Connect with us

News

What’s happening in China after zero-Covid protests? Here’s what you need to know | CNN

Published

on

What’s happening in China after zero-Covid protests? Here’s what you need to know | CNN


Beijing
CNN
 — 

After unprecedented protests swept China, a number of cities have taken steps to ease some Covid-19 restrictions and a prime official has signaled a softer strategy to virus controls – resulting in hypothesis that an finish to zero-Covid could also be in sight.

China’s most senior official answerable for its Covid response informed well being officers Wednesday {that a} “new stage and mission” within the pandemic response was as a result of “the lowering toxicity” of the Omicron variant, growing vaccinations and the “accumulating expertise” of preventing the virus, in response to state information company Xinhua.

Vice Premier Solar Chunlan’s feedback – which made no point out of “zero-Covid” – got here after anger over Beijing’s more and more expensive technique of mass-testing, enforced quarantine and lockdowns introduced hundreds of protesters onto the streets of main cities.

As their numbers swelled, many additionally demanded better political freedoms – and a few even known as for the elimination of Chinese language chief Xi Jinping.

Advertisement

Protests on such a big scale are extremely uncommon in China. Whereas demonstrations over native grievances happen periodically, the protests are probably the most widespread because the Tiananmen Sq. pro-democracy motion of 1989.

The Chinese language authorities has cracked down swiftly, deploying police at key protest websites, calling protesters to warn them and tightening on-line censorship.

Right here’s what we all know.

The demonstrations had been triggered by a lethal fireplace on November 24 in Urumqi, the capital of the far western area of Xinjiang. The blaze killed not less than 10 individuals and injured 9 in an condo constructing – resulting in public fury after movies of the incident appeared to indicate lockdown measures had delayed firefighters from reaching the victims.

Town had been beneath lockdown for greater than 100 days, with residents unable to depart the area and plenty of pressured to remain residence.

Advertisement

Movies confirmed Urumqi residents marching to a authorities constructing and chanting for the tip of lockdown on Friday. The next morning, the native authorities stated it might carry the lockdown in phases – however didn’t present a transparent time-frame or tackle the protests.

That did not quell public anger and the protests quickly unfold past Xinjiang, with residents in cities and universities throughout China additionally taking to the streets.

Thus far, CNN has verified 23 demonstrations since Saturday throughout 17 Chinese language cities – together with the capital Beijing and monetary heart Shanghai.

In Shanghai on Saturday, a whole bunch gathered for a candlelight vigil on Urumqi Street, named after the Xinjiang metropolis, to mourn the fireplace victims. Many held up clean sheets of white paper – a symbolic protest towards censorship – and chanted, “Want human rights, want freedom.”

Some additionally shouted for Xi to “step down,” and sang “The Internationale,” a socialist anthem used as a name to motion in demonstrations worldwide for greater than a century. It was additionally sung throughout pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Sq. in Beijing earlier than a brutal crackdown by armed troops in 1989.

Advertisement

By Sunday night, mass demonstrations had unfold to Beijing, Chengdu, Guangzhou and Wuhan, the place hundreds of residents known as for not solely an finish to Covid restrictions, however extra remarkably, political freedoms. Residents in some locked-down neighborhoods tore down boundaries and took to the streets.

Protests additionally befell on campuses, together with the distinguished establishments of Peking College and Tsinghua College in Beijing, and Communication College of China, Nanjing.

In Hong Kong, the place a nationwide safety legislation imposed by Beijing in 2020 has been used to stifle dissent, dozens of individuals gathered on Monday night within the metropolis’s Central district for a vigil. Some held clean items of paper, whereas others left flowers and held indicators commemorating these killed within the Urumqi fireplace.

Advertisement

Hear protesters in China name for Xi Jinping’s resignation

Vice Premier Solar’s remarks Wednesday about China’s “new stage and mission” in pandemic controls got here simply someday after the nation’s Nationwide Well being Fee (NHC) stated the rectification of present pandemic measures is underway and native governments ought to “reply to and resolve the cheap calls for of the lots” in a well timed method.

In a gathering with the NHC on Wednesday, Solar additionally acknowledged {that a} “human-centered strategy” ought to be taken, and China ought to improve its “prognosis, testing, therapy and quarantine” measures, proceed boosting vaccination charges – particularly amongst aged individuals – and strengthen treatment and medical sources.

Specialists have beforehand stated larger vaccination charges among the many aged was mandatory earlier than any potential rest of restrictions.

Advertisement
Police form a cordon  during a protest in Beijing on November 27.

At a State Council press briefing on Tuesday, prime well being officers appeared to acknowledge the disruptions attributable to measures akin to lockdowns, saying long-term closures “may cause anxiousness and life difficulties.”

NHC spokesperson Mi Feng stated Covid insurance policies had been being rectified to incorporate lifting lockdown “as shortly as attainable” to cut back inconvenience.

In latest days, not less than six cities throughout China, together with Beijing, have made modifications to their Covid insurance policies, in some circumstances lifting lockdowns, easing quarantine necessities and eliminating mass testing, in response to state-run information company Xinhua.

Since Monday, the variety of regionally transmitted Covid circumstances reported each day in China has been declining, primarily based on NHC information.

Public protest is exceedingly uncommon in China, the place the Communist Get together has tightened its grip on all points of life, launched a sweeping crackdown on dissent, worn out a lot of civil society and constructed a high-tech surveillance state.

Advertisement

The mass surveillance system is much more stringent in Xinjiang, the place the Chinese language authorities is accused of detaining as much as 2 million Uyghurs and different ethnic minorities in camps the place former detainees have alleged they had been bodily and sexually abused.

A damning United Nations report in September described the area’s “invasive” surveillance community, with police databases containing a whole bunch of hundreds of information with biometric information akin to facial and eyeball scans.

China has repeatedly denied accusations of human rights abuses within the area.

Protesters march in Beijing on November 27.

Whereas protests do happen in China, they hardly ever occur on this scale or take such direct goal on the central authorities and the nation’s chief, stated Maria Repnikova, an affiliate professor at Georgia State College who research Chinese language politics and media.

“It is a completely different sort of protest from the extra localized protests we now have seen recurring over the previous 20 years that are likely to focus their claims and calls for on native officers and on very focused societal and financial points,” she stated. As an alternative, this time the protests have expanded to incorporate “the sharper expression of political grievances alongside considerations about Covid-19 lockdowns.”

Advertisement

There have been rising indicators in latest months that the general public has run out of persistence with zero-Covid, after almost three years of financial hardship and disruption to each day life.

Remoted pockets of protest broke out in October, with anti-zero-Covid slogans showing on the partitions of public bogs and in varied Chinese language cities, impressed by a banner hung by a lone protester on an overpass in Beijing simply days earlier than Xi cemented a 3rd time period in energy.

Earlier in November, bigger protests befell in Guangzhou, with residents defying lockdown orders to topple boundaries and cheer as they took to the streets.

Whereas protests in a number of components of China seem to have largely dispersed peacefully over the weekend, authorities responded extra forcefully in some cities on Monday and Tuesday, flooding protest websites to discourage individuals from gathering.

Authorities in some cities have additionally adopted surveillance techniques, akin to these utilized in Xinjiang, to intimidate those that demonstrated over the weekend.

Advertisement

In what gave the impression to be the primary official – albeit veiled – response to the protests, China’s home safety chief vowed at a gathering Tuesday to “successfully preserve total social stability.”

With out mentioning the demonstrations, Chen Wenqing urged legislation enforcement officers to “resolutely strike laborious towards infiltration and sabotage actions by hostile forces, in addition to unlawful and prison acts that disrupt social order,” Xinhua reported.

The powerful language could sign a heavy-handed crackdown forward.

Video thumbnial china covid bbc journalist

Video exhibits British journalist ‘crushed’ and detained in China

Advertisement

In latest days, vigils and demonstrations expressing solidarity with protesters in China have been held world wide, together with in the UK, Canada, Australia, america and Malaysia.

International officers and organizations have additionally voiced help for the protesters and criticized Beijing’s response.

“We’re watching this intently, as you would possibly anticipate we might,” stated US Nationwide Safety Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby on Monday. “We proceed to face up and help the best of peaceable protest.”

UK International Secretary James Cleverly informed reporters the Chinese language authorities ought to “hearken to the voices of its personal individuals … when they’re saying that they don’t seem to be proud of the restrictions imposed upon them.”

Advertisement

The European Broadcasting Union additionally stated on Monday that it condemned “the insupportable intimidation and aggression” directed towards member journalists in China, in an obvious reference to overseas journalists who had been detained throughout protests.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Nvidia drops 10% as investors see risk in Big Tech shares

Published

on

Nvidia drops 10% as investors see risk in Big Tech shares

Stay informed with free updates

Nvidia’s share price plunged by 10 per cent on Friday, helping to seal the worst run for US stock markets since October 2022, as investors shunned risky assets ahead of a flurry of Big Tech earnings next week.

The chipmaker endured its worst session since March 2020, losing more than $200bn of its market value on the day. The decline accounted for roughly half of the 0.9 per cent fall in Wall Street’s S&P 500, according to Bloomberg data.

Netflix, meanwhile, shed about 9 per cent a day after the streaming service’s announcement that it would stop regularly disclosing its subscriber numbers overshadowed stronger than expected earnings. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite ended the session down 2.1 per cent.

Advertisement

Stocks that have been powered higher by investor enthusiasm for artificial intelligence also suffered, with Advanced Micro Devices, Micron Technology and Meta closing 5.4 per cent, 4.6 per cent and 4.1 per cent lower, respectively. Super Micro Computer, a server equipment group seen as a beneficiary of the AI boom, closed down 23 per cent.

“It’s a rough day for tech stocks,” said Kevin Gordon, a senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab. “Anything that was doing well earlier this year is unwinding, but banks and energy are doing well with [defensive] staples.” 

Friday’s moves come as investors have begun to take seriously the possibility that the US Federal Reserve could make just one quarter-point cut to interest rates this year, or perhaps none at all. Retaliatory strikes between Iran and Israel have also ratcheted up investor anxiety, denting the market rally.

But analysts said Friday’s sell-off was instead being driven by investors hurriedly repositioning their portfolios ahead of a flurry of Big Tech earnings next week. 

“The stock pullback has very little to do with [interest] rates,” said Parag Thatte, a strategist at Deutsche Bank. “It’s more to do with investors pricing in slower earnings growth [for Big Tech].”

Advertisement

Andrew Brenner, head of international fixed income at NatAlliance Securities, said “there is no relative pressure on rates” in the absence of fresh announcements from the Fed. “But equities are getting crushed.”

Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta all report results for the first quarter next week, while Nvidia’s results are due in late May. Although all are expected to have performed well, they face tough quarter-on-quarter comparisons.

Year-on-year earnings per share growth for Nvidia, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Apple peaked at 68.2 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2023. UBS analysts expect the so-called Big 6 to report EPS growth of 42.1 per cent for the first three months of this year.

Line chart of Index price performance (rebased) showing US stocks have slipped from record highs this month

Wall Street’s benchmark S&P 500 index shed 0.9 per cent on Friday, capping its worst week in more than five months in percentage terms. The index has declined every day since last Friday, its worst run in a year and a half.

All of a sudden, “the dip-buyers are not dip-buying . . . or if they are, they are getting swamped”, said Mike Zigmont, head of trading at Harvest Volatility Management.

The dollar index was steady on the day while oil prices rose modestly.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Is this fictitious civil war closer to reality than we think? : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Is this fictitious civil war closer to reality than we think? : Consider This from NPR

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

(L-R) Kirsten Dunst, Cailee Spaeny

Murray Close/A24


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Murray Close/A24


(L-R) Kirsten Dunst, Cailee Spaeny

Murray Close/A24

1. A civil war for the silver screen

Civil War, the new A24 film from British director Alex Garland, imagines a scenario that might not seem so far-fetched to some; a contemporary civil war breaking out in the United States.

Advertisement

In this world, the U.S. has split into various factions. The president, played by Nick Offerman – has given himself a third term, and he’s hoping to fend off an assault from one of the more powerful groups.

In what might seem like the most unbelievable narrative twist, California and Texas form an alliance to become the “Western Forces” and fight against Offerman’s regime. Sure, I guess!

2. How far are we from reality?

NPR movie critic Bob Mondello says the movie doesn’t do a lot of explaining to help us understand how the U.S. got to this moment. But he says that makes it stronger.

“What became much more interesting in the moment was what it looks like to transpose things that we’ve always associated with other countries – the bombed out helicopters and things like that – to place that in a J.C. Penney parking lot.”

And while the film has taken heat for little mention of politics, the question of an actual civil war has everything to do with it.

Advertisement

Polling has shown a significant minority thinks a civil war is at least somewhat likely in the next 10 years. So what do the experts say?

3. Division in the U.S.

Amy Cooter is a director of research at the Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. Her work has led her to the question that Garland’s movie has put in the minds of both moviegoers and political pundits: Could a second civil war really happen here?

Cooter wants to make one thing clear: “I don’t think that civil war is imminent, but I think there are some people who wish we would have one, and wish that they could be effectively culture soldiers to re-enact a civil order that they see as better for them and their families.”

In her studies of militias and political extremists, Cooter has observed a movement of groups similar to those who joined in on the January 6th riots who feel disconnected from the current political moment, or perhaps want to return to a previous version of society, that they feel served them better.

And while Cooter doesn’t think a civil war will be happening anytime soon, she does say this:

Advertisement

“I think we are at a moment of extreme political division that may get worse before it gets better.”

This episode was produced by Marc Rivers.

It was edited by Jeanette Woods, Jonaki Mehta and Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Continue Reading

News

Military briefing: the Israeli missiles used to strike Iran

Published

on

Military briefing: the Israeli missiles used to strike Iran

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Mysterious wreckages photographed in Iraq have given the clearest indication yet of how Israel might have launched its counterstrike against Iran.

The pictures, scoured by military analysts and open-source intelligence enthusiasts, suggest that Israel may have used an air-launched Sparrow ballistic missile to demonstrate to Tehran that it can successfully attack targets inside the country at range.

One Israeli official also indicated that the country’s armed forces used a stand-off missile attack launched far from Iran’s borders. “Israel has informed its partners that the primary attack vectors were airborne, with no entry into (Iranian) airspace,” the official said.

Advertisement

The exact combination of arms used in the counterstrike remains unclear, but it comes a week after Iran launched an unprecedented drone and missile salvo at Israel, itself a response to a suspected Israeli strike against Iran’s consulate in Damascus.

The missile segments, photographed and posted on social media by Sabereen News, an outlet linked to Iraqi Shia militias, were identified by some experts as most likely being the expended fuel propulsion units of Israeli-made Blue Sparrow missiles. Early Pentagon assessments pointed in the same direction, according to one person briefed on the work.

The Sparrow family of air-launched missiles have a range of up to 2,000km and could have been fired by Israeli fighter jets refuelled by tanker planes in Syrian airspace, according to OSINT analysts citing air flight data from late on Thursday.

Buttressing that theory, Syria’s Sana state news agency reported that Israeli missiles had targeted air defence positions in its southern region. Such a move would fit with Israel “clearing the air corridor in Syria for a stand-off strike on Iran”, said one former senior US defence official.

Opening a safe air raid corridor in Syria would in turn enable long-range attacks by Israeli fighter jets well outside Iranian airspace. As the Israeli missiles then flew east over Iraq, they would have jettisoned their fuel booster units, with the armed sections carrying on to their targets in Iran.

Advertisement

Israel has not commented on the strike, as per its traditional policy of strategic ambiguity. The US has said it played no role. The International Atomic Energy Agency also said none of Iran’s nuclear sites were damaged.

Map showing how Israel might have launched its counterstrike against Iran.  Israeli missiles target air defence positions in southern Syria  Israeli aircraft refuel over Syria and launch missile(s) towards Iran  Missile fuel propulsion units jettisoned over Iraq and fall to ground  Missile warhead(s) carry on to targets in Iran

Iran has meanwhile downplayed what happened, with officials signalling there are no plans to respond. One Iranian official told the Financial Times that a limited number of missiles were part of the attack but said they were intercepted.

“There is a lot of uncertainty still,” said John Ridge, an OSINT analyst. “But Sparrow missiles most closely fit the mission parameters . . .[especially] of range.”

Sparrow missiles have three variants: the short-range Black Arrow, and the mid-range Blue and Silver Arrow versions. Blue Sparrow missiles have “performed flawlessly in its missions so far”, according to its producer, Israeli defence company Rafael.

Ridge added that another possible weapon used by Israel may have been Rocks missiles, an air-launched precision missile similar to the Sparrow. Both are made by Israeli defence tech group Rafael.

Initial reports from Iranian state media suggested that Israel may have also used small drones or quadcopters rather than missiles for the attack. Iranian foreign minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said the “mini drones” that Israel reportedly launched at Iran “did not cause any damage or casualties”.

Advertisement

That may be part of a deliberate Iranian strategy to play down the impact of the Israeli strike and the effectiveness of its long-range weapons. An Israeli drone strike also fits with previous covert Israeli operations inside Iran, which on at least two occasions have used drones to target weapons facilities.

Amos Yadlin, a former Israeli air force general and military intelligence chief, said that regardless of how Israel conducted the strike on Iran, the mere fact that it took place would send a powerful message.

“What the Iranians and their proxies did with hundreds of projectiles we did with just a handful of missiles,” he said. It shows Tehran that “you’re vulnerable, we have much greater capabilities than you think”.

Alleged Israeli munition and/or weapons platform that fell near Baghdad during Israeli strike on Isfahan
Part of a suspected Israeli missile found in Iraq. Israel’s forces are thought have jettisoned their fuel booster units over Iraq with the armed sections carrying on to their targets in Iran © Sabereen News/Telegram

Commenting on the Iraqi images of the fallen missile segments, Yadlin added that they looked like parts of an “armament that has never been used before, with long-range capabilities”. 

Israel originally developed Sparrow missiles to test the effectiveness of its Arrow air defence system, which is used to down incoming ballistic missiles. Israel subsequently manufactured a variant with a live warhead. Rocks missiles are a derivative version of the Sparrow.

Noting that the Israeli attack appeared to have struck a balance between showing the country’s military strength without provoking an Iranian response, the former senior US defence official praised its “impressive execution”.

Advertisement

Further evidence came on Friday morning, when the Iraqi militias that photographed the expended missile segments declared on social media that they “were evidence of the great failure of the Zionist attack”.

Additional reporting by Raya Jalabi in Beirut, Mehul Srivastava in London and Felicia Schwartz in Capri

Illustration by Ian Bott and cartography by Steven Bernard

Continue Reading

Trending