Connect with us

Health

Fauci texts suggest officials were ‘too slow to pivot’ amid pandemic, says Dr Marc Siegel

Published

on

Fauci texts suggest officials were ‘too slow to pivot’ amid pandemic, says Dr Marc Siegel

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Newly released text messages from Dr. Anthony Fauci have sparked fresh questions about his handling of evolving COVID-19 evidence, according to Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst. 

The texts are part of an initial batch of communications from Fauci’s government-issued cellphone released Monday by Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. The messages shed light on private discussions between Fauci and other top health officials as they navigated evolving questions around the coronavirus pandemic.

In a Monday evening interview, Siegel suggested the former White House chief medical adviser was at times too “dogmatic” and slow to adapt as the science evolved.

Advertisement

EXPOSED FAUCI DIARY SHOWS HE ESTIMATED COVID-19 DEATH RATE TO BE MUCH LOWER THAN WHAT HE TOLD CONGRESS

Siegel said Fauci was a “top immunologist” and “top vaccinologist.”

“And I respect that a lot,” he said, adding that he felt Fauci then ventured beyond those areas of expertise.

Newly released text messages from Dr. Anthony Fauci have sparked fresh questions about his handling of evolving COVID-19 evidence during the pandemic. (Getty Images)

“The other issue is flexibility. I have a feeling about Dr. Fauci that he’s too dogmatic,” Siegel told Fox News Digital, adding that Fauci would “stick to some idea he has and [follow] it through regardless of contradictory or changing evidence.”

Advertisement

Siegel said he believed Fauci veered into territory beyond his medical training and knowledge, on issues including lockdowns, school closures and masking.

LEGACY MEDIA COVERS ANTHONY FAUCI DIARY BY CRITICIZING DONALD TRUMP INSTEAD OF FAUCI’S DISHONESTY

“So it’s not surprising that he would, for lack of a better word, flip-flop on those areas,” he said.

Regarding the newly released texts, Siegel said “it looks like he was trying to guide other public officials and leaders from the television camera, and that’s not what you should be doing.”

Questions around pregnancy guidance

Among the issues addressed in the newly released messages is COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Advertisement

Siegel emphasized that he remains a strong supporter of vaccines, including mRNA technology.

“I’m a big fan of the COVID vaccines and of the mRNA COVID vaccines,” the doctor said. “I think they’re getting a bad rap right now.”

Among the issues addressed in the newly released messages is COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. (iStock)

Pregnancy presented a complicated risk calculation because COVID-19 itself posed dangers to expectant mothers, Siegel noted. 

Early in the pandemic, he said, recommending vaccination during pregnancy was reasonable based on what was known at the time.

Advertisement

But as the virus changed and vaccines became less protective, Siegel said he believes the public discussion should have changed with it.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“As the vaccine changed and the virus mutated, and as the vaccine became less protective, that needed to be entered into the public debate about the vaccine — and Dr. Fauci wasn’t fast enough to do that,” Siegel said.

Siegel also pointed to a study that raised questions at the time about a potential link between a second vaccine dose and early miscarriage.

“I don’t think that Dr. Fauci and others may have been quick enough to consider that,” he said.

Advertisement

“As the vaccine changed and the virus mutated, and as the vaccine became less protective, that needed to be entered into the public debate about the vaccine — and Dr. Fauci wasn’t fast enough to do that,” said Dr. Siegel. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

While subsequent research has continued to support vaccination during pregnancy — Siegel said “the accumulation of data right now favors the vaccine throughout pregnancy” — he questioned whether contradictory evidence received sufficient consideration as it emerged.

“It’s a little eyebrow-raising to me that it appears he was trying to dismiss a study” suggesting miscarriage could be a concern, Siegel said.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

More broadly, such decisions should rest with patients and their doctors, while emphasizing that the underlying medical data was “not suppressed,” according to the doctor.

Advertisement

“I don’t like when the government superimposes their views, especially if they’re incorrect or if they are ill-informed, but I still think it should be between the patient and the doctor,” said Siegel. 

‘The mandates continued’

Siegel argued that another problem came when policies failed to adjust quickly enough to changing evidence about the vaccines’ effectiveness.

“I think the problem was that the mandates continued,” he said. “We were too slow to pivot on this vaccine, and that led to a lot of public distrust.”

Siegel emphasized that he remains a strong supporter of vaccines, including mRNA technology. (iStock)

Asked whether he saw a meaningful difference between what Fauci was discussing privately and what Americans were hearing publicly, Siegel said there was “more than I would like.”

Advertisement

“There’s a difference between public and private discourse here,” he said. “There should be none.”

“Where was the evolution of guidance and thought and staying within your lane as more and more information came out?” 

As additional messages are released, Siegel said he will be watching how Fauci’s guidance evolved alongside the evidence.

“I’m looking at one thing: Where was the evolution of guidance and thought and staying within your lane as more and more information came out?” he said. “Or did this develop more and more into dogma and megalomania? I don’t know. That’s what I’m disturbed about.”

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Advertisement

At the same time, Siegel cautioned against judging pandemic-era communications without considering what scientists knew at the time.

“To be fair to Dr. Fauci, things need to remain in context,” he said. “When did this happen? What was going on at the time? What did we know and what did we not know?”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Added Siegel, “We were learning on the job. We were learning as we went. We knew nothing about this thing, and it just blew over us.”

That uncertainty, he said, made a willingness to change course all the more important.

Advertisement

“Humility is the best way to go — not dogma.”

Advertisement

Health

Common cholesterol drug linked to lower dementia risk when started early

Published

on

Common cholesterol drug linked to lower dementia risk when started early

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Starting statin therapy shortly after a type 2 diabetes diagnosis may not only protect the heart — it may also be linked to a lower dementia risk.

A large study presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Munich on Aug. 30 found that adults who began taking a statin within one year of their type 2 diabetes diagnosis had a 15% lower relative risk of developing dementia over 10 years compared to those who did not take the medication within five years.

Even for those who delayed starting a statin for one to five years, there was still a 10% lower relative risk, according to the findings, which were published in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe.

Advertisement

3 THINGS TO AVOID IN MIDDLE AGE COULD MEAN 13 MORE YEARS WITHOUT DEMENTIA, STUDY FINDS

A statin is a prescription medication that lowers “bad” LDL cholesterol and helps reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Researchers conducted the study by tracking health data from 132,585 patients in Denmark who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes between 2006 and 2019 and had no prior history of statin use or dementia.

A statin is a prescription medication that lowers “bad” LDL cholesterol and helps reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke. (iStock)

During a median follow-up of 7.1 years, the team analyzed how the timing of statin treatment impacted overall dementia rates.

Advertisement

Dr. Liron Sinvani, a geriatrician and director for research and innovation at the Northwell Institute for Healthy Aging in New York, said this was a “well-designed, large-scale observational study that adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that statins may help protect brain health.”

GAME-CHANGING CHOLESTEROL PILL WINS FDA APPROVAL AFTER CUTTING LDL NEARLY 60%

She noted that while a 15% reduction is a modest improvement, it remains “very significant.”

People with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of cognitive decline and heart disease, consistent with previous research.

Starting a statin within one year of a type 2 diabetes diagnosis was associated with a 15% lower relative risk of developing dementia over 10 years, while delaying treatment reduced the benefit to 10%. (iStock)

Advertisement

Although guidelines generally recommend statins for many adults ages 40 to 75 with diabetes, statin treatment is not always started soon after a type 2 diabetes diagnosis.

The study also examined whether the timing of treatment was linked to dementia risk. People who started statins within a year of their diagnosis had a lower risk than those who did not begin treatment.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

“The message here is that maybe waiting is actually not the right approach,” Sinvani said, supporting earlier consideration of statin therapy in routine diabetes care.

The expert said she found the results “especially compelling” because the benefit was driven by a lower risk of vascular dementia rather than Alzheimer’s disease.

Advertisement

“The message here is that maybe waiting is actually not the right approach.”

“And that makes biological sense, because we know statins lower cholesterol, reduces inflammation and protects blood vessels,” she added, pointing out that these same mechanisms prevent vascular damage to the brain.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Statin therapy should be viewed as one piece of a broader health strategy alongside exercising regularly, adhering to a healthy diet and staying socially connected, according to the expert.

Because this was an observational study rather than a randomized controlled trial, the findings show a strong association but do not prove a direct causal link. (iStock)

Advertisement

Almost half of dementia cases may be preventable or delayable by addressing modifiable risk factors, according to the Lancet Commission.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

The study did have limitations. Because it was observational rather than a randomized clinical trial, the researchers could not definitively state that statins directly prevent dementia.

As Sinvani cautioned, “This is not proof that statins prevent dementia, but I think it’s an important step in this literature.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The doctor encouraged people with type 2 diabetes who are not taking a statin to ask their doctor whether the medication is appropriate for them.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Marijuana users may face hidden driving danger that standard tests can miss

Published

on

Marijuana users may face hidden driving danger that standard tests can miss

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A new study warns that driving after eating cannabis edibles can significantly impair road performance and reaction times, even if blood tests show THC levels far below the legal limit.

The findings, published in JAMA Network Open, highlight a potential challenge for impaired-driving enforcement in Canada and some U.S. jurisdictions.

Most previous cannabis-driving studies have involved smoked or inhaled marijuana, which more rapidly spikes levels of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive compound in cannabis) in the bloodstream.

Advertisement

AMERICA HITS MAJOR MARIJUANA MILESTONE AS DAILY WEED USE SURPASSES DAILY DRINKING

Edibles are absorbed more slowly and can produce driving impairment even when blood THC concentrations remain relatively low.

Researchers found that drivers who consumed higher doses of edible THC struggled with lane control, had slower reaction times and experienced greater speed fluctuations. Yet, their blood tests stayed below the standard legal cutoff used to prove impairment at roadside traffic stops.

Researchers measured how well drivers stayed in their lane, how quickly they reacted to road events and how consistently they maintained their speed. (iStock)

To assess how oral cannabis impacts driving, researchers at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto conducted a trial with 40 healthy adult volunteers who regularly use cannabis.

Advertisement

Each participant attended four separate sessions in which they consumed soft-chew gummies containing either 0, 2, 10 or 20 milligrams of THC.

CANNABIS COMPOUNDS COULD REVERSE DISEASE AFFECTING ONE-THIRD OF ADULTS

The researchers then tested the drivers using a driving simulator at two, five and 24 hours after consumption, tracking how well drivers stayed in their lane, how quickly they reacted to road events and how consistently they maintained their speed.

Blood samples and self-reported ratings of intoxication were also collected.

Participants recognized their own limitations, reporting a lower willingness to drive and reduced confidence in their driving skills after taking the gummies. (iStock)

Advertisement

The results showed driving impairment at two and five hours after consuming 10- and 20-milligram gummies. Compared with placebo, participants who consumed those doses had greater variability in lane position, while the 20-milligram dose was also linked to slower reaction times and less consistent speed control.

Participants also recognized their own limitations, reporting a lower willingness to drive and reduced confidence in their driving skills after taking the gummies.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The highest blood THC concentrations averaged 1.6 nanograms per milliliter after the 10-milligram dose and 3.4 nanograms per milliliter after the 20-milligram dose. Those levels were below the commonly used 5-ng/mL threshold, although THC limits vary by jurisdiction and some individual samples exceeded 5 ng/mL.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

By comparison, participants in the team’s previous smoked-cannabis study showed similar levels of impairment while reaching an average peak blood THC concentration of 30.3 nanograms per milliliter, nearly 10 times higher than the 20-milligram edible group.

The study did have some limitations. Tests were conducted on virtual simulators rather than actual roads, meaning drivers faced no real physical risk during the experiments. It also focused on regular cannabis users, so it is unclear how occasional users might react to similar doses.

When the research team previously tested smoked marijuana, drivers with similar impairment levels registered blood THC concentrations averaging 30.3 nanograms per milliliter, nearly 10 times higher. (iStock)

Additionally, minimal residual effects were detected after 24 hours. While maximum speed remained slightly higher among participants on the 10-milligram and 20-milligram doses, subjective feelings of intoxication had completely faded.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Advertisement

In an accompanying commentary, Dr. José Ignacio Nazif-Munoz of the Université de Sherbrooke noted that these biological differences pose a challenge for law enforcement.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Because edibles are absorbed slowly through the digestive system, standard blood tests may fail to identify unsafe drivers, leaving policymakers searching for more reliable roadside tools.

“The delayed absorption and prolonged duration of effects of edible cannabis distinguish it from smoked or inhaled cannabis, complicating the interpretation of biological measures,” he wrote.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

Walking for Weight Loss? These Surprising Tips Boost Fat Burn Fast

Published

on

Walking for Weight Loss? These Surprising Tips Boost Fat Burn Fast


Advertisement





How Walking for Weight Loss Helps Burn More Fat After 50



















Advertisement



Advertisement




Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending