Lifestyle
TMZ’s new ‘selfie’ tour of Hollywood isn’t just for Gen Z

Instead of focusing on Hollywood’s boldface names, the new TMZ Selfie Tour gives someone else the star treatment: You. In its first expansion since launching celeb-spotting rides in 2011, the company seeks out some of the city’s most iconic buildings and backdrops while offering to help those who plunk down $59 improve their selfie game.
The daily tour, which launched Oct. 16. was the brainchild of TMZ Senior VP, Business Development & Growth Stuart Alpert, who says the idea bubbled after discussions with TMZ founder Harvey Levin about how ways to expand the tour offerings.
“A few months ago, I was out and about in Hollywood and West Hollywood,” Alpert tells The Times, “And I’d see all these young people taking selfies at all these iconic locations — like the [Paul Smith boutique] pink wall — I thought it was fascinating. So I thought that this was something that could be so much fun — making the next extension of our tour product a curated tour of a lot of the iconic spots in Hollywood, West Hollywood, Beverly Hills [and down] Melrose where our guests can get their own selfies with context and narrative from the tour guides.”
Carlos Guzman, 67, left, from Hartford, Conn., photographs Raquel Morales, 60, of Los Angeles and his wife Marta Guzman, 62, (in yellow) in front of the pink wall at the Paul Smith store on Melrose Avenue
.
(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)
I tell Alpert that sounds like the tour is giving the A-list treatment to landmarks. “That’s right,” he responded emphatically. “And it gives our guests a chance to be a star in their own right in front of these locations that so many other influencers and celebrities have taken photos in front of. And along the way we’re also giving some tips here and there; how to get your best shot, where to stand.”
As inane as a selfie tour sounds, it’s not the first effort to leverage the look-at-me compulsion (Museum of Selfies circa 2018, I’m looking at you). And when you really think about it, the notion of swapping out celeb-spotting for landmark drive-bys makes sense. After all, Hollywood’s elite are slippery as eels in the wild, busy people with things to do and places — most often away from bright red tour buses — to be. The Capitol Records Building and Rodeo Drive? Not so much.
How is the new tour different from the long-running TMZ Celebrity Tour? Instead of several departures daily, there’s just one departing at 2 p.m. And it’s slightly longer, clocking in at 2½ to 3 hours, which allows for getting on and off the bus. It’s got just a handful of stops — nine in all right now — and goes roughly in the opposite direction from the flagship tour (down the Sunset Strip through West Hollywood to Beverly Hills, then looping back down Melrose past Paramount and back up to Hollywood). Many of the spots are instantly recognizable landmarks; buildings and signage with links to the industry while others lean more into the selfie side. There are some baffling omissions (like the Hollywood sign, which seems like a no-brainer), but Alpert said some of those had to do with logistics and time constraints.

Jenalyn Rapolla, left, 48, of Fairfield, Calif., receives some guidance on how to frame a selfie from tour guide Eunice Elliott in front of a mural at the Capitol Records Building on Vine Street in Hollywood.
(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)
It also skews slightly younger, says TMZ’s social media manager Jaysn Lewis. “Not as young as you’d think, though,” Lewis says, noting that the tour tends to attract those “in the 30- to 35-years-old range, compared to the mid-50s for the [original tour].”
As someone who lives within about a five-minute drive of all of the stops on the tour, but takes a lousy selfie, I found the prospect of learning to up my phone photography game compelling. If the TMZ Selfie Tour could help me look like even slightly less than a ham-handed buffoon in pictures of my own taking it would be worth the price. So, with the bar set just that low, I headed off on a Friday afternoon to snap some celebrity-level selfies.
Before embarking on our voyage, I had a chance to chat with the tour’s affable guide, Eunice Elliott at the TMZ kiosk just inside the Hard Rock Cafe on a tourist-heavy stretch of Hollywood Boulevard. She explained that her selfie expertise came from her stint as a morning news anchor at a Birmingham, Ala., TV station.
“Before I went on the air, I would always take a selfie as a way of checking my hair and makeup,” Elliott tells The Times. “So I’ve learned a few things. One is that it’s the angle — it’s always the angle. Another is to say in your head — not out loud but just in your head — ‘I know you see me.’ Have that ‘I know you see me’ energy.”
With that as my only preflight instruction, I made my way to the bright red, 25-seat, open-sided TMZ tour bus.

People board the bus in Beverly Hills, before heading to the next stop on the TMZ “Selfie Tour.” (Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)
(Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times)

Lifestyle
‘The Challenge’ is understanding why this ‘Squid Game’ game show was green-lit

Squid Game: The Challenge is a reality game show based on the sensational 2021 South Korean drama series. But this gruesome, creatively misbegotten concept should never have made it past the first meeting.
Netflix
hide caption
toggle caption
Netflix

Squid Game: The Challenge is a reality game show based on the sensational 2021 South Korean drama series. But this gruesome, creatively misbegotten concept should never have made it past the first meeting.
Netflix
It is one thing to extend a successful television series in a way that drains its meaning and dilutes its impact. It is another to drown it in greed and to gleefully embrace what it diagnoses as economically and spiritually catastrophic.
Squid Game, the South Korean drama series that was a sensation on Netflix in September 2021, is a work of despair. In it, hundreds of players who are deeply in debt are invited to participate in a secretive competition with an enormous cash prize for those who successfully complete a series of games. What they don’t realize until the first game is underway is that as they are eliminated from each game, they will be murdered.

The first episode, “Red Light Green Light,” finds 456 people in an enormous open space playing the childhood game in which, if you are caught moving after you’re told to freeze, you are out. But in this case, when you are out, you are shot dead by enormous guns embedded in the walls. Shot in the head, the neck, the back. As the group realizes what’s happening, many panic and run for the exit, but of course, this violates the rules as well, so they are massacred as they try to escape. They end as a pile of dead bodies against the doors, their identical green sweatsuits drenched in blood. Those who survive, owing to their desperate circumstances, eventually play on. How inhuman it is to conduct this game, to have to play it, and especially to watch it, those are the things that give the scene and the series such weight.
At some point, some person, some fool, somewhere, in some office, flush with the success of the series both critically and commercially, decided it would be entertaining to create a game show — a real game show — that imitated this scenario as closely as possible without actually murdering anyone. And so you have Squid Game: The Challenge.

What makes The Challenge so bad is that outside of the simulated killings and their shock value, it’s dull.
Netflix
hide caption
toggle caption
Netflix
It brings 456 real people to a vast dormitory designed to look as much as possible like the one in the show. And it begins, too, with the game of “Red Light Green Light.” It would have been easy to design The Challenge such that if you are caught moving, your number is called and you are simply out of the game. Had they stopped there, this effort would be empty and pointless, but perhaps only that. Instead, when a player is caught moving, a squib inside their shirt explodes, splattering their chest and neck with black fluid, and they fall over and play dead. It is meant to look as much like a true massacre by gunfire as they could manage, although someone seems to have drawn the line at fake red blood in a meaningless gesture toward, one can only assume, some simulacrum of good taste.


The original Squid Game indicts, above all, anyone who would find such a competition entertaining. The villains are the people who watch, who plan, and who enjoy this spectacle. So what makes The Challenge so creatively misbegotten is that it suggests at best (or worst?) a cynical effort to exploit the most superficial elements of Squid Game while entirely missing its point, and at worst (or best?) an ignorant failure to understand what the show is even supposed to be about. These games are not particularly exciting, in and of themselves. The murders are the story; the brutality is the one thing that makes it compelling. And the only reason the fictional game has been designed by its evil creators is that they want to watch people scramble to save their very lives. The deaths are not a decoration; they are the fabric of the thing.
And so what makes The Challenge so bad is that outside of the simulated killings and their shock value, it’s dull. There are too many contestants to get to know and no central characters to grab onto like the ones in Squid Game.

What makes The Challenge feel wrong is that a competition where the first episode is a whimsical game of “mass shooting and panic,” complete with squibs, complete with splatter, should never have made it past the very first meeting. That nobody said no, that nobody said “there’s an excellent chance that we will be dropping these episodes in the aftermath of a real mass shooting, and simulating one for entertainment will seem like an extraordinary violation of bare-bones decency” is an indictment of everyone involved. Someone — everyone — has lost the plot. (Not to mention what some contestants claim were, in real life, apparently atrocious conditions.)

Yep, this pretty much sums it up.
Pete Dadds/Netflix
hide caption
toggle caption
Pete Dadds/Netflix

Yep, this pretty much sums it up.
Pete Dadds/Netflix
In a media environment in which creative people manage, against all odds, to do work that is daring and interesting — like Squid Game was — it is brutal to see the same company that drove that work’s success turn around and treat it so carelessly. It’s not the first time Netflix has tried to have its cake and eat it too; recent seasons of Black Mirror that aired on Netflix have skewered formats and practices straight out of the service’s own playbook, to the point where a Netflix clone called Streamberry was one of the primary villains of the sixth season. But at least in that one, as far as we know, nobody got hurt.
This piece also appeared in NPR’s Pop Culture Happy Hour newsletter. Sign up for the newsletter so you don’t miss the next one, plus get weekly recommendations about what’s making us happy.
Listen to Pop Culture Happy Hour on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Lifestyle
Jonathan Taylor Thomas Surfaces Publicly for First Time in 2 Years

Jonathan Taylor Thomas said he’d be home for Christmas, and after disappearing from public life for a long time … he’s here to make good on his promise.
The elusive ex-child star — who vanished from the big show ten years ago — surfaced earlier this week in SoCal … where he was apparently out running errands near his home. As many people have noted, the dude looks almost unrecognizable compared to his childhood.
TMZ.com
8/15/13
Nothing all that remarkable in the pic itself … it’s just a guy who’s left Hollywood behind minding his business. But considering how big a star he once was — it is eye-popping.
Remember, the last time we saw JTT making the rounds and signing autographs was way back in 2013, and at the time … he was very much doing the A-lister thing, embracing cameras, questions and fans. Now, though, it’s quite clear — he wants none of that.
It was around this same time that he opened up to People Mag about why he’d decided to step away … saying he’d been working since he was a young kid and wanted a break. He also said he didn’t want fame to define him, and simply didn’t care much about it.
The last time Jon was out in public was during COVID — when he was spotted walking his dog and laying low. Now, two years later, we’re seeing him again … sans any pooch.
Here’s hoping he’s enjoying himself in whatever it is he’s up to these days. And since it’s that time of the year … no better time than to peep his classic holiday flick, not to mention all his other treasures from the ’90s. ‘Lion King,’ ‘Home Improvement’ … true legend, indeed.
Lifestyle
Kiss performs its final concert. But has the band truly reached the ‘End of the Road’?

Kiss band members, from left, Tommy Thayer, Gene Simmons, Eric Singer and Paul Stanley participate in the ceremonial lighting of the Empire State Building on Thursday in New York.
Charles Sykes/Invision/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Charles Sykes/Invision/AP

Kiss band members, from left, Tommy Thayer, Gene Simmons, Eric Singer and Paul Stanley participate in the ceremonial lighting of the Empire State Building on Thursday in New York.
Charles Sykes/Invision/AP
In the 50 years since Kiss first kicked and thrashed its way onto the New York rock scene, the band has given the world sing-and-shout-along hits like “Detroit Rock City,” “Crazy Crazy Nights” and “Beth,” and live performances replete with blood-spattering, fire-breathing, pyrotechnics and gobs of cartoonish stage makeup.
“Their schtick lifted them up to the absolute top,” music writer Joel Selvin, the author of numerous books about rock musicians including Linda Ronstadt, the Grateful Dead and Sly and the Family Stone, told NPR.
On Saturday, the memorable stagecraft that made Kiss one of the biggest selling hard rock bands in the world will come to an end, as its members perform what they are touting as their final show of their aptly titled, four-year-long “End of the Road World Tour” — at Madison Square Garden in New York. The concert will be available to watch live on Pay-Per-View.
“It has nothing to do with personalities in the band or tensions or a difference of opinion or musicality. It’s purely practical,” said Kiss co-founder, rhythm guitarist and vocalist Paul Stanley in an interview with the music publication Ultimate Classic Rock of the band’s reasons for bringing five decades of Kiss to an end. “You can play beat the clock, but ultimately the clock wins.”
The city has apparently gone Kiss-crazy in the days leading up to the occasion, with the appearance of Kiss-themed taxis, Metro cards and pizza boxes. On Wednesday, the New York Rangers hosted KISS Game Night, featuring Kiss-related activities and “limited-edition KISS x Rangers merchandise.” Band members also made an appearance at an Empire State Building lighting ceremony on Thursday. Staged in honor of Kiss’ swan song, Empire State emitted the colored lights associated with the band — silver, red, purple, green and blue.

Despite all the hooplah, this may not in fact be Kiss’ goodbye kiss. The band undertook a previous “farewell tour” more than 20 years ago. After a brief hiatus, it started touring again on and off in 2003. Live shows and album releases flowed on from there.
In interviews, band members have spoken about continuing on after Saturday’s Madison Square Garden performance in one way or another. Both Stanley and co-frontman Gene Simmons have their own bands and say they aim at the very least to continue making appearances in those formats.
“Nobody ever really says goodbye,” said rock critic Selvin, citing comebacks over the years by the likes of Cher, Steve Miller and the Grateful Dead. “It’s a show business strategy. You take a bow. But there’s always an encore.”
Selvin said artists often reappear after retiring because they can make a lot of money owing to fans’ pent-up demand. For example, the pop-punk band Blink-182 is earning four times as much on its current reunion tour than it did when it last re-united in 2009, according to Far Out magazine. (The band issued a statement in 2005 saying it was going on “indefinite hiatus,” only to reunite four years later.)
“Personal life interferes, you want to disappear into the woodwork for a while and then demand builds and you go back to it,” Selvin said. “Steve Miller took his band apart in ’99. He was just tired. And he was out for six years. And then in 2005, he put his band back together and suddenly his price was up, and there was more interest in seeing him.”
Meanwhile, some musical acts simply never retire. The Rolling Stones, for instance, are embarking on yet another North America tour in 2024. The band just announced additional dates.
Selvin doesn’t think we’ve heard the last of Kiss.
“The rule of the farewell tour is that you have to say goodbye to every hall, and sometimes you have to say goodbye twice,” Selvin said. “I do not expect this to be the last time that Kiss performs, any more than ‘Fare Thee Well’ was the last time The Grateful Dead performed.”
-
Science1 week ago
USC neuroscientist faces scrutiny following allegations of data manipulation
-
Business1 week ago
As most stores close for Thanksgiving, Black Friday may bring the biggest crowds since before COVID
-
Business1 week ago
Column: An exhaustive debunking of the dumbest myths about Social Security
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review | Tom Blyth, Rachel Zegler shine in latest ‘Hunger Games’ movie
-
Politics1 week ago
Pope Francis dines with transgender women for Vatican luncheon
-
Politics1 week ago
Sen Kennedy’s IQ dig at VP Harris sparks backlash from White House, DNC
-
Technology1 week ago
The best Black Friday deals you can still get for under $25
-
World1 week ago
Violent protests in Dublin after children injured in knife attack