Connect with us

News

The VA has its fix for a home loan debacle, but many vets who got hurt won't get help

Published

on

The VA has its fix for a home loan debacle, but many vets who got hurt won't get help

Edmund Garcia, an Iraq War veteran, stands outside his home in Rosharon, Texas. Like many vets, he was told if he took a mortgage forbearance, his monthly payments wouldn’t go up afterward.

Joseph Bui for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Joseph Bui for NPR


Edmund Garcia, an Iraq War veteran, stands outside his home in Rosharon, Texas. Like many vets, he was told if he took a mortgage forbearance, his monthly payments wouldn’t go up afterward.

Joseph Bui for NPR

The Department of Veterans Affairs announced a long-awaited new program on Wednesday to help thousands of veterans who were left on the verge of losing their homes after a pandemic aid effort went awry.

But it appears that many who were harmed financially won’t qualify to get this new help.

Advertisement

“The purpose of this program is to assist the more than 40,000 veterans who are at the highest risk of foreclosure,” Josh Jacobs, VA undersecretary for benefits, said at a media roundtable introducing the Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase program, or “VASP.”

What senior VA officials failed to say on their call with reporters is that the VA put veterans in that tough spot in the first place. In 2022, the VA abruptly ended part of its COVID mortgage forbearance program while tens of thousands of vets were still in the middle of it — trapping them with no affordable way to get current on their loans.

VASP is supposed to fix that problem, by allowing the VA to offer these homeowners loan modifications with interest rates that are well below the market rates on regular mortgages. The VA will own mortgages itself and will offer vets who qualify a modified home loan with a 2.5% interest rate.

But not everybody who got hurt is going to qualify. Most vets who have already ended up in much more costly modified loans won’t get the help.

The VA forbearance fiasco

In November, the VA halted foreclosures for all homeowners with loans backed by the VA after an NPR investigation revealed that the agency had left thousands of vets facing foreclosure through no fault of their own.

Advertisement

COVID mortgage forbearance programs were set up by Congress during the pandemic to help people with federally backed loans by giving them an affordable way to skip mortgage payments and then get current on their loans again.

But in late 2022, the VA abruptly ended its Partial Claim Payment (PCP) program, which had allowed a homeowner at the end of a forbearance to move the missed payments to the back of the loan term and keep the interest rate on their original mortgage.

That effectively turned a well-intentioned program into a bait-and-switch trap. Veterans say they were told before they took a forbearance that their regular monthly mortgage payments wouldn’t increase and their missed payments could be moved to the back of their loan term. But after the VA scrapped the PCP program, vets were told they needed to come up with all the missed payments at once.

“Almost $23,000? How am I gonna come up with that?” Edmund Garcia asked earlier this year in an interview with NPR. Garcia is a combat veteran who served in Iraq. He bought a house in Rosharon, Texas, with a VA home loan. After his wife lost her job during the pandemic, his mortgage company offered him a forbearance.

Edmund Garcia holds a photo of himself in 2000 as a specialist in charge of handling ammunition and supplies while he was in the Army.

Joseph Bui for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Joseph Bui for NPR


Edmund Garcia holds a photo of himself in 2000 as a specialist in charge of handling ammunition and supplies while he was in the Army.

Advertisement

Joseph Bui for NPR

The VA had other loan modification options, but those essentially required a new mortgage with a new interest rate, and rates were rising sharply — from around 3% up to around 7%.

Garcia was told that if he couldn’t pay back all the missed payments at once, he would have to accept a loan modification that would result in much bigger monthly bills. His old mortgage rate was 2.4%; the offer would increase that to 7.1% with payments $700 a month higher. Alternatively, he could get foreclosed on.

“I deal with PTSD, I deal with anxiety, and, you know, my heart is beating through my chest when I was having this conversation,” he told NPR. “My daughter … she’s asking, ‘Dad, are you OK?’ “

Now it appears that any veterans who succumbed to that pressure and accepted these higher-cost loan modifications will not be able to get help through the VA’s new rescue plan.

Advertisement

Vets pushed into high-cost loans won’t get help

“If you are not in default, this program is not for you,” John Bell, the director of the VA home loan program, told NPR at a press call this week. “And you have to be in default a certain amount of time.”

In other words, veterans who have been making payments on these higher-cost loans are not eligible. And it’s looking like that will exclude a lot of people.

Data obtained by NPR suggests that thousands of veterans ended up in modified loans with significantly higher interest rates following a mortgage forbearance.

The fine print to the VA’s new program also says that if a loan was modified, the borrower has to have made payments for at least six months, and then be in default for at least three months, to be eligible.

Advertisement

That doesn’t seem like the right approach to some policy experts.

“We definitely don’t think borrowers should have to pay six months on a bad, unaffordable modification,” said Steve Sharpe with the nonprofit National Consumer Law Center.

Also, the rules mean that if a veteran tried to pay a more costly loan modification for a few months, then defaulted and couldn’t afford it, they wouldn’t qualify.

“If they fail on an unaffordable modification, they should be able to access VASP,” Sharpe said.

He thinks the VA should extend the foreclosure moratorium on VA loans, which is set to expire at the end of May, both to give the VA time to consider fixing such issues and to give mortgage companies time to gear up and reach out to homeowners.

Advertisement

Still, Sharpe said, for those who do qualify, the VASP rescue plan should be a big help.

“It is great news that VASP has been released,” he said. “It is sorely needed because people have lacked a reasonable foreclosure alternative for a long time. … It’s exciting.”

VA Undersecretary Jacobs told reporters that a key difference with the new program is that the VA will hold the loans itself, rather than simply guarantee loans that are owned by investors. That’s what will allow the VA to set whatever mortgage rate it wants.

“These borrowers will have a consistent, affordable payment for the remainder of their loan at a fixed 2.5% interest rate,” Jacobs said.

Back in Rosharon, Texas, Edmund Garcia is wondering what happens next.

Advertisement

Edmund Garcia stands with his wife, Iris Garcia, inside their home, where they live with their four daughters. Iris lost her job during the pandemic and their mortgage company offered them a forbearance.

Joseph Bui for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Joseph Bui for NPR

Advertisement


Edmund Garcia stands with his wife, Iris Garcia, inside their home, where they live with their four daughters. Iris lost her job during the pandemic and their mortgage company offered them a forbearance.

Joseph Bui for NPR

“I was a little shocked to hear that I would have to qualify for this program,” Garcia told NPR this week.

The VA says borrowers should work with their mortgage company and contact a VA loan technician if they need help.

In Garcia’s case, he actually never accepted that more-costly loan modification. And it appears from a review of the rules that he should qualify for VASP. But there’s a catch. Under the rules, he’ll probably be put into a 40-year mortgage. That could end up happening to a lot of other veterans too.

Advertisement

“At the end I’ll be 82,” Garcia says. But he would still be very happy to get the help.

“This would be a huge relief for my family,” Garcia says. “And it feels like it’s within arm’s grasp.”

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending