Connect with us

News

Trump Claims He Declassified Documents. Why Don’t His Lawyers Say So in Court?

Published

on

Trump Claims He Declassified Documents. Why Don’t His Lawyers Say So in Court?

WASHINGTON — Former President Donald J. Trump claimed on Wednesday that when he was within the White Home, his powers have been so broad he might declassify nearly any doc by merely “excited about it.”

That argument — which got here as he defended his choice to retain authorities paperwork in his Florida dwelling in an interview with the Fox host Sean Hannity — underscored a widening hole between the previous president and his legal professionals. In contrast, they’ve to date been unwilling to repeat Mr. Trump’s declassification declare in court docket, as they counter a federal investigation into his dealing with of presidency paperwork.

Over the previous week, a federal appeals court docket in Atlanta — together with Mr. Trump’s alternative for a particular grasp to evaluation the paperwork seized final month — undermined a bulwark of his effort to justify his actions: Each prompt that there was no proof to help the assertion that Mr. Trump had declassified all the pieces — in writing, verbally or wordlessly — regardless of what the previous president could have mentioned on TV.

On Thursday, the particular grasp, Decide Raymond J. Dearie, additionally appeared to take intention at one other considered one of Mr. Trump’s excuses — that federal brokers had planted a few of the information after they searched his Mar-a-Lago property. In an order issued after the appellate court docket had dominated, Decide Dearie instructed Mr. Trump’s legal professionals to let him know if there have been any discrepancies between the paperwork that have been stored at Mar-a-Lago and those who the F.B.I. mentioned it had hauled away.

By the point the Hannity interview aired late Wednesday, a three-judge appellate panel of the Courtroom of Appeals for the eleventh Circuit — which included two jurists appointed by Mr. Trump — had blocked a part of a decrease court docket order favorable to the previous president. The panel brushed apart the suggestion that he had declassified 100 extremely delicate paperwork present in his residential and storage areas as each unfounded and irrelevant.

Advertisement

The court docket wrote that there was “no proof that any of those information have been declassified” and took word of the truth that, when Mr. Trump’s legal professionals appeared earlier than Decide Dearie this week, they too “resisted offering any proof that he had declassified any of those paperwork.”

The appellate panel went on to declare that the declassification concern, which Mr. Trump has repeatedly thrust on the middle of the case, was “a purple herring” that might not have factored into its ruling even when it had been extensively argued earlier than them. Even when Mr. Trump had, in reality declassified the information, the judges wrote, he was nonetheless certain by federal regulation, together with the Presidential Information Act, that required him to return all authorities paperwork, categorised or unclassified, when he left workplace.

Declassifying an official doc wouldn’t alone “render it private” or flip it right into a possession he might maintain onto after leaving workplace, the court docket mentioned.

The judges in Atlanta weren’t alone of their opinion.

In the future earlier, Decide Dearie expressed the same type of skepticism. He pointedly instructed Mr. Trump’s authorized crew that for the reason that categorised paperwork have been clearly marked categorised, he supposed to think about them as categorised — until they provided proof on the contrary.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling was a significant victory for the Justice Division, which argued that the sooner choice by Decide Aileen M. Cannon, whom Mr. Trump appointed to the Federal District Courtroom for the Southern District of Florida, had hamstrung its investigation and hampered the intelligence neighborhood’s capacity to conduct a separate intelligence evaluation.

On Thursday, Decide Cannon modified her order for the particular grasp evaluation to exclude paperwork marked as categorised, in step with the appeals court docket choice.

Nonetheless, the order appeared to lift new questions. Decide Cannon didn’t concern a written opinion explaining why she had taken that step earlier than Mr. Trump indicated whether or not he would attraction to the Supreme Courtroom. By pre-emptively eradicating the parts of the order that the appeals court docket had blocked, she could have rendered any additional litigation over the matter moot. Mr. Trump’s legal professionals didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Shortly after Decide Cannon’s order was issued, Decide Dearie launched his personal scheduling order for the evaluation that may now be targeted solely on the roughly 11,000 paperwork that aren’t marked as categorised.

Underneath his plan, the 2 sides would determine any disputes over whether or not the information are authorities or private property, or privileged or unprivileged, by Oct. 21.

Advertisement

After Decide Cannon guidelines on the disputed information, Decide Dearie mentioned, he’ll entertain a movement, ought to Mr. Trump want to file one, to get again the seized gadgets. Decide Dearie additionally mentioned he wouldn’t search any compensation since he’s nonetheless actively listening to instances, however would rent a retired Justice of the Peace choose from the Japanese District of New York, James Orenstein, to help him at a charge of $500 per hour.

Mr. Trump will nonetheless should foot the invoice, as laid out in a earlier ruling by Decide Cannon.

It stays potential that Mr. Trump’s legal professionals will attraction the matter to the Supreme Courtroom, hoping to get the court docket’s conservative majority to border a broad new definition of presidential authority that the federal government says is at variance with judicial precedent and norms. However the legal professionals may also pursue a narrower technique, looking for to delay the inquiry in hopes of defending Mr. Trump from authorized legal responsibility, quite than attempting to go away a extra sturdy constitutional imprint.

In the course of the listening to earlier than Decide Dearie, Mr. Trump’s legal professionals supplied a glimpse of what the declassification gambit may very well be about. It seems to be a method that the previous president’s authorized crew is holding in reserve ought to he finally problem the legality of the Mar-a-Lago search in a suppression movement or file court docket papers — generally known as a Rule 41 movement — to get a few of the seized supplies again from the Justice Division.

James Trusty, considered one of Mr. Trump’s legal professionals, gave a touch about what he and his companions have been planning, telling Decide Dearie that they could supply proof sooner or later that Mr. Trump declassified the paperwork. However to take action, Mr. Trusty mentioned, the authorized crew wanted to see the categorised materials first.

Advertisement

Whereas Decide Dearie welcomed the concept that Mr. Trump’s legal professionals would possibly at some point show their claims, he appeared much less happy to listen to them making arguments however not offering proof.

“I suppose my view of it’s,” he mentioned, “you possibly can’t have your cake and eat it.”

The concept of a magic-wand course of by which a president can each train energy and absolve himself of authorized legal responsibility holds deep attraction to Mr. Trump, in response to folks near him. And whereas many authorized specialists have dismissed such a broad definition of presidential energy, a number of of the previous president’s key allies — together with the previous White Home aide Kash Patel; the journalist John Solomon; and Tom Fitton, who runs Judicial Watch, a conservative authorized group — have urged him to undertake that protection.

Mr. Trump’s authorized crew has merely hinted on the risk that he declassified the paperwork, with out taking a agency place in court docket, the place making a false assertion can have skilled penalties.

In a letter to the Justice Division in Could, Mr. Trump’s authorized crew first put ahead a coy insinuation that Mr. Trump might need declassified all the pieces — whereas stopping in need of truly saying he did so. On the time, Mr. Trump had simply acquired a grand jury subpoena for any delicate information that remained at Mar-a-Lago, and the letter argued that Mr. Trump couldn’t be charged below a regulation that criminalizes mishandling categorised info.

Advertisement

Even then, there have been indications that the classification debate, whereas foremost within the former president’s thoughts, was of restricted use for his legal professionals.

No credible proof has emerged to help Mr. Trump’s claims, however even when they turned out to be true, authorized specialists say that might not get him out of authorized bother.

When the Justice Division later obtained a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago, it listed as the idea of the investigation three different legal guidelines for which prosecutors don’t must show {that a} doc was categorised as a component of the offense. They embrace the Espionage Act and obstruction.

Mr. Trump has continued to insist in public that he had declassified all the pieces the federal government seized from his residence.

But if the previous president is severe about utilizing that declare because the cornerstone of his protection, he’ll finally should take the danger of backing up these assertions in court docket — below oath.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump’s legal professionals might additionally submit sworn declarations, although it’s unclear if they’d be keen to take action; federal investigators are at the moment inspecting whether or not members of his authorized crew falsely attested that they’d returned delicate supplies to the federal government earlier than the search warrant uncovered dozens of paperwork.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Israel and Iran pull back from the brink

Published

on

Israel and Iran pull back from the brink

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Almost immediately after blasts erupted over an air base near Isfahan in the early hours of Friday, Iran did its utmost to play down Israel’s retaliatory attack against the Islamic republic.

Iranian commanders said there was no damage and that the explosions were caused by air defence batteries taking out unidentified objects. There were no accusations thrown at Israel or calls for revenge.

President Ebrahim Raisi made no mention of the attack when he gave a live televised speech hours later, even though officials have previously vowed to retaliate immediately to any direct Israeli assault on Iranian territory.

Advertisement

In Israel, there was a similarly muted response. Ever since Iran launched its first direct assault on Israel from Iranian soil last week, there was never any doubt that Benjamin Netanyahu’s government would respond. The only question was when and on what scale.

But when the response came it appeared — so far — to be limited. And Israel neither confirmed nor denied the attack, choosing not to take ownership as Israelis went about their normal daily business.

A man watches Iranian television coverage of the explosions in central Isfahan province on Friday © Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu/Getty Images

For the moment, it appears the arch foes — which have been gambling with the stability of the Middle East as they upped the ante in their long-simmering conflict — have pulled back from the brink.

Netanyahu, known to be risk-averse despite his belligerent rhetoric, seems to have heeded the advice of the US and Israel’s other western allies rather than his far-right allies who called for a “crushing” counterstrike. The measured, targeted response to Iran’s attack for now eases the risk of sparking a full-blown regional war.

Last weekend’s Iranian assault, though huge in terms of the projectiles launched, was telegraphed well in advance and also caused minimal damage. Tehran, which mounted that attack in response to an Israeli strike on its consulate in Damascus this month, also made clear it was “mission accomplished” and that it did not want a further escalation.

Advertisement

But even if the region, which has been on tenterhooks for days, breathes a sigh of relief, it will be only momentary.

Since Hamas’s brutal attack on October 7 and Israel’s ferocious retaliatory offensive in Gaza, the Middle East has been on a dangerous escalatory spiral.

Hostilities have erupted on multiple fronts between Israel and Iranian-backed militants. US troops have been drawn into combat in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Israel and Hizbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese militant movement, have been locked in daily cross-border combat that at any other time would be considered all-out war.

Pre-existing red lines between Israel, Iran and its proxies have been blurred while old precedents have gone by the wayside.

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei took a huge gamble by launching a direct strike on Israel © Iranian Supreme leader’s Office/dpa

Iran’s direct strike on Israel was a huge gamble by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader. He put aside, at least temporarily, his long-held strategy of “strategic patience” to underline that he was willing to risk his top priority — the survival of the republic — and direct conflict if he felt Israel crossed a line.

By striking Iran’s diplomatic mission in Damascus, Israel had also pushed Tehran too far, crossing a critical line for the regime. For Netanyahu, the strike was a signal that no target was off limits as Israel seeks to restore its deterrence after the huge intelligence failure it suffered on October 7.

Advertisement

The overnight attack on Friday bore the hallmarks of Israel’s more traditional approach to hitting Iranian assets through calibrated targeted strikes and assassinations. But it is far too early to assume the long-simmering Israeli-Iranian conflict has gone back into the shadows.

Israel can be expected to continue to target Iranian assets, particularly in Syria where it has already killed at least 18 Revolutionary Guards members, including senior commanders, since October. Israeli jets reportedly struck military targets in Syria as it mounted Friday’s attack on Iran.

Even if both sides — as they claim — want to avoid a full-blown war, another miscalculation or provocation could light the fuse for the next escalation. The volatile situation is made all the more precarious because the rules are constantly changing and the stakes are increasing: what one side deems a calculated action, the other might consider an unacceptable provocation.

Both are also determined to show that their respective deterrents are being restored and both face pressures from domestic constituencies to respond to the others’ hostility.

This is the grim reality that has been in existence since Hamas’s attack killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli officials. And the longer Israel’s offensive in Gaza continues, adding to a death toll that Palestinian officials say has reached almost 34,000 people, the greater the risks will be.

Advertisement

All-out war may have been averted for now, but the danger for the Middle East and beyond has far from passed.

Continue Reading

News

Alvin Bragg, Manhattan's district attorney, draws friends close and critics closer

Published

on

Alvin Bragg, Manhattan's district attorney, draws friends close and critics closer

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks during a press conference following the arraignment of former U.S. President Donald Trump in New York City on April 4, 2023.

Jennah Moon/The Washington Post/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jennah Moon/The Washington Post/Getty Images


Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks during a press conference following the arraignment of former U.S. President Donald Trump in New York City on April 4, 2023.

Jennah Moon/The Washington Post/Getty Images

Observers, friends and former colleagues view Alvin Bragg Jr., the Manhattan district attorney, as a smart, deliberate lawyer and a selfless public servant. And people who claim him as their friend say he’s a thoughtful one.

Those who spoke to NPR, who know Bragg well or watch him closely, say he is neither moved nor driven by politics. Bragg declined to speak for this story.

Advertisement

Attorney Anurima Bhargava has been friends with Bragg since they were undergrads at Harvard University, where Bragg also earned his law degree.

“One of the things that is so intensely remarkable,” she says, “is that he’s had friends, and colleagues, and people he grew up with, and he’s stayed close to all of us.”

Bhargava leads Anthem of Us, a consulting firm. She says Bragg finds ways to stay connected.

“This year, I had a movie premiere,” she says. “He was working, but he showed up in the back, and made sure I knew that he was in the room. And that’s the kind of stuff that, like, even if it’s for 10 minutes, it means something.”

Attorney Anurima Bhargava has been a friend of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg since they attended Harvard University in the 1990’s. She says his presence had always made her feel and supported.

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR


Attorney Anurima Bhargava has been a friend of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg since they attended Harvard University in the 1990’s. She says his presence had always made her feel and supported.

Advertisement

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR

Bragg was featured in Harvard’s student newspaper, The Crimson, in a 1995 article. He was described as “empathetic” and gregarious.”

“Alvin is always the person to go and start a conversation,” Bhargava says, and adds, he was at the center of difficult campus conversations, and someone who defied stereotypes as an actively listener, even with people he just met. Bhargava says whether at a committee meeting or a party, Bragg was a warm, welcoming presence.

“If Alvin was in the room, like, I always felt really safe and supported,” Bhargava says. “I felt like there was someone in the room who would always have my back.”

Alvin Bragg is now at the center of the first-ever criminal trial of a former American president.

Advertisement

The Manhattan district attorney now oversees a team of six prosecutors trying the case against Donald Trump. Trump is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.

Last year, the former president was arraigned and pleaded not guilty to all charges. Bragg then held a news conference.

“Under New York State law, it is a felony to falsify business records with the intent to conceal another crime,” Bragg said. “That is exactly what this case is about.”

Jury selection is expected to be complete by the end of the week. Opening arguments could happen as early as Monday. Donald Trump faces a penalty of up to four years in prison.

The former president has claimed Bragg’s prosecution to be politically motivated. Trump’s defense attorneys have filed and failed to have the case delayed or dismissed. The presiding judge, Juan Merchan, has denied all those motions.

Advertisement

Some view the case as a distraction, compared to three other criminal cases pending against Trump, where prosecutors allege his actions present far more serious threats to democracy.

Terri Gerstein worked with Alvin Bragg in the New York Attorney General’s office. He is smart and a careful lawyer, she says. Gerstein is now a director at the Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University.

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR

Terri Gerstein recalls Alvin Bragg as thoughtful and detail-oriented. “He’s one of the smartest people that I’ve known,” she says. “I know how careful he is as a lawyer.”

Bragg supervised Gerstein in the New York Attorney General’s office, where she was labor bureau chief.

“He would carefully read all of the pleadings or briefs or memos that we were writing. And look up the cases himself and, like, really, really delve into them,” she says.

Advertisement

Gerstein now is a director at the Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at NYU. She remembers working on a couple of wage theft cases where home care aides went unpaid, caring for older patients and people with disabilities.

“That case really touched a nerve with him,” she says. “That people would be doing this kind of work, and that someone would take advantage of them in that way.”

The employers pleaded guilty in both cases.

Before he was elected Manhattan district attorney, Bragg was steeped in prosecuting white collar crime and public corruption cases working for both the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the New York Attorney General.

He grew up as a son of Harlem

Advertisement

Alvin Bragg Jr. attended Trinity, a private K-12 college prep school. He was nurtured in a storied section of Harlem called Strivers’ Row. His mother, Sadie, taught high school math and later was vice president at Borough of Manhattan Community College. His father, Alvin Sr., headed the local Urban League for several years. He retired as the city’s director of homeless shelters. Bragg’s parents wanted their only child to be open and experience all kinds of people.

Bragg worshiped at Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem as a child, and still does now with his wife and children. He teaches Sunday school there. In 2021, the late pastor Calvin Butts III introduced candidate Bragg during a Sunday service as “a son of Harlem.” Rev. Butts gave Bragg a few moments to make his pitch to potential voters.

“I had a gun pointed at me six times, three by the NYPD during lawless stops, and three by people who were not police officers,” Bragg told the congregation.

“After the first gunpoint stop by the NYPD, I saw our pastor, Reverend Butts, and he guided me through how to file a civilian complaint. That was the beginning of my advocacy.” He was a high school student at the time.

Bragg campaigned and won on his lived experience, and became the first black person elected Manhattan district attorney.

Advertisement

Jelani Cobb has covered Bragg as a staff writer for The New Yorker.

Jelani Cobb, a staff writer for The New Yorker, observes progressive district attorneys like Bragg must balance their ability to make reform in the system with the public’s perception of its safety.

David Buchan/Penske Mediaa/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

David Buchan/Penske Mediaa/Getty Images


Jelani Cobb, a staff writer for The New Yorker, observes progressive district attorneys like Bragg must balance their ability to make reform in the system with the public’s perception of its safety.

David Buchan/Penske Mediaa/Getty Images

“Alvin Bragg is somebody who grew up in Harlem at the time that ‘stop and frisk’ was just a part of life,” Cobb says. “The Central Park Five are now kind of a stand-in for that whole era of policing.”

“And so, it means a lot,” says Cobb, who is also dean at Columbia University’s Journalism School. “That there’s somebody who has experienced both sides of the ledger, serving as a prosecutor, but also witnessing some of the areas in which the system has gone wrong.”

Advertisement

Bragg seeks to strike a balance between public safety and reform

D.A. Bragg declared prosecuting violent crime his top priority. He has also advocated for alternatives to jail when appropriate, and dropped prosecutions for low-level offenses.

Tina Luongo says Bragg has put people in high places of his administration who “think outside the box” in terms of reform. Tina Luongo heads criminal defense practice for the Legal Aid Society, the city’s primary source for public defenders. They were familiar with Bragg for many years and aware of his reform efforts when he worked in the New York Attorney General’s office.

Bragg is different from his predecessors, Luongo says.

Legal Aid Chief Attorney Tina Luongo says Alvin Bragg is an attentive listener. “He may or may not agree with my position, but he hears me out,” she says. She is shown speaking at a rally to protest the 17th death on Rikers Island at City Hall in New York City in 2022.

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images


Legal Aid Chief Attorney Tina Luongo says Alvin Bragg is an attentive listener. “He may or may not agree with my position, but he hears me out,” she says. She is shown speaking at a rally to protest the 17th death on Rikers Island at City Hall in New York City in 2022.

Advertisement

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

“I do believe that if I pick up a phone and I call Alvin and I complain about something, he’s listening,” Loungo says. “And he may or may not agree with my position, but he hears me out.”

Some of Bragg’s reforms, intended to reduce recidivism, draw criticism from conservative media who accuse Bragg of being “soft on crime.”

Jelani Cobb says Bragg works in a dynamic space where challenging the status quo on law and order issues can be tricky.

“For progressive prosecutors in general, I would say him included, their ability to make reform in the system is always counterbalanced by the public’s perception of its safety,” says Cobb.

Advertisement

A call for new ideas invites critics

Former prosecutor Karen Friedman Agnifilo was second in command to Cy Vance, the last Manhattan district attorney. “It really is a time in our history for a person of color to be the district attorney,” she says. Friedman says she decided not to run for the office after Vance declined a fourth bid.

She says “fresh, new ideas” are needed to solve recidivism, because “the old ways” or patterns of prosecution and incarceration are not working.

I’ve never worked with him, but he’s doing a really good job,” she says.

Karen Friedman Agnifilo was former Chief Assistant District Attorney for Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance. Every new district attorney has missteps in the beginning, she says.

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR


Karen Friedman Agnifilo was former Chief Assistant District Attorney for Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance. Every new district attorney has missteps in the beginning, she says.

Advertisement

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR

Bragg stumbled early on with the release of the Day One Memo, a document that outlined policy shifts for bail and sentencing, among other changes. It was sent office-wide via email, without any discussion.

“It didn’t go well at all,” says Catherine Christian, a veteran Assistant District Attorney who worked for three decades in the office before becoming a law partner in private practice.

Catherine Christian, a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and currently in private practice, believes Alvin Bragg is someone who learns from his mistakes.

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR


Catherine Christian, a former assistant district attorney in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and currently in private practice, believes Alvin Bragg is someone who learns from his mistakes.

José A. Alvarado Jr. for NPR

Advertisement

Christian, who left seven months into Bragg’s term, says he recovered after a long period of chaos and found his footing after about a year. “I think he’s someone who’s willing to learn, and learns from mistakes. And listens,” she says.

Only a few weeks in office, Bragg had another set of challenges.

Bragg reportedly questioned the lead prosecutors, Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, in several meetings. He’d stopped their team from presenting evidence against Donald Trump to a grand jury in a criminal probe into Trump’s involvement in fraud for overvaluing his assets. (New York Attorney General Letitia James later successfully pursued a civil lawsuit against the Trump Organization, largely along the same lines of evidence pursued by Mark Pomerantz, and it resulted in a $454 million penalty against Trump.)

Bragg had doubts about moving forward, and both Pomerantz and Dunne resigned in protest a month later. In March 2023, Bragg empaneled a new grand jury that voted to indict Trump.

“I know that there were a few missteps in the beginning, and growing pains,” Karen Friedman Agnifilo says. “But I think he’s maturing really nicely.”

Advertisement

The Manhattan District Attorney’s office is staffed by more than 1,500 people. The work ranges from prosecuting white collar crime to human trafficking to street crime to addressing needs of survivors, exonerating wrongful convictions police misconduct, and returning of stolen antiquities.

In January 2023, a New York state court ordered the Trump Organization to pay fines totaling 1.6 million in a tax fraud case. D.A. Bragg’s office successfully won that prosecution.

Bragg may be seen as maturing in his job, but he continues to be tested by cases and critics. Earlier this year, several migrants allegedly attacked police officers in Times Square. At the hearing, prosecutors did not request bail, due to a lack of evidence at the time. The suspected attackers were set free, and Bragg took heat for his handling of the case from politicians and others.

“Why are these four individuals released on their own recognizance?” Patrick Hendry asked during a news conference. Hendry is president of the Police Benevolent Association (PBA), the city’s largest police union. “Why aren’t they in jail right now?”

Prosecutors did a thorough investigation. Bragg defended his office.

Advertisement

“We do not tolerate people assaulting police officers,” Bragg told the press. “But in a court of law, our profound obligation is to make sure we have the right people charged with the right crimes.”

Prosecutors filed charges after many days and several suspects were held for trial.

“You’re not allowed to talk about details and facts,” says Karen Friedman Agnifilo. Bragg, like all district attorneys, is confronted by cases where he can’t share information with the public, or respond to critics the way politicians do.

“You’re an officer of the court and the highest law enforcement official, first and foremost,” Agnifilo Friedman says, “and you’re a politician second.”

The unprecedented trial of Donald Trump is a case that Alvin Bragg Jr. doubted, delayed and later revived. Now underway, it will put the Manhattan district attorney to the test.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Iran scrambles air defences and shoots at incoming targets

Published

on

Iran scrambles air defences and shoots at incoming targets

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Iran activated air defence systems and shot at several unidentified small airborne vehicles in the early hours of Friday, state television said, amid fears that Israel was taking retaliatory action for last week’s drone strike by Tehran.

Earlier reports in Iran said that explosions were heard near the cities of Isfahan, in central Iran, and Tabriz in the north west, according to the Tasnim news agency, which is close to Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards. Isfahan is home to a major base for the Iranian military.

Tasnim reported that the military air base and the nuclear installations in Isfahan were safe and rejected reports of any attack from outside the country. A senior military official in Isfahan said air defences had fired at unidentified objects and there was no damage, according to Tasnim.

Advertisement

Oil futures jumped following the reports. Futures for Brent crude, the international oil benchmark, rose as much as 4.2 per cent to $90.75 per barrel while West Texas Intermediate, the US marker, gained as much as 4.3 per cent to $86.28 per barrel.

Gold, a haven during times of geopolitical uncertainty, rose as much as 1.6 per cent to $2417.89 per troy ounce.

An Israeli official declined to comment. The White House and Pentagon declined to comment.

Some flights in Iran were suspended for safety reasons but had been restored, Iranian state television reported.

Tension is high in the Middle East over possible Israeli retaliation after Iran fired more than 300 armed drones and missiles at the Jewish state last weekend, the first time Tehran has targeted the country directly from its own soil.

Advertisement

Iran said the strike was a response to an attack on its embassy in Damascus that killed senior military commanders, which Tehran blamed on Israel.

Israeli officials have indicated they would respond, despite western pleas for restraint and fears of the impact it could have on the conflict in Gaza, and the risk that any retaliation could push the Middle East to all-out war.

The Pentagon earlier said that defence secretary Lloyd Austin spoke to his Israeli counterpart Yoav Gallant on Thursday to discuss “regional threats and Iran’s destabilising actions in the Middle East”.

This is a developing story

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending