Politics
Democrats worried about Biden re-election bid amid age questions, polling disaster: report
NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
President Biden insists that he’s going to run for a second time period, however his personal get together seems break up as as to whether that could be a good factor.
A New York Journal report citing remarks from nameless Democratic insiders revealed that whereas a phase of the get together is skeptical about whether or not Biden will be capable to win a second time period weeks earlier than he turns 82, others worry one else would have a shot at beating former President Donald Trump, ought to he run once more.
“I can’t even think about being 78, 79, 80, 81, 82 and beginning once more. Simply waking up is a chore,” a 66-year-old long-time Biden affiliate instructed the journal.
The report highlights sentiment amongst staffers, officers, and others attending the Democratic Governors Affiliation spring coverage assembly, stating that a variety of them puzzled what the Democratic Occasion may do if Biden’s well being fails him or his polling plummets greater than it already has.
A ballot from The Related Press-NORC Heart for Public Analysis final week had Biden’s approval score at 39%.
BIDEN GOES MORE THAN 100 DAYS WITHOUT MAINSTREAM MEDIA INTERVIEW: ‘HIS HANDLERS ARE PETRIFIED’
The massive title reportedly thrown round was North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, who received elections in 2016 and 2020 when his state went for Trump. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, and Colorado Gov. Jared Polis had been additionally names that had been repeated.
The report additionally factors to a current Wall Road Journal ballot that exhibits most Individuals don’t suppose Biden will run once more.
When requested about what’s going to occur in 2024, somebody described as being “excessive within the administration” mentioned, “Nice query.”
On the similar time, a buddy of that particular person and present White Home aide responded to the identical question incredulously by asking, “Is that this an actual query?”
MSNBC RIPS BIDEN FOR TAIWAN GAFFE: SIGN OF ‘BUMBLING FOREIGN POLICY,’ ‘INCOMPETENCE’
The specter of a Trump comeback might play into the president’s decision-making.
BIDEN TELLS OBAMA HE’S RUNNING IN 2024: REPORT
“Loads of us really feel that if Trump runs, there’s nobody else that would beat Trump than Joe Biden,” Biden pollster John Anzalone instructed Politico.
A supply described as a “veteran adviser” was much more emphatic.
“If Trump is alive,” they mentioned, “Biden is working.”
One longtime Biden adviser made it look like a reelection bid is inevitable.
“It’s been his life,” the adviser mentioned. “It’s like a shark that retains swimming. It’s how he stays alive.”
Politics
Judge rules illegal immigrants have gun rights protected by 2nd Amendment
A federal judge in Illinois has found that the Constitution protects the gun rights of noncitizens who enter the United States illegally.
U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman on Friday ruled that a federal prohibition on illegal immigrants owning firearms is unconstitutional as applied to defendant Heriberto Carbajal-Flores. The court found that while the federal ban is “facially constitutional,” there is no historical tradition of firearm regulation that permits the government to deprive a noncitizen who has never been convicted of a violent crime from exercising his Second Amendment rights.
“The noncitizen possession statute … violates the Second Amendment as applied to Carbajal-Flores,” the judge wrote. “Thus, the Court grants Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss.”
Coleman, a President Obama appointee, cited the landmark Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which established a new standard to determine whether a law violates the Second Amendment. Since Bruen, a multitude of federal and state gun control measures have been challenged in courts with mixed results.
DELAWARE BILL REQUIRING GUN BUYERS TO BE FINGERPRINTED, TRAINED, SET TO BECOME LAW
In this case, U.S. v. Carbajal-Flores, the court considered whether people who enter the country illegally can be banned from owning firearms.
Carbajal-Flores is an illegal immigrant who, on June 1, 2020, was found to be in possession of a handgun in the Little Village neighborhood of Chicago. He was subsequently charged with violating a federal law that prohibits any noncitizen who is not legally authorized to be in the U.S. from “possess[ing] in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.”
In an April 2022 decision, Coleman denied Carbajal-Flores’ first motion to dismiss his indictment, finding that the ban was constitutional. However, Carbajal-Flores asked the court to reconsider that ruling following the Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen and appellate decisions in the Third and Seventh Circuit that considered whether people convicted of non-violent crimes can be prohibited from possessing firearms.
CONGRESS POISED TO ROLL BACK ‘VETERAN GUN BAN,’ WITH RELUCTANT BIDEN BACKING
Upon review, Coleman concluded that Carbajal-Flores’ illegally present status was not sufficient to deny him Second Amendment rights. The judge said the “plain text” of the Constitution “presumptively protects firearms possession by undocumented persons.”
“Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” the judge wrote. “Additionally, Pretrial Service has confirmed that Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants.”
The court determined that because there is insufficient evidence to suggest Carbajal-Flores is a danger to society, there is no historical analogue that would permit the federal government to deny him his gun rights.
NRA SLAMS BIDEN’S SOTU SPEECH AS ATTACK ON ‘THE VERY FABRIC OF AMERICAN FREEDOM’
“The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores’ criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense,” Judge Coleman wrote. “Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.”
The ruling has divided gun rights activists, with some arguing that noncitizens should not have rights protected by the Constitution.
Erich Pratt, senior vice president of Gun Owners of America (GOA), told Fox News Digital his group “has historically recognized the dangers unchecked illegal immigration presents, chiefly of which is a serious potential to swing the balance of power into the hands of anti-gun politicians.”
Pratt reiterated GOA does not support amnesty for illegal immigrants.
“In this underlying ruling, the Second Amendment community undoubtedly has mixed feelings, because while illegal aliens are most certainly not part of ‘the People,’ everyone has a God-given right to defend themselves against violent acts like rape and murder,” he said.
“Of course, the courts wouldn’t have to decide this question if Joe Biden and the Democratic Party would simply secure our borders.”
Politics
Trump sues ABC News and George Stephanopoulos for defamation
Former President Trump is suing TV journalist George Stephanopoulos and ABC News for defamation for saying he raped advice columnist E. Jean Carroll.
On a March 10 edition of “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” the anchor said Trump was “liable for rape” during his interview with Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.). Stephanopoulos was pressing Mace, a rape victim herself, on how she could rationalize supporting Trump’s 2024 presidential candidacy.
Trump’s lawsuit, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Miami, said the jury in the Carroll case found him liable for sexual abuse — not rape — and that Stephanopoulos defamed the presumptive Republican presidential nominee by using the term.
A jury ruled in January that Trump must pay Carroll $83.3 million in damages after finding Trump liable for defamation, the second case related to a 1996 incident that occurred when the two met in a New York department store.
In May, jurors rejected Carroll’s allegation that she was raped but found Trump responsible for the lesser charge of sexual abuse, along with defamation, and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. Trump, who denied that the incident occurred, repeatedly mocked Carroll over her claims.
Trump’s suit cites how Stephanopoulos himself reported that Trump was not liable for rape when he reported on the verdict of the previous Carroll case on May 10.
The suit also noted that the headline on an ABC News online story on the Mace interview first used the word “rape” and was later changed to “sexual abuse.”
Trump’s suit is asking for unspecified damages.
ABC News has not issued a comment on the matter.
The tense “This Week” interview was widely shared on social media. Mace took umbrage at Stephanopoulos’ question, claiming he was “rape-shaming” her by bringing up her own experience as a victim, which she has publicly discussed.
Trump has previously sued media outlets, including the New York Times and CNN, with no success.
Trump sued the Times over its investigation of his finances, which led to the recent New York civil court ruling that has him on the hook for $454 million. The suit was dismissed in March and Trump had to reimburse the Times legal cost.
In 2022, Trump sued CNN for $475 million claiming the news network was waging a campaign against him by booking guests critical of his policies and speeches. The case was dismissed in 2023.
Politics
Mark Milley and former CENTCOM commander to face grilling in Congress over Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal
Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, will testify before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday for the first time since retiring, potentially freeing him to offer new details about the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Joining Milley will be retired Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, who served as United States Central Command (CENTCOM) commander during the 2021 withdrawal. The pair have appeared before Congress to discuss failings in the operation before, but Republicans say they may have been more tight-lipped then because they were still serving under President Biden.
Both Milley and McKenzie testified in 2021 that they had advised Biden to maintain a small U.S. force in Afghanistan, rather than committing to a full U.S. withdrawal. Milley himself has described the operation as a “strategic failure,” saying he has “lots of regrets.”
“It didn’t end the way I wanted it. That didn’t end the way any of us wanted it,” he told ABC News in September. “In the broader sense, the war was lost.”
OBAMA LIED TO AMERICANS ABOUT WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN: BOOK
The Tuesday afternoon hearing comes after months of Republican investigations into Biden’s handling of the withdrawal. Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas., has repeatedly demanded the State Department turn over documents relating to the operation.
BIDEN’S BOTCHED AFGHANISTAN WITHDRAWAL HAUNTS 2024 ELECTION AS BOOK CLAIMS ‘13 AMERICANS NEVER HAD TO DIE’
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has so far refused to offer interview notes relating to the Afghanistan after action report, which blamed senior officials for failing to prepare for all outcomes in the operation.
Despite the deaths of 13 U.S. servicemembers and the abandoning of tens of thousands of Afghan allies to Taliban rule, Biden strongly believes behind closed doors that he made the right decisions during the operation, according to an upcoming book.
THINK THE US EXIT FROM AFGHANISTAN WAS BAD? LOOK WHAT’S BREWING IN THE PACIFIC
Following the withdrawal, “no one offered to resign, in large part because the president didn’t believe anyone had made a mistake. Ending the war was always going to be messy,” author Alexander Ward writes in the book, “The Internationalists: The Fight to Restore Foreign Policy After Trump.”
Biden allegedly told his top aides, including White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan, that they had done their best given the situation and vowed to stand by them.
Fox News’ Nikolas Lanum contributed to this report.
-
News1 week ago
Threats, debt and Trump's advances: 'Stormy' doc examines the life of Stormy Daniels
-
Health1 week ago
Supercharge your immune system with these 10 foods
-
Culture1 week ago
Why March Madness belongs to the women: Star players, big ratings make it tourney to watch
-
News1 week ago
Microsoft hires DeepMind co-founder Mustafa Suleyman to run new consumer AI unit
-
Science1 week ago
California communities are banning syringe programs. Now the state is fighting back in court
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
A Beijing restaurant critic arrives at a crossroads in this absorbing family drama
-
World1 week ago
Biotech strategy launch, Newsletter
-
Politics1 week ago
Judge rules illegal immigrants have gun rights protected by 2nd Amendment