Connect with us

Wisconsin

Perimeter defense shines for Wisconsin men’s basketball but shot selection cancels it out

Published

on

Perimeter defense shines for Wisconsin men’s basketball but shot selection cancels it out


University of Wisconsin men’s basketball coach Greg Gard said he wasn’t going to give away any secret formulas, but Purdue — simply by the sheer lack of significant separation it was able to muster all throughout the Badgers’ 75-69 loss Sunday at the Kohl Center — made it obvious: It will dominate inside, but 3-pointers remain a necessary function.

Those 3-pointers weren’t there for Purdue. Boilermakers guard Lance Jones had three makes on seven shots. The rest of Purdue attempted just four all game.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

That’s part of what made Badgers guard Max Klesmit’s side-stepping 3-pointer in transition with Wisconsin trailing 39-36 with 16 minutes, 57 seconds left in the game so crucial. Both at that point and throughout the game, the Badgers just needed a few of those to fall.

Klesmit’s shot didn’t. Purdue went on a 9-2 run and Wisconsin (16-6, 8-3 Big Ten) never hit a 3-pointer again. Even with all the attention and doubles it threw toward reigning national player of the year Zach Edey, Wisconsin defended the 3-point line better than it has perhaps all season. The Boilermakers are a daunting team to face off against from the perimeter, connecting on 40.4% of its 3s (fourth in the country). They’ve connected on more than 10 3s eight times this year, and have never fired less than 15 in a game this season entering Sunday.

Advertisement

Yet at a 3 for 11 clip, a Wisconsin team that has allowed opponents to shoot 35.7% from 3 held Purdue to season lows in both categories. The issue for the Badgers, though, was the offense didn’t have perimeter success in return.

Wisconsin shot 3 of 19 from 3-point range, its own season-low output from the perimeter — a glaring look as the Badgers outscored the Boilermakers (21-2, 10-2) 44-34 in the paint yet couldn’t capitalize from the level above, where its 34.9% 3-point shooting hasn’t quite won it many games this year. 

“Some of them were good, some of them weren’t so good, I think in the shot selection (on 3-pointers),” Wahl said, “but when we get into post and draw two, we got to be able to make some plays.”

Wisconsin forward Steven Crowl said he isn’t surprised that the Badgers were able to outpace the Boilermakers on the interior. After all, he said, that is what they do best. Gard acknowledged that shot selection was an emphasis after Thursday’s collapse against Nebraska, where Gard felt Wisconsin was too reliant on jump shots. He alluded that the Badgers have discussed something along those lines all season long.

Advertisement





Wisconsin’s AJ Storr shoots the ball against Purdue’s Lance Jones in the second half Sunday at the Kohl Center.

Advertisement




Yet Wisconsin, coupled with some paint touches early, was able to get some open 3s early. Three of Wisconsin’s first six looks from there fell, and perhaps like it did against Nebraska, the Badgers looked there a bit more.

Though 3-point shooting hasn’t been a huge plus for Wisconsin this year, it hasn’t allowed its 3-point shooting to take it out of games much. After a 5-for-20 3-point shooting game against Providence on Nov. 14, 2023 — the last time Wisconsin experienced back-to-back losses — the Badgers only missed 15 3-pointers in a game twice more over a 15-4 stretch.

Some early success from deep can change things for the Badgers, which they’ve shown in the last two games. So Sunday, sophomore AJ Storr forced a few shots and a few others started to look from that distance.

Advertisement

When the misses piled up, Purdue coach Matt Painter said he understood why the Badgers struggled to shoot out of it. He’s seen it on his own sideline, too: players can tighten up when they’re missing, whether they’re open or not.

“A couple of those are: you do a good job, you contest it, they get a miss,” Painter said. “Then you have a defensive breakdown and they’re wide open and they miss them (too). So there’s a handful of them in there that we were very fortunate when they missed it.”

Klesmit, who hit both of his first-half 3s, was among the Badgers who fell victim to the 11 second-half misses by contributing two. But Klesmit was also among the reasons Wisconsin had a chance against the Boilermakers had his or his teammates’ 3s fallen through.







Max Klesmit blocks Lance Jones

Advertisement

Wisconsin guard Max Klesmit blocks the shot of Purdue’s Lance Jones in the second half Sunday at the Kohl Center.




He held Purdue’s Fletcher Loyer, who has connected on 42 3s this season, to zero attempts. The Badgers just didn’t have the responses to counter that. 

It’s the continuation of a theme for Wisconsin over its last two losses in a row: The Badgers have shown varying areas of elite play throughout the season, yet they’re not immune to weaknesses. And in back-to-back games, the weakness of its shot selection has shown itself in a way winning would never allow. With poor second-half jump shooting to match hot first-half jump shooting against Nebraska and the 3-point defense to its 3-point shooting Sunday, Wisconsin has canceled itself out.

Advertisement

“I’ll let a few heat-check shots go if the shots before then have gone down,” Gard said, “but when were heat checking and we haven’t gotten any heat, then we can’t heat check.”

Of course, Wisconsin — as good teams do — was able to make things interesting at the end, though. Klesmit stayed involved in the game, drawing an offensive foul on an inbounds play with the Badgers trailing 74-69 with 9.2 seconds left. The Badgers, off a good inbounds play, got an open 3 for freshman forward Nolan Winter.

Winter’s shot looked good, and even if it was too late, at least looked like it could give the Badgers chance. But its clank off the rim sealed Wisconsin’s fate: It wasn’t going to win with the 3 earlier in the game, and it certainly wasn’t going to at the end.

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

When does daylight saving time start? What to know before clocks ‘spring forward’

Published

on

When does daylight saving time start? What to know before clocks ‘spring forward’


play

Sunny spring evenings are just a few days away.

This weekend, clocks will “spring forward” as Milwaukee switches to daylight saving time for spring and summer.

Advertisement

That means you lose an hour of sleep the night before, but the city gains an extra hour of light in the evenings starting March 8, when the sun will set at 6:49 p.m., according to timeanddate.com. 

The seasonal change often reignites debates about whether daylight saving time should exist at all. Though the time adjustment allows for more daylight during spring and summer evenings, many experts have argued it disturbs the body’s circadian rhythms and has other health drawbacks.

Here’s what to know as daylight saving time approaches.

When does daylight saving time start?

Daylight saving time will resume on Sunday, March 8. Clocks will jump forward one hour between 2 and 3 a.m., meaning there will be more light in the evening and less light in the morning.

Advertisement

When does daylight saving time end?

Daylight saving time will end for the season on Sunday, Nov. 1, when clocks are turned back an hour at 2 a.m.

What is daylight saving time?

Between March and November, Wisconsin residents set their clocks forward by an hour to gain more daylight in the evenings. During the other four months of the year, the clocks fall back to allow for more daylight in the mornings.

Daylight saving time was enacted during World War I in an attempt to save on fuel costs by adding an extra hour of sunlight to the day. While it’s a common misconception, its creation had nothing to do with allowing farmers to work longer hours, and the agriculture industry actually “fervently opposed” the measure, according to the Library of Congress.

When is the first 7 p.m. sunset of 2026 in Milwaukee?

Milwaukee will get its first 7 p.m. sunset of the year on Tuesday, March 17, according to timeanddate.com. 

Advertisement

That day, the sun will rise at 7 a.m. that day and set at 7 p.m.

Why do some people want to end daylight saving time?

In the decades since daylight saving time was enacted, politicians, sleep experts and farmers have all pushed to change the practice, either by eliminating daylight saving time or making it permanent year-round.

In 2020, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine said the United States should “eliminate seasonal time changes in favor of a national, fixed, year-round time.” Daylight saving time disrupts the circadian rhythms of the human body, and the abrupt time change has been linked to higher risk of mood disorders and heart diseases, according to the organization.

The risk of vehicle crashes also increases each spring when drivers are especially sleep deprived after losing an hour of rest, the academy said.

Advertisement

As of October 2025, 19 states have enacted legislation to observe daylight saving time year-round, if Congress were to allow such a change, and two states and several territories observe permanent standard time year-round, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Over the years, some Wisconsin lawmakers have also drafted legislation to end daylight saving time, but those efforts have stalled.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Sister Bay, Wisconsin: 2026 USA TODAY 10BEST Readers’ Choice Awards

Published

on

Sister Bay, Wisconsin: 2026 USA TODAY 10BEST Readers’ Choice Awards


Located in scenic Door County, Wisconsin, the town of Sister Bay is a waterfront town directly on Green Bay. Outdoor enthusiasts head to Sister Bay for its access to hiking trails, nature preserves, and water pursuits such as boating, fishing, and ice-skating during winter. The town hosts a number of seasonal festivals including a film fest, marina fest, outdoor concert series, and the Door County Festival of Fine Arts. The annual Roofing of the Goats Parade is a popular event tied to Al Johnson’s, a local restaurant known for goats that graze on its rooftop during summer months.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Vote: Who is Wisconsin High School Boys Basketball’s Top Guard of 2025-26?

Published

on

Vote: Who is Wisconsin High School Boys Basketball’s Top Guard of 2025-26?


With the action-packed Wisconsin high school boys basketball regular season completed and March Madness beginning, it’s time to take a look at some of the outstanding players and cast your vote for the best.

We began by looking at the most prolific individual scoring threats, talented 3-point shooters,strong rebounders, and top free-throw shooters so now it’s time to take a look at the high-caliber guards from throughout the state.

There are hundreds of high-caliber boys basketball players in Wisconsin, and these lists are not intended to be comprehensive.

Voting remains open until March 9 at 11:59 p.m. PT.

Advertisement

(Players are listed in alphabetical order and all nominees are leaders from the 2025-26 season as compiled by Bound.com, and WIAA; the poll is below the list of athletes)

Castillo is averaging 25.4 points per game with 5.4 rebounds, 2.3 assists, and 1.1 steals for Greendale (18-6 overall record).

Collien is averaging 15 points per game with 4.1 rebounds and 2.0 assists for Oakfield (21-3 overall record).

Edwards is averaging 14.1 points per game with 7.1 rebounds and 6.6 assists for D.C. Everest (21-3 overall record).

Gray Jr. was averaging 24.3 points per game with 6.9 rebounds, 4.0 assists and 2.1 steals prior for West Allis Central (22-2 overall record).

Advertisement

Hereford is averaging 36.4 points per game with 9.0 rebounds, 5.6 assists, and 4.1 steals for Beloit Memorial (22-2 overall record).

Johnson is averaging 27.3 points per game with 8.5 rebounds, 4.6 assists, and 3.6 steals for Milwaukee Juneau (22-1 overall record).

Jones is averaging 23.3 points per game with 5.0 rebounds, 3.3 assists, and 2.6 steals for Germantown (15-9 overall record).

Kern is averaging 16 points per game with 6.2 rebounds and 3.0 assists for New Berlin West (21-3 overall record).

Kilgore is averaging 14.6 points per game with 7.0 rebounds, 3.6 assists, and 3.0 steals for Kewaunee (24-0 overall record).

Advertisement

Kohnen is averaging 16.3 points per game with 3.8 rebounds, 1.8 assists, and 1.3 steals for Slinger (20-4 overall record).

Knueppel is averaging 17.4 points per game with 7.4 rebounds, 3.9 assists, 1.9 blocks, and 1.4 steals for Wisconsin Lutheran (24-0 overall record).

Loose is averaging 18.2 points per game with 5.3 rebounds, 3.0 assists, and 2.3 steals for Port Washington (23-1 overall).

Manchester is averaging 35.8 points per game for Mount Horeb (19-5 overall record).

Platz is averaging 19.5 points per game with 7.2 rebounds and 2.3 assists, and 1.4 steals for Brookfield East (19-5 overall record).

Advertisement

Prochnow is averaging 21.3 points per game with 11.1 assists, 4.8 assists, and 3.2 steals for Reedsville (21-3 overall record).

Resch is averaging 21.3 points per game with 3.3 assists and 2.0 steals for Arrowhead (18-6 overall record).

Schultz is averaging 27.4 points per game with 6.5 rebounds, 3.8 assists, and 2.0 steals for Plymouth (17-7 overall record).

Schwalbach is averaging 15 points per game with 4.7 assists and 3.3 rebounds, and 1.7 steals for Kaukauna (21-3 overall).

Sweeney is averaging 15.5 points per game for Appleton North (20-4 overall record).

Advertisement

Vandenberg is averaging 13 points per game with 2.3 assists and 2.0 rebounds for Freedom (23-1 overall).

About Our Player Poll Voting
High School on SI voting polls are meant to be a fun, lighthearted way for fans to show support for their favorite athletes and teams. Our goal is to celebrate all of the players featured, regardless of the vote totals. Sometimes one athlete will receive a very large number of votes — even thousands — and that’s okay! The polls are open to everyone and are simply a way to build excitement and community around high school sports. Unless we specifically announce otherwise, there are no prizes or official awards for winning. The real purpose is to highlight the great performances of every athlete included in the poll.

— Jeff Hagenau | jeffreyhagenau@gmail.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending