Connect with us

Wisconsin

Perimeter defense shines for Wisconsin men’s basketball but shot selection cancels it out

Published

on

Perimeter defense shines for Wisconsin men’s basketball but shot selection cancels it out


University of Wisconsin men’s basketball coach Greg Gard said he wasn’t going to give away any secret formulas, but Purdue — simply by the sheer lack of significant separation it was able to muster all throughout the Badgers’ 75-69 loss Sunday at the Kohl Center — made it obvious: It will dominate inside, but 3-pointers remain a necessary function.

Those 3-pointers weren’t there for Purdue. Boilermakers guard Lance Jones had three makes on seven shots. The rest of Purdue attempted just four all game.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

That’s part of what made Badgers guard Max Klesmit’s side-stepping 3-pointer in transition with Wisconsin trailing 39-36 with 16 minutes, 57 seconds left in the game so crucial. Both at that point and throughout the game, the Badgers just needed a few of those to fall.

Klesmit’s shot didn’t. Purdue went on a 9-2 run and Wisconsin (16-6, 8-3 Big Ten) never hit a 3-pointer again. Even with all the attention and doubles it threw toward reigning national player of the year Zach Edey, Wisconsin defended the 3-point line better than it has perhaps all season. The Boilermakers are a daunting team to face off against from the perimeter, connecting on 40.4% of its 3s (fourth in the country). They’ve connected on more than 10 3s eight times this year, and have never fired less than 15 in a game this season entering Sunday.

Advertisement

Yet at a 3 for 11 clip, a Wisconsin team that has allowed opponents to shoot 35.7% from 3 held Purdue to season lows in both categories. The issue for the Badgers, though, was the offense didn’t have perimeter success in return.

Wisconsin shot 3 of 19 from 3-point range, its own season-low output from the perimeter — a glaring look as the Badgers outscored the Boilermakers (21-2, 10-2) 44-34 in the paint yet couldn’t capitalize from the level above, where its 34.9% 3-point shooting hasn’t quite won it many games this year. 

“Some of them were good, some of them weren’t so good, I think in the shot selection (on 3-pointers),” Wahl said, “but when we get into post and draw two, we got to be able to make some plays.”

Wisconsin forward Steven Crowl said he isn’t surprised that the Badgers were able to outpace the Boilermakers on the interior. After all, he said, that is what they do best. Gard acknowledged that shot selection was an emphasis after Thursday’s collapse against Nebraska, where Gard felt Wisconsin was too reliant on jump shots. He alluded that the Badgers have discussed something along those lines all season long.

Advertisement





Wisconsin’s AJ Storr shoots the ball against Purdue’s Lance Jones in the second half Sunday at the Kohl Center.

Advertisement




Yet Wisconsin, coupled with some paint touches early, was able to get some open 3s early. Three of Wisconsin’s first six looks from there fell, and perhaps like it did against Nebraska, the Badgers looked there a bit more.

Though 3-point shooting hasn’t been a huge plus for Wisconsin this year, it hasn’t allowed its 3-point shooting to take it out of games much. After a 5-for-20 3-point shooting game against Providence on Nov. 14, 2023 — the last time Wisconsin experienced back-to-back losses — the Badgers only missed 15 3-pointers in a game twice more over a 15-4 stretch.

Some early success from deep can change things for the Badgers, which they’ve shown in the last two games. So Sunday, sophomore AJ Storr forced a few shots and a few others started to look from that distance.

Advertisement

When the misses piled up, Purdue coach Matt Painter said he understood why the Badgers struggled to shoot out of it. He’s seen it on his own sideline, too: players can tighten up when they’re missing, whether they’re open or not.

“A couple of those are: you do a good job, you contest it, they get a miss,” Painter said. “Then you have a defensive breakdown and they’re wide open and they miss them (too). So there’s a handful of them in there that we were very fortunate when they missed it.”

Klesmit, who hit both of his first-half 3s, was among the Badgers who fell victim to the 11 second-half misses by contributing two. But Klesmit was also among the reasons Wisconsin had a chance against the Boilermakers had his or his teammates’ 3s fallen through.







Max Klesmit blocks Lance Jones

Advertisement

Wisconsin guard Max Klesmit blocks the shot of Purdue’s Lance Jones in the second half Sunday at the Kohl Center.




He held Purdue’s Fletcher Loyer, who has connected on 42 3s this season, to zero attempts. The Badgers just didn’t have the responses to counter that. 

It’s the continuation of a theme for Wisconsin over its last two losses in a row: The Badgers have shown varying areas of elite play throughout the season, yet they’re not immune to weaknesses. And in back-to-back games, the weakness of its shot selection has shown itself in a way winning would never allow. With poor second-half jump shooting to match hot first-half jump shooting against Nebraska and the 3-point defense to its 3-point shooting Sunday, Wisconsin has canceled itself out.

Advertisement

“I’ll let a few heat-check shots go if the shots before then have gone down,” Gard said, “but when were heat checking and we haven’t gotten any heat, then we can’t heat check.”

Of course, Wisconsin — as good teams do — was able to make things interesting at the end, though. Klesmit stayed involved in the game, drawing an offensive foul on an inbounds play with the Badgers trailing 74-69 with 9.2 seconds left. The Badgers, off a good inbounds play, got an open 3 for freshman forward Nolan Winter.

Winter’s shot looked good, and even if it was too late, at least looked like it could give the Badgers chance. But its clank off the rim sealed Wisconsin’s fate: It wasn’t going to win with the 3 earlier in the game, and it certainly wasn’t going to at the end.

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees

Published

on

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees


Nearly all artificial Christmas trees in the world today are made in China. And with that comes an up to 30 percent tariff rate on imported Christmas products — including artificial trees. 

Kris Reisdorf is co-president of the Racine- and Sturtevant-based home and garden store Milaeger’s. On WPR’s “Wisconsin Today,” Reisdorf said tariffs are affecting their prices on artificial trees, but she’s mitigating most of the rate hike through negotiations with manufacturers and by taking on lower profit margins herself. 

“We are doing our fair share in making Christmas affordable,” Reisdorf said. “When the average person is thinking 30 percent (tariffs), that’s not by any means what they’re really paying.”

News with a little more humanity

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

Milaeger’s “almost real” trees range from under $100 to well over $3,000. Reisdorff said she’s raised prices for all artificial trees by only around $20 compared to last year.

Residorf said tree sales are largely stable despite the uptick in tariff pricing.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll last year found that 58 percent of Americans were buying artificial trees instead of real ones. That’s up from 40 percent in 2010. 

Advertisement

Greg Hann owns Hann’s Christmas Farm in Oregon. Hann also sits on the Wisconsin Christmas Tree Producers Association Board and is president-elect of the National Christmas Tree Association. 

Hann told “Wisconsin Today” the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created a surge in business for real evergreen trees and that demand has been holding relatively steady ever since. That said, Hann acknowledged real Christmas tree sales are up for him and fellow growers this year. He attributed the increase in sales to the tariffs and the fact that farmers’ supplies are finally catching up to the higher demand brought on by COVID-19. Nearly all real trees come from the United States or Canada, according to Hann. 

Hann said a recent survey by the National Christmas Tree Association found 84 percent of Christmas tree growers nationwide have kept prices the same over the last two years, and that includes his own farm. Being grown locally in Wisconsin, Hann said his business is largely unaffected by tariffs.

“It’s kind of nice to have a good supply with a stable price in this economy,” he said. 

Reisdorf said that some artificial tree manufacturers are moving operations outside of China to places like Cambodia. But most other countries in the east are also facing tariff threats. 

Advertisement

Instead, Reisdorf said artificial tree importers are lobbying President Donald Trump to lower his 30 percent tariffs on Christmas products like trees and ornaments, because those kinds of goods aren’t coming back to be made in the U.S.

Meanwhile, Hann said his organization is lobbying to have tariffs on artificial trees increased to 300 percent. He said the added tariff costs help create an “even playing field” between real and artificial trees, since farmers have to pay farm staff and cover fertilizer costs. 

But it isn’t always about the cost. Reisdorf said artificial trees have the benefit of lasting “forever,” essentially.

Hann said many of his customers come to the farm looking to keep up the Christmas tradition of picking out their own family tree. 

“They’re looking for that fragrance of a real tree,” he said. “They want to start that tradition of the family together. They pick the tree, they take it into their house.” 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal

Published

on

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal


In a bit of a surprise, Wisconsin Badgers starting center Jake Renfro is using a medical hardship year and entering the transfer portal for his final season of eligibility.

Renfro, a sixth-year senior in 2024, battled numerous injuries this season, limiting him to only four games after having season-ending surgery. He was a full-time starter for Wisconsin in 2024 after missing the entire 2023 season except for the team’s bowl game due to injury.

Prior to his time at Wisconsin, Renfro had played for head coach Luke Fickell at Cincinnati for three seasons. He played in seven games as a freshman in 2020, making six starts at center. He then was the full-time starter as a sophomore in 2021, earning All-AAC honors before missing the entire 2022 season due to injury.

Now, he’s set to come back to college football for a seventh year, rather than turn pro, and will look to do so at another school.

Advertisement

“I want to thank Coach Fickell, the entire coaching and training staff, my teammates, and the University of Wisconsin for everything over the past three seasons,” Renfro wrote. “I am grateful for the support, development, friendships, and memories I have made during my time in Madison. After much prayer and consideration, I have decided to enter the transfer portal and use a medical hardship year to continue my college football journey. I will always appreciate my time as a Badger.”

Renfro was one of the biggest supporters of Fickell publicly, being a vocal leader on the team as the starting center.

With his departure, Wisconsin could need a new starting left tackle, left guard, and center next season, depending on whether Joe Brunner heads to the NFL or returns for another season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister

Published

on

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister


play

  • Sisters Alicia and Lizzy Andrew will face each other in the NCAA volleyball tournament regional semifinals.
  • Alicia is a redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin, while Lizzy is a sophomore middle blocker for Stanford.
  • Alicia and Lizzy Andrew have similarities on and off the court as they each contribute to college volleyball powerhouses.

MADISON — It did not take long for Alicia Andrew to text her younger sister after watching the NCAA volleyball selection show with her Wisconsin teammates in a lounge area in the south end zone of Camp Randall Stadium.

“I was like, ‘Girl!’” Andrew said. “She’s like, ‘I know! I’ll see you in Texas! And I was like, ‘I’m so excited!’”

Advertisement

Andrew will not see her younger sister in the Gregory Gym stands like any other family members, but rather on the court as an opposing player in the Badgers’ NCAA tournament regional semifinal match against Stanford.

Alicia Andrew is a 6-foot-3 redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin. Lizzy Andrew is a 6-foot-5 sophomore middle blocker for Stanford. The sisters will play against each other for the first time with a spot in the NCAA regional finals on the line.

“Certainly when you’re having two high-level Division I starters on teams that are top five, top 10 in the country playing the same position, that’s pretty unique,” Wisconsin coach Kelly Sheffield said. “They’re both talented and competitive. But I also know that the players aren’t going to make it about themselves or the person that’s on the other side of the net. They’re parts of teams that are trying to move on and move forward and play great volley.”

Alicia has naturally fielded questions about the sibling rivalry, but she is “not reading too much into rivalry stuff and just playing this sport.”

Advertisement

“It’s another game,” she said after a recent UW practice. “Yes, it’s her across the net. But it’s a business. We both want to move on to the next round.”

Both players have played key parts in their respective teams’ path to this stage.

Alicia, after transferring from Baylor, is the only UW player to appear in all 98 sets this season and one of five to appear in all 30 matches. She is second on the team with 111 blocks, barely trailing fellow middle blocker Carter Booth’s 119.

“Really wants to be good for the people around her,” Sheffield said of Alicia. “Wants to do her job. Takes pride in her job. There’s a maturity, but yet there’s a playfulness that is a really good balance for her. Love coaching her. She’s wired the right way. She really is.”

Advertisement

Lizzy, meanwhile, ranks seventh in the country with a .441 hitting percentage in 2025 after earning a spot on the all-ACC freshman team in 2024. She also has experience playing with the U.S. U21 national team.

“I’m so proud of how hard she worked and her journey to Stanford,” Alicia said. “She puts in so much work, and she just loves the sport of volleyball. And I have loved watching her grow. It’s been fun to see her get better and better every year. And this past season, she’s been playing lights out.”

That pride has turned Alicia into a frequent viewer of ACC volleyball, of course whenever it has not conflicted with the Badgers’ own matches.

“We try to watch as many of each other’s games as we can, and I always just love watching her play,” she said. “I’m so proud of her. She’s just worked her tail off at Stanford, so to see her excel has been so fun.”

The Andrew sisters — Alicia, Lizzy and Natalie, who is on the rowing team at the U.S. Naval Academy — competed together in high school. (They also have a younger brother, William.) Competing against each other is a new concept for them, though.

Advertisement

“We’re not huge trash talkers, neither one of us,” Alicia said. “So I think that she’s going to play her game. I’m going to play my game. We’re going to have our heads down. There might be some looking across and smiling because we make the exact same expressions and quirky faces and reactions.”

The sisters don’t look the same – Lizzy has blonde hair and Alicia has brown hair. But Alicia quickly sees the resemblance with those on-court mannerisms.

“If there’s a silly play or if there is like a really unexpected dump or something, she’ll turn around and make the exact same face that I will,” Alicia said. “And it’s funny watching her on TV because I’m like, ‘Wow, that looks scary familiar.’”

Advertisement

They have some similarities off the court, too.

“We’re just goobers,” Alicia said. “We just like to have a good time together. Obviously she’s my little sister, but we have always been a close family — like all the siblings — so I feel like we’ve done all the things together growing up in all the sports.”

The Andrew parents are perhaps the biggest winners of the NCAA tournament bracket.

“My parents were super excited,” Alicia said. “They don’t have to split the travel plan, so they can save some frequent flyer miles there and both be in Texas. … They’re always trying to coordinate all the schedules.”

The Andrew family made T-shirts for the unique sisterly matchup. (Alicia thinks she is getting one considering they asked her and Lizzy for their shirt sizes in the family group chat.) The shirts are black, too, so there is no favoritism between Wisconsin and Stanford’s variations of cardinal red.

Advertisement

“They have a Stanford ‘S’ and a tree on it and then a Wisconsin ‘W’ and a little Badger on it, too,” Andrew said. “They’re really excited about these shirts. They’re being non-biased; they’re repping both daughters.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending