Connect with us


It’s Not Evident What The Facial Tattoo On Cardi B’s Jawline Says

Press Room



The “Bodak Yellow” singer could be noticed getting some artwork utilized to her jawline in a video that tattoo artist Robinson De Los Santos shared on Instagram on Sunday. Within the video, Cardi hides her face as Santos attracts messages to it with crimson ink.

Followers responded to the article in a wide range of methods. One wrote, “OMG, not a wise alternative… I like Cardi. B, imagine me after I say that your attractiveness is not diminished by your face. Others supported Cardi’s alternative, with one including, “Her physique her alternative y’all bumming and what she does not even contact your every day existence.”

Cardi’s new facial tattoo was seen in a selfie uploaded by a fan account, however neither she nor Santos have supplied a close-up of the paintings or defined what it means.

Cardi, 29, did inform her followers again in January that she was fascinated by getting her child. Wave ‘s identify is tattooed on her face, however neither of the letters subsequent to her chin appear to be a “W.”

Oddly sufficient, I am 1% away from tattooing my son’s identify on my face. I need to do it so badly! When she posted on the time, she additionally talked about that she supposed to have a tattoo on her jaw.


The rapper already has quite a few tattoos honoring her family members; in February, she and her husband Offset flaunted related hand inks of their marriage ceremony date that they’d really engraved on each other for a “Cardi Tries” episode.
On his personal chin, the Migos artist has the initials of the couple’s 4-year-old daughter, Kulture.

In a earlier put up, At an extravagant celebration, Cardi B dressed her daughter Kulture in related mermaid outfits to honor her fourth birthday.

The 29-year-old rapper posted celebration footage on Instagram on Sunday with “I’ve your again, your entrance, your sides.” “BIG 4.




This Is Not About Sexy Secretary Role-Play

Press Room



My boyfriend, Jamie, was making an attempt to return an uncomfortably tender mattress he had ordered on-line.

He scheduled a pickup, however when the truck arrived, the driving force stated he couldn’t settle for it unboxed. The mattress had been delivered in an industrially compressed state, and its field was lengthy gone (no mortal might have squeezed the unfurled mattress again into that field, anyway).

So Jamie drove to Residence Depot and purchased six of the largest transferring packing containers they’d. Again house, he used up a complete roll of packing tape however nonetheless couldn’t get the behemoth into any type of shippable form. Delirious with frustration, he gave up and tried to get on together with his life, however the mattress loomed in his room like a beacon of defeat.

A number of weeks later, he rekindled his resolve and known as customer support, the place a consultant stated there was a mix-up and he ought to have been booked with a mattress-specific pickup service, no field wanted. A window was scheduled however nonetheless nobody got here.

When Jamie advised me all of this, I perked up, animated like a toy soldier in “The Nutcracker.” Our relationship had been in a nebulous place lately, and I noticed this as a chance to resolve one thing easy — to point out him, in a small however concrete means, that issues actually can work out.


I jotted down his order data and stepped exterior to make some calls.

There’s a dynamic that tends to emerge in my relationships whereby I get off on taking part in the function of administrative assistant. I’m not speaking about horny secretary role-play. I’m speaking about operating errands, making returns and scheduling appointments — all whereas totally clothed.

My therapist calls my tendency towards logistical care-taking a manipulative bid for management. I name it effectivity activism.

When Jamie and I met over the summer season, we had been each within the thick of life transitions. My five-year relationship was ending, and I used to be getting ready to relocate from Los Angeles to New York, the place I’d transfer again in with my mom and start graduate faculty. Jamie was metabolizing geographic {and professional} modifications himself, in addition to reckoning with the latest analysis of an autoimmune illness.

Assembly on this mind-set, on equally unstable floor, might be terrifying and magical, equally ripe for catastrophe and ecstasy. I consider that is the pinnacle area through which one is maximally inclined to becoming a member of a cult.


Round this time, my therapist assigned me homework, a guide with a mortifying title: “Boundary Boss.” I positioned a maintain on the library and was relieved to be taught there could be a six-week wait, giving me loads of time to take pleasure in romantic recklessness.

As summer season melted into fall, Jamie and I tumbled from relationship to associates with advantages to doing the Sunday crossword collectively and joking about having twins. “Boundary Boss” remained on maintain on the library, and having a brand new love felt like the most effective antidepressant on the earth.

Round Jamie, I felt myself increasing in unexpected methods. Phrases I had used to explain myself for years — cynical, cautious, un-fun — not appeared relevant to the particular person I used to be turning into. Pleasure, compassion and creativity grew to become far more attention-grabbing to me. As a substitute of killing the bugs on my windowsill, I started trapping them beneath cups and shepherding them exterior. I began sporting extra colour and writing unhealthy poetry.

This part felt like discovering a brand new room in my childhood house — kicking open the door and wiping away the mud, discovering built-in bookshelves and bay home windows. The room had been there all alongside; Jamie simply occurred to have a replica of the important thing.

Then, in November, two main issues occurred: Jamie bought again collectively together with his ex, and Jamie bought bedbugs.


I swiftly fell right into a pit of anxious despair. I learn the primary 37 pages of “Infinite Jest,” appeared up flats for hire in Norway and discovered that heartbreak refuses to be mentioned in any language aside from excessive cliché. Infuriatingly, I used to be not mad at him. Nonetheless, I did consider him deserving of punishment.

I later discovered that after his spontaneous, halfhearted try at reconciliation, Jamie and his ex realized for the umpteenth time that, romantically, they had been unhealthy information. They got here collectively solely to scatter, items of shrapnel that had reunited for no cause aside from to blow up once more.

When the person who breaks your coronary heart will get bedbugs, it feels fairly biblical. As I wallowed, my creativeness grew to become an increasing number of sadistic. The one milliseconds of pleasure I might conjure had been from picturing the hell he was going by means of, waking up with new bites and blood-flecked sheets, feeling a relentless crawl on his flesh, driving the carousel of disgrace and isolation.

He did all the pieces you’re alleged to do to eradicate bedbugs: He spent kilos of quarters on countless a great deal of laundry, scorched his textiles within the dryer and scrubbed his room into submission. An exterminator got here, however the bedbugs persevered. Jamie’s roommate turned on him; solely the bedbugs remained loyal.

All furnishings needed to go. Jamie dragged his infested mattress to the curb, and a second exterminator was known as to annihilate what the primary couldn’t. By Thanksgiving, 4 weeks after infestation, Jamie was left with a naked room. He went to mattress each night time in a sleeping bag on the ground, surrounded by piles of a chalk-like repellent known as diatomaceous earth that shaped a fringe round his physique, as if he had been a tragic boy scout making an attempt a summoning circle.


A month after Jamie broke my coronary heart, I texted him. It’s laborious to be a Boundary Boss whenever you’re in love.

Right here’s the factor: I’m a really understanding particular person as a result of I’ve been all kinds of horrible folks. And as somebody who has dabbled within the unforgivable — having lied, stolen and ghosted — I don’t wish to dwell in a world the place actions are irredeemable.

Jamie replied, and we cannonballed into texting, messaging with the fervor of middle-school greatest associates catching up after a monthlong grounding. That night time, we talked on the cellphone for hours — in regards to the stupidity with which he had acted, and about how depressing we had been aside.

I advised him I wished to strive once more. Not as a result of he deserved it, however as a result of our relationship did. It was after we hung up that Jamie ordered the brand new mattress that will grow to be too tender.

Issues bought higher. Jamie saved proving to me that he would present up; he spent six hours within the kitchen making me Bolognese; he learn my favourite books aloud. He continues to be probably the most encouraging particular person I’ve ever encountered. Our relationship regrew, remodeling in just a few months from a leafless keep on with one thing with inexperienced buds to a correct houseplant filled with shiny leaves.


After our reconciliation, I spent every week at Jamie’s (then parasite-free) house. After I stepped into his bed room, I used to be met with extra mattress than I had anticipated. This was once I requested — demanded, actually — that he ahead me the paper path of his failed return. I wished to carry out the executive service of fixing this as an act of affection, fueled by a hope that hovers midway between optimism and naïveté.

Jamie was doing the dishes 45 minutes later once I sauntered into the kitchen and knowledgeable him that the mattress could be picked up between 4 and 6 p.m. on Wednesday.

“I’ve heard it earlier than,” he stated.

I requested him to have religion.

“I consider in you,” he stated. “However I don’t consider in them.”


“For now, simply consider in my perception.”

“Positive,” he stated with a smile, flicking water droplets at me.

The mattress was picked up on Wednesday between 4 and 6 p.m., as scheduled. It has but to be refunded, however I’ve determined to let Jamie deal with that. (I nonetheless haven’t learn “Boundary Boss,” however I feel I’m heading in the right direction.)

The phrases hope and redemption have been tumbling round my head recently, like bedding being disinfected within the dryer. I don’t wish to be within the place of relying on somebody to vary, however I do wish to give them room to. There isn’t any means that the particular person I’ve change into in simply the previous few years might match into the field that used to comprise me so effectively. I’ve grown — as a result of I had the area to.

I wished to show to Jamie that we dwell in a world the place mattresses get picked up when they’re scheduled to. I wished to show to myself that new chapters are doable, that the previous doesn’t dictate the long run. That we’re allowed to be as fantastic as we as soon as had been horrible. And that, as soon as free of their cardboard confines, our lives can develop and hold increasing.

Continue Reading


Woman Killed Newton Man After He Discovered She Had Been Forging Checks, DA Says

Press Room



A girl has been arrested in reference to the alleged homicide of a 65-year-old man from Newton, Massachusetts, Middlesex District Legal professional Marian Ryan introduced Wednesday.

Ryan stated 43-year-old Xiu Fang Ke was arrested Wednesday for killing Leonard Garber in his house on Mt. Vernon Terrace. She was arraigned on Wednesday afternoon in Newton District Court docket.

Prosecutors stated after Garber’s physique was discovered, Ke was referred to as to police headquarters, the place she confessed.

“Through the interview the defendant admitted that she had stolen checks from Leonard Garber and that she had killed him,” Assistant District Legal professional Julie Kunkel stated in courtroom Wednesday. “She later acknowledged that she had used a hammer and hid his physique within the location the place it was finally discovered by police.”

The district lawyer stated the investigation that led to Ke’s arrest started on Monday when police obtained telephone calls from family and friends of Garber saying that he was somebody who stored in common contact with individuals however hadn’t been heard from because the finish of final week.


Police went to the home Monday and once more early Tuesday. After they returned to the house Tuesday afternoon, Ryan stated they discovered Garber’s physique wrapped in a curtain underneath development supplies and a number of other different heavy gadgets within the entrance hallway of the house. She stated it appeared the physique had been there for over a day and had been positioned in a method to conceal it from individuals coming into the house.

Xiu Fang Ke, 43, was arrested Wednesday for killing Leonard Garber in his house on Mt. Vernon Terrace. She was arraigned on Wednesday afternoon in Newton District Court docket.

Because of their investigation, Ryan stated police discovered that Garber had been spending a while these days with Ke, a former tenant of his at a special deal with. The investigation signifies that Ke had been forging checks from Garber’s accounts and had allegedly stolen over $40,000.

Prosecutors stated there may be proof that Ke had stolen checks earlier than and had playing money owed.

“She had been a tenant of his a number of years in the past at a special property, not on the home the place the incident befell. Apparently they’d been mates since that point,” Ryan stated.


She stated investigators are nonetheless wanting into whether or not the 2 might need been in a romantic relationship.

Ryan stated investigators have discovered that someday between Thursday and Saturday, Garber turned conscious of using his checks, confronted Ke about them, and she or he struck and killed him after which made efforts to cover the physique. The reason for demise has not but been decided, however Ryan stated it seems to be blunt power trauma.

Middlesex District Legal professional Marian Ryan supplies particulars on a homicide investigation in Newton.

Surveillance footage from the outside of Garber’s house confirmed a girl, later recognized as Ke, coming into the house a number of occasions within the days main as much as the invention of his physique.

Newton Mayor Ruthanne Fuller additionally spoke at Wednesday’s press convention, expressing her condolences to Garber’s household.


“I communicate for the individuals of Newton once I say our hearts and prayers are heavy,” she stated. “Mr. Garber was a member of our group, he attended synagogue right here, and he had mates and neighbors who cared about him.”

“Actually unhappy this might occur to Lenny,” neighbor Pat Hamilton stated Wednesday. “You by no means anticipate this kind of factor to occur to individuals you recognize.”

“When it occurs subsequent door, it is a bit bit totally different,” added Ron Cohen, one other neighbor. “My spouse had a tough time with it, awoke crying.”

Fuller stated Ke can also be recognized in the neighborhood, and referred to as this “a disturbing and tough time” for individuals who know her. She stated there isn’t any recognized hazard to Newton residents, as this doesn’t seem to have been a random act.

The case was investigated by the Middlesex District Legal professional’s Workplace, state police and Newton police.

Continue Reading


Inside the Met’s Plans for a Major Karl Lagerfeld Show

Press Room



Karl Lagerfeld, the culturally omnivorous, furiously prolific designer of Chanel, Fendi and his personal line, who died in 2019, was, all through his profession, resolutely targeted on the longer term. Obsessed, even. He believed, he as soon as instructed The New York Instances, within the “previous German dictum: ‘no credit score on the previous.’”

He had no truck with hagiographic exhibitions of designer careers. Certainly, throughout a press preview for the opening of the Chanel present at Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum of Artwork in 2005 (he refused to attend the present itself), he introduced, straight up: “I dislike retrospectives.”

Just a few years later he declared to The Instances, “I don’t wish to see all these previous clothes.”

However the powers that be of style apparently imagine that, relating to Mr. Lagerfeld’s legacy, everybody else does.

In Could, 4 years after his loss of life, Mr. Lagerfeld is getting the most important present of all: the following Metropolitan Museum of Artwork Costume Institute blockbuster. Simply don’t name it a retrospective.


“I’m calling it an essay,” stated Andrew Bolton, the curator answerable for the Costume Institute, including that Mr. Lagerfeld’s contributions to style had been “unparalleled.” Not simply due to his 65-year profession, and the breadth and variety of his work, however as a result of the mannequin he created for remodeling a heritage home when he took over Chanel has develop into a template for the style trade.

Entitled “Karl Lagerfeld: A Line of Magnificence,” after Hogarth’s concept of aesthetics described in his 1753 e book “The Evaluation of Magnificence,” the exhibition will deal with the connection between Mr. Lagerfeld’s sketches and his completed merchandise over the size of his profession; the best way his concepts morphed from two dimensions to 3.

Mr. Bolton stated the concept for the present got here to him nearly instantly after Mr. Lagerfeld’s loss of life, and the museum shortly accepted. Initially scheduled for 2022, it was postponed a 12 months due to the pandemic.

“Each certainly one of his designs started as a sketch,” Mr. Bolton stated of Mr. Lagerfeld’s working methodology. “He stated, ‘I draw simply as I breathe.’ They’ll appear very charming and expressionistic to the untrained eye, however to his premieres they had been nearly mathematical of their precision, nearly like a secret language between Karl and the ateliers.” The present is an try to decode it for posterity.

It should function roughly 150 items from the 5 heritage homes Mr. Lagerfeld formed — Balmain (which he joined after successful the Woolmark prize in 1954), Patou, Chloé, Fendi and Chanel — and his personal model. Alternatives will likely be winnowed from what Mr. Bolton stated was “between 5,000 and 10,000” clothes sourced from every model’s archives, with just a few from non-public collectors and the Met.


Each bit will likely be paired with the out there sketches, and there will likely be video interviews with the heads of every atelier created by Loïc Prigent, the French filmmaker whose 2005 sequence “Signé Chanel” documented the making of a Chanel couture assortment.

Credit score…Chloé Archive through The Metropolitan Museum of Artwork

The exhibition will likely be organized alongside two guiding rules: the S, or serpentine, line, which Mr. Bolton sees as representing Mr. Lagerfeld’s historicist and romantic designs, and the straight line — Mr. Lagerfeld’s extra modernist, classical work.

And it’ll culminate with a small grouping of what Mr. Bolton calls “the satirical line”: references, sprinkled by Mr. Lagerfeld like Easter eggs amongst all of his collections, to his personal uniform of stiff-collared white shirt, black denims, black cutaway, powdered white ponytail and fingerless gloves. Or given Mr. Lagerfeld’s style, Fabergé eggs.

“He was a bit like Alfred Hitchcock that manner,” Mr. Bolton stated.

(The curator has included his personal Easter eggs within the present, with every major part being divided into 10 subsections in honor of Mr. Lagerfeld’s birthday on Sept. 10, and every of these subsections containing seven items, as a result of seven was Mr. Lagerfeld’s fortunate quantity.)


Although Hogarth prized the serpentine line above the straight one, Mr. Bolton stated that Mr. Lagerfeld “had no such aesthetic prejudices.”

Additionally, he stated: “In Roman mythology the straight line entwined by an S line is the image of Mercury, the god of commerce and communication. And arguably the fashionable god of commerce and communication was Karl.”

The exhibition, designed by Tadao Ando, the Japanese architect who designed a house for Mr. Lagerfeld that was by no means constructed, will likely be staged within the Tisch Gallery. Amanda Harlech, who labored intently with Mr. Lagerfeld at Chanel for greater than 1 / 4 of a century, was a artistic guide. There could also be a drone concerned.

“I all the time thought if Karl got here again in one other kind, he would come again as a drone,” Mr. Bolton stated. “He was all the time observing the tradition from above, and I might like to have a drone surveying the customer’s reactions.”

Nonetheless, Mr. Bolton continued, if Mr. Lagerfeld did come again and bought wind of the present, “I’m positive he would hate it. He’d in all probability nonetheless refuse to return.”


That is solely the third solo designer present curated by Mr. Bolton for the Met after Alexander McQueen in 2011 (one other posthumous exhibition) and Rei Kawakubo in 2017. In a uncommon second of unity amongst style rivals, it is going to be sponsored by Chanel, Fendi and the Lagerfeld model, together with Condé Nast.

The movie star hosts of the gala that opens the exhibition, and that has develop into the New York style occasion of the 12 months, haven’t been introduced. Given Mr. Lagerfeld’s multifarious profession and his quite a few muses, it’s not arduous to think about boldface names lining up for the distinction, together with Kirsten Stewart, Julianne Moore and Nicole Kidman, all of whom had been faces of his Chanel.

As for the gown code, that appears a foregone conclusion. At the least Anna Wintour, the honorary co-chair and gala maestro, can store her closet: She has worn Chanel for nearly each gala since 2005.

Continue Reading


Subscribe To Newsletter
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Stay Updated
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.