Connect with us

News

North Korean hackers use AI to up their game

Published

on

North Korean hackers use AI to up their game

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

North Korean cyber criminals are turning to artificial intelligence to help Pyongyang steal cutting-edge technologies and secure funds for its illicit nuclear weapons programme.

The hackers have long targeted employees of global defence, cyber security and crypto companies, tricking users on LinkedIn and other networking platforms into revealing sensitive information or giving access to computer networks or crypto wallets.

Their most notorious hacking operations include the theft of $951mn from Bangladesh’s central bank, and the WannaCry ransomware attack on the UK’s National Health Service in 2017.

Advertisement

ChatGPT developer OpenAI and its investor Microsoft last week confirmed that hackers working on behalf of North Korea, as well as China, Russia and Iran, are using the company’s AI services “in support of malicious cyber activities”.

South Korea had previously detected North Korean hackers using generative AI to target security officials, a South Korean intelligence official said. “We are closely monitoring North Korea’s related movements, while keeping in mind the possibility of North Korea putting generative AI to bad use,” the official added.

Of the 1.62mn hacking attempts made against South Korean companies and public bodies last year, more than 80 per cent have been traced back to North Korea, South Korea’s National Intelligence Service briefed reporters last month.

But Pyongyang’s phishing and social engineering operations have often been undermined by North Korean hackers’ poor grasp of the colloquial English or Korean needed to gain the trust of their targets.

North Koreans’ adoption of generative AI — software that mimics human ability — constituted a formidable new challenge, said Erin Plante, vice-president of investigations at crypto-focused cyber security company Chainalysis.

Advertisement

“North Korean hacking groups have been seen to create credible-looking recruiter profiles on professional networking sites such as LinkedIn,” said Plante. “Generative AI helps with chatting, sending messages, creating images and new identities — all the things you need to build that close relationship with your target.”

She described one case in which North Korean hackers used generative AI tools to target a senior engineer at a Japanese cryptocurrency exchange by posing on LinkedIn as recruiters for an exchange in Singapore. The fake recruiters asked the engineer to conduct “a technical exercise” that involved downloading software. This allowed them to infect it with North Korean spyware.

“The attacks are getting very sophisticated — we are not talking about a badly worded email that says ‘click on this link’,” said Plante. “These are detailed profiles on LinkedIn and other social media platforms, which they use to build relationships over weeks and months.”

Shreyas Reddy, an analyst with Seoul-based information service NK Pro, said that while LinkedIn was a “particularly useful hunting ground” for fake North Korean recruiters, “they also use other platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram and Discord to target potential phishing victims”.

Reddy said that AI services such as ChatGPT could also help the North Koreans to develop more sophisticated forms of malicious software, or malware, used to infiltrate their victims’ computer networks.

Advertisement

“There are safeguards in these services to prevent their use for malicious purposes, but people have been able to find their way around them,” said Reddy, noting North Koreans also benefit from access to Chinese AI services.

Pyongyang has spent decades building up its cyber capabilities, a project that dates back to the late 1980s and early 1990s when the ruling Kim dynasty began to develop what was then a nascent nuclear weapons programme.

According to a UN panel of experts monitoring the implementation of international sanctions, money raised by North Korea’s criminal cyber operations is helping to fund the country’s ballistic missile and nuclear programmes.

Hyuk Kim, a research fellow at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, notes that North Korean researchers have published hundreds of AI-related studies over the past two decades. North Korea established an Artificial Intelligence Research Institute in 2013 and several North Korean universities have introduced AI-focused programmes.

Academic papers published in North Korean scientific journals, several of which were co-authored with Chinese scholars affiliated with Chinese military institutions, give an insight into Pyongyang’s thinking as to possible future applications for AI programmes.

Advertisement

In one paper from 2022, North Korean scholars refer to a study exploring the use of a machine learning method called “reinforcement learning” in a war gaming simulation. Another paper from the same year looks at how a different machine learning technique could help safely operate a large nuclear reactor.

“From what we can tell, the sophistication of North Korean AI systems is still embryonic,” said Kim. “But it is also possible they simply don’t want to reveal their capabilities.”

Additional reporting by Kang Buseong

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending