Connect with us

Politics

On the Orange County coast, voters fume about gas prices but fear for climate’s future

Published

on

On the Orange County coast, voters fume about gas prices but fear for climate’s future

When Amy Sibley heads to the Costco right here from her dwelling in close by San Clemente, her finest buddy, Lisa Miller, tags alongside — to save lots of gasoline cash.

“I hitch a experience along with her,” mentioned Miller, 58, an unemployed enterprise advisor, because the temperature within the black-tar parking zone topped 100 levels. “If I put gasoline in my automobile, I can solely put in 5 – 6 gallons at a time. It hurts when you’ve gotten the minimal coming in and a variety of obligations. There’s solely a lot you are able to do — pay the payments or get within the automobile and drive round.”

Miller is a Republican who voted for Donald Trump within the final presidential election; Sibley is a Democrat who voted for Joe Biden. Each say the price of gasoline — and groceries and different items — is prime of thoughts as they resolve the way to vote within the November midterm election that may decide management of Congress.

“It’s not about one aspect or the opposite,” mentioned Sibley, 54. “It’s about what’s finest for the folks right here. Folks have to survive. Lots of people are barely making it.”

Advertisement

Amy Sibley, left, and Lisa Miller drive collectively to the Costco in San Juan Capistrano to economize on gasoline. “Lots of people are barely making it,” Sibley mentioned.

(Seema Mehta / Los Angeles Instances)

On this coastal congressional district — which might assist decide which occasion controls the Home — gasoline costs are a key consideration within the run-up to the election, in response to interviews with voters and candidates.

The forty ninth Congressional District straddles Orange and San Diego counties, stretching from Laguna Seashore to Del Mar and is dwelling to Camp Pendleton, which has skilled generations of Marines who’ve battled within the oil-rich Center East. Right here, filling up a tank on the best way to work is a part of the day by day routine.

Advertisement

“Clearly gasoline costs have been essentially the most seen signal of inflation, and that’s notably true on this district, the place folks commute as much as Orange County or right down to San Diego,” mentioned Thad Kousser, a political science professor at UC San Diego who lives in Solana Seashore and surfs in Del Mar on his means into the workplace. “We’re basically a Marine base and a set of bed room communities with lots of people driving SUVs.”

America Unsettled

In a deeply divided nation, the one factor unifying Individuals is a shared sense of unease. A overwhelming majority consider the nation is heading within the incorrect route, however fewer agree on why that’s — and which political occasion is guilty.

This occasional sequence, America Unsettled, examines the difficult causes behind voters’ selections on this momentous and unpredictable midterm election.

Although the district’s affluence cushioned some residents from excessive costs, the difficulty is a part of a broader debate concerning the nation’s vitality coverage — the response to local weather change, the soundness of the facility grid, imported vitality, the function of renewables, nuclear, fracking and drilling.

Advertisement

Such points have dominated current headlines — fears of blackouts throughout blistering warmth waves, California’s ban on gross sales of latest gas-powered automobiles beginning in 2035, and fines over a 2021 oil spill that closed seashores on the northern tip of the district. The coastal midpoint of the district is studded by the decommissioned domes of the San Onofre nuclear energy plant, the place radioactive spent gasoline rods are buried indefinitely as a result of there is no such thing as a federal repository for such waste.

People pump gas.

In a Gallup ballot, greater than half of the respondents mentioned gasoline costs had prompted them to upend summer season trip plans.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Instances)

Fuel costs have shaken Individuals this yr; 55% mentioned the spike prompted them to upend summer season trip plans, in response to a Gallup ballot.

Nationally, costs have declined since. However not in California. After dipping for a number of weeks, the common price of a gallon of standard gasoline in California was as much as $6.38 on Monday, in response to the American Vehicle Assn. The nationwide common was $3.80.

Advertisement

California’s gasoline costs have lengthy been larger than the remainder of the nation due to state taxes and costs. UC Berkeley economist Severin Borenstein partially attributes the current value will increase to some refineries that make the particular mix of gasoline that meets the state’s environmental requirements being taken offline for upkeep, in addition to one having an unplanned outage.

“California makes use of about 40 million gallons of gasoline a day — a couple of gallon per particular person per day,” Borenstein mentioned. “So including an additional $2 per gallon signifies that’s an additional $2 per particular person per day for price of dwelling. For comparatively prosperous folks, that’s half a visit to Starbucks. For much less prosperous folks, and individuals who need to drive lots, which are typically extra working-class folks, that may be a major burden.”

Borenstein famous that voters are inclined to blame these in energy for such pocketbook points, which have the potential to tilt congressional races.

“Clearly, every time the value of gasoline goes up, any politician in energy takes some blame for it, regardless of how little energy they’ve over it,” he mentioned.

A man holds a microphone and talks to people.

“We’re all feeling the ache of inflation. The distinction is the opposite aspect doesn’t have any concrete options,” mentioned incumbent Democratic Rep. Mike Levin.

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Instances)

Advertisement

Within the forty ninth District, the place Democrats have a scant 2.9% voter registration edge and greater than $6.5 million in tv promoting has been reserved between now and election day, incumbent Democratic Rep. Mike Levin acknowledges this dynamic.

“We’re all feeling the ache of inflation. The distinction is the opposite aspect doesn’t have any concrete options,” the environmental legal professional advised greater than 60 seniors at a current meet-and-greet in a gated Oceanside group.

“I encourage any of you to essentially attempt to discuss to your Republican buddies and neighbors about this subject right here at Ocean Hills and say, ‘Effectively, OK, we are able to agree that this can be a actual drawback,’” mentioned Levin, who was first elected in 2018. “‘The price of gasoline … the price of groceries: too costly. The price of housing continues to be too excessive. However what are your concrete options?’”

Levin blamed excessive gasoline costs on “the three P’s”: the pandemic, Putin and value gouging. COVID-19 has precipitated provide chain issues, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine disrupted the worldwide gasoline market, and opportunistic oil firms inflated charges, he mentioned in an interview after the reception.

Advertisement

“How we wean ourselves off of that’s not to double down on the dirty-energy insurance policies of the previous. It’s to not unfold misinformation or disinformation concerning the transition to cleaner vitality, but it surely’s to truly embrace a extra sustainable future,” mentioned Levin, who voted for the Client Gasoline Value Gouging Prevention Act and efficiently fought for the inclusion of local weather change investments within the infrastructure invoice.

The primary general-election advert aired by Levin highlighted his work to wash up radioactive waste at San Onofre. Levin, who began the bipartisan Spent Nuclear Gasoline Options Caucus, launched laws to prioritize the removing of such waste in areas with massive populations and seismic dangers; it was co-sponsored by quite a few GOP members of Congress.

A man and woman stand side by side.

Christopher and Betsy Quinn, who help incumbent Rep. Mike Levin, say they understand that vitality coverage is advanced and affected by world affairs.

(Seema Mehta / Los Angeles Instances)

Levin supporters agree that vitality coverage is “a really advanced world state of affairs.”

Advertisement

“It’s not simply an American drawback. We’re responding to what’s occurring on the planet, with vitality and with Russia specifically,” mentioned Betsy Quinn, 71, a retired college principal who lately moved to the Oceanside senior group.

Her husband, Christopher Quinn, 70, a fellow former principal who now works as a minister, lately modified his registration to no occasion choice after a lifetime within the Republican Get together due to his frustration with what he describes as its leaders’ intransigence. And he simply changed his automobile with a hybrid. “I’m stepping one small, costly step to make it slightly bit extra accountable,” he mentioned.

Hours earlier, Republican candidate Brian Maryott and a couple of dozen supporters gathered at an intersection in Oceanside, holding indicators that learn “Honk for decrease gasoline costs” and “Folks earlier than politics.”

A woman holds a sign and waves.

Teri Elmore of Oceanside campaigns for Republican congressional candidate Brian Maryott.

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Instances)

Advertisement

Teri Elmore, 63, was amongst these waving at passing commuters. The lately retired occasion planner mentioned the nation’s financial woes had upended her post-work plans along with her husband.

“We saved our cash our entire working lives, dwelling beneath our means, to retire and journey,” mentioned Elmore, a former Democrat who switched to the GOP within the Nineteen Nineties. “And now every part is so costly, proper? Our investments have tanked and gasoline costs simply make it more durable to go see folks. You actually suppose two or thrice earlier than you make any type of journey.”

Elmore mentioned she hoped Maryott, a former Wells Fargo govt, would assist Congress scale back spending. And he or she was assured the nation’s environmental requirements would hold the coast secure. “We’re america. We work cleaner than most nations the world over,” Elmore mentioned.

Traditionally, Republicans within the space are inclined to take extra average positions on environmental coverage than in different components of the nation — this isn’t the “Drill, child, drill” crowd.

A man waves.

Republican congressional candidate Brian Maryott acknowledges local weather change however says the federal government is transferring too rapidly to scale back the nation’s reliance on fossil fuels.

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Instances)

Advertisement

Scientists warn that if the emissions created by these fuels aren’t rapidly and drastically decreased, the Earth will see catastrophic temperature fluctuations, with way more devastating storms, fires and droughts.

Maryott — a former councilman and mayor of San Juan Capistrano, the place Levin additionally lives — opposes new drilling off the California coast and acknowledges local weather change. (In his marketing campaign emblem, the “O” contains the define of a whale’s tail.) However he’s in opposition to punitive rules on companies. His web site locations in daring the phrases “No penalties! No impractical deadlines! No monetary punishment!”

In an interview in an Oceanside park, Maryott mentioned he believes the nation wants to extend its home vitality productions via the fracking of shale oil and the creation of liquified pure gasoline, whereas additionally supporting renewables and subsidizing electrical car purchases.

“All of us care concerning the generations to come back forward of us, and we all know that we’re simply passing via. So we’re all very aware of our accountability to that,” he mentioned. “However we’ve got to be keen to have a dialogue about local weather economics alongside of it. We’ve got to be pragmatic.”

Advertisement

Maryott, who unsuccessfully ran within the 2018 district major and challenged Levin in 2020, mentioned liberal politicians are transferring too quick in making an attempt to scale back the nation’s dependence on fossil fuels. He pointed to the state urging electrical automobile homeowners to not cost automobiles in peak utilization hours throughout the current warmth wave, per week after asserting the 2035 ban on new gasoline-powered automobiles.

“They will’t shove these items down the nation’s throat with out ramification, and people ramifications are coming in November when a great variety of them are going to be voted out.”

A man poses with his dog.

Dana Level resident Fahim Fazli, together with his canine Baba, says he’s undecided about how he’ll vote in November.

(Seema Mehta / Los Angeles Instances)

Some undecided voters, like actor Fahim Fazli, say they need coverage proposals, not political broadsides. And the unbiased voter from Dana Level is in search of some aid from gasoline costs.

Advertisement

The retired Marine — who served as an interpreter in Afghanistan greater than twenty years after he fled the nation and has appeared in movies equivalent to “Iron Man” and “American Sniper” — mentioned the one purpose gasoline costs haven’t gutted him is as a result of a lot of his work, notably auditions, is now carried out just about.

As an actor, I used to drive to Los Angeles, drive two hours, come again with site visitors, 4 hours. And I wasn’t frightened concerning the gasoline. Now, thank God, every part is on-line. Every little thing is on FaceTime. Every little thing is on Zoom,” mentioned the 56-year-old. “I used to refill my automobile for $50 bucks; now I refill for $120.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Judge rules illegal immigrants have gun rights protected by 2nd Amendment

Published

on

Judge rules illegal immigrants have gun rights protected by 2nd Amendment

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Having trouble? Click here.

A federal judge in Illinois has found that the Constitution protects the gun rights of noncitizens who enter the United States illegally.

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman on Friday ruled that a federal prohibition on illegal immigrants owning firearms is unconstitutional as applied to defendant Heriberto Carbajal-Flores. The court found that while the federal ban is “facially constitutional,” there is no historical tradition of firearm regulation that permits the government to deprive a noncitizen who has never been convicted of a violent crime from exercising his Second Amendment rights.

Advertisement

“The noncitizen possession statute … violates the Second Amendment as applied to Carbajal-Flores,” the judge wrote. “Thus, the Court grants Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss.”

Coleman, a President Obama appointee, cited the landmark Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which established a new standard to determine whether a law violates the Second Amendment. Since Bruen, a multitude of federal and state gun control measures have been challenged in courts with mixed results. 

DELAWARE BILL REQUIRING GUN BUYERS TO BE FINGERPRINTED, TRAINED, SET TO BECOME LAW

The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (iStock)

In this case, U.S. v. Carbajal-Flores, the court considered whether people who enter the country illegally can be banned from owning firearms.

Advertisement

Carbajal-Flores is an illegal immigrant who, on June 1, 2020, was found to be in possession of a handgun in the Little Village neighborhood of Chicago. He was subsequently charged with violating a federal law that prohibits any noncitizen who is not legally authorized to be in the U.S. from “possess[ing] in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.” 

In an April 2022 decision, Coleman denied Carbajal-Flores’ first motion to dismiss his indictment, finding that the ban was constitutional. However, Carbajal-Flores asked the court to reconsider that ruling following the Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen and appellate decisions in the Third and Seventh Circuit that considered whether people convicted of non-violent crimes can be prohibited from possessing firearms. 

CONGRESS POISED TO ROLL BACK ‘VETERAN GUN BAN,’ WITH RELUCTANT BIDEN BACKING

U.S. District Judge Sharon J. Coleman presents award to attorney Paula E. Litt

U.S. District Judge Sharon J. Coleman, left, presents an award for Excellence in Pro Bono and Public Interest Service to attorney Paula E. Litt, on May 1, 2019. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division)

Upon review, Coleman concluded that Carbajal-Flores’ illegally present status was not sufficient to deny him Second Amendment rights. The judge said the “plain text” of the Constitution “presumptively protects firearms possession by undocumented persons.” 

“Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” the judge wrote. “Additionally, Pretrial Service has confirmed that Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants.”

Advertisement

The court determined that because there is insufficient evidence to suggest Carbajal-Flores is a danger to society, there is no historical analogue that would permit the federal government to deny him his gun rights. 

NRA SLAMS BIDEN’S SOTU SPEECH AS ATTACK ON ‘THE VERY FABRIC OF AMERICAN FREEDOM’

Gun store customer

A federal judge in Illinois has ruled that the Second Amendment protects the gun rights of illegal immigrants. (Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores’ criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense,” Judge Coleman wrote. “Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.”

The ruling has divided gun rights activists, with some arguing that noncitizens should not have rights protected by the Constitution.

Erich Pratt, senior vice president of Gun Owners of America (GOA), told Fox News Digital his group “has historically recognized the dangers unchecked illegal immigration presents, chiefly of which is a serious potential to swing the balance of power into the hands of anti-gun politicians.” 

Advertisement

Pratt reiterated GOA does not support amnesty for illegal immigrants. 

“In this underlying ruling, the Second Amendment community undoubtedly has mixed feelings, because while illegal aliens are most certainly not part of ‘the People,’ everyone has a God-given right to defend themselves against violent acts like rape and murder,” he said. 

“Of course, the courts wouldn’t have to decide this question if Joe Biden and the Democratic Party would simply secure our borders.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump sues ABC News and George Stephanopoulos for defamation

Published

on

Trump sues ABC News and George Stephanopoulos for defamation

Former President Trump is suing TV journalist George Stephanopoulos and ABC News for defamation for saying he raped advice columnist E. Jean Carroll.

On a March 10 edition of “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” the anchor said Trump was “liable for rape” during his interview with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.). Stephanopoulos was pressing Mace, a rape victim herself, on how she could rationalize supporting Trump’s 2024 presidential candidacy.

Trump’s lawsuit, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Miami, said the jury in the Carroll case found him liable for sexual abuse — not rape — and that Stephanopoulos defamed the presumptive Republican presidential nominee by using the term.

A jury ruled in January that Trump must pay Carroll $83.3 million in damages after finding Trump liable for defamation, the second case related to a 1996 incident that occurred when the two met in a New York department store.

In May, jurors rejected Carroll’s allegation that she was raped but found Trump responsible for the lesser charge of sexual abuse, along with defamation, and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. Trump, who denied that the incident occurred, repeatedly mocked Carroll over her claims.

Advertisement

Trump’s suit cites how Stephanopoulos himself reported that Trump was not liable for rape when he reported on the verdict of the previous Carroll case on May 10.

The suit also noted that the headline on an ABC News online story on the Mace interview first used the word “rape” and was later changed to “sexual abuse.”

Trump’s suit is asking for unspecified damages.

ABC News has not issued a comment on the matter.

The tense “This Week” interview was widely shared on social media. Mace took umbrage at Stephanopoulos’ question, claiming he was “rape-shaming” her by bringing up her own experience as a victim, which she has publicly discussed.

Advertisement

Trump has previously sued media outlets, including the New York Times and CNN, with no success.

Trump sued the Times over its investigation of his finances, which led to the recent New York civil court ruling that has him on the hook for $454 million. The suit was dismissed in March and Trump had to reimburse the Times legal cost.

In 2022, Trump sued CNN for $475 million claiming the news network was waging a campaign against him by booking guests critical of his policies and speeches. The case was dismissed in 2023.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Mark Milley and former CENTCOM commander to face grilling in Congress over Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal

Published

on

Mark Milley and former CENTCOM commander to face grilling in Congress over Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Having trouble? Click here.

Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, will testify before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday for the first time since retiring, potentially freeing him to offer new details about the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Joining Milley will be retired Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, who served as United States Central Command (CENTCOM) commander during the 2021 withdrawal. The pair have appeared before Congress to discuss failings in the operation before, but Republicans say they may have been more tight-lipped then because they were still serving under President Biden.

Advertisement

Both Milley and McKenzie testified in 2021 that they had advised Biden to maintain a small U.S. force in Afghanistan, rather than committing to a full U.S. withdrawal. Milley himself has described the operation as a “strategic failure,” saying he has “lots of regrets.”

“It didn’t end the way I wanted it. That didn’t end the way any of us wanted it,” he told ABC News in September. “In the broader sense, the war was lost.”

OBAMA LIED TO AMERICANS ABOUT WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN: BOOK

Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, left, will testify before the House Foreign Affairs Committee for the first time since retiring on Tuesday, potentially freeing him to offer new details about the botched U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

The Tuesday afternoon hearing comes after months of Republican investigations into Biden’s handling of the withdrawal. Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas., has repeatedly demanded the State Department turn over documents relating to the operation.

Advertisement

BIDEN’S BOTCHED AFGHANISTAN WITHDRAWAL HAUNTS 2024 ELECTION AS BOOK CLAIMS ‘13 AMERICANS NEVER HAD TO DIE’

Secretary of State Antony Blinken has so far refused to offer interview notes relating to the Afghanistan after action report, which blamed senior officials for failing to prepare for all outcomes in the operation.

General McKenzie Afghanistan Pentagon

Retired Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, former commander of the United States Central Command, listens during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the conclusion of military operations in Afghanistan. (Sarahbeth Maney/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

Despite the deaths of 13 U.S. servicemembers and the abandoning of tens of thousands of Afghan allies to Taliban rule, Biden strongly believes behind closed doors that he made the right decisions during the operation, according to an upcoming book.

THINK THE US EXIT FROM AFGHANISTAN WAS BAD? LOOK WHAT’S BREWING IN THE PACIFIC

Following the withdrawal, “no one offered to resign, in large part because the president didn’t believe anyone had made a mistake. Ending the war was always going to be messy,” author Alexander Ward writes in the book, “The Internationalists: The Fight to Restore Foreign Policy After Trump.”

Advertisement
President Joe Biden

Despite the deaths of 13 U.S. servicemembers and the abandoning of tens of thousands of Afghan allies to Taliban rule, President Biden strongly believes behind closed doors that he made the right decisions during the operation, according to an upcoming book. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Biden allegedly told his top aides, including White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan, that they had done their best given the situation and vowed to stand by them.

Fox News’ Nikolas Lanum contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending