Connect with us

Politics

Inside the small liberal arts college that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wants to take over

Published

on

Inside the small liberal arts college that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wants to take over

The campus was on edge, with greater than a dozen police and a bomb-sniffing canine on patrol and rumors spreading that far-right militias had been on their method.

Outdoors an auditorium, a couple of protesters held up indicators declaring: “NO HOSTILE TAKEOVER!”

The main target of the controversy was Christopher Rufo, essentially the most outstanding of six conservatives lately named trustees at New School of Florida by the state’s governor, Ron DeSantis, as a part of his battle on “woke.”

In a hyper-politicized age wherein liberals dominate increased training and conservatives push for extra management over what college students are taught, this small faculty overlooking Sarasota Bay seems set to change into a pivotal battleground within the battle over the mission of public universities.

Advertisement

Rufo, finest identified for his activism towards crucial race principle in American training, had come to the left-leaning liberal arts college to carry a pair of city halls, one for school and the opposite for college kids.

Minutes earlier than the primary assembly was to begin, the provost introduced that she had determined to cancel it due to a threatening email the college had obtained a day earlier. It was directed at one other new trustee who was additionally scheduled to talk, Jason “Eddie” Speir, the founding father of a close-by Christian college: “MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE A FLAK JACKET ON.”

Rufo and Speir refused to depart.

“That is the issue at your college, you recognize that, proper?” Rufo said, pointing on the provost, Suzanne Sherman. “You’ve created an setting wherein essentially the most illiberal and essentially the most aggressive individuals who threaten violence can veto you, can veto the president, can veto any modifications.”

“We’re closing this constructing, sir,” Sherman stated.

Advertisement

“No, we’re not,” Rufo stated.

Rufo has vowed to scrap “range, fairness and inclusion” packages and rent new school with experience in constitutional regulation, “American rules” and what he calls household values. Speir lately floated the concept of terminating all contracts with school, employees and administration after which instantly rehiring those that “match within the new monetary and enterprise mannequin.”

Training consultants fear that the true goal of the brand new board just isn’t tutorial freedom or range of thought however turning New School right into a mannequin for conservative training.

Lots of the college’s 698 college students concern that their professors shall be banned from discussing matters resembling race and gender.

“Proper now, everyone seems to be tremendous scared,” stated Ellen Benedict, 18, a marine biology pupil who identifies as nonbinary and is contemplating a switch to a different college, most likely to someplace in New York, in case DeSantis goes after different faculties in Florida.

Advertisement

“That is larger than right here,” Benedict stated.

Conservative activist Christopher Rufo speaks to college on the New School of Florida in Sarasota on Jan. 25.

(Washington Publish)

Keith Whittington, a political scientist at Princeton College and creator of “Communicate Freely: Why Universities Should Defend Free Speech,” stated New School may change into “an actual laboratory for a way a lot, and in what method, state governors may intervene in how universities function.”

Advertisement

A majority of U.S. professors determine as far left or liberal — 60% in 2017, up from 41% in 1990, in accordance with surveys by the Increased Training Analysis Institute at UCLA. And there was no scarcity of circumstances of universities disinviting conservative audio system, disciplining professors who stray from liberal orthodoxy and policing language.

Whittington has lengthy been involved concerning the homogeneity of concepts on faculty campuses and the mounting conservative backlash. However he stated that meddling with the hiring of school or the curriculum or ruling sure topics out of bounds — as a few of the new trustees at New School of Florida have vowed to do — “crosses a crimson line.”

“It’s applicable for politicians in a few of these states to be apprehensive concerning the route their public universities are taking,” he stated. “The query is: How do you try to reform them with out critically damaging them within the course of?”

: :

New School started as a non-public establishment in 1960, an period when legislators in Florida had been purging allegedly subversive civil rights activists, communists and homosexual folks from state establishments. Its founders envisaged it as a bastion of free thought.

Advertisement

The faculty turned public the following decade due to monetary troubles, nevertheless it maintained a unusual, anything-goes vibe. In 1992, the Solar Sentinel newspaper described the campus like this: “Footwear are elective. Grades are out of date. Attitudes are open.”

However not completely. 4 years in the past, the faculty’s then-president advised the Sarasota Herald-Tribune {that a} examine commissioned by directors discovered that some college students had been leaving as a result of the political environment had change into “too hostile.”

Rufo, 38, says he needs to alter that. On the day he was named a trustee, he shared his agenda on Twitter.

“We at the moment are over the partitions and able to rework increased training from inside,” he wrote. “Our all-star board will exhibit that the general public universities, which have been corrupted by woke nihilism, will be recaptured, restructured, and reformed.”

A view of the New College of Florida campus in Sarasota.

A view of the New School of Florida campus in Sarasota.

(Jenny Jarvie / Los Angeles Occasions)

Advertisement

By the point Rufo set foot on campus late final month, many school and college students had been vowing to boycott the city halls. Some had been cautious of giving Rufo publicity. Others stated they felt unsafe.

Rufo and Speir prevailed of their standoff with directors, and about 200 professors, faculty employees and neighborhood members poured into the auditorium.

“We’re going to liberate the campus,” Rufo advised reporters. “We’re going to liberate directors. We’re going to liberate school from the cultural hostage takers!”

Groans stuffed the room as Rufo stated enrollment was down and the faculty’s funds had been so strained that some lawmakers wished to close it down.

Advertisement

New School, he stated, had a “tradition downside.”

“We’ve an echo chamber right here, the place just one orthodoxy is allowed,” Rufo stated. ”It doesn’t mirror the breadth of opinions within the state of Florida, it doesn’t mirror the breadth of opinion at liberal arts faculty.”

His proof: Non-public conversations with unnamed school and employees and a 2019 report commissioned by directors to check low enrollment that discovered the faculty had an “extraordinary concentrate on social justice” and that — based mostly on a survey of candidates who had been admitted — the phrases most strongly related to the faculty had been “politically right,” “druggies” and “weirdos.”

Many within the viewers dismissed his take, sighing, booing and heckling.

“You’re the downside!”

Advertisement

“Please cease!”

“Liar!”

When it got here time to move a mic across the viewers, a psychology technician grilled Rufo about statements he had made that appeared to hyperlink LGBTQ people with pedophilia — a query that Rufo stated misrepresented his beliefs.

The college’s chief range officer, Yoleidy Rosario-Hernandez, requested how the brand new trustees would be certain that liberals had been additionally welcome and “folks like myself will possibly not be fired subsequent week?”

Rufo agreed that no one ought to be intimidated, however he supplied Rosario-Hernandez no assurance that her job was protected.

Advertisement

Diego Villada, a theater professor who wore a rainbow-colored flag over his shoulder, advised Rufo and Speir that they sounded loopy in media accounts, however that he discovered them extra affordable in particular person.

“At this time I really feel like I perceive the phrases which are popping out of your mouth,” he stated. “I really feel like they’re earnest.”

Nonetheless, Villada stated he didn’t see proof of a restrictive left-wing tutorial tradition.

“How does one gauge a stifling orthodoxy via the anecdotal proof that you simply all are gathering?” he requested.

: :

Advertisement

College students at New School freely acknowledge that they and their professors are inclined to lean left. However a number of stated in interviews that they had been uncovered to a variety of concepts.

And although the college’s conservative critics have been fast to single out lessons resembling “Queer Research” and “Feminist, Queer and Trans Idea,” the faculty additionally affords a broad spectrum of programs within the sciences and humanities.

A young person with curly pink hair, wears a white dress and a black cardigan, smiles while posing in front of a large tree.

“Doing a full 180 and making it conservative or conventional or classical just isn’t going to assist anyone,” stated Rocío Ramírez Castro, who research anthropology and Spanish on the New School of Florida.

(Jenny Jarvie / Los Angeles Occasions)

Rocío Ramírez Castro, a 21-year-old finding out anthropology and Spanish, stated she feared that conservatives may block future college students from pursuing the sorts of coursework that she did: East African anthropology, Afro-Caribbean drumming and a senior thesis exploring the cultural and folkloric significance of cockfighting in her native Puerto Rico.

Advertisement

“Doing a full 180 and making it conservative or conventional or classical just isn’t going to assist anyone,” she stated.

On the city corridor with college students, Rufo insisted he was merely upholding the faculty’s founding precept of free inquiry.

“My objective is to not say, ‘Let’s substitute the left-wing orthodoxy with the right-wing orthodoxy,’” he stated. “My objective is to say, ‘Let’s develop the bounds of public debate.’”

The scholars had been skeptical. Throughout questions, one stated Rufo’s appointment to the board was already damaging the college.

“Are you conscious that the faculty’s admissions workplace has already reported college students calling to un-enroll and request deposit refunds?” the coed requested.

Advertisement

When the assembly ended, Sam Sharf, a 22-year-old worldwide politics pupil who’s transgender, walked as much as Rufo and accused him of attempting to “instill some type of dogmatic conservative ideology.”

“Do you help the banning of lessons that train a critical historical past of racism and misogyny?” she stated. “As a result of that doesn’t sound like freedom.”

Rufo was not rattled.

“I don’t suppose you’ll be able to have a classical liberal training, for instance, with out grappling with Marx,” he stated. “However I feel we get into an issue when it’s left-wing liberal activism masquerading as impartial scholarship.”

At left man in a suit talks with a young person on the right, while other people, including a police officer, stand around.

Christopher Rufo speaks with Sam Sharf, a 22-year-old worldwide politics pupil, after a city corridor assembly at New School of Florida on Jan. 25 on the faculty campus in Sarasota.

(Jenny Jarvie / Los Angeles Occasions)

Advertisement

A couple of college students stated in interviews that they felt the faculty had change into an echo chamber for liberals.

Jesse Hudson, 33, entered faculty wanting to check philosophy however stated he was disillusioned that even lessons on long-dead German philosophers had a “political bent” as they veered into modern-day points resembling incapacity and being pregnant.

“Edmund Husserl mentions nothing about any of that!” Hudson stated. “I wished to check Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, Husserl with out attempting to tie it into what I view to be a type of tutorial activism — speaking concerning the phenomenology of race, the phenomenology of gender, the phenomenology and politics and philosophy of trans research.”

He wound up specializing in math, as a result of it felt much less political.

Advertisement

: :

Extensively seen as a contender for the Republican presidential nomination, DeSantis has elevated his nationwide profile by branding his state a spot “the place woke goes to die.”

In spring, he signed laws to restrict dialogue of race, gender and sexuality in universities — restrictions that had been struck down in November by a federal decide who referred to as them “positively dystopian.”

Undeterred, the governor introduced a sweeping plan final week to get rid of “ideological conformity” in public increased training by eliminating range packages, weakening tenure protections for professors and focusing the curriculum on the historical past and philosophy that has formed Western civilization.

He additionally promised to work with legislators to right away spend $15 million to overtake New School, together with recruiting new school.

Advertisement

Hours later, the brand new board of trustees met for the primary time, providing clues of what that overhaul may entail.

Greater than 100 protesters held indicators that stated “NO BIGOTS ON THE BOARD” and chanted: “Racist, sexist, antigay. Ron DeSantis, go away!”

However his six new trustees — together with right-wing scholar Ryan T. Anderson, who was appointed final month by Florida’s Board of Governors — give conservatives a controlling majority on the 13-member panel.

Young people sit on stairs of a building holding handmade signs. One reads "Black history is American History."

College students attend a “Defend New School” protest in Sarasota, Fla. on Tuesday.

(Octavio Jones / Bloomberg)

Advertisement

Over the objection of protesters, Rufo moved swiftly to advance a movement abolishing the workplace that oversees range initiatives and undertake a coverage drawn up by the Manhattan Institute — the conservative suppose tank the place he’s a senior fellow — to “restore colorblind equality.”

“Range, fairness and inclusion sounds nice,” Rufo stated, “however in follow divides folks and affords separate judgments on the idea of race and id.”

“Your opinion doesn’t matter,” somebody within the viewers hollered.

“My opinion does matter, truly,” Rufo stated.

The group booed, however the board voted to check the problem and draft a coverage based mostly on Rufo’s suggestion.

Advertisement

Then the board moved on to its subsequent agenda merchandise. Protesters pleaded with the faculty’s president, Patricia Okker, to battle to maintain her job. However she knew that might be futile.

“My deepest apologies, however I’m going to say publicly: I don’t imagine that college students are being indoctrinated at New School,” Okker advised the board because the viewers whooped and cheered.

After ousting Okker, the board put in an interim president: Richard Corcoran, a former Republican state Home speaker and staunch DeSantis ally.

As for what is going to occur subsequent, the brand new trustees have despatched conflicting indicators.

Mark Bauerlein, a professor emeritus at Emory College and an editor on the Catholic journal First Issues, stated banning topics out of hand can be “anti-academic and opposite to free and open inquiry.”

Advertisement

He proposed taking a look at how senior thesis initiatives have modified during the last 30 years to verify there was no “mental deterioration.”

Speir stated he would “completely” contemplate eradicating topics resembling gender research from the curriculum.

“Every little thing’s on the desk,” he stated. “There aren’t any sacred cows.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

NY AG Letitia James asks judge to void Trump's $175M bond in civil fraud case

Published

on

NY AG Letitia James asks judge to void Trump's $175M bond in civil fraud case

New York Attorney General Letitia James is pushing the judge in former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud case to void the $175 million bond that Trump previously posted to appeal his New York civil lawsuit.

In her 26-page filing obtained by Fox News Digital, James questions whether the insurance company has sufficient funds to back it up.

Trump’s bond was posted by California-based Knight Specialty Insurance Company (KSIC), but James argued that the insurer was “not authorized” to write business in New York, stating it is a small insurer that is not authorized to write business in New York and is not regulated by the state’s insurance department, had never before written a surety bond in New York or in the prior two years in any other jurisdiction, and has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million.

The company has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million, the filing states. According to New York state law, smaller businesses like KSIC are not permitted to expose themselves to liabilities, like a bond, or any potential loss greater than 10 percent of their surplus.

NEW YORK AG TAKES VICTORY LAP AFTER TRUMP FRAUD RULING: ‘JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED’

Advertisement

New York Attorney General said she is “prepared” to ask the judge to seize former President Donald Trump’s assets if he cannot pay the $354 million judgement handed down in his civil fraud case.  (ABC News/Screenshot/Brendan McDermid-Pool/Getty Images)

“Based on KSIC’s policyholder surplus in its most recent annual financial statement of $138,441,671, the limitation of loss on any one risk that KSIC is permitted to write is $13.8 million,” the lawyers wrote. “The face amount of the bond exceeds this limitation by $161.2 million.”

James also wrote in the filing that “KSIC is not qualified to act as the surety under this standard because its management has been found by federal authorities to have operated affiliated companies within KSIC’s holding company structure in violation of federal law on multiple occasions within the past several years.”

“KSIC does not now have an exclusive right to control the account and will not obtain such control unless and until it exercises a right to do so on two days’ notice,” the filing read.

James also wrote that the Court should not rely on KSIC’s financial summary attached to the bond as evidence that KSIC has sufficient capacity to justify writing a $175 million bond.

Advertisement

“That is because KSIC sends 100% of its retained insurance risk to affiliates in the Cayman Islands, where lax regulations allow KSIC to use this risk transfer to reduce the liabilities it carries on its books in a way that artificially bolsters its surplus, a practice New York regulators have dubbed “shadow insurance” and about which they have sounded the alarm,” the filing read. 

For these reasons, James writes that the Court should deny the Motion and require Defendants to post a replacement undertaking within seven days of the Court’s ruling.

NY AG LETITIA JAMES BOOED AT FDNY CEREMONY WITH CHANTS OF ‘TRUMP! TRUMP! TRUMP!’

Letitia James and Donald Trump

Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James and former President Donald Trump. (Getty Images)

In September, Judge Arthur Engoron ruled that Trump and the Trump Organization had committed fraud while building a real estate empire by deceiving banks, insurers and others by overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork used in making deals and securing financing.

The judge also prohibited Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation or legal entity in New York for two years. 

Advertisement

The former president has repeatedly slammed the case against him and denied any wrongdoing, calling it a “witch hunt.” 

James brought the lawsuit against Trump, accusing Trump and the Trump Organization of fraudulent business practices. James claimed Donald Jr., Ivanka, and Eric, as well as his associates and businesses, committed “numerous acts of fraud and misrepresentation” on their financial statements.

Trump has pleaded not guilty on all counts. 

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The judge is expected to hold a hearing Monday to discuss the issues raised by the attorney general’s office. The hearing is set to run in conjunction with opening statements in Trump’s New York criminal trial.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Brooke Singman and Timothy Nerozzi contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Public defenders, foster kids, climate: Programs created during California's boom may stall amid deficit

Published

on

Public defenders, foster kids, climate: Programs created during California's boom may stall amid deficit

Just a few years ago, California’s budget was overflowing with a record high surplus, spurring the creation of a slew of programs reflecting the state’s liberal ideals.

Democrats who control the state Capitol funded pilots to test new ways to support foster youth, help oil workers transition to cleaner industries and prevent more Californians from becoming homeless — just some of the ambitious ideas that became reality when the budget was flush.

Now, as the state faces an enormous budget deficit that the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office predicted in February could be as much as $73 billion, some of those programs could come to a screeching halt.

Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers are considering significant cuts to some of the very initiatives they recently helped launch while promising to “protect our progress.”

Advertisement

It’s both a reflection of California’s wild budget fluctuations and what can happen in a one-party state known as a progressive policy trailblazer when financial times are good.

For Republicans, it’s an “I told you so” moment.

“The surpluses were absolutely abnormal. They should have put much more money into the budgetary reserve than they did,” said Sen. Roger Niello (R-Fair Oaks), vice chair of the Senate Budget Committee.

Newsom’s budget last year included record reserves of nearly $38 billion, but for those in the minority party like Niello, more could have been put away in lieu of creating costly new programs.

“Let’s not get too crazy with these huge revenues,” is the approach Democrats should have taken, Niello said.

Advertisement

Organizations such as the California Budget Policy Center, which advocates for low-income residents and policies that curb inequities, argue there’s nothing wrong with trying out new ideas when the money is there.

“The state needs these opportunities to experiment and practice innovation because you can improve the efficiency and effectiveness during those periods of time,” said Chris Hoene, executive director of the center. “The deficit is forcing them to pull back on a significant share of programs but … if there are better revenue periods ahead, they have said they will continue to make those investments.”

Reducing or altogether eliminating newer programs that are still being tested is better than cutting long established programs that Californians rely on, said H.D. Palmer, a spokesperson for Newsom’s Department of Finance.

“These clearly are proposals that wouldn’t be put forward were [it] not for the fact that we’ve got a substantial shortfall,” Palmer said. “It is understandable that people would have objections to these proposals. The question then becomes: What alternatives would people want to put forward, if you choose not to do these measures, that would provide us a like amount of savings to close the shortfall?”

Sen. Dave Min (D-Irvine) put it more bluntly during a legislative budget meeting held at the Capitol last week: “I’ll just be honest, this sucks.”

Advertisement

Newsom signed into law this week a budget agreement made with lawmakers that reduces the deficit by $17 billion, though it’s only a first step toward closing the yawning gap in the state’s spending plan.

As negotiations continue leading up to the June 15 deadline for lawmakers to pass a budget, here are some of the pilot programs Newsom has suggested scaling back or eliminating:

Support for public defenders and eligible prisoners

Prisoners who can’t afford to pay private attorneys and are eligible to have their sentences shortened could potentially stay behind bars longer due to one proposed funding reduction.

In 2021, a public defense pilot program was created to help attorneys cope with a backlog of cases involving prisoners eligible for earlier release under the state’s latest progressive resentencing laws.

Under the program, county public defender offices have received $100 million, collectively helping free more than 8,000 people in the program’s first six months, according to the California Board of State and Community Corrections. Many of those beneficiaries were charged with murder because of their involvement in a felony that led to a death, even if they were not the actual killer — a remnant of a law that California overturned in 2019.

Advertisement

The program now faces a $40-million reduction — a move proponents say could render some of California’s resentencing laws useless because understaffed and overburdened offices won’t be able to adequately assist those eligible.

A representative for Newsom said the funding given so far “still provides data for the evaluation of the results” of the program. But Ricardo Garcia, public defender for Los Angeles County, says it will hamper the state’s efforts to “right some of the mistakes of the past.”

In Los Angeles County, the program has led to the release of more than 100 prisoners, representing 685 fewer years of total potential incarceration, according to Garcia. The program has allowed Garcia’s office to hire more public defenders, social workers and support staff as they represent more than 800 eligible clients who await resentencing.

“Having all these statutes in place … isn’t very helpful if we don’t have the resources to implement it and to really make them effective,” Garcia said.

Help for struggling foster kids

Since 2019, thousands of foster kids — and some of their caretakers — have been able to call a 24/7 hotline for help with everyday conflicts and receive expert support.

Advertisement

The urgent response system was prompted by concerns about “placement disruptions” that can lead to instability and possibly homelessness for the already vulnerable youths.

The hotline annually serves about 5,000 foster children and caregivers, according to state data.

Child welfare advocates are calling on the governor and lawmakers to reconsider a $30-million proposed reduction — a cut they say will shutter the program entirely.

Foster placement changes in California decreased by 16% since the launch of the hotline, according to the data, and advocates say that’s no coincidence.

“We’re certain cutting it will lead to serious negative outcomes for foster children, including increased hospitalization and criminalization,” Ted Lempert, president of Children Now, said.

Advertisement

Funding for low-income housing

In 2023 alone, more than 100,000 Californians had to move because the owners of their homes fell behind on their bills, according to the Community Landtrust Network.

The foreclosure intervention housing preservation program was launched as a way to prevent displacement of renters. It offers grants to residents and nonprofits so they can buy properties at risk of foreclosure and keep them available as homes for people with low incomes.

Proponents of the program called it an “unprecedented” solution to the state’s homelessness crisis because it allows at-risk renters to stay where they are instead of potentially being forced onto the streets or into shelters.

Newsom proposed cutting $248 million meant for the program over three years — about half its total budget. Advocates are urging him to change his mind, as the funding has not even yet been disbursed.

“The need for the program is too great and both [the California Department of Housing & Community Development] and other key stakeholders have sunk too many resources into this pioneering housing strategy to hobble it now,” the Community Landtrust Network said in a statement.

Advertisement

A slew of climate friendly programs

Low-income Californians at the highest risk of wildfires destroying their homes, and oil and gas workers at risk of losing their jobs, are among those who could feel the brunt of climate programs now on the chopping block.

Funding reductions are proposed for a home hardening initiative, a program that helps workers find new jobs as the state moves away from fossil fuels, and a program that promotes composting in local governments.

The proposed reductions have environmental activists concerned, even as the budget draft maintains billions in investments to curb climate change and California is considered an international leader on the issue.

“The state needs to accelerate its efforts to prepare, not pull back — especially in vulnerable and underresourced communities,” Zack Cefalu, a legislative affairs analyst for the League of California Cities, said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Appeals court drops charges against Michigan elections worker who downloaded voter list

Published

on

Appeals court drops charges against Michigan elections worker who downloaded voter list

An appeals court dismissed charges against a Michigan election worker who put a USB flash drive into an electronic poll book and downloaded the names of voters at the close of a primary election in 2022.

The court’s conclusion: James Holkeboer’s conduct was improper but not a crime.

He was charged with election fraud. But Holkeboer’s lawyers pointed out that the state law used by prosecutors only bars acts that change the election record.

CALIFORNIA SUES BEACH CITY OVER VOTER ID LAW BACKED BY MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS

“The prosecution had to demonstrate that Holkeboer fraudulently removed or secreted the election list of voters such that the information was no longer available or altered,” the court said in a 3-0 opinion Thursday.

Advertisement

An appeals court has dismissed charges against a Michigan elections worker who downloaded a voter list.

“Here, no evidence was presented that election information was altered or made unavailable” to local election officials, the court said.

Holkeboer’s acts did not affect the results of the 2022 primary election. He was working at a polling place in Kent County’s Gaines Township, south of Grand Rapids, for the first time.

Holkeboer, a Republican, told investigators that he downloaded information about voters because he wanted to compare it to lists he was seeking under a separate public records request, according to a summary of the case.

Kent County Clerk Lisa Posthumus Lyons, who oversees elections, said she’s in favor of an appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Advertisement

“This breach of public trust must be addressed,” she said.

Continue Reading

Trending