Connect with us

News

Harry and Meghan take aim at media in highly anticipated Netflix documentary | CNN

Published

on

Harry and Meghan take aim at media in highly anticipated Netflix documentary | CNN


London
CNN
 — 

Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, have taken intention at Britain’s media and promised to recall their experiences of their bitter break up from the British royal household, of their extremely anticipated Netflix documentary collection.

The primary three episodes of the venture, titled “Harry & Meghan,” have been launched on Thursday after months of hypothesis that the couple would star in a tell-all collection.

They element the pair’s preliminary romance and Meghan’s first publicity to the constructions and calls for of royal life, in addition to Harry’s childhood, the pervasive nature of Britain’s tabloid media and the dying of his mom, Princess Diana.

Buckingham and Kensington Palaces will doubtless be braced for the fallout from the collection, after sustained tensions between Harry and his father, King Charles, and brother, Prince William.

Advertisement

“It’s actually onerous to look again on it now and go, what on earth occurred? Like how did we find yourself right here?,” Harry mentioned in a video diary proven within the first episode, recorded shortly after the pair completed their last royal duties in March 2020.

He mentioned he turned “genuinely involved for the security of my household,” attacking the intrusion of the media, which he has often lamented lately.

Harry took intention on the media throughout the first couple of minutes of the present. “Nobody is aware of that full fact. We all know the total fact, the establishment is aware of the total fact, and the media is aware of the total fact as a result of they’ve been in on it,” Harry mentioned. He mentioned he considers it his “obligation” to “uncover this exploitation and bribery that occurs inside our media.”

The collection comes over a 12 months and a half after the couple’s bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, which contained a flurry of criticisms of members of the royal household and precipitated turmoil on the Palace.

Advertisement

It marks a primary main public relations check for the monarchy beneath King Charles III, who himself has been tacitly criticized by Harry since their break up from the household, and whose relationship together with his grandson has frayed.

“I settle for that there shall be individuals world wide who basically disagree with what I’ve achieved and the way I’ve achieved it,” Prince Harry mentioned of the watershed choice to go away the royal household in early 2020, which set the stage for years of revelations from the couple and turned their relationships with Harry’s relations frosty.

“However I knew that I needed to do every thing I might to guard my household, particularly after what occurred to my mum,” Harry continued.

All through the primary three episodes of the collection, the couple spoke angrily of their expertise by the hands of the notoriously boisterous British media.

“My face was in every single place, my life was in every single place, tabloids had taken over every thing,” Meghan mentioned of her early encounters with the press.

Advertisement

Harry additionally in contrast Meghan to his mom, Princess Diana, who died in a automotive crash whereas being chased by paparazzi in 1997. A lot of what Meghan is and the way she is is so just like my mum … She has the identical confidence, she has this heat about her,” he mentioned within the first episode.

Harry mentioned he “realized issues” from his mom’s anger on the media whereas she was alive that coloured his view of royal life, together with seeing firsthand “the ache and struggling of ladies marrying into this establishment.”

“I keep in mind considering, how can I ever discover somebody who’s keen and succesful to have the ability to face up to all the luggage that comes with being with me?” he mentioned.

The couple have spoken earlier than concerning the constraints positioned on them whereas members of the royal household, and that frustration re-emerged repeatedly within the documentary.

Meghan described her engagement announcement in 2017 as an “orchestrated actuality present.” And talking of the media’s preliminary fascination with the prince’s then-girlfriend, Harry recalled how different members of the royal household struggled to share his concern.

Advertisement

“So far as a number of the household have been involved, every thing that she was being put by means of, they’d been put by means of as nicely. So it was virtually like a ceremony of passage,” Harry mentioned. “My spouse needed to undergo that, so why ought to your girlfriend be handled any in a different way? Why do you have to get particular remedy? Why ought to she be protected?,” he mentioned, paraphrasing their arguments.

“I mentioned the distinction right here is the race ingredient,” Harry added.

The primary three episodes have been launched on Thursday, with three extra scheduled for subsequent week. Interviews have been accomplished in August, the month earlier than the Queen’s dying, in response to the collection.

Join CNN’s Royal Information, a weekly dispatch bringing you the within observe on the royal household, what they’re as much as in public and what’s taking place behind palace partitions.

Advertisement

News

Video: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

Published

on

Video: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

new video loaded: Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

transcript

transcript

Kennedy Family Endorses President Biden

At a campaign rally in Philadelphia, members of the Kennedy family endorsed President Biden, rejecting one of their own, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent candidate.

I’m joined here today with my sisters, Kathleen and Rory, with Joe and Chris and Max. And with my hero, President Joe Biden. We want to make crystal clear our feeling that the best way forward for America is to re-elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to four more years. That’s right, the Kennedy family endorses Joe Biden for president.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in 2024 Elections

Continue Reading

News

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Published

on

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Twelve New Yorkers who represent a cross-section of Manhattan residents have been sworn in as jurors for Donald Trump’s “hush money” case, after three days of selection in which almost 200 candidates were vetted for political bias by the court.

The panel — which includes a female physical therapist, a retired male wealth manager, a male investment banker, a male security engineer, two male attorneys, a female English teacher and an Irish-born salesman from Harlem — was finalised just after 4:30pm local time on Thursday. The court also selected the first of likely six alternate jurors.

Opening arguments in the criminal trial, the first against a former US president, are expected to commence on Monday morning.

Advertisement

Trump is facing trial on 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records for alleged payments made in the run-up to the 2016 election to buy the silence of a porn actor who claimed she had an affair with him 10 years prior. He has pleaded not guilty in the case, which is one of four criminal indictments he is facing.

Trump, a New York native and real estate tycoon, must be present in the Lower Manhattan courtroom throughout the six-week trial. Leaving the courthouse, he complained that the proceedings were preventing him from hitting the campaign trail as the presumptive Republican nominee in November’s election.

“I’m supposed to be in New Hampshire. I’m supposed to be in Georgia. I’m supposed to be in North Carolina, South Carolina,” he told reporters. He clutched a stack of paper he said were printouts of news articles criticising the indictment, which he once again decried as a “hoax”.

The third day of jury selection in a Manhattan criminal court had earlier got off to a rocky start. Two previously selected jurors were excused by the court after one woman’s identity was pieced together by family and friends from publicly reported details, and another man was connected to an arrest for ripping down rightwing posters in the 1990s.

Over the course of the week, dozens of potential jurors were dismissed for claiming they could not set aside their bias when it came to determining Trump’s fate.

Advertisement

Soon after court resumed on Thursday morning, an oncology nurse from Manhattan’s Upper East Side, who had been seated late on Tuesday, told Justice Juan Merchan that she had “friends, family and colleagues” contact her after piecing together from press reports that she had been chosen as a juror in the trial.

She added that as a result of the external pressure, she no longer felt she could be fair and unbiased, and was promptly excused.

Minutes later, lawyers for the Manhattan district attorney, who brought the case, revealed their research had uncovered that a male juror may not have been truthful about his past, and had been arrested for ripping down rightwing political posters in the Westchester County area of New York State in the 1990s. His wife may have been “previously accused or involved in a corruption inquiry”, the district attorney’s office said.

Merchan later excused him without further explanation.

Although prospective jurors’ names and addresses have been kept private for fear of reprisals, Merchan admonished the press for publishing “so much information” about their physical attributes and professional lives that some had become “very, very easy to identify”.

Advertisement

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

Prosecutors on Thursday also renewed their request for Merchan to hold Trump in contempt for violating a gag order that prevents him from talking about many of the people involved in the case, pointing specifically to a social media post shared by the former president that seemed to imply some prospective jurors were “undercover Liberal Activists”.

Merchan said he would rule after oral arguments on the issue, which are scheduled for Tuesday.

Continue Reading

News

Trump's anti-abortion stance helped him win in 2016. Will it hurt him in 2024? : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Trump's anti-abortion stance helped him win in 2016. Will it hurt him in 2024? : Consider This from NPR

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally outside Schnecksville Fire Hall in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally outside Schnecksville Fire Hall in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

1. Trump wasn’t always anti-abortion.

Trump will forever be known as the president who appointed the justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade in June of 2022. But the former president hasn’t always been against abortion rights. In 1999, when he was considering a run for the White House, Trump told NBC’s Tim Russert on Meet the Press:

Advertisement

“I’m very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. I hate it, I hate everything it stands for. I cringe when people debate the subject. But I still believe in choice.”

By 2011, Trump had changed his position. Once again he was considering a run for president, and Trump described himself as “pro-life” when speaking to the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC.

2. When he first ran for president, about half the country supported a legal right to abortion.

But a key group of voters overwhelmingly opposed it – white evangelical Christians. Trump needed their support, and he was successful: exit polling in the 2016 election showed nearly two-thirds of Christian voters chose Trump.

Their candidate delivered. Trump appointed three Supreme Court justices during his term– which ultimately led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Some Republicans in Congress are pushing for a federal ban on abortion, with many in the Republican base pressuring Trump to voice his support. Last week, Trump posted a video on Truth Social that supported leaving abortion access up to the states:

Advertisement

My view is that now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint. The states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land, in this case the law of the state.”

By saying he will instead leave the issue to the states – essentially the status quo – Trump appears to be trying to avoid strengthening Democrats’ ability to rally their voters around abortion rights.

3. Now, an anti-abortion stance could be a political liability.

Every time there’s been an abortion referendum since Dobbs, voters have favored abortion rights.

Supporting a national abortion ban is a position that some Republicans like Chris Christie and Nikki Haley have said was unwise or at least impractical.

This election year, Trump’s position on abortion could influence whether he wins or loses the race. But if he is elected, anti-abortion activists will likely push Trump to use the power of the executive branch to restrict abortion access.

Advertisement

For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

This episode was produced by Brianna Scott. It was edited by Courtney Dorning and Megan Pratz.

Continue Reading

Trending