Connect with us

News

Roger Federer brings down curtain on his career with a defeat, but still dazzles alongside longtime friend and rival Rafael Nadal | CNN

Published

on

Roger Federer brings down curtain on his career with a defeat, but still dazzles alongside longtime friend and rival Rafael Nadal | CNN



CNN
 — 

Roger Federer’s profession might have resulted in a defeat on Friday, however the five-minute standing ovation that adopted was testomony to the distinctive, indelible mark he left on the game of tennis.

The adulation of the group, seemingly countless rounds of applause and chants of “Roger, Roger, Roger,” decreased Federer to tears.

“I’m comfortable, I’m not unhappy,” he mentioned after the match, a 6-4 6-7 9/11 defeat to Jack Sock and Frances Tiafoe alongside longtime good friend and rival Rafael Nadal on the Laver Cup at London’s O2 Area.

“I loved tying my footwear one final time. Every little thing was the final time.”

Advertisement

Following 24 years of excellence on the courtroom – greater than 1,500 matches, 103 singles titles and 20 grand slams – this was Federer’s final aggressive match.

The epic tiebreak that sealed the win for the American pair was a becoming finish to not solely a match that, regardless of the extraordinary and sometimes emotional build-up, far surpassed expectations in its grandeur and high quality, but additionally a profession that has produced so many moments of genius and supplied pleasure to so many.

For 3-day competitors between groups from Europe and the remainder of the world that has not often felt like rather more than an exhibition since its inception in 2017, the announcement of Federer’s retirement added some welcome status to this weekend’s play.

Whereas the competitors, that includes 9 head-to-head singles and three doubles matches, might have beforehand garnered unsubstantial world consideration, this 12 months’s version had now unquestionably develop into one of many greatest tennis occasions of the 12 months.

Advertisement

In fact, this was largely resulting from it being Federer’s swansong, however it was additionally offering tennis followers with one thing they hadn’t seen for a few years: Federer, Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray all wholesome and collectively competing on the identical event.

Social media posts from these 4 superstars within the week main as much as the occasion little doubt would have had followers feeling nostalgic. The quartet displayed real heat in direction of each other, akin to a gaggle of faculty pals that hadn’t been collectively for a few years, as they explored London’s landmarks.

Maybe, although, the emotions of nostalgia got here not solely from the 2022 Laver Cup signaling the tip of Federer’s lengthy and storied profession, but additionally from the very fact it lastly confirmed the start of the tip of tennis’ golden period.

With Nadal, Djokovic and Murray all effectively into their 30s and all struggling prolonged harm absences sooner or later throughout their careers, their eventual retirements now loom massive over the game.

These 4 gamers – “the large 3 plus some clown,” as Murray comically put it on his personal Instagram web page – will formally by no means grace the identical event once more.

Advertisement
Federer serves during Friday's match.

The place Federer’s on-court achievements rank among the many greats within the males’s sport might be up for debate – although he’s little doubt within the prime three – there isn’t any query he’s probably the most transcendent tennis participant to ever choose up a racket.

Largely because of the method he performed the sport, no person else within the sport has garnered the worldwide adoration, the endorsements or develop into a cultural icon fairly just like the suave Swiss famous person.

For many of his profession, Federer appeared to glide across the courtroom quite than scamper, his locks flowing and bouncing above his headband, whereas his outrageously aesthetic one-handed backhanded turned arguably probably the most iconic and recognizable shot tennis has ever seen.

Extra importantly, the fantastic thing about his sport introduced – on the peak of his powers – unprecedented success. He turned the primary participant to surpass the earlier males’s report of 14 grand slams titles held by Pete Sampras, then turned the primary to achieve the landmark 20.

Whereas Nadal and Djokovic might have now surpassed his grand slam complete, the epic battles Federer had with these two gamers throughout his profession solely additional added to his legacy.

Advertisement

On one other day, the three matches that preceded Federer’s last goodbye might have been noteworthy in themselves – Muray versus Alex De Minaur was a very engrossing encounter – however at the moment felt like warmups for the primary occasion.

By the tip of the second set of Murray’s match towards De Minaur – which the Australian received in a third-set match tie break to earn Workforce World’s first level of the day – Federer had turned into his shorts and headband within the Workforce Europe dugout and seemed able to take to the courtroom, solely including to the anticipation that had been steadily constructing inside the sector.

In De Minaur’s on-court interview after the match, he talked about how he can be cheering on Workforce World towards Nadal and Federer, ensuing within the 23-year-old being roundly booed by a crowd that then burst into laughter.

Team Europe's Roger Federer on day one of the Laver Cup at the O2 Arena in London on Friday.

When Federer’s identify was lastly introduced as he made his method onto the courtroom, the noise of the group was so deafening that it drowned out the announcer’s voice totally earlier than he may end introducing the Swiss and his doubles companion Nadal.

The 41-year-old was met with one other booming cheer when having his accomplishments learn out throughout the warmups, however the loudest roar got here when Federer punched away a volley to offer him and Nadal their first level of the match.

Advertisement

For many of the opening exchanges, there was nonetheless a zipper in Federer’s pictures as he carried himself together with his trademark grace across the courtroom, however when chasing a dropshot from Tiafoe that landed not two yards in entrance of him, the age in Federer’s legs started to point out for the primary time as he struggled to achieve the ball.

Not that these moments occurred typically, a exceptional thought given his age and the three knee surgical procedures he has undergone. The truth is, as he continued to point out a exceptional contact – on the internet specifically – it’s doubtless most within the capability crowd contained in the O2 Area had been questioning why he was retiring in any respect.

One second specifically drew shocked gasps from the group when the large screens confirmed the replays. Whereas chasing down a brief ball, Federer squeezed his forehand via the tiny hole between the web and the put up.

It might have misplaced them the purpose, because the ball handed below the highest of the web, however even within the last sport of his profession Federer was producing moments most had by no means seen on a tennis courtroom earlier than.

Federer poses with Nadal, Djokovic and Murray following a practice session ahead of the 2022 Laver Cup.

Maybe unsurprisingly, there nonetheless gave the impression to be loads of magic left in what many viewers all through his profession have typically described as a wand as a substitute of a racket.

Advertisement

There have been loads of smiles from each Federer and Nadal early on, together with amusing when Federer had clearly misheard the plan for the upcoming level and needed to stroll again over to his companion for an additional debrief, ensuing within the Swiss sheepishly holding his palms as much as apologize.

However as the primary set wore on, the temper on the courtroom shifted because the relentless aggressive nature that has made these two gamers such a drive over time lastly started to return to the fore.

When the pair, affectionately dubbed ‘Fedal’ by followers, clinched the primary set 6-4, the ambiance inside the sector was on the point of social gathering mode.

However make no mistake, Sock and Tiafoe had been not at all comfortable to roll over and permit Federer to stroll off into the sundown with a simple victory. The American duo broke serve early within the second set as they seemed to spoil the social gathering ambiance, however Federer and Nadal quickly broke again to revive parity.

Roger Federer is hoisted after his Laver Cup Tennis match.

The most effective sport of the match got here with the scores tied at 5-5, as Nadal saved six break factors – together with one in all back-to-back smashes from Federer that drew raucous cheers from the group – to place the pair on the point of victory.

Advertisement

However Sock then held a tough service sport of his personal to take the set to a tiebreak, the primary level of which Federer – and your complete stadium – thought he had served an ace, solely to be greeted by a “let” name from the umpire that was loudly booed by your complete area.

A superb tie break from the American duo sealed the second set and led to an epic decider.

The drama that was packed into the third set – a 3-0 lead opened and squandered by Federer and Nadal, a brutal forehand that Tiafoe smashed into Federer’s again and an ace from Federer that was greeted with a standing ovation – was a becoming finish to an incomparable profession.

Ultimately, that Federer was unable to safe the win didn’t matter an excessive amount of and the emotion in his goodbye speech – barely in a position to get via it when talking in regards to the assist his household had given him all through his profession – additionally decreased his doubles companion to tears.

“It appears like a celebration,” Federer mentioned. “It’s precisely what I needed on the finish, precisely what I hoped for.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Published

on

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The US oil industry and Republicans are demanding Kamala Harris clarify her energy and climate policy, as the Democratic candidate tries to please her progressive base without alienating voters in shale areas like Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state.

On Thursday, the vice-president said she no longer supported a ban on fracking, the technology that unleashed the shale revolution. But Harris’s reversal has not quelled attacks from Donald Trump or US executives that she would damage the country’s oil and gas sector.

The heads of the US’s two biggest oil lobby groups said the Democratic candidate must also say whether she would keep or end a pause on federal approvals for new liquefied natural gas plants, and whether she supported curbs on drilling imposed by the Biden administration.

Advertisement

“Based on what we know of her past positions, the bills that she has sponsored, and her past statements she’s taken a pretty aggressively anti-energy and anti-oil and gas industry stand,” said Anne Bradbury, head of the American Exploration and Production Council.

“These are significant and major policy questions that impact every American family and business, and which voters deserve to understand better when making their choice in November,” she said.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s most powerful lobby group, said Harris should say whether she would stick with Biden administration policies that had unleashed “a regulatory onslaught the likes of which this industry has never seen”.

Trump, the Republican candidate, has accused Harris of plotting a “war on American energy” and has repeatedly blamed her and President Joe Biden for high fuel costs in recent years.

On Thursday, he vowed to scrap Biden administration policies that “distort energy markets”. The former president has called climate change a hoax and his advisers have said he would gut Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

The debate over Harris’s energy policy comes as she and Trump court blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania, a huge shale gas producer that employs 72,000 workers — a potentially decisive voting group in a state Biden won narrowly in 2020.

Harris said in 2019 that she supported a fracking ban but told CNN on Thursday she had ditched that position and the US could have “a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking”.

US oil and gas production has reached a record high under Biden, even as clean energy capacity has expanded rapidly.

But gas executives in particular have been alarmed at a federal pause on building new LNG export plants, which supply customers from Europe to Asia, saying the policy will stymie further US shale output.

Toby Rice, chief executive of Pennsylvania-based EQT, the US’s largest natural gas producer, said Harris should lift the restrictions, which he argued would compromise energy security.

Advertisement

“Ignoring her anti-fracking statement four years ago for a second, can we talk about the recent LNG Pause that was put in place this year?”, he said. “This is a policy that has received massive criticism from all sides — our allies, industry and environmental champions . . . a step backwards for climate and American energy security.”

While Biden put climate at the centre of his and Harris’s 2020 White House campaign, Harris has been largely silent, and made only a passing reference to climate change in her speech at the Democratic convention.

“It looks like the Harris campaign has concluded that it’s safer to avoid antagonising producers or climate activists by skirting these issues entirely,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners.

Climate-focused voters are less vexed than energy executives by the lack of explicit policy from Harris.

“Let’s be clear: the most important climate policy right now is defeating Donald Trump in November,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a non-profit organisation. “All the wonky policy details in the world won’t matter if climate deniers control the White House.”

Advertisement

Last week the political arms of the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund unveiled a $55mn advertising campaign backing Harris in swing states, focused on economic rather than climate issues.

In contrast, Trump has courted oil bosses who are backing his pledge to slash regulation and scrap clean energy subsidies. His campaign received nearly $14mn from the industry in June, according to OpenSecrets, almost double his oil haul in May.

Additional reporting by Sam Learner

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement

   

Continue Reading

News

Why the U.S. isn't ready for wars of the future, according to experts

Published

on

Why the U.S. isn't ready for wars of the future, according to experts

AI and technology will be at the center of modern warfare, experts say.

Anton Petrus


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Anton Petrus

Earlier this month, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, and the former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, wrote an article for Foreign Affairs arguing that the future of warfare is here.

They say that the U.S. is not ready for it.

Their article opens with Ukraine and describes warfare that features thousands of drones in the sky, as AI helps soldiers with targeting and robots with clearing mines.

Advertisement

The authors argue technological developments have changed warfare more in the past several years than the decades — spanning from the introduction of the airplane, radio and mechanization to the battlefield. And while this new tech has been used minimally in current conflicts, it is only the beginning.

“Today, what we’re experiencing is the introduction of drones on the ground and drones at sea, and also driven by artificial intelligence and the extraordinary capability that that’s going to bring,” General Milley told NPR.

“Now, it’s not here in full yet, but what we’re seeing are snippets, some movie trailers, if you will, of future warfare. And you’re seeing that play out in Gaza. You’re seeing it play out in Ukraine. You’re seeing it play out elsewhere around the world.”

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Evolution on the battlefield

Schmidt says that this transition is going to happen much quicker than some may expect.

Advertisement

“Autonomy and abundance are going to transform wars very, very quickly,” he told NPR.

“The only reason it hasn’t happened is, thank goodness, the U.S. is not at war, [but] others are. If you study Ukraine, you see a glimpse of the future. Much of the Kursk invasion that recently happened was due to their ability to use short and mid-range drones to support combined operations on the ground.”

Now that the human element of physically being on a battlefield can be replaced by remote operations, Schmidt argues that this will set a new, more precise method of fighting that would also be dramatically less expensive than traditional methods.

“I’m worried, of course, that this will ultimately set a new standard and actually lower the cost of war. But if you think about it, this technology is going to get invented one way or the other, and I’d like it to get invented under U.S. terms.”

Feeling underprepared

Both Milley and Schmidt say that even if major efforts are made to address this change, the red tape involved with approvals from the Pentagon make it difficult to take quick, effective action.

Advertisement

“Not even the president of the United States can fix the procurement process of the Pentagon,” Schmidt said.

“The procurement process is designed for weapon systems that take 15 years. In the Ukraine situation, innovation is occurring on a three to six-week timeline, and we need to find a way to get the Pentagon on that tempo. The only way to do that is with other authorities and other approaches, and with an understanding that you don’t design the product at the beginning and then develop it over five years. You do it incrementally, which is how tech works.”

Milley agrees that in order to keep up, entire systems of operating within the military will need to be revolutionized.

“We are in the midst of really fundamental change here. And then from that, you have to have an operational concept. And then from that, you’ve got to identify the attributes of a future force. And then from that, change the procurement system in order to build the technological capabilities, modify the training, develop the leaders, et cetera. Our procurement systems need to be completely overhauled and updated.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump says he will vote against abortion rights in Florida

Published

on

Donald Trump says he will vote against abortion rights in Florida

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Donald Trump said he would vote against an amendment to Florida’s state constitution guaranteeing abortion rights, raising the stakes on an issue that is mobilising Democrats and threatening his White House bid.

The former Republican president had sent mixed signals and avoided taking a stance on the proposed amendment, which will appear on the state ballot in November’s election.

But on Friday, he told Fox News that he would be voting “no” on the measure, which would protect abortion rights until viability and negate a law signed by Republican governor Ron DeSantis in Trump’s home state that bans abortions after six weeks of gestation.

Advertisement

Trump said that while he disagreed with a six-week ban because “you need more time”, Democrats had “radical” policies on abortion. “It is just a ridiculous situation where you can do an abortion in the ninth month,” he said.

The former president has been caught between the need to maintain the support of staunchly conservative, religious voters who are opposed to abortion, and the political imperative of winning over moderate and independent voters who favour abortion rights.

Trump and other Republicans have been on the defensive over abortion ever since the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, including three justices he appointed during his presidency, overturned the right to an abortion nationally in 2022. That has prompted Republican-controlled state legislatures across the country to pass increasingly strict abortion laws, including the six-week abortion ban in Florida.

Opinion polls consistently show that the majority of Americans oppose such strict measures, and Democrats, including Trump’s rival in the race for the White House, US vice-president Kamala Harris, have relentlessly pounded Trump on abortion rights — and raised concerns that other reproductive practices, including in vitro fertilisation and contraception, could be at risk if he is re-elected.

Earlier this week, Trump had scrambled to say that he would ensure funding for IVF procedures, and on Thursday he had suggested that in Florida he would vote to make sure that abortion was not limited to the first six weeks of pregnancy.

Advertisement

But that comment triggered a backlash from the right, forcing him to clarify his position opposing the amendment on Friday.

Harris said in a statement that with his comments on Friday to Fox News, Trump had “just made his position on abortion very clear: he will vote to uphold an abortion ban so extreme it applies before many women even know they are pregnant”.

“I trust women to make their own healthcare decisions and believe the government should never come between a woman and her doctor,” Harris added.

Trump’s struggles to define his positions on reproductive rights come after his campaign attacked Harris for changing stances on a number of issues, including healthcare, energy and immigration, in order to appeal to centrist voters.

Trump’s latest comments on abortion came hours before he was set to address a national conference for Moms for Liberty, a conservative women’s group, in Washington. The Florida-based political organisation was formed to protest Covid-19 pandemic mask and vaccine mandates and now advocates to stop public schools from teaching about LGBT+ identities and structural racism, among other issues.

Advertisement

Tiffany Justice, a co-founder of the group, told the Financial Times earlier on Friday that Trump “really understands and cares about parents and parental rights” and urged anyone who had “an issue” with his stance on abortion to look at the Democratic party’s positions.

“Just wait until you see what the Harris-[Tim] Walz ticket, how anti-life they are,” Justice said. “People need to understand, we need to move our country forward, we need to unite to do that, and if there is anything that we can come together on, it should be our children and their health and safety and development.”

Have your say

Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending