Connect with us

Health

Getting pregnant soon after abortion or miscarriage might have lower risks than previously suspected: study

Published

on

Getting pregnant soon after abortion or miscarriage might have lower risks than previously suspected: study

A brand new medical examine performed in Europe is suggesting there could also be fewer “antagonistic being pregnant outcomes” for ladies who get pregnant weeks after they’ve had a miscarriage or an abortion. 

The cohort examine, which was performed by numerous educational researchers from around the globe, analyzed pregnancies in Norway to see if the World Well being Group’s (WHO) advisable six-month ready interval after a miscarriage or induced abortion so as to decrease the prospect of a being pregnant complication.

Hostile being pregnant outcomes the WHO’s steerage reportedly goals to forestall embody preterm births, spontaneous preterm births, small for gestational age births, massive for gestational age births, preeclampsia (hypertension) and gestational diabetes mellitus diagnoses.

WOMAN, 22, WHO SAYS GYNECOLOGIST DENIED HER A TUBE-TYING PROCEDURE, SPEAKS OUT

The examine investigated the chance of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes post-pregnancy loss as a result of the proof “underlying [WHO’s] suggestion is scarce” and will not pose as a lot of a threat as beforehand thought. 

Advertisement

A brand new examine suggests ladies who get pregnant in below 6 months of a miscarriage or abortion might not have excessive dangers of “antagonistic being pregnant outcomes.”
(iStock)

The examine’s findings had been revealed in PLOS Medication, a peer-reviewed medical science journal, on Tuesday, Nov. 22.

Researchers studied 72,765 beginning information from three Norwegian well being registries from Jan. 1, 2008, to Dec. 31, 2016, together with the Medical Beginning Registry of Norway, the Norwegian Affected person Registry and the Common Practitioner database.

The interpregnancy interval (IPI) and the six antagonistic being pregnant outcomes had been analyzed individually for births that occurred after miscarriages (complete of 49,058) and births that occurred after induced abortions (complete of 23,707) inside the eight-year interval.

The birth-related affected person information had been analyzed for maternal age, gravidity, the yr they gave beginning, smoking standing throughout being pregnant and pre-pregnancy physique mass index.

Advertisement

MOM OF 12 KIDS, PREGNANT FOR 16 YEARS IN A ROW, SHARES STRONG MESSAGE OF FAITH: ‘CHILDREN ARE A BLESSING’ 

Researchers sorted and in contrast pregnancies that occurred in lower than three months after a being pregnant loss, three to 5 months after a being pregnant loss, six to 11 months after a being pregnant loss and greater than a yr after a being pregnant loss.

The six antagonistic being pregnant outcomes had been examined and calculated for every interval group.

Researchers examined 72,765 birth records from Norway to see if women experienced "adverse pregnancy outcomes" when they conceived in under six months after a miscarriage or abortion.

Researchers examined 72,765 beginning information from Norway to see if ladies skilled “antagonistic being pregnant outcomes” after they conceived in below six months after a miscarriage or abortion.
(iStock)

Ladies who acquired pregnant in below three months or three to 5 months after a miscarriage reportedly had decrease dangers of small for gestational age births at 8.6% and 9%, respectively.

Pregnancies that occurred in lower than three months after an induced abortion had been “related to a nonsignificant however elevated threat of [small for gestational age births]” at 11.5% in comparison with those that acquired pregnant after six to 11 months (10%). 

Advertisement

MORE COLLEGE-EDUCATED WOMEN ARE HAVING BABIES BEFORE MARRIAGE: STUDY 

Conversely, ladies who acquired pregnant inside three to 5 months after an induced abortion had a decrease threat of huge for gestational age births (8%) in comparison with those that acquired pregnant after six to 11 months (9.4%).

Cases of gestational diabetes mellitus had been discovered to be decrease in ladies who acquired pregnant in lower than three months of a miscarriage (3.3%) in comparison with ladies who acquired pregnant inside six to 11 months of a miscarriage (4.5%).

“There was no proof of upper dangers of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes amongst ladies with an IPI of higher than 12 months after miscarriages or induced abortions,” the examine claims.

The World Health Organization advises women to wait at least six months before attempting a planned pregnancy if they've had a miscarriage or induced abortion.

The World Well being Group advises ladies to attend not less than six months earlier than trying a deliberate being pregnant in the event that they’ve had a miscarriage or induced abortion.
(iStock)

Although, there have been observable exceptions to “an elevated threat of gestational diabetes mellitus amongst ladies” who acquired pregnant 12 to 17 months (5.8%), 18 to 23 months (6.2%) and greater than 24 months (6.4%) after a being pregnant loss in comparison with those that acquired pregnant six to 11 months (4.5%) after a miscarriage.

Advertisement

Researchers additionally state that their findings counsel that pregnancies that occurred “inside six months” or “as quick as three months” weren’t “related to antagonistic being pregnant outcomes.”

The interpregnancy interval examine discovered that three out of 5 Norwegian ladies who skilled a miscarriage conceived inside six months whereas certainly one of 5 Norwegian ladies who underwent an induced abortion conceived inside six months.

“Our examine means that conceiving inside three months after a miscarriage or an induced abortion just isn’t related to elevated dangers of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes,” the examine concludes. “Together with earlier analysis, these outcomes counsel that ladies may try being pregnant quickly after a earlier miscarriage or induced abortion with out rising perinatal well being dangers.”

Authors of the examine famous that the researched outcomes “don’t assist present worldwide suggestions to attend not less than six months after a miscarriage or an induced abortion,” however the “variations in being pregnant outcomes in keeping with interpregnancy interval after miscarriage versus induced abortions stays unclear.”

Advertisement
Researchers have reportedly found that pregnancies that happen within six months of a pregnancy loss aren't associated with higher risk of "adverse pregnancy outcomes."

Researchers have reportedly discovered that pregnancies that occur inside six months of a being pregnant loss aren’t related to increased threat of “antagonistic being pregnant outcomes.”
(iStock)

The examine says its findings ought to inspire a evaluate of present steerage on beginning spacing after miscarriage or induced abortion from worldwide well being companies.

The interpregnancy interval examine was funded by the Analysis Council of Norway — a Norwegian authorities company — by its Centre of Excellence, which offers long-term funding for focused analysis on advanced issues, in keeping with the Norwegian College of Science and Expertise.

Fox Information Digital reached out to the WHO for remark.

The total examine might be discovered on journals.plos.org.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

Nutrition Pro's Easy Sugar Detox Breaks the Cravings Cycle to Boost Weight Loss — Here's How to Do It

Published

on

Nutrition Pro's Easy Sugar Detox Breaks the Cravings Cycle to Boost Weight Loss — Here's How to Do It



Advertisement


Sugar Detox: Nutrition Pro’s Easy Plan Ends Addiction | Woman’s World
























Advertisement













Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Having trouble sleeping? It could be for this surprising reason, experts say

Published

on

Having trouble sleeping? It could be for this surprising reason, experts say

When creating an ideal sleeping environment, you might think of lighting, temperature and sound — but what about food?

What you eat during the day can have a surprising impact on how well you sleep at night, according to experts.

Food choice is an essential consideration for ensuring good sleep quality. Some types of food promote sleep while others may cause sleep disruption,” Dr. Chelsie Rohrscheib, head sleep expert at Wesper, a sleep analysis company in New York, told Fox News Digital.

LACK OF SLEEP COULD BE A FACTOR IN A ‘SILENT EPIDEMIC,’ EXPERTS WARN

Here’s what to know. 

Advertisement

Signs that food is interfering with sleep

If after eating you’re struggling to fall asleep, waking up often during the night or experiencing heartburn, acid reflux or indigestion, your food choices could be the culprit, according to Dr. Raj Dasgupta, chief medical adviser at Sleepopolis in California.

What you eat can have an impact on how well you sleep at night, experts say. (iStock)

Other warning signs include experiencing restlessness or stomach discomfort, needing more frequent bathroom breaks at night, or waking up feeling groggy or unrested.

“Having intense dreams or nightmares or noticing changes in your usual sleep routine” are other indications that food could be interfering with sleep, Dasgupta said.

“Paying attention to these cues can help you figure out if certain foods or drinks are messing with your sleep quality, so you can make adjustments as needed for better rest,” he said.

Advertisement

Best foods to eat for quality sleep

Foods that encourage better sleep include meals with a good amount of lean protein, meals that are high in fiber, and meals that are rich in complex carbohydrates, according to Rohrscheib.

“This food combination keeps us feeling full and satisfied throughout the night and prevents us from waking up from hunger,” she said. 

Midnight snack

“Having intense dreams or nightmares or noticing changes in your usual sleep routine” are other indications that food choices could be interfering with sleep, an expert said. (iStock)

“It also reduces the risk of indigestion and heartburn.” 

Foods containing dairy are especially beneficial, she said, because they contain tryptophan, an amino acid that is essential for the production of serotonin and melatonin, two chemicals needed for sleep.

“Food choice is an essential consideration for ensuring good sleep quality.”

Advertisement

Bananas can also help promote sleep, according to Dasgupta.

“They contain magnesium and tryptophan, which can help you relax and boost production of sleep-inducing hormones,” he told Fox News Digital. 

Bowl of peanuts

Almonds provide magnesium for muscle relaxation and also contain protein and healthy fats to keep blood sugar levels stable, said an expert.  (iStock)

Almonds also provide magnesium for muscle relaxation; they contain protein and healthy fats to keep blood sugar levels stable, he said. 

“Cherries contain natural melatonin, potentially helping to regulate your sleep-wake cycles,” Dasgupta said.

IMPROVE YOUR SLEEP BY OPTIMIZING 6 BIOMARKERS: ‘INTEGRAL TO HEALTH’

Advertisement

Oatmeal is also a sleep-friendly food. 

“Its complex carbohydrates increase serotonin levels, while its melatonin content helps to regulate sleep,” said Dasgupta.

As we all hear around Thanksgiving time, turkey is rich in tryptophan, facilitating the production of serotonin and melatonin, Dasgupta noted. 

A bunch of bananas sitting on a cashier checkout scale.

Bananas can help with quality sleep because they contain magnesium and tryptophan, which can promote relaxation, an expert said. (iStock)

“Kiwi is loaded with antioxidants, vitamins and serotonin, all of which support sleep pattern regulation,” he said.

Dasgupta also recommends eating Greek yogurt to promote improved sleep, as its calcium content assists in the body’s use of tryptophan for melatonin production, while its protein helps maintain blood sugar levels.

Advertisement

6 SURPRISINGLY SIMPLE WAYS TO KEEP YOURSELF HEALTHY (HINT: SLEEP IS INVOLVED)

“Finally, warm milk, with its tryptophan content and comforting warmth, can help you relax” for a good night’s sleep, he said. 

Those who are lactose-intolerant can opt for warm almond milk.

Foods that can disrupt sleep

Some foods are more likely to cause indigestion and heartburn, which makes it difficult to fall asleep and maintain sleep, according to Rohrscheib.

“This includes foods with high fat or acid content, foods containing caffeine, or spicy foods,” she said.

Advertisement

Dasgupta agreed that eating heavy or spicy foods ahead of bedtime can cause stomach discomfort, heartburn and acid reflux, which can make it harder to settle down comfortably. 

fried chicken

Eating heavy or spicy foods can cause stomach discomfort, heartburn and acid reflux, which can make it harder to settle down comfortably for the night, an expert said. (iStock)

“Greasy or heavy meals take longer to digest, which can leave you feeling uncomfortable and disrupt your sleep,” he advised. 

Caffeine is also a common culprit in sleep disruption — experts recommend avoiding it in the hours leading up to bedtime.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“Any food containing caffeine, even small amounts, should be avoided to prevent sleep disruption,” Rohrscheib said. “This includes coffee, some teas, sodas, energy drinks and some chocolates.”

Advertisement

It’s best to abstain from alcohol as well, Dasgupta said. “While it might seem like a nightcap, it messes with your sleep cycles, leading to worse sleep quality.”

Person drinking soda

Caffeine is also a common culprit in sleep disruption — experts recommend avoiding it in the hours leading up to bedtime. (iStock)

Highly processed foods and foods containing high amounts of sugar cause a quick spike in glucose levels and increase the risk of a “blood sugar crash,” also known as hypoglycemia, Rohrscheib warned. 

“When we’re hypoglycemic, our brain will attempt to wake us up to eat more food to normalize our blood glucose levels,” she said. “Thus, these foods should be avoided before bedtime.”

“Consuming too much and making yourself over-full is likely to make you uncomfortable and cause poor sleep quality.”

“Lastly, processed or junk foods, loaded with additives and unhealthy fats, can throw off your sleep patterns,” Dasgupta added.

Advertisement

Portion size is also a factor in sleep quality, both experts agreed.

“Regardless of the type of meal you eat, consuming too much and making yourself over-full is likely to make you uncomfortable and cause poor sleep quality,” Rohrscheib said. 

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

World Health Organization, experts reach landmark agreement on how to define airborne diseases

Published

on

World Health Organization, experts reach landmark agreement on how to define airborne diseases
  • The World Health Organization and 500 experts have established a consensus on the definition of airborne diseases.
  • The groups are aiming to prevent confusion similar to that experienced during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The WHO released a document outlining the definition, marking a step toward improving prevention of diseases transmitted through the air.

The World Health Organization and around 500 experts have agreed for the first time what it means for a disease to spread through the air, in a bid to avoid the confusion early in the COVID-19 pandemic that some scientists have said cost lives.

The Geneva-based U.N. health agency released a technical document on the topic on Thursday. It said it was the first step towards working out how to better prevent this kind of transmission, both for existing diseases like measles and for future pandemic threats.

The document concludes that the descriptor “through the air” can be used for infectious diseases where the main type of transmission involves the pathogen traveling through the air or being suspended in the air, in line with other terms such as “waterborne” diseases, which are understood across disciplines and by the public.

WHO DIRECTOR CALLS FOR WORLD PANDEMIC TREATY TO PREPARE FOR DISEASE X

Almost 500 experts contributed to the definition, including physicists, public health professionals and engineers, many of whom disagreed bitterly over the topic in the past.

The World Health Organization and around 500 experts have agreed for the first time what it means for a disease to spread through the air, in a bid to avoid the confusion early in the COVID-19 pandemic that some scientists have said cost lives. (REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo)

Advertisement

Agencies have historically required high levels of proof before calling diseases airborne, which required very stringent containment measures; the new definition says the risk of exposure and severity of disease should also be considered.

Past disagreements also centered around whether infectious particles were “droplets” or “aerosols” based on size, which the new definition moves away from.

During the early days of COVID in 2020, around 200 aerosol scientists publicly complained that the WHO had failed to warn people of the risk that the virus could spread through the air. This led to an overemphasis on measures like handwashing to stop the virus, rather than focusing on ventilation, they said.

By July 2020, the agency said there was “evidence emerging” of airborne spread, but its then chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan – who began the process to get a definition – later said the WHO should have been more forceful “much earlier”.

Advertisement

Her successor, Jeremy Farrar, said in an interview that the new definition was about more than COVID, but he added that at the beginning of the pandemic there was a lack of evidence available and experts including the WHO acted in “good faith”. At that time, he was head of the Wellcome Trust charity and advised the British government on the pandemic.

Farrar said getting the definition agreed among experts from all disciplines would allow discussions to begin about issues such as ventilation in many different settings, from hospitals to schools.

He compared it to the realization that blood-borne viruses like HIV or hepatitis B could be spread by medics not wearing gloves during procedures.

“When I started out, medical students, nurses, doctors, none of us wore gloves to take blood,” he told Reuters. “Now it is unthinkable that you wouldn’t wear gloves. But that came because everyone agreed on what the issue was, they agreed on the terminology… [The change in practice] came later.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending