Connect with us

Maine

Maine AG’s response to Supreme Court win for religious schools blasted as ‘baffling and offensive’

Published

on

Maine AG’s response to Supreme Court win for religious schools blasted as ‘baffling and offensive’


NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

Maine Legal professional Normal Aaron Frey was blasted for hitting the brakes on spiritual faculties celebrations after the Supreme Court docket struck down a state regulation prohibiting them from receiving public funds.

In a 6-3 determination, the Court docket dominated final week in Carson v. Makin that the state of Maine had violated the free train of faith clause in the First Modification for spiritual faculties, by exempting them from their tuition help program. 

Frey launched a press release following the Court docket’s preliminary ruling, sharing his disappointment and itemizing what he thought of the ills of the spiritual establishments named within the lawsuit. In response to the AG, the 2 faculties concerned within the lawsuit, Temple Academy in Waterville or Bangor Christian Colleges, have insurance policies that discriminate in opposition to college students and employees when it comes to sexual orientation or gender identification, stopping their participation within the tuition program. He stated that each one faculties receiving state tuition should abide by the Maine Human Proper Act, which bans discriminating in opposition to somebody due to their race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity or incapacity.  

Advertisement

MEDIA MELTDOWN OVER SUPREME COURT RULING IN FAVOR OF RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS: ‘PRIME CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST STUFF’

On this picture taken Jan. 26, 2016, the empty playground at Trinity Lutheran Church in Columbia, Mo. Justice Neil Gorsuch’s first week listening to Supreme Court docket arguments contains a case that is giving faculty selection advocates hope for a neater use of public cash for personal, spiritual faculties in dozens of states. 
(Annaliese Nurnberg/Missourian by way of AP)

“I’m terribly dissatisfied and disheartened by as we speak’s determination,” Frey stated within the assertion. “Public schooling ought to expose youngsters to a wide range of viewpoints, promote tolerance and understanding, and put together youngsters for all times in a various society. The schooling offered by the colleges at subject right here is inimical to a public schooling. They promote a single faith to the exclusion of all others, refuse to confess homosexual and transgender youngsters, and overtly discriminate in hiring academics and employees. One faculty teaches youngsters that the husband is to be the chief of the family.”  

SUPREME COURT: COLUMNIST TORCHED FOR TWEETS TRYING TO INCITE BACKLASH AGAINST RULING ON RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS

“Whereas mother and father have the appropriate to ship their youngsters to such faculties, it’s disturbing that the Supreme Court docket discovered that folks even have the appropriate to power the general public to pay for an schooling that’s basically at odds with values we maintain pricey,” he continued. “I intend to discover with Governor Mills’ administration and members of the Legislature statutory amendments to handle the Court docket’s determination and be certain that public cash shouldn’t be used to advertise discrimination, intolerance, and bigotry.” 

Advertisement
Outside United States Supreme Court June 25

Exterior United States Supreme Court docket June 25
(Fox Information Digital/Lisa Bennatan)

Jacob Posik, director of communications at Maine Coverage Institute, wrote in an op-ed for the Bangor Day by day Information that Frey is “scrambling to vary the statute.” He expanded on what he framed because the folly of Frey’s arguments in an interview with Fox Information Digital. Frey urged in his assertion that this system is meant to offer the equal of a public schooling. However, Posik stated, “nothing could possibly be farther from the reality.” Maine enacted the state tuition program in 1873, he famous, and it was used to ship youngsters to spiritual faculties till the exclusion was codified in 1981.

“So for him to say that this program was by no means supposed for use this manner, it is simply completely devoid of historic context and the fact,” Posik stated, including that Chief Justice John Roberts reiterated a lot of the identical within the courtroom’s opinion. 

“However he begins off by reiterating feedback that the courtroom struck down,” Posik stated of Frey. “He says public funds can’t be used to attend a non-public faculty that promotes faith as a result of such faculties, by definition, don’t present the equal of a public schooling. After which if you happen to really undergo – if you happen to undergo the ruling and skim it, John Roberts actually eviscerates him. He says the statute would not say something of the such.”   

“After which so for him to for him to reiterate the identical argument that he made earlier than the courtroom, that the courtroom rejected and put it out in a press launch, is past irresponsible,” he later added.

Activists flocked to the Supreme Court following the overturn of Roe v. Wade on Friday June 24, 2022. 

Activists flocked to the Supreme Court docket following the overturn of Roe v. Wade on Friday June 24, 2022. 
(Fox Information Digital/Lisa Bennatan)

Carroll Conley, government director of the Christian Civic League of Maine, advised Fox Information Digital why he believed Frey’s assertion was “the very definition of bigotry.”

Advertisement

“We commend the nation’s highest courtroom for putting down Maine’s 40-year discriminatory prohibition of sectarian faculties’ participation in tuition applications,” Conley stated. “Our AG‘s response to dropping this case was concurrently baffling and offensive. His assertion that sectarian faculties are ‘inimical to a public schooling’ merely for not aligning with the state’s orthodoxy concerning human sexuality is the very definition of bigotry.” 

CNN WORRIES SUPREME COURT RULING IN FAVOR OF RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS ‘ERODES’ ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

He provided some hypotheticals as he continued to slam the lawyer basic’s authorized threats.

“Does AG Frey contend {that a} Hebrew faculty is working towards intolerance for insisting its Torah teacher be an adherent of Judaism?” Conley requested. “Would a Muslim faculty who selected to not make use of a male kindergarten trainer expressing himself as a feminine be disqualified for discrimination? Would a parochial faculty be thought of bigoted for permitting college students to specific themselves as cats or canines? I have no idea of anybody who thought the state of Maine would prevail on this case, and but our Legal professional Normal insists on losing taxpayers’ cash by ignoring this ruling and pursuing authorized motion that will thwart this growth of academic option to households no matter their monetary circumstances.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

“It seems the Maine Legal professional Normal is not uninterested in dropping but,” Corey DeAngelis, senior fellow on the American Federation for Youngsters and a board member of Liberty Justice Heart, advised Fox Information Digital. “After opponents of academic freedom took an enormous L on the Supreme Court docket of america final week, they’re already greedy at straws making an attempt to determine different methods to discriminate in opposition to spiritual households. Additional discrimination in opposition to spiritual households would violate the free train clause of the First Modification of the U.S. Structure. SCOTUS has constantly dominated in favor of spiritual liberties in schooling. If Maine needs to lose once more by looking for different methods to discriminate in opposition to spiritual households, so be it.”

College selection proponents cheered the Maine spiritual faculty ruling as a win for his or her motion as a result of it may open doorways for applications that supply mother and father extra management over their youngsters’ schooling. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Opinion: Government mandates to blame for continuing decline of Maine education

Published

on

Opinion: Government mandates to blame for continuing decline of Maine education


Following the release of Maine Policy Institute’s new report on the decline of Maine K-12 education earlier this week, the Maine Department of Education responded by trying to discredit both the report and the National Assessment of Educational Progress, an important piece of data used in the analysis.

The report itself is not an attack on Maine’s current DOE. Rather, it tells a story of decadeslong decline in Maine classrooms due to mandates that disrupt learning, for which prominent politicians at all levels of government – on both sides of the aisle – are responsible.

The NAEP, or the “Nation’s Report Card,” as it is often called, is a congressionally mandated test administered by the National Center for Education Statistics. It involves a representative sample of students in each state taking the test every two to four years. MPI’s report provides evidence that Maine fell in the NAEP rankings from consistently scoring first and second in math and reading in the early 1990s to an average of 36th by 2022.

In public comments this week, the DOE said that the NAEP “is used to identify national trends and was never designed to measure individual states.” The comments further claim that the test “provides a limited and narrow snapshot of the academic performance” of a small group of fourth and eighth graders and has proven “not to be a valid or reliable measure of individual states’ performance.”

Advertisement

It is dishonest that the DOE would say the NAEP was never designed to measure student performance in individual states. The NAEP itself has said its two major goals are to compare results between states and across time.

If the assessment itself was not representative, the federal government’s statisticians would not let it be used for comparisons between states. In fact, the National Center for Education Statistics works hard to ensure there are representative subgroups to analyze in each state, accounting for demographics such as race, gender and socioeconomic status.

It is also worth noting that while the DOE criticizes the use of the NAEP, Maine’s NAEP results are publicly available on the DOE website going all the way back to 2003. Users can compare Maine’s results to other states and see its performance over time. The department provides no disclaimer about utilizing the test in the way I did.

The NAEP was selected for this report because it is a rigorous and reliable test that provides data going all the way back to the 1990s. It is used by policy scholars across the ideological spectrum, from the American Enterprise Institute to the Brookings Institution. As one leading education scholar said, “When it comes to education, no facts are as reliable or respected as those produced by the (NAEP).”

To me, it seems the DOE does not care about data and is working to obscure the obvious: Maine test scores have been falling, students are not learning as much as they should be, and teachers and administrators are burning out and leaving their professions in droves. The DOE knows the report is right on those key findings, and that is why it must resort to attacking the use of this assessment.

Advertisement

Far more important than these test scores is the reality that Maine has seen a recent exodus of teachers and is facing one of the most staggering teacher shortages nationwide.

Experimental top-down mandates, pushed on Maine schools by the state and federal government over many decades, have forced teachers to change the way they teach, test, grade and manage students. What used to be valuable instruction time is now being dedicated to paperwork, data collection, social-emotional learning and other tasks. This steals valuable classroom time from students, and teachers do not like it either.

If Maine wants its test scores and student achievement to improve, local parents, teachers, administrators and school boards should be empowered to make the important decisions regarding their children’s education. Now is not the time to ignore evidence. Now is the time to learn from past mistakes and deliver Maine students the education they deserve.


Use the form below to reset your password. When you’ve submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Advertisement

« Previous

Opinion: To improve Maine students’ health and academics, start in the cafeteria

Next »

Opinion: What if Portland became a bike town?



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine passes extensive gun safety bill in response to Lewiston mass shooting

Published

on

Maine passes extensive gun safety bill in response to Lewiston mass shooting


Lawmakers in Maine voted to enact comprehensive gun safety measures less than six months after the deadliest mass shooting in state history left 18 people dead and more than a dozen injured.

Legislation approved Thursday strengthens background checks on private gun sales and makes it a criminal offense to wantonly provide a firearm to someone who shouldn’t have one.

The bill, urged by Democratic Gov. Janet Mills, also provides funding for a mental health crisis center in Lewiston, where Army reservist Robert Card went on a deadly Oct. 25 shooting spree, targeting a bowling alley and a bar.

Gun safety steps taken Thursday came hours after Maine’s Senate agreed to a 72-hour waiting period on gun purchases. The governor will review that bill as well as another that would ban bump stocks.

Advertisement
Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, left, confers with Senate Majority Leader Eloise Vitelli, D-Arrowsic, Senate Minority Leader Sen. Harold “Trey” Stewart, R-Presque Isle, and Assistant Senate Minority Leader Sen. Lisa Keim, R-Dixfield, in front of the rostrum during a break in the morning session Wednesday, April 17, 2024, at the Maine State House in Augusta, Maine. (Joe Phelan/The Kennebec Journal via AP)

Executive director of the Maine Gun Safety Coalition Nacole Palmer called this week’s actions by lawmakers “significant steps” toward keeping citizens safe.

While some Mainers impacted by Card’s shooting spree supported measures to make mass shootings in the state less likely, Ben Dyer, who was shot five times that night, told the Associated Press he’s not sure Thursday’s actions legislators accomplish that feat.

“A sick person did a sick thing that day,” he said. “And the Legislature and politicians are trying to capitalize on that to get their agendas passed.”

Dyer believes rigid gun control laws mainly hurt law-abiding weapon owners.

Card was institutionalized prior to his killing spree and said he “heard voices” before opening fire on civilians in Maine’s second-largest city.

Advertisement

Maine has yellow flag laws that allow police to ask courts to consider whether an individual is fit to possess a gun. The state hasn’t been able to pass a red flag law that would allow family members to petition a judge directly with concerns about a loved one’s access to firearms.

Card had 20 years of military experience, but was never deployed, officials said. The 40-year-old shooter took his own life shortly after using his Ruger SFAR semi-automatic rifle to wreak havoc on unsuspecting patrons at Just-in-Time Recreation bowling alley and Schemengees Bar & Grille Restaurant.

With News Wire Services



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

11-year-old Maine boy killed after crashing friend’s ATV

Published

on

11-year-old Maine boy killed after crashing friend’s ATV


Maine authorities investigating death of 11-year-old in ATV accident

Advertisement


Maine authorities investigating death of 11-year-old in ATV accident

00:17

Advertisement

SANGERVILLE, Maine – Authorities in Maine are investigating after an 11-year-old boy was killed in an ATV accident on Tuesday.

The Maine Warden Service says it responded to a report of an ATV crash on East Sangerville Road at 4:15 p.m. 

The boy had been helping with chores on a friend’s property, and then went out for a ride on the friend’s ATV, which he had used before. 

“When the boy did not return, the neighbor went to look for the boy, and found him on the trail, unresponsive with the ATV on top of him,” the agency said in a statement.

Neighbors tried to save boy

The neighbor called 911 and got help to lift the ATV off the boy. Other people at the scene performed CPR until a sheriff’s deputy arrived to take over.

Advertisement

The Warden Service says emergency medical personnel arrived on the scene “soon after” but the 11-year-old died at the scene.

The agency has not released the boy’s name or any other information as it continues to investigate the crash.   

Maine ATV safety

In Maine, you have to be at least 10 years old to drive an ATV. Children between the ages of 10 and 16 are not allowed to operate an ATV unless they have successfully completed a safety course and are accompanied by an adult.

Last July, a Massachusetts woman was killed and her passenger was seriously in an ATV crash on a trail in Coplin, Maine.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending