Connect with us

News

Live updates: Donald Trump indictment news

Published

on

Live updates: Donald Trump indictment news

Some Republican lawmakers are criticizing the Manhattan grand jury’s Thursday indictment of Donald Trump. Here is what they’re saying:

Sen. John Cornyn, a member of Senate GOP management, informed CNN the Trump indictment “seems to be to me like this is a chance for this (district lawyer) to attempt to make headlines and achieve publicity.”

Rep. James Comer: The Home Oversight Chairman attacked the “political witch-hunt” of former President Donald Trump the day after he was indicted by Manhattan District Lawyer Alvin Bragg.

“One factor that we’re involved about in Washington, Congressman Jordan and myself, is that if there may be coordination being performed right here between Merrick Garland, DOJ and all these totally different entities which might be going after Donald Trump,” Comer informed Fox on Friday. “This can be a political witch-hunt, they’re doing all the things of their potential to create a story that will harm Donald Trump.”

Advertisement

Comer informed CNN that Bragg’s investigation “a political stunt.”

Earlier than the indictment, Comer and two different Home Chairman despatched a letter requesting testimony and data from Bragg on his investigation. 

Sen. John Barrasso: The Senate GOP Convention Chairman referred to as the indictment a “political hit job” in an announcement to CNN. 

“This can be a politically-motivated prosecution by a far-left activist. If it was anybody aside from President Trump, a case like this might by no means be introduced. As an alternative of ordering political hit jobs, New York prosecutors ought to deal with getting violent criminals off the streets,” he stated.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene: The important thing Trump ally, who can be near Home GOP management, tweeted that she plans on touring to New York Metropolis on Tuesday to protest Donald Trump’s indictment – the most recent signal of how Republicans are racing to defend the previous president.

Advertisement

Greene serves on the Home Oversight Committee, one of many key committees making an attempt to research the Manhattan District Lawyer’s workplace, and informed CNN she commonly retains Trump updated on their investigative priorities.

Rep. Mike Johnson: Johnson, a member of Home Republican management, attacked Bragg and stated the indictment “all however ensured” former President Donald Trump would be the Republican nominee for president.

“The individual denigrating integrity, the integrity of our whole judicial system is Alvin Bragg, this Soros-funded political activist who’s occupying the Manhattan DA’s workplace,” stated Johnson on Fox Information on Friday. “He’s spending all his time and sources going after the previous President. Why? The timing is necessary, as a result of the President has introduced he’s operating once more.”

The indictment has “ensured” that Trump would be the Republican presidential nominee “and certain get reelection” in 2024, Johnson added.

Rep. Barry Moore, a conservative Republican who has endorsed Trump, defended Republicans who’ve attacked Bragg earlier than seeing any proof towards Trump. Moore stated the indictment “smells fairly fishy.”

Advertisement

Requested if he would contemplate re-evaluating after seeing proof, Moore replied, “I am open to pondering that. However I am within the rubbish enterprise, you recognize, and so a variety of occasions, I understand how to identify a pile of rubbish, and this factor seems to be like a pile of rubbish.”

He predicted that the indictment may really assist Trump’s presidential possibilities. Moore himself was indicted and finally discovered not responsible on perjury prices in 2014, when he was a member of the Alabama State Home.

“After I used to be indicted, that weekend, we had extra folks knock doorways than any time in our marketing campaign,” he added. “… We did, as a result of the folks noticed it for what it was. I believe the American folks see this for what it’s.”

Learn extra reactions right here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

Published

on

Video: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

new video loaded: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

transcript

transcript

Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

At a campaign rally in Philadelphia, members of the Kennedy family endorsed President Biden, rejecting one of their own, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent candidate.

I’m joined here today with my sisters, Kathleen and Rory, with Joe and Chris and Max. And with my hero, President Joe Biden. We want to make crystal clear our feeling that the best way forward for America is to re-elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to four more years. That’s right, the Kennedy family endorses Joe Biden for president.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in 2024 Elections

Continue Reading

News

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Published

on

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Twelve New Yorkers who represent a cross-section of Manhattan residents have been sworn in as jurors for Donald Trump’s “hush money” case, after three days of selection in which almost 200 candidates were vetted for political bias by the court.

The panel — which includes a female physical therapist, a retired male wealth manager, a male investment banker, a male security engineer, two male attorneys, a female English teacher and an Irish-born salesman from Harlem — was finalised just after 4:30pm local time on Thursday. The court also selected the first of likely six alternate jurors.

Opening arguments in the criminal trial, the first against a former US president, are expected to commence on Monday morning.

Advertisement

Trump is facing trial on 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records for alleged payments made in the run-up to the 2016 election to buy the silence of a porn actor who claimed she had an affair with him 10 years prior. He has pleaded not guilty in the case, which is one of four criminal indictments he is facing.

Trump, a New York native and real estate tycoon, must be present in the Lower Manhattan courtroom throughout the six-week trial. Leaving the courthouse, he complained that the proceedings were preventing him from hitting the campaign trail as the presumptive Republican nominee in November’s election.

“I’m supposed to be in New Hampshire. I’m supposed to be in Georgia. I’m supposed to be in North Carolina, South Carolina,” he told reporters. He clutched a stack of paper he said were printouts of news articles criticising the indictment, which he once again decried as a “hoax”.

The third day of jury selection in a Manhattan criminal court had earlier got off to a rocky start. Two previously selected jurors were excused by the court after one woman’s identity was pieced together by family and friends from publicly reported details, and another man was connected to an arrest for ripping down rightwing posters in the 1990s.

Over the course of the week, dozens of potential jurors were dismissed for claiming they could not set aside their bias when it came to determining Trump’s fate.

Advertisement

Soon after court resumed on Thursday morning, an oncology nurse from Manhattan’s Upper East Side, who had been seated late on Tuesday, told Justice Juan Merchan that she had “friends, family and colleagues” contact her after piecing together from press reports that she had been chosen as a juror in the trial.

She added that as a result of the external pressure, she no longer felt she could be fair and unbiased, and was promptly excused.

Minutes later, lawyers for the Manhattan district attorney, who brought the case, revealed their research had uncovered that a male juror may not have been truthful about his past, and had been arrested for ripping down rightwing political posters in the Westchester County area of New York State in the 1990s. His wife may have been “previously accused or involved in a corruption inquiry”, the district attorney’s office said.

Merchan later excused him without further explanation.

Although prospective jurors’ names and addresses have been kept private for fear of reprisals, Merchan admonished the press for publishing “so much information” about their physical attributes and professional lives that some had become “very, very easy to identify”.

Advertisement

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

Prosecutors on Thursday also renewed their request for Merchan to hold Trump in contempt for violating a gag order that prevents him from talking about many of the people involved in the case, pointing specifically to a social media post shared by the former president that seemed to imply some prospective jurors were “undercover Liberal Activists”.

Merchan said he would rule after oral arguments on the issue, which are scheduled for Tuesday.

Continue Reading

News

Trump's anti-abortion stance helped him win in 2016. Will it hurt him in 2024? : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Trump's anti-abortion stance helped him win in 2016. Will it hurt him in 2024? : Consider This from NPR

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally outside Schnecksville Fire Hall in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally outside Schnecksville Fire Hall in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

1. Trump wasn’t always anti-abortion.

Trump will forever be known as the president who appointed the justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade in June of 2022. But the former president hasn’t always been against abortion rights. In 1999, when he was considering a run for the White House, Trump told NBC’s Tim Russert on Meet the Press:

Advertisement

“I’m very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. I hate it, I hate everything it stands for. I cringe when people debate the subject. But I still believe in choice.”

By 2011, Trump had changed his position. Once again he was considering a run for president, and Trump described himself as “pro-life” when speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC.

2. When he first ran for president, about half the country supported a legal right to abortion.

But a key group of voters overwhelmingly opposed it – white evangelical Christians. Trump needed their support, and he was successful: exit polling in the 2016 election showed nearly two-thirds of Christian voters chose Trump.

Their candidate delivered. Trump appointed three Supreme Court justices during his term– which ultimately led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Some Republicans in Congress are pushing for a federal ban on abortion, with many in the Republican base pressuring Trump to voice his support. Last week, Trump posted a video on Truth Social that supported leaving abortion access up to the states:

Advertisement

My view is that now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint. The states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land, in this case the law of the state.”

By saying he will instead leave the issue to the states – essentially the status quo – Trump appears to be trying to avoid strengthening Democrats’ ability to rally their voters around abortion rights.

3. Now, an anti-abortion stance could be a political liability.

Every time there’s been an abortion referendum since Dobbs, voters have favored abortion rights.

Supporting a national abortion ban is a position that some Republicans like Chris Christie and Nikki Haley have said was unwise or at least impractical.

This election year, Trump’s position on abortion could influence whether he wins or loses the race. But if he is elected, anti-abortion activists will likely push Trump to use the power of the executive branch to restrict abortion access.

Advertisement

For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

This episode was produced by Brianna Scott. It was edited by Courtney Dorning and Megan Pratz.

Continue Reading

Trending