Connect with us

Politics

Biden admin agencies refuse to answer, ‘What is a woman?’

Published

on

Biden admin agencies refuse to answer, ‘What is a woman?’

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

A handful of Biden administration federal businesses have been unable to outline the that means of the phrase “lady” – in some instances, even in relation to their very own makes use of of phrases akin to “girls’s well being”  –  when requested by Fox Information Digital.

The Biden administration’s Division of Justice (DOJ), Division of Training, Division of Housing and City Growth (HUD) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons have been all contacted by Fox Information Digital requesting a definition of “lady.” Not one of the businesses offered their definition or standards for a person to be categorized as a “lady,” regardless of every boasting complete initiatives geared toward serving to girls and DOJ declined to remark.

Fox Information Digital additionally reached out to the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH) to request the group’s definition of “lady” in relation to phrases akin to “girls’s rights” and “girls’s healthcare.” NIH describes itself as “the steward of medical and behavioral analysis for the Nation,” and its goal as “[seeking] elementary data concerning the nature and habits of residing methods.”

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, BIDEN’S SUPREME COURT PICK, REFUSES TO DEFINE THE WORD ‘WOMAN’

Advertisement

When requested for the definition, the NIH directed Fox Information Digital to its web site part on “intercourse and gender.” 

Supreme Court docket nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson testifies throughout her Senate Judiciary Committee affirmation listening to on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 23, 2022. 
(AP Photograph/Alex Brandon)

“‘Intercourse’ refers to organic variations between females and males, together with chromosomes, intercourse organs, and endogenous hormonal profiles,” the NIH claims on their web site. “‘Gender’ refers to socially constructed and enacted roles and behaviors which happen in a historic and cultural context and fluctuate throughout societies and over time. All people act in lots of ways in which fulfill the gender expectations of their society. With steady interplay between intercourse and gender, well being is decided by each biology and the expression of gender.”

Nonetheless, the literature offered by the NIH didn’t tackle the that means of “lady” or “girls” in relation to intercourse and gender. Regardless of utilizing the phrase regularly of their writing, no clarification is given on whether or not the phrase “girls” – as utilized by the NIH – is descriptive of intercourse or gender.

Requested for clarification, the NIH refused to remark additional.

Advertisement

“Glad the web page was considerably helpful,” the NIH replied, however continued, “We don’t have anything so as to add.”

Fox Information Digital additionally reached out on to the Division of Well being and Human Providers (HHS) for touch upon the difficulty. After two days and a number of replies stating that the inquiry can be addressed, the HHS failed to supply a solution.

The HHS’ Workplace of Inhabitants Affairs launched a doc Thursday titled “Gender Affirming Care and Younger Individuals.” The identical day, the Substance Abuse and Psychological Well being Providers Administration’s Nationwide Youngster Traumatic Stress Community – one other subset of the HHS – launched a parallel doc titled, “Gender-Affirming Care Is Trauma-Knowledgeable Care.”

The HHS paperwork describe what it calls applicable therapies for transgender adolescents, together with: “‘Prime’ surgical procedure – to create male-typical chest form or improve breasts;” and “‘Backside’ surgical procedure – surgical procedure on genitals or reproductive organs, facial feminization or different procedures.”

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 30:  Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra answers questions at a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing to discuss reopening schools during Covid-19 at Capitol Hill on September 30, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Greg Nash- Pool/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 30:  Secretary of Well being and Human Providers Xavier Becerra solutions questions at a Senate Well being, Training, Labor, and Pensions Committee listening to to debate reopening colleges throughout Covid-19 at Capitol Hill on September 30, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photograph by Greg Nash- Pool/Getty Photographs)
(Greg Nash- Pool/Getty Photographs)

The RAND Company – a assume tank nearly solely funded by the U.S. authorities for the needs of session on army coverage – additionally said that they didn’t have a definition for the phrase “lady,” regardless of in depth analysis into girls’s rights, well being and health.

Advertisement

“You’re right in that RAND has completed quite a lot of research associated to gender and girls particularly, however our experiences are largely centered on the impacts to girls of assorted insurance policies or circumstances,” a RAND spokesperson informed Fox Information Digital. “I don’t consider your query is one which we’ve got ever explicitly researched, thus I don’t have anybody who can converse to it. Sorry we are able to’t be extra assist.”

Requested how RAND is ready to measure or analysis the impacts to girls of assorted insurance policies with out a definition of the phrase, RAND didn’t reply.

RAND receives roughly $68.4 million in funds from the HHS, and greater than 70% of their funds are from U.S. authorities businesses.

Kara Dansky, U.S. president of Ladies’s Declaration Worldwide, informed Fox Information Digital on a press name hosted by Unbiased Ladies’s Voice & Unbiased Ladies’s Legislation Heart Thursday that “President Biden started to obliterate intercourse as a definite class instantly upon taking workplace when he signed Govt Order 13988 on stopping and combating discrimination on the idea of so-called gender identification and sexual orientation.”

ATLANTA, GA - MARCH 17:  Members of Young Women For America protest transgender swimmer Lia Thomas at the NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships on March 17th, 2022 at the McAuley Aquatic Center in Atlanta Georgia.

ATLANTA, GA – MARCH 17:  Members of Younger Ladies For America protest transgender swimmer Lia Thomas on the NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships on March seventeenth, 2022 on the McAuley Aquatic Heart in Atlanta Georgia.
(Wealthy von Biberstein/Icon Sportswire through Getty Photographs)

She stated that Biden administration businesses together with DOJ, HHS, HUD and others “have all introduced that girls now not exist as a coherent class as a matter of federal administrative regulation.”

Advertisement

On Thursday, Unbiased Ladies’s Voice, Unbiased Ladies’s Legislation Heart, Ladies’s Liberation Entrance and different advocates launched a “Ladies’s Invoice of Rights” to “reserve organic intercourse as a definite authorized class.”

A press launch accompanying the announcement said that dictionaries generally outline “lady” as an “grownup feminine human being.” The advocacy teams are involved by “activists” who’re distorting and disputing the “organic foundation of womanhood.”

The difficulty has intensified as controversial feminine transgender swimmer, Lia Thomas, was allowed to compete within the NCAA girls’s swimming championship final month. She beat out organic females in a lot of her races, which many say could be attributed to her bigger measurement and stature as a organic male. 

 

In the course of the Senate hearings for Supreme Court docket nominee Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson final week, the possible justice was requested by Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., to outline the time period “lady.” After a brief back-and-forth, Jackson informed the senator that she couldn’t present a definition as a result of she is “not a biologist.” 

Advertisement

“Are you able to present a definition for the phrase ‘lady?’” the senator requested.

“Can I present a definition? No,” Jackson responded. “I am unable to.”

“You may’t?” Blackburn requested.

“Not on this context, I am not a biologist,” the decide replied.

Jackson’s incapability to outline the phrase triggered main backlash from conservatives, who questioned how she would deal with subjects explicitly associated to gender variations if confirmed as a Supreme Court docket justice.

Advertisement

Fox Information’ Kelly Laco contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Dem leader condemns Thanksgiving bomb threats against liberal lawmakers after Team Trump targeted

Published

on

Dem leader condemns Thanksgiving bomb threats against liberal lawmakers after Team Trump targeted

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries condemned several threats, mostly focused on lawmakers from Connecticut, targeting members of his caucus, just days after numerous threats were made against President-elect Trump’s cabinet selections.

Jeffries, D-N.Y., confirmed in a statement Friday that several Democrats were targeted with threats ranging from pipe bombs in their mailboxes to “swatting” — or filing a false police report on another person’s behalf that often results in a SWAT team being dispatched.

All of the threatening messages were signed “MAGA,” Jeffries said, adding law enforcement found no ordnance at any of the targeted lawmakers’ homes.

“America is a democracy. Threats of violence against elected officials are unacceptable, unconscionable and have no place in a civilized society. All perpetrators of political violence directed at any party must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law,” he said.

TOP DEM: ‘UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRATION’ IS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY

Advertisement

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

“House Democrats will not be deterred or intimidated from serving the people by violent threats. We have been in close communication with the Sergeant at Arms office and it is imperative that Congress provide maximum protection for all Members and their families moving forward.”

After Jeffries spoke out, Rep. Seth Magaziner, a Democrat from neighboring Rhode Island, announced on Friday afternoon that his home had been targeted, as well. Magaziner said Providence police responded quickly and no one was harmed.

Sen. Christopher Murphy, D-Conn., had his home targeted by a bomb threat. A spokesperson said it appeared to be part of a “coordinated effort.”

Five other Democrats from the Constitution State received similar threats, including Reps. Joe Courtney, John Larson, Rosa DeLauro, Jahana Hayes and James Himes.

Advertisement

CT DEM SAYS IT’S CLEAR HUNTER BIDEN BROKE THE LAW

“There is no place for political violence in this country, and I hope that we may all continue through the holiday season with peace and civility,” said Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee who replaced Sen.-elect Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

Prior to that spate of threats, Trump’s U.N. ambassador-designate Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., said she was traveling home to her North Country district for Thanksgiving when she was informed of a threat against her home.

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. — Trump’s initial choice for attorney general — also received a threat.

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y. — Trump’s nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency — said his home was subjected to a “pro-Palestinian-themed” pipe bomb threat. Zeldin is Jewish.

Advertisement

Former Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, R-Ore., whom the president-elect tapped for Labor secretary, said her Oregon home was targeted, as was that of former San Diego Chargers cornerback Scott Turner, whom Trump named to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Trump nominees including Cantor-Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick, America First Policy Institute President Brooke Rollins and former Fox News host Pete Hegseth also received threats.

In a statement, the FBI said it is aware of “numerous bomb threats and swatting incidents targeting incoming administration nominees and appointees, and we are working with our law enforcement partners.”

“We take all potential threats seriously and, as always, encourage members of the public to immediately report anything they consider suspicious to law enforcement,” it said.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Kevin Ward contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Capitol rioter's defamation suit against Fox News is dismissed

Published

on

Capitol rioter's defamation suit against Fox News is dismissed

A Delaware court judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit against Fox News filed by a Jan. 6 rioter who said the network falsely identified him as an FBI informant.

U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Hall granted Fox News’ motion to dismiss the suit filed last year by Ray Epps.

Now based in Utah, Epps alleged his life was upended after former Fox host Tucker Carlson repeatedly described him as a federal agent who helped instigate the attack on the Capitol, which was an attempt to stop the certification of the election of Joe Biden.

Carlson described Epps as a principal in a false flag operation in which the government incited the Jan. 6 riot, an unfounded conspiracy theory. He made the false comments about Epps on his program over a period of nearly two years and in a series called “Patriot Purge” that streamed on Fox Nation in 2022.

In her remarks from the bench, Hall said Carlson did not act with malicious intent.

Advertisement

Fox News welcomed the judge’s decision, which is the third consecutive defamation case to be decided in favor of the network after the record $787-million settlement it paid to Dominion Voting Systems in April 2024.

Dominion said its business was damaged by false claims Fox News presented regarding voting fraud in the 2020 election. Fox News chose to settle the case rather than have its executives and on-air talent take the witness stand in a trial.

A separate defamation suit filed by Nina Jankowicz, the former head of the federal Disinformation Governance Board, was dismissed in July. Another case brought by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, was thrown out on Tuesday.

“Fox News is pleased with these back-to-back decisions from federal courts preserving the press freedoms of the First Amendment,” the network said in a statement.

Epps was at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and pleaded guilty in January to a misdemeanor charge for his role in the riot.

Advertisement

Former prime-time host Tucker Carlson is seen in the studio on the set of his show on Fox News in New York in 2018.

(Jennifer S. Altman / For The Times)

Epps testified under oath to the House committee investigating the attack that he had no involvement with the FBI, which has also stated publicly that he had no association with the bureau.

The lawsuit claimed Epps and his wife received threatening voice mails, emails and text messages because of Carlson‘s comments. Epps told the CBS news magazine “60 Minutes” that the lies ruined his Arizona-based business and led to death threats.

Advertisement

Carlson’s prime-time program was pulled from the Fox News lineup on April 24, 2023, the day after Epps appeared on “60 Minutes.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Political betting markets still have plenty of action despite end of election season

Published

on

Political betting markets still have plenty of action despite end of election season

The end of the election season does not mean the end of political betting, with many platforms allowing users to place wagers on everything from the 2028 election to who will be confirmed to President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet.

“Some people will be amazed by this, but people are already betting on 2026 and 2028,” Maxim Lott, the founder of ElectionBettingOdds.com, told Fox News Digital. “There’s been about a quarter million dollars bet already.”

The comments come after the 2024 election produced plenty of betting action, with users across multiple platforms wagering over $2 billion on the outcome of the latest race. 

WHAT ARE ELECTION BETTING ODDS? EXPERT EXPLAINS WHY TRUMP IS CURRENT FAVORITE

President-elect Donald Trump, right, welcomes Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the stage at a Turning Point Action campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on Oct. 23, 2024 in Duluth, Georgia. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Advertisement

While mega sporting events, such as the Super Bowl and the recent Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul fight, gives gamblers plenty to wager on after the election, those looking for something political to bet on will still have plenty of options.

One of the most popular topics is who will be the nominees for both major parties in 2028, with ElectionBettingOdds.com showing California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Vice President-elect JD Vance being the current leaders for Democrats and Republicans, respectively.

Other names with a significant amount of attention for betters include Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for the Democratic nomination, while Vance is trailed by names like entrepreneur and future head of the new Department of Government Efficiency Vivek Ramaswamy and Donald Trump Jr. on the Republican side.

“The big Democratic governors are favored to be the next nominee,” Lott said, noting that Vance currently holds a sizable lead over other options on the GOP side.

Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

TRUMP OPENS UP LARGEST BETTING LEAD SINCE DAYS AFTER BIDEN’S DROPOUT

Advertisement

Vance is also the current betting leader on who will win the 2028 presidential election, ElectionBettingOdds.com shows, followed by Newson and Shapiro as the next two likely options.

However, Lott warned it is still too early to tell what the future holds, noting that the markets will start to provide more clarity as more information becomes known over the next few years.

“As the future becomes clearer… as we get closer to 2026, 2028, these odds will change,” Lott said. “So if the Trump administration is doing really well, the economy is booming, inflation is not out of control, wars are ending, Vance’s odds will certainly go up.”

Bettors also are not limited to wagering on elections, with platforms such as Polymarket allowing users to place bets on Trump’s picks to serve in his Cabinet and whether they will be confirmed. Bettors can also place wagers on questions such as if they believe the war in Ukraine will end in Trump’s first 90 days or if there will be a cease-fire in Gaza in 2024.

Sen. JD Vance

Vice President-elect JD Vance. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Advertisement

According to Lott, taking a look at the current betting odds for many scenarios can help inform you about what is going on in the world, even if you do not place bets yourself.

“People often ask… is there any value to this… it’s just gambling. It’s silly,” Lott said. “But actually it’s very useful… if you want to know what’s going to happen in 2028 or if the Trump administration is going to be a success, you could read 100 news articles on it. Some will misinform you. Or, you can just go to the prediction markets and see… is Vance a 20% chance of becoming the next Republican nominee or is he a 90% chance? That tells you a lot.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending