The 2 candidates in Wisconsin’s essential Supreme Court docket race met for his or her solely debate Tuesday, debating hot-button points similar to abortion entry and gerrymandering two weeks earlier than voters will determine the steadiness of the state’s highest court docket.

Milwaukee County Circuit Choose Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal decide, and former Wisconsin Supreme Court docket Justice Daniel Kelly, a conservative, sparred for practically an hour on the Wisconsin Bar Affiliation, dinging one another over trustworthiness and coverage within the race to win a 10-year time period.

Protasiewicz forged Kelly as a “true risk to our democracy,” whereas Kelly repeatedly responded by portray his liberal opponent as a liar, with each citing ties to their partisan affiliations. The race is formally nonpartisan, however the two candidates’ résumés and feedback forged little doubt as to their ideological makeups.

Be part of FiveThirtyEight for his or her stay protection of the Wisconsin Supreme Court docket election outcomes as they arrive in on the evening of April 4.

Protasiewicz highlighted Kelly’s observe file of working with state GOP officers in an try and submit pro-Trump electors after the 2020 election regardless that then-candidate Joe Biden gained the state.

“I’m operating in opposition to most likely one of the crucial excessive partisan characters within the historical past of the state. That is any person who suggested the Republican Occasion on the pretend elector scheme,” Protasiewicz mentioned. Kelly accused Protasiewicz of mendacity about his function in that effort.

The previous state Supreme Court docket justice, in the meantime, accused his opponent of being “purchased and paid for” by the state’s Democratic Occasion and instructed she would have a “main drawback going ahead” if she have been elected. Protasiewicz mentioned she would recuse herself from any circumstances involving the state Democratic Occasion because of the help it has given her marketing campaign.

Kelly did use the Republican Occasion of Wisconsin’s places of work as his marketing campaign headquarters in his 2020 marketing campaign to remain on the court docket, however he mentioned he wouldn’t settle for any cash from the state get together.

The 2 additionally took goal at one another over feedback on abortion and outdoors teams concerned within the concern, with every accusing the opposite of forecasting how she or he would rule on an 1849 abortion regulation nonetheless technically on the books that bans the process in just about all situations.

Protasiewicz, whereas acknowledging being an abortion rights supporter, mentioned she would determine a case concerning the ban based mostly on the regulation not her private beliefs.

“I’ve been very clear about my values to the voters as a result of I feel the voters deserves to know what an individual’s values are, Somewhat than hiding, I feel the voters should know. I’ve additionally been very clear that any choice that I render will probably be made based mostly solely on the regulation and the Structure,” she mentioned.

“My private opinion is that it ought to be a girls’s proper to make a reproductive well being choice, interval,” she added.

Protasiewicz additionally famous Kelly’s endorsement from Wisconsin Proper To Life, a bunch that opposes abortion rights, although Kelly mentioned he didn’t make any guarantees to the group on how he’d rule.

“The conversations we had have been this: Will you pledge to comply with the regulation? Will you uphold the Structure? Will you do the job of the justice and easily utilizing present regulation to determine the case has to return earlier than the court docket? And that is the identical pledge I made to everybody, whatever the concern concerned that may come earlier than the court docket. And so, they are often assured — identical to everybody else within the state — that selections can be based mostly on the regulation,” Kelly shot again.

Protasiewicz and Kelly additionally tangled over the state’s legislative strains, with Protasiewicz claiming the present maps are rigged in Republicans’ favor and Kelly accusing her once more of forecasting a future ruling from the talk stage.

“So, we all know that the maps should not truthful. We’ve battleground elections. We all know they don’t seem to be. However the query is, am I capable of pretty decide on a case? In fact I might. … That is what you do. I can guarantee you that each single case that I’ll ever deal with will probably be rooted within the regulation 100%,” Protasiewicz mentioned.

“See, it is a drawback that you’ve got when you could have a candidate who does nothing however speak about her private politics,” Kelly responded. “She’s already instructed every one in all you the way she’s going to strategy this. And though she says the formulaic phrases that she’s going to comply with the regulation, she’s by no means mentioned one factor on this marketing campaign that may result in any cheap perception that that is what she’s going to do.”

The stakes are excessive for the April 4 faceoff between the 2. The seven-member Supreme Court docket, presently break up 4-3 in conservatives’ favor, would flip if Protasiewicz changed retiring Justice Endurance Roggensack, a conservative.

Moreover ruling on points like abortion rights and gerrymandering, the court docket might change into concerned in an in depth presidential election, as was the case when it intervened in 2020 to close down an effort by former President Donald Trump to overturn his slim loss within the state.