Connect with us

Finance

India to sustain growth through more govt capital spending – finance minister

Published

on

India to sustain growth through more govt capital spending – finance minister

NEW DELHI, Nov 30 (Reuters) – India will maintain its excessive progress charge via extra authorities capital spending, the finance minister stated in an interview at  the  Reuters NEXT convention on Wednesday, including that she noticed indicators of a pick-up in non-public investments too.

“We might proceed to push capital expenditure, and that I’m saying whilst I’m making ready for the following finances,” Nirmala Sitharaman stated.

“We’re properly on target on assembly this yr’s goal. The states have proven extraordinary absorption capability for taking the monies and spending on capital property.”

She stated the federal government sees the “capital expenditure route as a kind of which might assure good progress”.

She added that she regarded ahead to “an excellent … rising Indian economic system this yr and the following”.

Advertisement

Sitharaman is more likely to current the 2023/24 finances on Feb. 1, the final full finances earlier than nationwide elections in 2024. India’s fiscal yr begins on April 1 and runs via March.

Reporting by Ira Duggal and Aftab Ahmed; Enhancing by Andrew Heavens

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Golden-goodbye payouts on Wall Street could be at risk under resurrected Financial-Crisis era rule

Published

on

Golden-goodbye payouts on Wall Street could be at risk under resurrected Financial-Crisis era rule

U.S. financial watchdogs plan to take another crack at regulating Wall Street executives’ pay — an outstanding requirement of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act that has repeatedly failed to materialize.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. aims to vote on a measure in coming weeks, according to people with knowledge of the initiative, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential deliberations. Still, the rules would have to clear a half-dozen regulators before taking effect. Two prior campaigns to do so ended unsuccessfully.

The incentive-compensation rules, long resisted by the financial industry, are meant to curb risky behavior by forcing executives and other prominent employees to wait longer to cash out their bonuses. A prior proposal would have given companies as long as seven years to claw back pay tied to misconduct, even if the bonus were already vested. Financial firms would also have to give watchdogs additional details on pay packages that could be made available to the public.

Agencies previously proposed versions of the rule in 2011 and 2016. The renewed regulatory push was reported earlier by the Wall Street Journal.

While last year’s regional-banking turmoil stoked debates over the broader industry’s stability, finalizing executive-compensation rules would still be a big lift. Beyond the FDIC, imposing the rules would require action and approvals from the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Housing Finance Agency and the National Credit Union Administration.

Advertisement

Each of the agencies would move at their own pace, and there’s no guarantee that all would complete the effort before November elections that could usher in a change in administrations. Still, some have signaled a willingness to try.

In response to a request for comment, an SEC spokesperson pointed to a December speech by agency Chair Gary Gensler in which he said: “We stand ready to work with our fellow regulators to fulfill this mandate and through re-proposing rules in this area.”

Representatives for the FDIC, Fed, OCC and NCUA declined to comment. A spokesperson for the FHFA didn’t immediately respond to a message.

Subscribe to the CFO Daily newsletter to keep up with the trends, issues, and executives shaping corporate finance. Sign up for free.
Continue Reading

Finance

Football: Vitesse docked 18 points amid Russia finance probe – DW – 04/20/2024

Published

on

Football: Vitesse docked 18 points amid Russia finance probe – DW – 04/20/2024

The Netherlands’ KNVB football association handed Vitesse Arnhem an 18-point deduction on Friday, making the struggling side’s relegation a mathematical certainty. 

It’s the largest penalty of its kind in the history of Dutch football. However, the club said it did not plan to appeal, and it welcomed the lifeline offered by the KNVB that means it might at least be able to retain its license and continue to exist as a club.

The club’s been in turmoil for some time now, as it tries and fails to extricate itself from Russian ownership following the invasion of Ukraine and EU sanctions against its current owner. 

Vitesse were already bottom of the league on 17 points with just a few matches left to save themselves. Now they have a nominal total of -1 points and relegation is inevitable. 

Vitesse players walk off after a 6-0 defeat to PSC on April 13
The club faced a crushing 6-0 defeat away to PSV Eindhoven last weekendImage: Toin Damen/PRO SHOTS/picture alliance

Why is the club in trouble? 

A mainstay in the Dutch Eredivisie top division for more than 30 years and in either Russian or Georgian ownership for the last decade, Vitesse is facing allegations of financial irregularities and licensing breaches as it tries and fails to convince authorities to approve a takeover by a US investment group. 

The team is still owned by Russian oligarch Valerij Oyf, and it used to be nicknamed “Chelsea B” because of the close ties it had to the London club when that was owned by Roman Abramovich. Several high-profile Chelsea players, including Nemanja Matic and Mason Mount, spent periods on loan in Arnhem. 

Advertisement
Vitesse owner Valeriy Oyf during the Dutch Eredivisie match between Vitesse Arnhem and Feyenoord Rotterdam at Gelredome on December 08, 2019 in Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Vitesse owner Valeriy Oyf bought in in 2018, and has been trying to get out since Russia’s invasion of his native Ukraine in 2022Image: Maurice van Steen/VI Images/imago images

Oyf, like Abramovich at Chelsea, made it clear soon after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that he was looking to sell the club. He would soon face EU sanctions, again like Abramovich. However, he has not been able to sell so far. 

Dutch authorities are not convinced by the financial viability of the takeover proposal, and accuse Vitesse of submitting false information while trying to secure approval for the change of ownership. 

An investigative report by British newspaper The Guardian and The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, alleging a secret network of loans linking the club to Abramovich, and suggesting Abramovich ultimately funded the 2014 purchase of Vitesse by a Georgian investor, helped prompt the investigations. 

KNVB says penalty reflects ‘extent of the violations’

“The size of the sanction is based on the exceptional seriousness and the extent of the violations of the licensing system,” the KNVB said in a statement on Friday

It said the withheld information might even have hidden potential violations of sanctions against Russia.

Advertisement

“This includes providing incorrect information that was important for the forensic investigation into possible violations of sanctions legislation and withholding information important for the assessment of Vitesse’s continuity,” it said. 

The KNVB warned it continued to investigate other potential violations by Vitesse and said it would comment further should further penalties follow. 

It said it had responded to the club’s latest bid to win approval for new ownership, requesting an amended plan. It said it would update on this issue, too, as soon as a decision was reached. 

How football and ‘sportswashing’ helped Putin start a war

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Vitesse plans not to appeal, welcomes ray of hope for broader survival

Vitesse, meanwhile, said that it “will not appeal against the punishment and will seize the chance of retaining its license with both hands.” 

Advertisement

It conceded in a statement that some such sanction had long seemed “unavoidable” given that the club had been unable to meet certain requirements.

“For example, Vitesse did not submit the half-yearly figures correctly, acted incorrectly with regard to ING Bank and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate, and the Vladimirov report was unable to demonstrate whether or not there are connections between Vitesse and Roman Abramovich,” the club said. 

Interim general manager Edwin Reijntjes was quoted as saying that although it was a “dark day” for everyone who cares about Vitesse, facing relegation for the first time this century, “this is the harsh reality.”

“On the other hand — and I really want to make this clear to everyone — we are extremely happy with the opportunity that is being offered to us to retain our license. This too was hanging by a thread,” Reijntjes said. 

A revocation of the club’s license would effectively mark its dissolution, at least temporarily, with it unable to compete in any KNVB-organized competitions. 

Advertisement

Friday’s penalty, at least as it stands, foresees the club fighting in the Dutch second divsion next year.

msh/wd (AP, dpa, Reuters)

Continue Reading

Finance

By 2054, there will be 422,000 Americans over age 100. That poses a financial challenge

Published

on

By 2054, there will be 422,000 Americans over age 100. That poses a financial challenge

Artur Debat | Moment | Getty Images

The number of centenarians in the U.S. is poised to balloon in coming decades. That longevity poses a big financial challenge for households.

By 2054, there will be an estimated 422,000 Americans age 100 and older — more than four times the 101,000 in 2024, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.

Centenarians make up 0.03% of the total U.S. population today, a share expected to reach 0.1% three decades from now, the analysis found.

Advertisement

What’s more, the centenarian population has nearly tripled in the last three decades alone, according to Pew.

Irving Piken during his 111th birthday celebration at the Laguna Woods Community Center in California on Dec. 20, 2019. Piken, who passed away in February 2020, was believed to be the oldest man living in the U.S. 

Mark Rightmire/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images

Meanwhile, even if Americans don’t reach age 100, more of them will live to 90 and 95 years old, said John Scott, director of retirement savings at The Pew Charitable Trusts.

That demographic shift will put enormous stress on the traditional notion of financing retirement, experts said.

Advertisement

More from Personal Finance:
Why women turning ‘peak 65’ may be financially vulnerable
Americans think they need almost $1.5 million to retire
What’s wrong with TikTok’s viral savings challenges

“If people still retire in their 60s, it means the funding for retirement needs to go on for decades,” said Barry Glassman, a certified financial planner and founder of Glassman Wealth Services.

 “If retirement is going to last that long, then savings needs to last that long as well,” said Glassman, a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.

Working longer may be necessary …

Among the best ways to hedge against outliving one’s savings is by working longer, according to retirement experts.

It’s already happening.

Advertisement

By 2032, 25% of men and 17% of women age 65 and older are expected to be in the labor force, up from 24% and 15%, respectively, in 2022, according to Population Reference Bureau.

That may be more necessary as employers have offloaded responsibility for retirement savings onto workers’ shoulders, by shifting from pensions to 401(k)-type retirement plans. Workers must choose how to invest and how much money to save with each paycheck to ensure for a comfortable retirement.

But even delaying retirement by a few years — to 68 years old from 65, for example — can financially “move the needle significantly,” Glassman said.

“People need to be prepared to work longer,” he said.

Doing so yields more years of income, and generally allows people to save for a longer time, delay drawing down their nest egg and defer claiming Social Security benefits.

Advertisement

Social Security, unlike 401(k) plans, provides guaranteed income for life. By delaying claiming to age 70, retirees can maximize their monthly checks.

If they have the resources, retirees can also consider buying an annuity with a portion of their savings to generate a monthly guaranteed income stream like Social Security, Pew’s Scott said.

Retirees can still work part time so they have some additional cash flow, Glassman said.

He sees more clients doing this, with professionals who become consultants upon retirement, or radiologists who can work remotely and read health scans, he said.

“There is a demand for labor in this country,” Scott said.

Advertisement

Staying up to date with skills may help retirees find some work later if they need to supplement income, he said.

… and more possible in the future

Of course, working longer won’t be possible for everyone.

People may have physically taxing jobs that require them to retire relatively early, or suffer health complications that require early retirement, for example. Others may not be able to do jobs on a part-time basis.

Retirement is likely to be full of many more “healthy, vibrant” years in coming decades due to advancements in technology and health care, for example — meaning the notion of working longer, even in physical jobs, isn’t far-fetched, Glassman said.

Retirement Planning: How to Maximize Your Financial Future

He pointed to marathon statistics as an example: 441 people age 70 and older finished the New York City Marathon in 2023, about 0.9% of all runners. That’s up from 144 people two decades earlier, or roughly 0.4% of the total runners.

Aside from work, Americans should try to save as much as they can, and start as early as they can, Scott said. Those who get an employer 401(k) match at work should strive to save enough to get the full match, which is essentially free money, he said.

Advertisement

Responsibilities like paying student loans, saving for a house and spending on caregiving needs for children does make saving difficult, but even saving a little bit now will help in the long run, he said.

“Over time, that will add up,” Scott said.

Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO

  • Thursday’s biggest analyst calls: Tesla, Nvidia, Apple, Amazon, eBay, Zoom, JetBlue, BJ’s & more
  • If you’re worried about a correction and over-invested in Nvidia, replace it with these steady growth stocks instead
  • It may be time for investors to sell Nvidia on the next bounce, according to the charts
  • Wall Street is bullish on copper, thanks to AI. Analysts love these stocks, giving one 234% upside
  • ‘Hard to Ignore’: Jefferies says this cybersecurity stock could double after 75% rise in the past year 
  • A four-day work week could be coming as AI proliferates — and these companies could capitalize
Continue Reading

Trending