Lifestyle
Oh Bother! Winnie, poo and deforestation

Before and after images from the original (left) and the new Winnie-the-Pooh: The Deforested Edition in which all of the trees have been removed or cut down.
Who Gives A Crap
hide caption
toggle caption
Who Gives A Crap
Winnie-the-Pooh: The Deforested Edition is a reimagining of the A.A. Milne classic created by the toilet paper company Who Gives A Crap.
There is just one, stark difference: There are no trees.
The Hundred Acre Wood? Gone.
Piglet’s “house in the middle of a beech-tree” is no longer “grand.”
Six Pine Trees is six pine stumps.
Yes, this is imaginative PR (a free eBook is available on the Who Gives A Crap website; a hardcover was available for purchase but is now sold out). But the company’s co-founder, Danny Alexander, said the goal is to raise awareness about deforestation. Who Gives A Crap prides itself on “creating toilet paper from 100% recycled paper or bamboo,” he said.
Without trees, Winnie-the-Pooh can’t fall out of branches in his pursuit of honey. Christopher Robin can’t climb the big oak. Owl’s home at The Chestnuts is barely there.
These sad predicaments are “kind of the point,” said Alexander.
Deforestation destroys ecosystems. “Animals and plants lose their habitats, naked land becomes unstable,” said NPR’s Climate Desk reporter Rebecca Hersher. “But deforestation also contributes to climate change because forests absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.”
As the United Nations put it, “Forests are essential to life on earth.”
Alexander said Who Gives A Crap has tried to spread the word that “over a million trees are cut down every single day just to make traditional toilet paper,” according to a study the company commissioned.
“But it’s a hard message to get across and it’s really hard to imagine,” he said.
Who better to enlist in the effort than an adorable, world-renowned bear?

Winnie-the-Pooh: The Deforested Edition is a word-for-word republishing of the A.A. Milne classic, with one arresting change: all of the trees have been cut down.
Who Gives A Crap
hide caption
toggle caption
Who Gives A Crap

Winnie-the-Pooh: The Deforested Edition is a word-for-word republishing of the A.A. Milne classic, with one arresting change: all of the trees have been cut down.
Who Gives A Crap
“It’s just an extremely powerful re-use of the original Winnie-the-Pooh book to convey that even a bear ‘of very little brain’ could appreciate the impacts of deforestation,” said Jennifer Jenkins, director of Duke University’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain.
Reimagining — or ruining — iconic stories?
Once artistic works are in the public domain, they are no longer protected by copyright law. They belong to the public. Other creators are free to reimagine them as they see fit.
Frozen drew from the fairy tale The Snow Queen. Demon Copperhead is an adaptation of David Copperfield. “The Great Gatsby Glut,” read a New York Times headline for a piece on all of that novel’s adaptations. Pride and Prejudice, Shakespeare, Greek myths…creativity begets creativity, not all of it worthy of the original.
As for Winnie-the-Pooh, the story’s been made into a slasher film that “nobody asked for,” according to Fatherly and was parodied by Ryan Reynolds in an ad for Mint Mobile.

The map of Winnie-the-Pooh’s world looks very different in Who Gives A Crap’s Deforested Edition.
Who Gives A Crap
hide caption
toggle caption
Who Gives A Crap

The map of Winnie-the-Pooh’s world looks very different in Who Gives A Crap’s Deforested Edition.
Who Gives A Crap
This Pooh’s shirt is purple
The original 1926 Winnie-the-Pooh illustrations by E.H. Shepard were in black and white. Pooh first appeared in a red shirt in the early 1930s. That and other colorized versions are not yet in the public domain.
Writer Tim X. Rice had some fun with Winnie-the-Pooh’s public domain entrance, instructing those who might rework him: “Red shirt on the bear, artists beware. If nude he be, your Pooh is free.”
Misleading messages
Tensie Whelan, founding director of the NYU Stern Center for Sustainable Business is weary of stories where “forest products companies are the villain.” While some of them “absolutely are destructive,” she said, “most forest products companies today are doing it much more sustainably.”
She says Who Gives A Crap is, “taking something that is relatively complex” and “then sort of manipulating kids into an emotional response using this, you know, wonderful story in order to sell their product.”
“100% recycled paper still comes from trees,” she noted. Recycled paper operations also rely on burning fossil fuels, adding to the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change.
Whelan is also concerned that the tone is too dark for kids. “We want kids to see the upside and the opportunities and not scare them too much.”
What would Pooh think?
Alexander, the company co-founder, conceded that seeing images of Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet, Christopher Robin and the rest of the characters living in a world without trees is “uncomfortable and jarring.”
Alexander wants the Deforested Edition to, “spark a conversation between parents and children…about the impact our daily habits have on the environment, and how we can all be part of the solution.”
At first, he said, he and his colleagues at Who Gives A Crap struggled with the idea of tampering with such a beloved character but “ultimately the message you’re trying to get across here is one that’s really powerful and is challenging, and I think it kind of fits the message.” He said they decided not to contact the A.A. Milne estate about their new version.
“The way we thought about it is really, what would Winnie-the-Pooh think? And from our perspective…we think that he would be proud of it and we think he’d agree with it.”
A.A. Milne and E.H. Shepard’s literary agency declined NPR’s request for comment.
Next year, Mickey Mouse comes into the public domain. We could imagine all kinds of dark scenarios in which he might appear.
But we won’t. Disney will probably put up a fight to keep its famous characters on brand.
This story was edited by Meghan Sullivan and Jennifer Vanasco with help from NPR’s Climate Desk.

Lifestyle
Spotify to cut 17% of staff in the latest round of tech layoffs

Daniel Ek, CEO of Swedish music streaming service Spotify, in 2016. On Monday, Ek announced Spotify would layoff 17% of employees.
Toru Yamanaka/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Toru Yamanaka/AFP via Getty Images

Daniel Ek, CEO of Swedish music streaming service Spotify, in 2016. On Monday, Ek announced Spotify would layoff 17% of employees.
Toru Yamanaka/AFP via Getty Images
The music streaming giant Spotify has announced it’s cutting 17% of its workforce in a dramatic move aimed at slashing costs.
In a memo addressed to staff, CEO Daniel Ek said it was critical that the company “rightsize” its financial situation after hiring too many people in 2020 and 2021, when capital was cheaper.
“The Spotify of tomorrow must be defined by being relentlessly resourceful in the ways we operate, innovate, and tackle problems,” Ek wrote. “This kind of resourcefulness transcends the basic definition — it’s about preparing for our next phase, where being lean is not just an option but a necessity.”

This latest round of cuts — the third this year — equates to about 1,500 jobs, according to a CNBC source that said the Swedish company currently employs about 9,000 people across more than 40 global office locations.
Across the tech industry, tens of thousands of positions have been cut in the last year as a pandemic-era boon continues to fade. According to the tech job tracker layoffs.fyi, more than 250,000 tech workers have been laid off since the start of the year.
Still, the size of the Spotify cuts may feel “surprisingly large” for the moment, Ek wrote.

The company posted $34 million in operating income during its third-quarter earnings call, its first quarterly profit since 2021. Lower personnel costs, driven by two smaller rounds of cuts, was one of the factors cited for saving costs.
The company cut 6% of its workforce, about 600 employees, in January. It laid off another 2% of staff, roughly 200 roles, in June.
At the same time, Spotify raised prices on its subscription plans and set a lofty goal to reach a billion users by 2023. It currently has over 570 million of them — a little less than double the number of listeners the platform attracted in 2020.
The company has also shared its vision to go beyond music and expand in audiobooks and podcasting, a space that’s feeling a financial strain and steep competition for both listeners and advertisers.

Since 2019, Spotify has spent close to a billion dollars buying up podcasting studios, signing exclusive deals with celebrity hosts and, most recently, investing in generative AI for ad creation.
But all this investment has come with high-profile headaches — and still failed to turn a profit. The company’s layoffs in June were specifically focused on downsizing its podcast division.
As of 8:30 a.m. on Monday, Spotify’s shares were up about 5% in premarket trading.
Departing employees will be offered approximately five months of severance pay plus healthcare coverage, vacation pay, immigration support and two months’ worth of career-search assistance, according to Ek’s statement.
Lifestyle
20-year-old Iraqi arrested for alleged plot to attack Hanover Christmas market
Lifestyle
Longtime ‘Fresh Air’ contributor Dave Davies signs off (sort of)

Dave Davies began covering local politics and government for WHYY in Philadelphia in 1982.
WHYY
hide caption
toggle caption
WHYY

Dave Davies began covering local politics and government for WHYY in Philadelphia in 1982.
WHYY
After 22 years of interviews, longtime Fresh Air contributor and fill-in host Dave Davies is cutting back on his workload.
For years Davies has contributed at least one interview a week to Fresh Air, and oftentimes more — especially when the topics concern sports, investigative journalism or history. Davies is always thinking about the experience of the listener.
“If … something isn’t clear because the guest is using shorthand for something or it’s just not quite working, you have to intervene in some way to make sure the audience stays with it,” he says. “The audience is always in your mind.”
A native of Lubbock, Texas, Davies grew up in Corpus Christi and moved to Philadelphia in 1975, where he initially worked as a taxi driver and a welder. In 1982, he found his way to the WHYY newsroom, covering local politics and government. He left in 1986 for stints at KYW Newsradio and the Philadelphia Daily News, but returned to public radio doing free-lance gigs, including Fresh Air interviews, beginning in 2001.
Though Davies occasionally hears a Philly accent creep into his speech, you’re unlikely to find a trace of Texas in his voice — either on-air or in real life.

Dave Davies stands outside of the Fresh Air studio in Philadelphia with a collection of press passes from over the years.
Molly Seavy-Nesper/WHYY
hide caption
toggle caption
Molly Seavy-Nesper/WHYY

Dave Davies stands outside of the Fresh Air studio in Philadelphia with a collection of press passes from over the years.
Molly Seavy-Nesper/WHYY
“I remember in junior high and high school being aware that the people on television, like the newscasters, spoke this standard English,” Davies says. “And I kind of I just decided to do that.”
Davies is not signing off completely from WHYY. You’ll still hear him interviewing guests on Fresh Air — just less frequently. And, of course, he’ll continue to bring his A-game to the listeners.
“The one thing that I’ve done from the beginning is to really prepare very, very thoroughly for every interview because there’s a standard here, right?” he says. “The thorough preparation is really, I think, in some ways one of the things that defines the show.”
Click on the audio link above to hear clips of some of Davies’ most compelling interviews, including conversations with Frank Calabrese Jr. (2011); novelist Kate Christensen (2013); biographer Robert Caro (2019); and sports announcer Joe Buck (2017).
Heidi Saman and Seth Kelley produced and edited this interview for broadcast, with assistance from Roberta Shorrock. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Beth Novey adapted it for the web.
-
Culture1 week ago
Finding a Moral Center in This Era of War
-
Technology1 week ago
The best Black Friday deals you can still get for under $25
-
Politics1 week ago
Trudeau blames ‘right-wing, American MAGA’ after Canadian Conservative Party votes against Ukraine bill
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘Renaissance: A Film By Beyoncé’ Review: An Intimate Yet Extravagant Exploration Of Beyoncé’s Latest World Tour
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Dream Scenario movie review: (un)likely boogeyman – FlickFilosopher.com
-
Politics1 week ago
Senator presses Army over backpay, religious freedoms for soldiers discharged for COVID vaccine refusal
-
Politics1 week ago
Biden tries to hide away in Nantucket but can’t escape pro-Palestinian protesters
-
Science7 days ago
Backlash to affirmative action hits pioneering maternal health program for Black women