New York
What to Know About Proposals to Fix the Chaos at Rikers Island
A federal judge overseeing the Rikers Island jail complex in New York City is weighing two distinct proposals on how to fix the city’s troubled and violent lockups.
For nearly a decade, the judge, Laura Taylor Swain, has been monitoring the city’s jails to keep them in compliance with a court order to overhaul Rikers. But conditions at the complex — which now houses about 6,600 people — have continued to deteriorate.
Since 2022, at least 35 people have died either while being held at city jails or shortly after being released from custody, according to city data.
In November, Judge Swain found the city in contempt for failing to stem violence and excessive force at Rikers. She said she was leaning toward stripping control of the city’s jails from Mayor Eric Adams and handing it to an outside authority, known as a receiver. That remedy, the judge said, would “make the management of the use of force and safety aspects of the Rikers Island jails ultimately answerable directly to the court.”
The appointment of a federal receiver is considered a last resort. Judge Swain has refrained from imposing one for years, even as lawyers for Rikers detainees called for a takeover.
Lawyers representing the inmates and the city each sent Judge Swain plans for how a receivership could work. The proposals, contained in a nearly 1,000-page document, are the culmination of a decade of motions, court hearings and rulings.
The proposals differ dramatically, and Judge Swain has not set a date for deciding whether to follow one of the plans — or one of her own.
Here are the issues in play in a potential takeover of New York City’s jail network.
Rikers at a Crossroads
The city has struggled to control jail violence for decades. The Department of Correction is also the target of lawsuits about the denial of medical care to detainees and the decrepit conditions of the buildings at Rikers Island, which is in the East River near LaGuardia Airport.
The City Council voted to close Rikers and replace it with smaller jails in four of the city’s five boroughs by 2027. But officials have said the city is unlikely to meet that deadline.
A federal monitor, appointed as a result of the case, has been giving Judge Swain regular updates over the past decade on conditions inside the complex. And nearly every one has sounded the alarm about safety conditions.
In a recent filing to the court, the monitor, Steve J. Martin, wrote that the problems facing the Correction Department were “so deeply entrenched that there is no singular solution that will fix these issues.”
The Plaintiffs’ Proposal
The Legal Aid Society and a private law firm that represents incarcerated people have argued that the court should install a receiver. They have been joined by the federal prosecutor’s office for the Southern District of New York.
They say that the receiver, who would answer only to the court, should have broad power to make changes, including some ability to address union contracts.
Rikers has struggled to overcome a staffing problem for decades, but the issue has not been caused by a shortage of officers. There is roughly one uniformed officer for each detainee housed at Rikers, according to city data, making it among the best-staffed jails in the country.
A New York Times investigation in 2021 found that guards were often stationed in inefficient ways that failed to protect inmates, and that the system’s unlimited-sick-day policy meant that posts went unguarded and detainees gained control of entire housing areas.
The percentage of officers out sick on any given day dropped to about six in November from a peak of 32 at the start of the pandemic in early 2020.
The plaintiffs’ proposal would let the receiver not only renegotiate union contracts but hire, fire and deploy employees as needed within the bounds of local law. The receiver could also be able to “review, investigate and take disciplinary or other corrective or remedial actions with respect to violations of D.O.C. policies, procedures and protocols” related to the court order, they wrote.
The receiver, who would work alongside the monitor and the Correction Department’s commissioner, would be employed at the pleasure of the court. The receivership would last as long as needed for the city to comply with the terms of the settlement.
“The specific powers afforded to the receiver under our proposal are both justified by this court’s specific findings, and well within the scope of powers that other federal courts have granted to receivers in corrections cases,” the plaintiffs wrote.
The City’s Plan
City officials proposed a markedly different plan.
The current commissioner of the Correction Department, Lynelle Maginley-Liddie, should serve in a twofold role, the city said:
-
She should answer to the court on the use of force and safety measures.
-
On everything else related to the administration of the jails, she would answer to the mayor.
The mayor would not be able to remove the commissioner, who would be serving in the new role of “compliance director.”
The city hopes to capitalize on the good will Ms. Maginley-Liddie has garnered since her appointment in 2023. Judge Swain said that the monitoring team had “observed an immediate change in the department’s approach and dynamic” after she took the helm.
The city also argued that its proposal would accomplish the consent decree’s objective while following the “principles of federalism, that the Court’s intrusions into state and local law and governance be kept to the absolute minimum necessary to remedy constitutional violations.”
To ensure that Ms. Maginley-Liddie would remain shielded from political influence — a point of concern voiced by Judge Swain — the commissioner would have her job guaranteed for five years.
In a key difference from the plaintiffs’ plan, the city’s proposal does not include giving the compliance director broad authority over union contracts, although the director could ask the court to alter them. Such a power cannot “be justified as necessary to correct constitutional violations,” the city said. “Contracts with one municipal union can have a far-reaching impact on the city’s relationships and contract negotiations with other municipal unions.”
Mr. Adams gained favor with the powerful correction officers’ unions early in his tenure: Before taking office, he stood flanked by union representatives and announced that he would reinstate solitary confinement, a policy the union had pushed. And as soon as he took office, he replaced the correction commissioner, as well as the deputy commissioner of the Investigation and Trials Division, with whom the union had sparred.
The city argued that having the commissioner also serve as compliance director would make change happen more quickly. And because Ms. Maginley-Liddie is already a city employee, she would receive only her commissioner salary and benefits.
Ms. Maginley-Liddie is “acutely familiar with the legal and practical workings of city government, and accordingly, is best positioned to more immediately identify and correct any impediments,” the city wrote.
In New York, a group that includes former Department of Correction workers have filed a letter to Judge Swain warning that the city’s proposal would not result in meaningful changes. Any receiver must exist outside the city’s power structure, said the group, led by Elizabeth Glazer, who ran the mayor’s office of criminal justice under Mayor Bill de Blasio.
“The mayor would continue to be able to assert immense political pressure over the proposed commissioner / compliance director, ensuring that such individual lacked any meaningful independence,” they wrote.
Can a Receiver Fix Rikers?
Federal takeovers of jails are rare. There have been only nine in the nation since the late 1970s, according to the federal monitor.
Governments fight to retain control, said Hernandez D. Stroud, a senior fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law.
“Receivership litigation strikes at the heart of democratic governance,” Mr. Stroud said.
The structure of receiverships, from who the appointee is to how much control that person has, has varied vastly. In some cases, the person comes from outside the system; other times a government official is chosen.
In two cases, the receiver had complete authority, essentially replacing the local government officials, according to the monitor. In the other instances, some local government control remained.
However, receiverships have not always led to fast or permanent changes.
California’s prisons have been under a receivership focused on medical care since 2006.
People in the Washington, D.C., jail system filed a class-action lawsuit in 2024 accusing it of unconstitutional treatment because of a failure to provide medical care, according to the monitor, 24 years after the receivership ended.
And Alabama’s prison system, whose groundbreaking receivership concluded in 1983, was found to have violated the constitutional rights of detainees in its men’s prisons in 2020 following a U.S. Justice Department investigation.
New York
How a Parks Worker Lives on $37,500 in Tompkinsville, Staten Island
How can people possibly afford to live in one of the most expensive cities on the planet? It’s a question New Yorkers hear a lot, often delivered with a mix of awe, pity and confusion.
We surveyed hundreds of New Yorkers about how they spend, splurge and save. We found that many people — rich, poor or somewhere in between — live life as a series of small calculations that add up to one big question: What makes living in New York worth it?
Sara Robinson boarded a Greyhound bus from Oregon to New York City to attend Hunter College in the early 2000s, bright-eyed and eager to pick up odd jobs to fuel her dream of living there.
For a long time, she made it work. But recently, that has been more challenging than ever.
Right around her 40th birthday, Ms. Robinson began to feel financially squeezed in Brooklyn, where she had lived for years. Ms. Robinson (no relation to this reporter) was also feeling too grown to live with roommates.
“As a child,” she said, “you don’t think you’re going to have a roommate at 40.” She decided to move into a place of her own: a one-bedroom apartment in the Tompkinsville neighborhood of Staten Island.
After she moved, the preschool where she’d worked for over a decade closed. Now, she works two jobs. She is a seasonal employee for the state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, working from Tuesday to Saturday. And on Monday nights, she sells concessions at the West Village movie theater Film Forum, which pays $25 an hour plus tips.
Ms. Robinson, now 45, loves her job as an environmental educator at a state park on Staten Island. Her team runs the park’s social media accounts and comes up with event programming, like a recent project tapping maple trees to make syrup.
But the role is temporary. Her last stint was from June 2024 to January 2025. Then she was unemployed until August 2025. Ms. Robinson’s current contract will be up in April, unless she gets an extension or a different parks job opens up.
Ms. Robinson’s biweekly pay stubs from the parks department amount to about $1,300 before taxes. She barely felt a difference, she said, while she was out of work and pocketing around $880 every two weeks from her unemployment checks. (Her previous parks gig paid $1,100 a check.)
Living in New York’s Greenest Borough
“It used to be, ‘There’s no way I’m moving to Staten Island,’” Ms. Robinson said. “But the place is close to the water. I’m three minutes from the ferry. The rest is history.” She lives on the third floor of a multifamily house, above an art studio and another tenant. Her rent is $1,600 a month, plus $125 in utilities, including her phone bill.
“If my situation changes, I don’t know if I could find something similar,” she said. “So much of my New York life has been feeling trapped to an apartment. You get a place for a good price, and you’re like, ‘I can’t leave now.’”
Staten Island is convenient for Ms. Robinson’s parks job, but it’s become harder to justify living in a borough where she knows few people. It takes more than an hour to get to friends in Brooklyn, an especially hard trek during the winter. After four years of living on Staten Island, Ms. Robinson feels somewhat isolated.
“All my friends on Staten Island are senior citizens,” she said. “It’s great. I love it. But I do want friends closer to my age.”
One of Ms. Robinson’s friends, Ray, took her on nature walks and taught her about tree identification, sparking an interest in mycology, the study of mushrooms. This led to a productive — and free — fungi foraging hobby during unemployment. She has found all sorts of mushrooms, including, after a month of searching, the elusive morel.
The Budgeting Game
Ms. Robinson doesn’t update her furniture often, but when she does, she shops stoop sales in Park Slope or other parts of Brooklyn.
“It’s like a treasure hunt,” she said. “You could make a whole apartment off the street, off the stuff that people throw away.”
She also makes a game out of grocery shopping, biking to Sunset Park in Brooklyn or Manhattan’s Chinatown to go to stores where there are better deals. She budgets about $300 for groceries each month.
Ms. Robinson bikes almost everywhere, sometimes traveling a little farther to enter the Staten Island Railway at one of the stations that don’t charge a fare. She spends $80 a month on subway and ferry fares, and $5 a month for a discounted Citi Bike membership she gets through a credit union, though she usually uses her own bike. She is handy and does repairs herself.
There are certain splurges — Ms. Robinson drops $400 once or twice a year on round-trip airfare to Seattle, where her family lives. She also spent $100 last year to see a concert at Forest Hills Stadium in Queens.
She said she has many financial saving graces. She has no student loans and no car to make payments on. She doesn’t get health insurance from her jobs, but she qualifies for Medicaid.
She mostly eats at home, though sometimes friends will treat her to dinner. She repays them with tickets to Film Forum movies.
Nothing Beats the Twinkling Lights
Ms. Robinson’s friends often talk about leaving the city — and the country.
Two friends have their eyes set on Sweden, where they hope to get the affordable child care and social safety net they are struggling to access in New York.
Ms. Robinson can’t see herself moving elsewhere in the United States, but she is entertaining the idea of an international move if she can’t hack it on Staten Island.
Yet the pull of the city is hard for her to resist.
“I just get a rush when I’m riding the Staten Island Ferry across the bay,” she said. “You see all the little twinkling lights. It’s this feeling of, ‘everything is possible here.’”
That feeling, plus the many friendly faces Ms. Robinson sees every day — the ferry operators, the conductors on the Staten Island Railway, her co-workers at Film Forum — are what tie her to New York.
“My savings are not increasing, so there’s that,” she said. “But I’ve been OK so far. I think I’m going to figure it out.”
New York
How the Editor in Chief of Marie Claire Gets Styled for a Trip to Italy
Nikki Ogunnaike, the editor in chief of Marie Claire magazine, did not grow up the scion of an Anna Wintour or a Marc Jacobs.
But, she said, “my mom and dad are both very stylish people.”
They got dressed up to go to church every week in her hometown Springfield, Va. Her mother managed a Staples; her father, a CVS. “Presentation is important to them,” she said.
Since landing her first internship with Glamour magazine in college, Ms. Ogunnaike, 40, has held editorial roles there and at Elle magazine and GQ. She has been in the top post at Marie Claire since 2023.
She recently spent a Saturday with The New York Times as she prepared for Milan Fashion Week.
New York
How a Physical Therapist and a Retiree Live on $208,000 in Harlem
How can people possibly afford to live in one of the most expensive cities on the planet? It’s a question New Yorkers hear a lot, often delivered with a mix of awe, pity and confusion.
We surveyed hundreds of New Yorkers about how they spend, splurge and save. We found that many people — rich, poor or somewhere in between — live life as a series of small calculations that add up to one big question: What makes living in New York worth it?
It has never really occurred to Marian or Charles Wade to live anywhere but the city where they were born and where they raised their children.
New York is in their bones. “We have our roots here, and our families enjoyed life here before us,” Ms. Wade said.
And they feel lucky. Between Mr. Wade’s pension, earned after more than 40 years as an analyst at the Manhattan district attorney’s office, and his Social Security benefits, along with Ms. Wade’s work as a physical therapist at a psychiatric center, they bring in about $208,000 a year.
Still, it’s hard for the couple not to notice how much the city has changed as it has become wealthier.
About 10 years ago, Ms. Wade, 65, and Mr. Wade, 69, sold the Morningside Heights apartment they had lived in for decades. The Manhattan neighborhood had become more affluent, and tensions over how their building should be managed and how much residents should be expected to pay for upkeep boiled over between people who had lived there for years and newer neighbors.
They found a new home in Harlem, large enough to fit their two children, who are now adults struggling to afford the city’s housing market.
All in the Family
Ms. Wade knew it was time to leave Morningside Heights when she spotted her husband hiding behind a bush outside their building, hoping to avoid an unpleasant new neighbor. They had bought their apartment in 1994 for $206,000, using some money they had inherited from their families, and sold it in 2015 for $1.13 million.
The couple found a new apartment in the Sugar Hill section of Harlem for $811,000, and put most of the money down upfront. They took out a loan with a good rate for the remaining cost, and had a $947 monthly payment. They recently finished paying off the mortgage, but they have monthly maintenance payments of $1,555, as well as two temporary assessments to help improve the building, totaling $415 a month.
Their two children each moved home shortly after graduating from college.
The couple’s son, Jacob Wade, 28, split an apartment with three roommates nearby for a while, but spent down his savings and moved back in with his parents. He is searching for an affordable one bedroom nearby and plans to move out later in the year. Their daughter, Elka Wade, 27, came home after college but recently moved to an apartment in Astoria, Queens, with roommates.
Until their daughter moved out a few weeks ago, she and her brother each took a bedroom, and Mr. and Ms. Wade slept in the dining room, which they had converted into their bedroom with the help of a Murphy bed and a new set of curtains for privacy.
There is very little storage space. A piano occupies an entire closet in their son’s bedroom, because the family has no other place to fit it.
The setup is cramped, but close quarters have their benefits: When their daughter, a classically trained cellist, was living there, she often practiced at home in the evenings. “I love listening to her play,” Ms. Wade said.
Three Foodtowns and a Thrift Shop
The Wades do what they can to keep their costs low. They’ve decided against installing new, better insulated windows in their drafty apartment. They don’t go on vacations, instead visiting their small weekend home in rural upstate New York. And they’ve pulled back on takeout food and retail shopping.
Instead, Mr. Wade surveys the three Foodtown supermarkets near their home for the best deals, preferring one for produce and another for meat. The weekly grocery bill has been around $500 with both kids living at home, and the family usually orders delivery twice a week, rotating between Chinese and Indian food, which typically costs $70, including leftovers.
For an occasional splurge, they love Pisticci, a nearby restaurant where the penne with homemade mozzarella costs $21.
The couple owns a car, which they park on the street for free. But they often use public transportation to avoid paying the $9 congestion pricing fee to drive downtown, or when they have a good parking spot they don’t want to give up. They have a senior discount for their transit cards, which allows them to pay $1.50 per subway or bus ride, rather than $3.
Ms. Wade stopped shopping at the stores she used to frequent, like Eileen Fisher and Banana Republic, years ago. Instead, she visits a thrift store called Unique Boutique on the Upper West Side. She was browsing the aisles a few months ago, before a big Thanksgiving dinner, and spotted the perfect dress for the occasion for just $20.
But she has one nonnegotiable weekly expense: a private yoga lesson in an instructor’s apartment nearby, for $150 a session.
Swapping Mortgage Payments for Singing Lessons
For every member of the Wade family, life in New York is all about the arts.
The children each attended the Special Music School, a public school focused on the arts. Their son, an actor, teacher and director, works part time at the Metropolitan Opera and the Kaufman Music Center, a performing arts complex in Manhattan. His sister works in administration at the Kaufman Center.
Mr. Wade is still close with friends from high school who are now professional musicians, and the couple often goes to see them play at venues like the Bitter End in Greenwich Village, where shows typically have a $12 cover and a two-drink minimum.
The couple has cut back on going to expensive concerts — they used to try to see Elvis Costello every time he came to New York, for example — but have timeworn strategies for getting affordable theater tickets.
They recently splurged on tickets to “Oedipus” on Broadway for themselves and their daughter, who they treated to a ticket as a birthday gift. The seats were in the nosebleed section, but still cost $80 apiece.
The couple has a $75 annual membership to the Film Forum, which gives them reduced price tickets to movies. They occasionally get discounted tickets to the opera through their son’s work, and when they don’t, they pay for family circle passes, which are usually $47 a head, plus a $10 fee.
Ms. Wade, who grew up commuting from Flushing, Queens, to Manhattan to take dance lessons, sometimes takes $20 drop-in ballet classes during the week at the Dance Theater of Harlem, just a few blocks away from the apartment.
Recently, when the couple paid off their mortgage, Ms. Wade celebrated by giving herself a treat: weekly private singing lessons, for $125 a session.
-
World5 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts5 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO5 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
News1 week agoWorld reacts as US top court limits Trump’s tariff powers