The Boston Red Sox have to shift their focus now that superstar outfielder Juan Soto has reportedly signed a historic deal with the New York Mets.

Players like slugger Teoscar Hernández and pitchers Max Fried and Corbin Burnes have been rumored to be a few of the Red Sox’s targets. Audacy’s Rob Bradford believes getting a starting pitcher for the top of the rotation should be the Red Sox’s No. 1 priority, but it doesn’t necessarily need to be Fried or Burnes.

“But now what you have is that you have to compete with some of these other teams, including the Blue Jays, by the way, who lost out on Soto, who are in the same desperation that you are to get a Max Fried or Corbin Burnes,” Bradford said on WEEI’s Adam Jones and Rich Keefe on Monday. “… If I’m a team, and I have Zach Gallen for Arizona, I absolutely say, ‘Hey, this isn’t going to cost as much as (Garrett) Crochet. So, Boston Red Sox, you need a starter. Here.’ You go trade for him. I think that there might be a starter out there that they have that we aren’t talking about that they might trade for instead of maybe getting uncomfortable for one of these other guys.”

Gallen had a 14-6 record with a 3.65 ERA across 28 starts with the Diamondbacks in 2024. He surrendered just 13 home runs in 148 innings of work with 156 strikeouts.

Even though Bradford believes the Red Sox need a top of the rotation pitcher, he admitted Alex Bregman wasn’t on his radar before today.

“I did not account for Alex Bregman in the way that maybe I should have accounted for,” Bradford said. “How much they prioritize because right-handed hitter, obviously open to a move to second base, a championship pedigree. … The type of guy that they need in that clubhouse from a position player standpoint. It checks off a lot of boxes.”

Alex Cora obviously believes Bregman would be a good fit in Boston. The Red Sox manager raved about Bregman when he spoke with reporters at the Winter Meetings on Monday.

Connecticut has been a beacon of fiscal responsibility in the last few years, proudly maintaining one of the largest Rainy Day Funds in its history. This achievement is a testament to the fiscal guardrails that have strengthened our state’s economy, rebuilt financial reserves, and safeguarded us against uncertainty.

But as we face mounting challenges, it’s time to ask: Are we prepared for the storm brewing on the horizon?

We find ourselves in turbulent times. Inflation, “greedflation,” post-pandemic hardships, and shifting federal priorities are straining communities across Connecticut. These challenges are not abstract; they manifest daily in rising costs of living, struggling families, and overwhelmed safety nets. Corporate greed, coupled with inflation, has pushed many residents to the edge of financial collapse. The problem deepens over time, too, leaving more at risk as days go by.

Meanwhile, critical sectors like healthcare, education, transportation, and agriculture, as well as support programs those in need have relied on for decades, are under threat from federal policies shaped by President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments. Early indications are that his preferred financial policies are expected to have negative impacts on our economy, cutting jobs and raising prices. The double blow of reduced social services and these rockier financial conditions could place our communities, especially our most vulnerable residents, in a precarious place.

History is our teacher: the first Trump administration’s reductions in funding had tangible, negative impacts on states like Connecticut, and early signals suggest we may face similar obstacles again.

Standing still is no longer an option. Connecticut’s residents are struggling, and the social safety nets we’ve built must be fortified. Yet maintaining the status quo on fiscal guardrails while addressing these growing challenges is untenable. The guardrails have served us well, but they were crafted during pre-pandemic times when the economy was stronger for individual families and our financial outlook was rosier than it is today. Today’s realities demand an evolution of our approach to ensure Connecticut’s continued resilience in the face of known and unknown challenges in years to come.

Over nearly a decade, the guardrails have allowed for our state to improve its financial position, and that work’s not yet done. We’ve paid down billions in debt, but tens of billions in debt remain. We need to keep them in place – we just need to make sure they’re reflecting our current needs and the landscape of 2025, not 2018.

Successfully navigating this landscape involves adjusting the state’s volatility cap moving forward. Getting rid of it would be foolish, but reviewing it, and seeing what adjustments can be made to current revenues, would not be. Reviewing the volatility cap after seven years allows us to see exactly what our state’s finances require in savings, especially as the volatility cap’s threshold has increased in recent years. That represents hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue that could be redirected where austerity has stretched margins into thin rubber bands without causing a financial disaster.

This would go a long way to benefit residents of the state; it keeps us on a good financial track moving forward, but also ensures those needing help aren’t left behind.

This is not a call to abandon fiscal responsibility; it’s recognition that true responsibility lies in adaptability. Now is the time to utilize state resources strategically. Failing to act risks failing our most vulnerable residents, those who rely on us to create opportunity and security in the face of hardship. We can take this action without the dangers of a spending cliff with proper foresight and adjustments, creating long-term solutions.

Reforming fiscal policies does not equate to reckless spending. It means investing wisely in the people who are the backbone of our state, addressing immediate needs, and securing a brighter future for all. Connecticut’s strength lies in its people, and we must prioritize their well-being over rigid adherence to outdated policies.