Connect with us

Michigan

Michigan price scanner law: Overcharged? You’re owed compensation. Here’s what to know.

Published

on

Michigan price scanner law: Overcharged? You’re owed compensation. Here’s what to know.


Do you pay attention to shelf tags or other displayed prices on items you buy only to look at your receipt and discover it scanned at a higher price at the checkout?

If so, know you have a right to recover your loss, and a little bonus to boot, thanks to a Michigan law that’s been around, with iterations, for decades.

Michigan’s “Shopping Reform and Modernization Act” protects consumers when an item purchased scans at a higher price. The law took effect on Sept. 1, 2011, and replaced Michigan’s item pricing law of 1976, often called the nation’s most strict, that was in place for more than three decades.

With the new law, individual price stickers or tags were no longer required on just about everything sold in Michigan.

Advertisement

But in its place, under the new law, retailers were required to display the price near or where the product is displayed. But an actual sticker on the item indicating the price was no longer required.

Retailers, of course, applauded the move because they no longer needed to deal with the expense and costs of adding and changing price stickers to items.Those who opposed the law, according to several Free Press archives reports, cited that pricing individual items for customers to know what they are charged for the product.

Also known as the “Scanner Law,” the act allows for compensation to consumers when overcharged for an item, though with, of course, a few caveats.

With the holidays arriving, people are busy and it’s easy to overlook prices or not pay attention to receipts.

Advertisement

In addition, more stores from grocery retailers to home improvement stores, have more self-checkouts, relying on customers to scan their own items.

While it’s easy to scan, pay, and go, it’s a good practice to keep an eye on what the price of an item is, how much it scans for, and pay attention to receipts. Go over your receipt and make sure the items you purchased are scanned at the correct, displayed price.

While you may have a phone app to check a price, the Scanner Law requires retailers to display or clearly indicate the price of an item.

Here’s what to know

How should stores display prices?

  • Prices can be on a price sticker, stamped on the item, or otherwise marked.
  • Other ways to look for prices include signage, electronic readers, or any other method that “clearly and reasonably conveys the current price of the consumer item, to a consumer when in the store at the place where the item is located.”

Does it include all items?

  • There are exceptions. Among the 13 items exempt from displaying the total price, according to the law, are items sold by weight or volume and not in a package or container, prepared food for consumption, unpackaged food items, cars and car parts, live plants, and live animals.

What must happen for consumers to trigger the Scanner Law?

  • There is a price displayed for the item.
  • The item is purchased using an automatic checkout, such as a scanner.
  • A receipt describes the item and states the price charged for the item.

When to act if you are overcharged:

  • You have 30 days after buying an item to notify (in person or in writing) the store or seller of your loss because you were charged more for an item than what was displayed.
  • Once the seller is notified and within two days they are to compensate for the loss.

Here’s how consumers are compensated:

  1. Consumers (buyers) are given an amount equal to the difference between the price displayed and the price charged for the consumer item. For example, if the price of something is $1.59 and scans at $2.09, the difference is 50 cents.
  2. The buyer receives a bonus, also called a “bounty” of 10 times the difference that is not less than $1 and a maximum of $5. In the example above that would be $5. Note: If you bought multiples of the same item, the bonus only applies to one item not all of them.
  3. Using the example, the consumer would receive $5.50 as a total bonus.
  4. If a seller refuses to pay the consumer can take the seller to court and may receive up to $250 in damages and up to $300 in attorney’s fees, according to the law.

When the law or the bonus doesn’t apply:

  • The scanning error is caught and corrected before the transaction is complete.
  • The item is rung up by hand incorrectly and a scanning device is not used. This is considered human error and the bonus doesn’t apply.
  • If an item is on sale but scans as the regular price, you are not entitled to the bonus because you were not charged a price higher than the displayed price.
  • You are past the 30-day mark or no longer have a receipt.

Keep in mind, if a store doesn’t provide a bonus, it is not a violation. It does open the retailer, according to the Michigan Attorney General’s office, to “a private right of action by the consumer.”

You can download a scanner error bill of rights that explains the law. To report a retailer not in compliance with price display contact the Michigan’s Department of Agriculture and Rural Development at 517-655-8202 or write to them at 940 Venture Lane, Williamston, MI 48895.

Advertisement

Contact Detroit Free Press food and restaurant writer Susan Selasky and send food and restaurant news and tips to: sselasky@freepress.com. Follow @SusanMariecooks on Twitter. Subscribe to the Free Press.



Source link

Michigan

Michigan Football: Offensive player grades vs. Arkansas State

Published

on

Michigan Football: Offensive player grades vs. Arkansas State


Michigan got it’s second win of the 2024 season at home against Arkansas State in a 28-18 victory. The Wolverines still didn’t look like a defending national championship team, but they did end up getting the job done.

Michigan’s defense was almost reminiscent of last years squad, and looked dominant through three quarters. They ended up giving away two touchdowns to Arkansas State’s backup QB Timmy McClain with less than 10 minutes left in the 4th quarter during garbage time. Michigan’s run game looked phenomenal, but the passing game was nonexistent which led to changes at the QB position. Michigan’s top pass catcher Colston Loveland went out with a shoulder injury, and the Wolverines will need to monitor his status in the coming days.

There is plenty to review in the Week 3 victory, but here’s how some of Michigan’s offensive players graded out:

Michigan Football

Sep 14, 2024; Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Michigan Wolverines quarterback Davis Warren (16) prepares to run a play against the Arkansas State Red Wolves during the first half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images / Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images

Davis Warren (F)

Advertisement

Starting QB Davis Warren had his worst game of the season through the air against the Red Wolves before eventually getting benched for backup QB Alex Orji late in the 3rd quarter. Warren threw three self-inflicted interceptions in only 14 attempts. Interestingly enough, he did move the offense downfield for three touchdowns, but they mostly included handing the ball to the running backs. Other than his three interceptions, he actually completed all 11 of his other passes. Overall he was a negative contributor to the Michigan offense and needed to be taken out of the game.

Alex Orji (B-)

Alex Orji ended up leading the offense after starting QB Davis Warren was taken out of the game following a third interception. Orji threw a touchdown to rookie TE Hogan Hansen on his first pass attempt on his first drive of the game. He also had a decent fourth quarter on the ground rushing three times for 27 yards totaling 9.0 ypc. He ended the game on two drives that included only one first down and a three-and-out on the last Michigan drive of the game which didn’t help his offensive output overall.

Michigan Football

Sep 14, 2024; Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Michigan Wolverines running back Kalel Mullings (20) celebrates with offensive lineman Evan Link (71) after running for a touchdown against the Arkansas State Red Wolves in first half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images / Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images

Donovan Edwards (A-)

Edwards took the backseat in the backfield this week putting up a solid performance against a shaky Arkansas State run defense. The senior and team captain ended the game with 17 rushes for 82 yards and a touchdown. He also added one catch for 11 yards. It was a solid game for the veteran who broke out for multiple chunk plays, but his performance was overshadowed by backup running back Kalel Mullings.

Advertisement

Kalel Mullings (A+)

Kalel Mullings had the best single game individual performance of the year so far this season. Mullings proved himself as a very efficient running back option for the Michigan offense taking less carries than Edwards with only 15, but turning it into 153 total rushing yards. He averaged an outstanding 10.2 ypc cutting through the Red Wolves defense for huge plays. We will see how his role changes next week following this monster performance.

Michigan Football

Sep 14, 2024; Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Michigan Wolverines tight end Hogan Hansen (80) celebrates with running back Donovan Edwards (7) after scoring a touchdown against the Arkansas State Red Wolves during the second half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images / Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images

Tight Ends (B-)

Colston Loveland was again the favorite target for Davis Warren before going out of the game with a shoulder injury late in the 2nd quarter. He ended up coming back and catching the first ball of the 2nd half before once again going to the sideline for his shoulder, and eventually leaving the field altogether. Loveland only totaled three catches for 30 yards, while the leading pass catcher for the Wolverines offense was Junior TE Marlin Klein (three receptions for 43 yards). Rookie TE Hogan Hansen had his first career catch which was also his first touchdown as a Wolverine. Hogan had the only Michigan receiving touchdown on the day.

Receivers (D)

Advertisement

The receiver room struggled once again to develop a rhythm with the QBs, which seems to have become a weekly occurrence. Fredrick Moore led all wideouts with just 38 receiving yards receiving. The only other wideout to catch a pass was Semaj Morgan, who turned two catches into just three yards. The struggles in the receiver room could be the result of the lackluster QB play through three weeks, which will hopefully improve with the change from Warren to Orji.

Michigan Football

Sep 14, 2024; Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Michigan Wolverines quarterback Davis Warren (16) prepares to run a play against the Arkansas State Red Wolves during the first half at Michigan Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images / Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images

Offensive Line (B+)

The Michigan offensive line looked the best it has all season in Saturday’s game. They led the RB room to 255 rushing yards on 35 total carries. With Kalel Mullings leading the way, the Wolverines o-line created huge holes in the Red Wolves run defense which led to big plays on the ground. The only blemish on their performance was the below average pass block performance which led to both Michigan QB’s being forced to throw either on the run or outside the pocket on many occasions.

The Wolverines will look to double-down on Saturday’s performance when No. 11 USC comes to the Big House in a heavyweight ranked matchup on CBS at 3:30 pm EST

Sherrone Moore updates Michigan’s quarterback status following Arkansas State win

Advertisement

The Good, The Bad: Michigan defeats Arkansas State

Takeaways: Michigan defeats Arkansas State but leaves much to be desired



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

MSU Football Offers Unique Two-Sport Star

Published

on

MSU Football Offers Unique Two-Sport Star


Michigan State offensive line coach Jim Michalczik is one of the best recruiters on a staff of very good recruiters. He is beloved by recruits who commit. He is beloved by ones that don’t.

Three-star offensive lineman Darius Afalava, a 2025er who chose Oklahoma over the Spartans, was a big fan of Michalczik. 2025 commit Justin Bell, of Macomb Dakota, said this of Michalczik:

“[Michalczik] never lies about anything, he’s always truthful to you on what happened. And basically, he really wants to be as truthful as he can, and not sugarcoat anything. And he’s always been a great guy overall. He’s always checking in on people, making sure they’re okay. He’s a really great recruiter, too.”

For Bell in particular, Michalczik’s ability to develop NFL talent was eye-opening. Michaczik is a renowned developer and the architect behind 2024 NFL Draft first-rounder Taliese Fuaga, who many considered a can’t-miss prospect.

Advertisement

“He’s had a lot of people come in and put in the work, and with his drills, his teaching, and his play-calling, he’s had a lot of guys develop to be great football players to go to the NFL,” Bell had said. “And I really can see myself being able to get developed under him.”

Where does all this come in? Michalczik recently offered 2026 offensive lineman Claude Mpouma. Mpouma has a unique story — the 6-foot-8, 308-pound offensive tackle who is also a prolific basketball player.

Allen Trieu wrote that when Mpouma first arrived at Phillips Academy, the prospect thought it was just going to be a basketball experience. His head coach, Ivan Simmons, said that changed.

“He was always interested and it was on his mind to try it, but no one really pushed him to do it,” Simmons said. “He came in and we had a conversation to talk about some technical stuff, lifting, training, and starting to go to camps and getting noticed. He did one padded camp. His first time in pads was at Lindenwood and now we’re in pads and scrimmaged several times and he’s driving guys off the ball.”

Now Mpouma has eight offers, including those from Florida State, Miami, Minnesota, and Illinois. Simmons lauded Mpouma’s traits and tools. And there are a bunch of them.

Advertisement

“I think he’s naturally strong and gifted in pass protection because he moves so well,” Simmons said. “He’s played soccer and basketball, so his upside with his pass blocking is very high. We’ve tried him at defensive tackle and he gets off the ball and shows signs of aggression. UCLA and Notre Dame came in and Notre Dame liked him more on defense but everyone else coming in says offense and his pass protection is excellent.”

Michalczik certainly thinks so. Mpouma is a raw prospect, but he has two more years of prep football to develop. Even then, if he were to arrive in East Lansing, Michalczik would have a lot to work with.

Michael France is Sports Illustrated’s Michigan State recruiting beat writer, covering all things Big Ten recruiting for Spartan Nation. Be sure to follow him on Twitter/X@michaelfrancesi for exclusive Spartans recruiting coverage.

Don’t forget to follow the official Spartan Nation Page on Facebook Spartan Nation WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE, and be a part of our vibrant community group Go Green Go White as well WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

University of Michigan student assaulted by group after saying he was Jewish

Published

on

University of Michigan student assaulted by group after saying he was Jewish


A Jewish student at the University of Michigan (UoM) was assaulted in an alleged antisemitic incident on Sunday, according the UoM Hillel in a post on Facebook, the ADL and the University on Monday morning.

The student reported to the Ann Arbor police that a group of people had assaulted him after he had told them he was Jewish. 

Advertisement

The 19-year-old male student was allegedly thrown to the ground, kicked, and spat on, according to a WhatsApp broadcast on a local group.

The Ann Arbor Police Department (AAPD) said in a statement that they were actively investigating a “bias-motivated assault that occurred on 9/15/24 at approximately 12:45 a.m in Hill Street and S. Forest.”

“The 19-year-old male victim reported he was walking when a group of males behind him asked if he was Jewish. When the victim said yes, the group of males proceeded to assault him. The suspects fled on foot.”

Advertisement
Statement on antisemitic incident at University of Michigan by @A2Police (credit: SCREENSHOT/X)

The victim was mildly wounded and did not need to go to hospital, the statement continued. He reported the incident to the AAPD.

AAPD Police Chief Andre C. Anderson said he had spoken to the UoM police (UMPD) and that there “is absolutely no place for hate or ethnic intimidation” in the city. 

Advertisement

“Our department stands against antisemitism,” he stated.

Rabbi Davey Rosen, the director of UoM Hillel, said that, in addition to the AAPD and UMPD, “through Hillel’s partnership with Jewish Community Security Inc, we are in regular communication with state and federal law enforcement.”

He added that Police Chief Anderson had called him following the incident to assure him “that the AAPD stands against antisemitism and an investigation is underway.”

Advertisement

Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter


President of UoM Santa Ono said the “safety of our campus community is our highest priority” and said the university stands “firmly against antisemitism and all bias-motivated behavior.”

Advertisement

The CEO of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Jonathan Greenblatt, said he was “horrified to learn of an alleged antisemitic assault on a Jewish @UMich student” in an X/Twitter post.

“We are grateful @A2Police  are investigating this as a hate crime.”

Advertisement

Greenblatt added that ADL will give $5000 to anyone providing information that could lead to an arrest or conviction of the suspects.

“There is no place for antisemitism or bigotry on our streets or on our campuses,” he added.

Advertisement

Jewish students make up around 14% of the student body at Michigan, numbering around 6,500, of which 5,000 are undergrads and 1,500 are graduate students, according to the UoM Hillel’s website. 

Previous incidents, investigations at UoM

The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights has previously investigated UoM for violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, finding Michigan failed to comply with Title VI in its handling of antisemitic incidents.

Of the 75 complaints of harassment investigated by the OCR, many of which include incidents of targeting Jewish students, few were handled by the university. 

Advertisement

OCR found “no evidence” that the university complied with Title VI requirements to investigate whether campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war created a “hostile environment” for students, faculty, and staff.

In one incident, the university rejected a Jewish student’s request for conflict resolution after the student said a graduate student instructor had harassed them on social media in October 2023. The university told the student that social media “is largely going to be protected as free speech,” according to the Office of Civil Rights report.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending