Connect with us

Indiana

Chicago Bears are looking at 2 sites for stadium in Indiana and could end up using both

Published

on

Chicago Bears are looking at 2 sites for stadium in Indiana and could end up using both


Chicago Bears President and CEO Kevin Warren addresses the team’s ongoing stadium plans during a news conference Thursday, Aug. 13, 2026, in Lake Forest, Ill. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh)

LAKE FOREST, Ill. — The Chicago Bears have at least one viable site for a stadium in northwest Indiana and they are examining a second location as they move closer to finalizing a place for their new home.

The Bears announced in June that they were moving forward with a stadium development project in Hammond, Indiana. They have completed their review of what they are calling the Lost Marsh site, and they are doing their due diligence on the Wolf Lake Terminal site. They could merge the two options together in some way.

“Even though we’ve had occasional meetings with the state of Illinois, our sole focus at this point in time is working on a world-class stadium and mixed-use development in Hammond, Indiana,” team President Kevin Warren said Thursday.

Advertisement

The Bears also had been considering Arlington Heights — about 30 miles northwest of Chicago — as a potential location for an enclosed stadium. Wherever they end up, a name change is off the table.

“We will be the Chicago Bears whether we’re in Arlington or whether we’re in Hammond,” chairman George McCaskey said.

The Bears, a charter NFL franchise, have played in Illinois since the team’s founding in 1920 as the Decatur Staleys. They moved to Chicago in 1921 and called Wrigley Field home before they started playing at Soldier Field in September 1971.

The Bears’ lease runs through 2033, but they can pay a fee to break the lease early. Soldier Field is about 40 miles south of Halas Hall — the team’s headquarters in Lake Forest — and Hammond is about 20 miles south of the team’s lakefront stadium.

McCaskey acknowledged the “anxiety” of a move to northwest Indiana for the team’s fans.

Advertisement

“But when I’ve driven that route, other than a sign telling me so, I wouldn’t know that I’ve just crossed the state border,” he said. “And as Kevin said, once people see the building, once they get in there, once they understand that our top priority from day one was a world-class stadium experience, we think we’ll make that adjustment. We think Bears fans are up for that.”

The Bears ramped up their focus on Indiana after a proposal to provide financial incentives for the team to build its new home in Illinois stalled in the state legislature. A committee in the Indiana House of Representatives passed a bill in February that established a Northwest Indiana Stadium Authority to finance, construct and lease a stadium.

The Illinois Senate passed a bill that would have cleared the way for Arlington Heights and Chicago to create local stadium authorities, creating a pathway for the Bears to avoid paying property taxes on a new stadium. But the House adjourned without taking up the measure on the last day of the state’s spring legislative session.

McCaskey said the team has had minimal conversations with Illinois legislators since June. Asked if he was hopeful about Illinois coming up with a plan and building in Arlington Heights, McCaskey demurred.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell “has said to us many times in league meetings, ‘Hope is not a strategy,’” McCaskey said. “We have to deal with the here and now. We have to deal with real circumstances, and these are the real circumstances.”

Advertisement

Speaking before McCaskey and Warren held their news conference, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said his office has been in contact with the team.

“We’re working hard to make sure that there’s an opportunity for the Bears to stay in the state of Illinois, whether it’s in Chicago or in Arlington Heights,” Pritzker said.

“I also want, at the same time, to protect the fans and the taxpayers of the state. So we’re going to do everything we can to make sure that that happens.”

The Bears have been pursuing a new home for years, but the process has been hampered by repeated twists and turns.

The team announced in September 2021 that it had signed a purchase agreement for 326 acres of land in Arlington Heights. The $197 million deal with Churchill Downs Inc. was finalized in 2023.

Advertisement

In September 2022, the team unveiled a nearly $5 billion plan for Arlington Heights that called for an enclosed stadium that could host Super Bowls and Final Fours. The conceptual illustrations also provided for a year-round entertainment district with restaurants and shopping.

But the Bears shifted their focus toward building a new stadium next to Soldier Field after Warren was hired as team president in January 2023, replacing the retiring Ted Phillips. The plan to transform Chicago’s Museum Campus got an enthusiastic endorsement from Mayor Brandon Johnson and a tepid reception from Pritzker and state legislators when it was announced in April 2024.

The team switched gears again in May 2025, announcing it had made “significant progress” with local leaders in Arlington Heights.

Amid lingering efforts to secure tax incentives in Illinois, along with as much as $855 million in public money for infrastructure at the Arlington Heights site, the Bears began to take a closer look at possible options in northwest Indiana.

“We’re in regular, almost daily communication with the state of Indiana working on this,” Warren said. “We have an excellent deal, a win-win partnership together. And the cost of the significance of this decision from a stadium standpoint, we will make sure that we take our time to get this right.”

Advertisement





Source link

Indiana

Why Indiana flags are lowered to half-staff today

Published

on

Why Indiana flags are lowered to half-staff today


play

Indiana Gov. Mike Braun directed state flags lowered to half-staff Friday from sunrise to sunset. Flags across the Hoosier State will return to full staff on Saturday.

Advertisement

Here’s why.

Why flags are at half-staff

In Indiana and across the country, both state and U.S. flags have been lowered in remembrance of those who died during the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

On Thursday, Sept. 10, Braun directed state flags at government agencies to be lowered for Patriot Day, commemorating the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.

Braun, in a news release, encouraged Hoosiers to honor those who died by lowering flags to half-staff at their homes and businesses.

Advertisement

A similar order came Wednesday by President Donald Trump, who issued a proclamation in recognition of Patriot Day. The president directed U.S. flags to fly at half-staff in honor of the 2,977 people who died during the terrorist attacks.

Why do flags fly at half-staff?

  • The death of a government official, military member or emergency first responder, or person of national significance.
  • A national tragedy.
  • Memorial Day and other national days of remembrance.

Is it half-mast or half-staff?

It depends. For ships and naval stations ashore, the flags are flown at half-mast. But if you happen to be on dry land, flags on a flagpole are flown at half-staff.

📩 Start your morning with the top Indy news delivered straight to your inbox with IndyStar’s Daily Briefing. Sign up for free at indystar.com/newsletters.

John Tufts covers trending news for IndyStar and Midwest Connect. Send him a news tip at JTufts@Gannett.com. Find him on BlueSky at JohnWritesStuff.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court hears Jewish religious freedom challenge to abortion ban | The Jerusalem Post

Published

on

Indiana Supreme Court hears Jewish religious freedom challenge to abortion ban | The Jerusalem Post


A landmark legal battle to determine whether Jewish women have a religious right to an abortion entered a critical new stage in Indiana.

The state Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Thursday in a case that began with a local Jewish group’s 2022 religious freedom challenge to Indiana’s near-total abortion ban. The state  is appealing a permanent blocking of the ban that a lower court imposed in March.

The arguments, held in Indianapolis, explored a legal theory that the state’s abortion ban impedes Jews’ religious freedom because many interpretations of Jewish law prioritize the life of the mother over that of the fetus. 

Advertisement

The case, one of the recent major challenges based on Jewish law to an abortion ban, could carry significant ramifications for how the American legal system weighs Jewish religious rights against conservative Christian doctrine, which strongly opposes abortion.

Indiana was one of several states to pass severe abortion restrictions following the 2022 US Supreme Court ruling overturning its 1972 Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing the right to an abortion. Separately, Christian groups and businesses have prevailed in national religious freedom cases determining whether they can be compelled to pay for contraception that can be used to perform abortions, arguing doing so violates their religious views.

Kenneth Falk, legal director of American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, delivers oral arguments before the state Supreme Court on Sept. 10, 2026. (credit: SCREENSHOT VIA JTA)

But Kenneth Falk, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, argued before the court Thursday that it was the abortion bans that curtailed the free exercise of religion. “Under Jewish law, the human life does not begin until the first breath,” said Falk, who argued the case on behalf of Hoosier Jews for Choice, a group formed explicitly to challenge the state’s abortion law, as well as two anonymous plaintiffs. While liberal Jewish denominations are generally permissive of abortion, Orthodox scholars offer more mixed interpretations.

In response to a question by Chief Justice Loretta Rush about what the state should do “further along in a pregnancy,” Falk said, “I don’t think anyone is going to be advocating for abortions of a viable fetus.”

‘Secular’ exceptions to the abortion ban

In his arguments, Falk compared the Jewish women’s standing to what he called “secular” exceptions to the abortion ban in cases of rape or incest.

Advertisement

“What is the reason for allowing these secular exceptions, but not a religious exception?” Falk asked the justices. He also referred to permitted religious exceptions to healthcare laws in other cases, including vaccine mandates.

In March, a judge in the Marion County Superior Court ruled in favor of Hoosier Jews for Choice, permanently blocking the state’s near-total abortion ban in cases where it would “substantially burden their religious exercise.”

That ruling prompted the appeal from the state now under consideration, as well as conservative backlash, with Republican Indiana Sen. Jim Banks calling for the judge’s impeachment.

“Our nation’s long tradition of respect for religious exercise has never been understood to encompass a right to intentionally destroy human life, any more than a right to abusively punish children,” Indiana Solicitor General James Barta argued before the state Supreme Court on Thursday.

Barta otherwise largely sidestepped the Jewish group’s religious arguments in his own presentation. Instead he insisted that the plaintiffs did not have proper standing because they were not actively seeking abortions themselves, though one is hoping to get pregnant but worried about getting proper care if an abortion were required.

Advertisement

Their case, Barta insisted, was “purely hypothetical.”

A similar argument briefly prevailed in Kentucky in 2024, when a judge threw out a religious freedom lawsuit brought by three Jewish mothers against that state’s abortion law. The plaintiffs, the judge said in that case, lacked standing because none of them were currently pregnant. One of the plaintiffs, who was considering a pregnancy via in vitro fertilization, was allowed to appeal the case, which resulted in a partial victory this May when a judge struck down part of Kentucky’s abortion ban — related to a definition of when human life begins — as unconstitutional.

Many mainstream and progressive-leaning Jewish organizations, including the National Council of Jewish Women, the Anti-Defamation League and representatives of the Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist movements, are supporting Hoosier Jews for Choice and have signed onto briefs on the group’s behalf in court.

In a statement to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, the NCJW noted that questioning from the justices Thursday “appeared to focus on more procedural matters,” rather than “the merits of the case.” Yet Darcy Hirsh, the group’s vice president of government relations and advocacy, said she was “hopeful” the court would rule in the Jewish groups’ favor.

“No individual should be forced to abandon their religious beliefs in order to comply with a narrow, Christian belief of when life begins,” Hirsh said.

Advertisement

A representative for the state of Indiana did not return a JTA request for comment following the oral arguments.

Jews on the other side of the debate

There are also Jews on the other side of the debate. The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty, a legal advocacy group, has filed amicus briefs in support of the state.

“From a theological perspective, it’s hard to say what is the single Jewish teaching on abortion,” Josh Blackman, an attorney with the coalition and professor at the South Texas College of Law, told JTA following the oral arguments.

Blackman added that, of all major religions, Judaism has “the strongest basis for the right to terminate a pregnancy.” But, he said, Jewish groups should be mindful of advocating for a system “where Jews in Indiana can have an abortion but Catholics cannot.”

“At a time when there’s growing hostility between people on the right and Jews, I”m not sure this is the best use of Jewish resources,” Blackman said. “This could actually backfire in significant ways.”

Advertisement

There is no timeline for when the state Supreme Court might issue a decision on the case.





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana’s defense focused on correcting Week 1 issues ahead of Saturday’s matchup with Howard

Published

on

Indiana’s defense focused on correcting Week 1 issues ahead of Saturday’s matchup with Howard


Despite an underwhelming defensive performance vs North Texas, No. 5 Indiana is keeping its confidence high heading into Saturday’s matchup vs. Howard.

Indiana’s top defenders know they have to put their Week 1 mistakes behind them quickly and turn their full attention to the Bison.

“Monday we watched film…to make those corrections,” veteran linebacker Rolijah Hardy said Tuesday. “We’ve been hammering those corrections really hard in practice.” 

Advertisement

IU’s defense looked uncharacteristically out-of-rhythm in the North Texas game, surrendering 367 yards of total offense — tied for the second-most the Hoosiers allowed in any game in 2025. In addition, the Mean Green possessed the ball for more than 37 minutes, almost 15 minutes more than Indiana.

“Defense had a hard time getting off the field…combination of some critical missed assignments and poor tackling,” head coach Curt Cignetti added Monday. “There’s things we have to do better.”

The tackling issues were particularly noticeable, as Indiana missed 13 total tackles. Needless to say, that will not be acceptable once Big Ten play starts later this month.

Cignetti also offered praise for Howard starting quarterback Ja’Shawn Scroggins, admitting that containing the Bison signal-caller will not be an easy task.

“He’s their leading rusher…a really good athlete. They’ve got good team speed,” Cignetti added Monday. “He’s played a lot for them…a dual (threat) guy.”

Advertisement

Scroggins’ ability to make plays both with his arm and with his legs will present IU’s defense with another challenge. In addition to being their leading rusher, he threw for 315 yards in the Bison’s opening game vs Alabama A&M.

With a game under their belt, the Hoosiers will look to clean up the mistakes that plagued them in their opening day matchup.

For Indiana’s leaders on the defensive side of the ball, they know that accumulating in-game reps is the best way for the unit to improve collectively throughout the early course of the season.

“As you continue to play, you gain chemistry with your brothers,” Hardy added. “The biggest thing is getting better every day…one percent (better).”

Indiana’s matchup with Howard is scheduled for noon Eastern on Saturday, Sept. 12 and will be televised on Big Ten Network.

Advertisement

For complete coverage of IU football, GO HERE.


The Daily Hoosier –“Where Indiana fans assemble when they’re not at Assembly”



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending