Rodgers, a Republican who’s attempting to overturn the 2020 election, is sponsoring a invoice that might set up an “election bureau” to research fraud with sweeping authority, together with the power to impound election tools and information.

In Georgia, Republicans within the Home handed a voting invoice on Tuesday that might, amongst different modifications, develop the authority of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to establish and examine election violations, together with the power to conduct election audits of any subpoenaed paperwork.

Advertisement

Republican efforts additionally prolong to election directors. Republicans in Texas final 12 months elevated the penalties on election staff who’re accused of influencing a voter’s choice whereas providing help, similar to translations.

However Florida’s laws can be the primary within the nation limiting how election officers can defend themselves in court docket. The invoice bars them from accepting authorized protection offered or funded by a nongovernmental company.

That provision has drawn bipartisan criticism. “The precept {that a} state would deny authorized illustration of an election official’s alternative after they’re being pursued for prison fees is profoundly towards the rule of regulation,” stated Ben Ginsberg, a lawyer for Republican presidential campaigns and nationwide committees earlier than breaking with the celebration through the Trump period.

Mr. Ginsburg and Bob Bauer, a distinguished Democratic lawyer, have began the Election Official Authorized Protection Community, a corporation of attorneys that provides free authorized recommendation and illustration to election directors.

Sentences for these convicted of voter fraud differ broadly. A Minnesota man who was on probation for a felony was ordered to pay a $214 tremendous this week after pleading responsible to mendacity about his voting eligibility on an absentee poll software. He by no means returned the poll.

Advertisement

However in Memphis, Pamela Moses was sentenced to 6 years in jail in January after registering to vote when she had a felony conviction. The voter fraud conviction was thrown out final month and a brand new trial ordered when a choose dominated that the Tennessee Division of Corrections had improperly withheld proof that was later uncovered by The Guardian.

In a press release, the Shelby County district legal professional, Amy Weirich, a Republican who faces re-election this 12 months, blamed Ms. Moses for the lengthy sentence. “I gave her an opportunity to plead to a misdemeanor with no jail time,” Ms. Weirich stated. A spokesman stated Ms. Weirich hadn’t determined whether or not to pursue a brand new trial.

Ms. Moses, a musician and Black Lives Matter activist, stated she hadn’t identified she was ineligible to vote.

“They did make an instance out of me,” she stated in an interview. “They confirmed each Black particular person in Tennessee and whoever else noticed this case, you higher not vote, they’re going to place you in jail.”

Kitty Bennett contributed analysis.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Secret Service agent on VP Harris' detail removed from assignment after physical fight while on duty

Published

on

Secret Service agent on VP Harris' detail removed from assignment after physical fight while on duty

A U.S. Secret Service agent with Vice President Kamala Harris’ detail was removed from their assignment after engaging in a physical fight with other agents while on duty Monday, Fox News Digital has learned. 

The fight was first reported by The New York Post and confirmed to Fox News Digital by a source.

The incident happened at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland while Harris was at the Naval Observatory, but didn’t delay her departure from the base, the Secret Service told Fox News Digital.  

Anthony Guglielmi, chief of communications for the U.S. Secret Service, called the incident a “medical matter,” adding that the agency wouldn’t be commenting further. 

RECORDS SHOW BIDEN DOG, COMMANDER, ATTACKED SECRET SERVICE MEMBERS AT LEAST 24 TIMES 

Advertisement

A Secret Service agent with Vice President Kamala Harris’ detail was removed from their assignment after engaging in a physical fight, a source confirmed to Fox News Digital. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

“At approximately 9 a.m. April 22, a U.S. Secret Service special agent supporting the Vice President’s departure from Joint Base Andrews began displaying behavior their colleagues found distressing,” Guglielmi said in a statement shared with Fox News Digital.

TEEN CHARGED IN 2023 BREAK-IN OF SECRET SERVICE SUV PARKED OUTSIDE OF NAOMI BIDEN’S DC HOME

Secret Service members helping the president

FILE- The chief of communications for the U.S. Secret Service called the incident a “medical matter” after an agent was removed from their assignment following a fight. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

He added, “The agent was removed from their assignment while medical personnel were summoned. The Vice President was at the Naval Observatory when this incident occurred and there was no impact on her departure from Joint Base Andrews.

“The U.S. Secret Service takes the safety and health of our employees very seriously. As this was a medical matter, we will not disclose any further details.” 

Advertisement

The agent, who had been acting “erratically,” began punching the special agent in charge after getting on top of him, Real Clear Politics reported. 

Kamala Harris campaigns in South Carolina on the eve of the state's Democratic presidential primary

Harris wasn’t delayed by the incident, the Secret Service said.  (AP Photo/Meg Kinnard)

The agent, who was handcuffed after the incident and treated by medical staff, had previously been a subject of concern by staff, the outlet reported.

Continue Reading

Politics

Bill would allow Arizona abortion providers to practice in California temporarily

Published

on

Bill would allow Arizona abortion providers to practice in California temporarily

Arizona abortion providers could practice in California under a new law designed to provide care to women who cross the state line as they face newly restrictive prohibitions at home.

The bill introduced Wednesday aims to expedite temporary authorization for those Arizona doctors to practice in both states. It is the latest move by Gov. Gavin Newsom to make California a reproductive health “sanctuary” as abortion seekers in several Republican-led states have lost access to care after the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade in 2022. The bill would also protect the privacy of medical professionals who practice in California.

“We are putting the boxing gloves on to protect women’s rights,” said Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) at a morning news conference. “The state of California has the authority to stand strong for Arizona and their doctors.”

Newsom also attended the news conference alongside members of the women’s caucus and healthcare leaders. The legislation was introduced by Skinner and Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Winters), the chair and vice chair of the women’s caucus, respectively.

Advertisement

“Arizona law is the first border state law that will directly impact California,” Newsom said. He cited a report that said abortion access in states that border a state that has banned access increased 37% from 2020 to 2023. “This is not an academic exercise. This is real life. This is happening in real time.”

Newsom cited a recent report that found that 160,000 people across this country had to flee their states to access reproductive care last year. An additional 65,000 women who were raped became pregnant in 14 of the most restrictive states, he said.

“We are trying to get ahead of this law which goes into effect on June 8,” Newsom said of the Arizona ban.

The proposal would temporarily allow licensed Arizona doctors to perform abortions and provide related care to Arizona patients traveling to California until the end of November. The Arizona doctors would be under the oversight of California’s Medical Board and Osteopathic Medical Board.

The legislation, which if passed and signed by the governor would go into effect immediately, comes after the Arizona Supreme Court voted this month to impose a near total abortion ban, reinstating a law from 1864 that prohibits abortions except when the woman’s life is at risk.

Advertisement

“Arizona Republicans continue to put women in danger — embracing a draconian law passed when Arizona was a territory, not even a state,” Newsom said in a statement released Wednesday morning. “California will not sit idly by.”

The Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday approved a proposal to repeal the state’s near-total ban on abortions, though that was just the first step in the legislative process. The Arizona Senate is not expected to take a final vote on the proposal until May.

The governor is working with the state Legislature’s California Women’s Caucus to pass the bill.

California saw a surge in abortions after the Supreme Court reversed Roe, and now clinics are bracing for more after the latest Arizona ruling.

The bill is likely to pass with ease with Newsom’s support but is sure to reignite criticisms from Republican lawmakers who say the Democratic governor — widely viewed as a future presidential candidate — should focus more on California’s crises, including a budget deficit and surging homelessness, and less on out-of-state policies.

Advertisement

The bill joins a litany of abortion measures that Newsom and California’s Democratic supermajority have approved in recent years — not just to enhance care in the Golden State but to provide support to nonresidents facing limited care nationwide.

Last year, Newsom signed a bill into law to allow doctors living under “hostile” laws in states where abortion is banned to receive training in California.

Earlier this week, at a news conference in Modesto, Newsom said abortion access rollbacks have “placed a burden” on California’s healthcare system, especially in Imperial, Riverside and San Diego counties, where clinics have seen an increase in out-of-state patients, including those from Arizona and Texas.

On Sunday, Newsom launched another round of TV advertisements that call out red state antiabortion laws, this time to be aired in Alabama and focusing on proposals that aim to punish women for interstate travel to obtain services.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What to Make of the ‘Zombie Vote’ Against Donald Trump

Published

on

What to Make of the ‘Zombie Vote’ Against Donald Trump

Even after Nikki Haley dropped out of the Republican presidential primary, effectively handing the party’s nomination to former President Donald J. Trump, nearly 20 percent of G.O.P. primary voters have cast ballots for someone other than Mr. Trump. The Pennsylvania primary on Tuesday, where Ms. Haley won more than 16 percent, was just the latest example.

These anti-Trump votes have been closely watched, particularly in light of the unusually high number of votes for “uncommitted” and candidates other than President Biden in this year’s Democratic primary.

Ballots cast for candidates who have suspended their campaigns are sometimes called zombie votes. This phenomenon is hardly new.

In fact, a review of contested primaries since 2000 reveals that sizable shares of the electorate routinely chose someone other than the eventual nominee, even after all other serious contenders had dropped out.

The zombie vote in presidential primaries

Share of the vote against the nominee after all serious contenders have dropped out

Advertisement

Note: The zombie vote refers to the median vote share against a party’s eventual nominee in primary contests after their major opponents had all withdrawn.

By The New York Times

In 2020, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont withdrew from the Democratic primary on April 8, leaving Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the only serious candidate in the race. Still, in the weeks and months that followed, Mr. Sanders received votes. In the Pennsylvania Democratic primary on June 2, 2020, for example, more than 20 percent of voters chose someone other than Mr. Biden, including 18 percent who selected Mr. Sanders.

Advertisement

The zombie vote in this year’s Republican primary has actually been low by historical standards. In Democratic and Republican primaries going back to 2000, roughly a quarter of voters picked a candidate other than the eventual nominee even after all the other serious contenders had exited the race.

How this year’s zombie vote compares to previous years

Each rectangle represents the vote share in a state’s presidential primary contest.

There are many factors that lead to zombie votes. Not all of them indicate a true protest vote from party loyalists against the eventual nominee.

One factor is the rise of early voting and mail ballots. In Florida, for example, around one in three Republican voters had mailed their ballots before Ms. Haley dropped out on March 6.

Advertisement

However, she has continued winning a decent chunk of votes in states where nearly all voting has occurred after her departure. In the Wisconsin election on April 2, Ms. Haley won 13 percent of the vote.

The Trump campaign has argued that some of Ms. Haley’s support has come from Democrats voting in Republican contests. This may explain the zombie vote in, for example, Georgia, where any voter can vote in either presidential primary.

But the pattern has persisted even in states like Pennsylvania, Connecticut and New York where the primaries were open only to registered Republicans.

Unlike protest votes against incumbent presidents in the form of minor candidates and ballots cast for “uncommitted,” contested primaries feature big-name candidates who get wide media exposure, have clear policy differences and forge emotional connections with many voters. Perhaps the affinity some voters develop is the easiest explanation of the persistent zombie vote across so many election cycles.

We shouldn’t expect the zombie vote to go away any time soon. In the past, the share of voters still supporting candidates who had already withdrawn remained relatively consistent, even on the last day of primaries held before the party conventions. And there is no pattern linking the size of the zombie vote to the eventual nominee’s chances of winning or losing in the general election.

Advertisement

For Mr. Trump, what matters is how many of Ms. Haley’s primary voters will rally behind him come November. Polls have shown that her supporters are likely to say they will vote for Mr. Biden. Even so, those same polls often find that many of those voters already supported Mr. Biden in 2020.

Sources

Primary election results for 2024 are from The Associated Press. Results for previous years are from the Federal Election Commission. The Democratic primaries in 2008 and 2016 were not included in the analysis because they were contested through the final primaries. Caucus results were also not included.

Continue Reading

Trending