Lifestyle
I Refused to Switch Seats on a Plane. Twice. Was I Wrong?
I’m an organized individual. After I journey, I ebook my flights effectively prematurely. This normally lets me declare my most well-liked seat: on the aisle within the bulkhead row. I’ve lengthy legs, and people seats have a tendency to offer extra legroom — not that I’ve to justify myself. This brings me to my downside: The final two occasions I’ve flown, a steward requested me to alter seats to accommodate a mother or father flying alone with young children. My transferring would permit them to take a seat collectively. However I didn’t need to transfer! (They might have booked prematurely, too.) So, I politely refused. A number of passengers made nasty feedback. Was I incorrect to carry my floor?
LISSA
Typically, you might be entitled to take a seat within the seat that you just paid for — the one that’s printed in your boarding move. (Let’s put apart guidelines about emergency exit rows and different particular circumstances.) You weren’t “incorrect” to politely refuse a request to maneuver. Any variety of passengers may have carried out so to accommodate these households.
I wouldn’t be doing my job, although, if I didn’t encourage you to empathize with the dad and mom. Flying with younger youngsters is difficult; doing so whereas sitting in separate rows, or beneath surprising circumstances (a distant member of the family falling unwell, for example), is much tougher. Now, none of this obliges you to alter seats. Simply let or not it’s a part of your calculation.
Personally, I’m a softy for switching the place youngsters are concerned, and fewer so for adults (if I’ve an excellent seat). I recommend that stewards look elsewhere for volunteers if fellow passengers attempt to disgrace me from the sidelines. And I all the time ask if an improve is offered. The complimentary wine and heat nuts of enterprise class are a balm to many wounds.
Not Him
Our wedding ceremony is approaching. My future husband has 4 siblings, one among whom is single. As we finalized our visitor listing, it was apparent to me that his single sister wouldn’t get a plus one for the marriage. However my fiancé objected. His sister sometimes brings a male good friend to household occasions, and so they interact in public shows of affection which might be awkward for everybody. Additionally, our wedding ceremony is going down throughout the nation, and together with this man in wedding ceremony occasions over a number of days doesn’t sit proper with me. Am I being old style?
BRIDE-TO-BE
That is your wedding ceremony. You might be allowed to be as old style as you and your fiancé comply with be. Have in mind, although, that his sister could also be essential to him. And since you might be asking folks to fly throughout the nation to spend a number of days celebrating your wedding ceremony, he could need to provide his sister the courtesy of a companion.
Nonetheless, you have got an equal vote right here. I’m not precisely clear whether or not your objection to the plus one is that his sister is single, her P.D.A. along with her boyfriend makes you uncomfortable otherwise you simply don’t need to see this man at your wedding ceremony. (Possibly it’s all three!) Be straight along with your fiancé and speak this via. Sadly, it won’t be the final compromise you two have to achieve.
How Many Occasions Do I Should Say It?
I made pals with a lady whom I see at my youngsters’ play dates and within the park. I discover myself bristling at how pushy she is: insisting that I mother or father like she does or attend occasions I’ve already informed her I don’t need to go to. I’m pleased to be cordial once I see her, however she isn’t taking the trace once I reply to her invites by saying “I’m busy.” They preserve coming. What ought to I do?
MOM
It’s not your job to placate anybody — although I acknowledge that ladies typically really feel pressured to. For me, it in all probability wouldn’t be definitely worth the emotional vitality (and attainable fallout at future play dates) to stage a proper breakup with an informal acquaintance.
The following time she tries to strain you, assert your self: “I’ve already stated I don’t need to go.” You can additionally change the way in which you reply to her invites, from “I’m busy” — which suggests you’ll go should you weren’t busy — to “No, thanks.” That approach, your message might be clear.
Hey, I Stay Right here!
I not too long ago moved from Denver to Saint Paul, Minn. After I meet new folks, they typically apologize on behalf of Minnesota (“Sorry concerning the winters!” — as if I didn’t understand it was chilly right here earlier than I got here) or categorical shock that I selected to maneuver (“I might like to reside in Denver!”). It was humorous at first. Now, it’s getting annoying. I prefer it right here. How ought to I reply when folks query my life selections after simply assembly me?
NEW IN TOWN
Individuals blurt — particularly about climate in the course of winter. We won’t cease that. However you might be able to short-circuit these annoying conversations. Provide one other interpretation immediately: “Sounds such as you want a trip. I adore it right here, and I’m delighted I moved!” I’ll wager that adjustments these chats.
For assist along with your awkward state of affairs, ship a query to SocialQ@nytimes.com, to Philip Galanes on Fb or @SocialQPhilip on Twitter.
Lifestyle
Brad Pitt and George Clooney are perfectly cast as two old pros in 'Wolfs'
For most of its history, Hollywood made its money by putting stars the public liked to watch in stories that wouldn’t be worth watching without them. These days, such star-driven films are falling out of fashion — except on our streamers.
That’s where you’ll find Wolfs, an AppleTV+ vehicle that features George Clooney and Brad Pitt skating through a crime plot in glamorously grizzled mode. They play two professional “fixers” — they’ll do anything to clean up a client’s mess — who collide while working the same job. Written and directed by Jon Watts (who did a popular Spider-Man reboot), Wolfs matters more for its stars than for the characters they play.
The action begins when a New York politico played by Amy Ryan has a casual fling at a posh hotel that goes terribly wrong. She calls Clooney, a seasoned pro who knows how to make trouble disappear. He’s doing just that when they’re interrupted. Enter Pitt who, as it turns out, is working for the hotel, which also wants the problem to go away. Because Clooney and Pitt (their characters don’t use names) always work alone, both bristle at each other’s presence.
The two bicker and gibe and question each other’s expertise — Pitt keeps hinting that Clooney’s an old man. And naturally, they discover that their task is more challenging than it looked.
All too soon they’re dealing with four bricks of stolen drugs, a goofy college kid and a group of murderous gangsters. Over the course of a long night the two come to a kind of understanding — not only with one another, but about their larger role in the world.
If I’d paid to see Wolfs in a theater rather than screened it on TV — which has the lowered expectations of in-flight viewing — I’d probably have been bugged by its lack of imagination and urgency. Watts’ script gives you no singing dialogue a la Elmore Leonard or Quentin Tarantino, none of the stinging emotional force you find in comparable two-hander stories — Elaine May’s Mikey and Nicky, say, or Martin McDonagh’s In Bruges.
And yet the movie’s still enjoyable. Clooney and Pitt are such deft, charismatic actors that, even in a lazy, low-key picture like this one, you get a lot of pleasure from their barbed asides and mocking silences. It’s clear why they’ve been stars for three decades.
Thirty years ago, one would have wagered that Clooney, a smart man with a wide-ranging mind, would wind up with the weightier resume of the two. And indeed, he’s been in lots of terrific movies, like Out of Sight, Up in the Air and his work with the Coen Brothers. Yet just as he’s drawn to the idea of Frank Sinatra’s Rat Pack — he has one of his own — he often throws himself into projects that feel like throwbacks to the 1950s or ‘60s. He’s an old-fashioned kind of star. And while a lot of his movies are fun — think Ocean’s Eleven — they rarely resonate in the culture as much as he does off the screen.
For all his prettiness and ubiquity in the tabloids, Pitt’s movies do. Maybe because he’s always been running away from his beauty — he’s never happier than when scruffed up — he’s chosen a more adventurous path. From Thelma & Louise and Se7en, to Fight Club and The Tree of Life, to 12 Years a Slave and Moneyball and Once Upon a Time in … Hollywood, he’s made movies that feel in touch with our present moment.
What Clooney and Pitt share, beyond friendship, is that both achieved stardom by doing the kind of movies that rarely get made anymore. That’s why, even though Wolfs is slight, I can see how they might find it meaningful.
After all, this is a story about two old pros who each start out thinking he’s irreplaceable — the only one who can do this special job. Then each discovers that, far from being unique, there’s somebody else who does exactly what they do. And so far from being indispensable, they’re working for soulless people who have no qualms about getting rid of them and hiring somebody new. Which is to say, Wolfs isn’t really a film about being a fixer. It’s a film about being an aging movie star.
Lifestyle
Bigfoot Expert Says Knuckleheads' Pranks Help Spread True Curiosity
Bigfoot is buzzing again after a TikTok went viral this week, with non-believers pointing and laughing … but one Ph.D. expert on the subject tells TMZ the joke is on them.
Here’s the deal … on Thursday, an apparent Bigfoot made its TikTok debut … recorded just chilling against a tree in a wooded area of Lawton, about 3 hours from Oklahoma City. It was quickly dismissed as an obvious fake — but it also piqued some legit new interest!
TMZ.com
Dr. Jeffrey Meldrum, a professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University, tells TMZ Bigfoot finding such a popular foothold in pop culture is a double-edged sword … ’cause it does poke fun at those who truly are investigating its existence … but the silliness also encourages more people to ask questions.
The author of “Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science” says the existence of a Bigfoot creature is “one of the most interesting questions facing researchers of human evolution” … so there’s a lot more to this than just selling beef jerky, and stooges trying to get clicks.
TMZ.com
Dr. JM says he has “hundreds” of legit foot casts of sasquatch and other relict hominoids from around the world … so he is quite confident something was — and may still be — out there.
It is easy for skeptics to point to prank videos like the recent one, and to snack commercials, to mock the idea … but if people look at the actual evidence, their tune would change pretty quickly.
Tik Tok/@e_man580
Of course … he points out discoveries of actual evidence rarely make news … people acting like boobs with fake videos are more fun for the media to cover.
As for the popularity of Bigfoot over other mysterious creatures … Dr. Meldrum tells us that is born out of nationalism. The term “Bigfoot” was coined in the U.S. in 1948, and it became “our monster” … and from there, creatives ran with the idea for sci-fi.
One thing’s for sure — if the experts are correct, “Harry and the Hendersons” might turn out to be a documentary.
Lifestyle
The 'reddit bro' vs. the 'wife guy'; plus, Fat Bear Week! : It's Been a Minute
-
Technology2 days ago
Charter will offer Peacock for free with some cable subscriptions next year
-
World1 day ago
Ukrainian stronghold Vuhledar falls to Russian offensive after two years of bombardment
-
News1 week ago
Video: Where Trump and Harris Stand on Democracy
-
World2 days ago
WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange says he pleaded ‘guilty to journalism’ in order to be freed
-
Technology21 hours ago
Beware of fraudsters posing as government officials trying to steal your cash
-
Business1 week ago
Visa, Google, JetBlue: A Guide to a New Era of Antitrust Action
-
Education1 week ago
Video: Los Angeles Bus Hijacked at Gunpoint
-
Politics1 week ago
FLASHBACK: VP Harris pushed for illegal immigrant to practice law in California over Obama admin's objections