Connect with us

Entertainment

UCLA announces ambitious ‘Hip Hop Initiative’ with Chuck D as artist in residence

Published

on

UCLA announces ambitious ‘Hip Hop Initiative’ with Chuck D as artist in residence

Two years in the past on the California African American Museum in downtown Los Angeles, three titans of East Coast rap converged for a roundtable: influential “Paid in Full” rapper Rakim; Public Enemy’s cofounder Chuck D; and indie rap royalty Talib Kweli.

Known as “Sweat the Method: The Politics and Poetics of Hip-Hop,” the occasion attracted a standing-room-only crowd in South Los Angeles. Little did they know that the roundtable — which was presupposed to be the primary in a months-long L.A. Phil sequence referred to as Energy to the Folks! — would lay the groundwork for UCLA’s just-announced Hip Hop Initiative, or that Chuck D would function its inaugural artist in residence.

“The room was sweating. It was on fireplace,” recollects says H. Samy Alim, UCLA professor of anthropology and director of the college’s new initiative. He mentioned the occasion set the template for “what we are able to do once we all come collectively to showcase hip-hop’s energy and power.”

Touting itself as “the main heart for Hip Hop Research globally,” the initiative goals to amplify and multiply the dialog on hip-hop tradition throughout inventive disciplines “by the use of artist residencies, group engagement packages, a e book sequence, lecture sequence, an oral historical past and digital archive venture, postdoctoral fellowships and extra,” based on the initiative’s announcement.

The initiative will broaden the Hip Hop Research Collection of books printed by College of California Press and edited by Alim and Jeff Chang, greatest recognized for his important e book on rap, “Can’t Cease Gained’t Cease: A Historical past of the Hip-Hop Technology.” It would additionally construct on the college’s decades-in-the-making archive, accelerating the researching and documentation of hip-hop within the Los Angeles space.

Advertisement

UCLA has lengthy cast paths within the scholarship of American music. Alumni of its famed faculty of music embrace Kamasi Washington, Randy Newman, Carol Burnett, John Fahey and La Monte Younger, and its college has included Herbie Hancock, Kenny Burrell, Patrice Rushen and the late Barbara Morrison, amongst many others.

Alim describes the 2020 “Sweat the Method” roundtable — produced by the Los Angeles Philharmonic with assist from the California African American Museum and UCLA’s Ralph J. Bunche Middle for African American Research — as indicative of the Hip Hop Initiative’s mission.

Noting that it’s been a half-century since Bronx disc jockey Kool Herc planted the seeds of hip-hop, Alim asks, “If we’re 50 years in, how are individuals going to know tradition 50 years, 100 years from now? Now we have to institutionalize the form of research and rigorous evaluation of the tradition so the story will get informed.”

Tyree Boyd-Pates, the curator and historian who moderated the dialogue amongst Rakim, Chuck D and Kweli, hopes that the initiative will draw new generations of consultants who’re “really diving into the inside workings of the methods of hip-hop and taking a look at it by means of a lens of scholarship.”

The initiative is a part of UCLA’s Ralph J. Bunche Middle for African American Research and never the Herb Alpert Faculty of Music, which has lengthy been a pacesetter in rap research by means of the work of students together with Cheryl L. Keyes, Shana Redmond, Tricia Rose and Mark Anthony Neal. That’s as a result of hip-hop hasn’t simply reworked music. Throughout the a long time its aesthetic and philosophy has woven its method into vogue, artwork and commerce. “Hip-hop research has exploded as an space of inquiry,” Alim says. The initiative can even be steered by Kelly Lytle Hernandez, the director of the Ralph J. Bunche Middle; Bunche assistant director Tabia Shawel; and Samuel Lamontagne, Ph.D. candidate in ethnomusicology.

Advertisement

Chuck D performs at a Bernie Sanders rally in March 2020.

(Dania Maxwell/Los Angeles Instances)

Throughout a current name to debate his forthcoming artist-in-residency, Chuck D mentioned, “All the opposite musics on the market have been understood, interpreted, rolled out, books made about it. So this latest artwork type of the final 50 years, hip-hop and rap music, is reaching this level the place you hear immediately from from the sources — the inspiration, the impression and connectivity between the creators and the audiences.”

Keyes, chair of UCLA’s Division of African American Research, was a pupil at College of Indiana within the early Nineteen Eighties. On the time, academia barely acknowledged hip-hop’s existence, focusing as a substitute on blues, rock ‘n’ roll and people music scholarship. Recognizing a chance and obsessive about the emergent tradition, the grad pupil knew she was onto one thing, from a scholarly perspective.

Advertisement

“My professors would say, ‘Why don’t you research jazz or gospel music?’” Keyes mentioned. “However persistence is likely one of the issues that I discovered from and respect about hip-hop tradition. After 20-plus years, we’re starting to see hip-hop heart stage as a reputable space of interdisciplinary research right here at UCLA.”

“Once you have a look at hip-hop’s commodification, you have got this dominance within the public sphere,” Alim says. “And never simply with document gross sales and charts, however now you have got hip-hop within the Tremendous Bowl halftime present. You’ve gotten breakdancing as a class within the 2024 Olympics. Every little thing from the music to bop is coming into new ranges of mainstream dominance. Intellectually — and in addition traditionally and politically — we’re on this new second.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Entertainment

Who's afraid of Roy Cohn? Not Jeremy Strong

Published

on

Who's afraid of Roy Cohn? Not Jeremy Strong

Brutal. Vicious. Crooked. Cruel.

So filmmaker Ali Abbasi’s new biopic “The Apprentice” describes its dominant figure, a New York and Washington, D.C., power broker who lies, cheats, charms and browbeats his way into the uppermost ranks of American business and government.

No, it’s not Donald Trump. It’s Roy Cohn.

As the film depicts with garish flair, the pugilistic, Bronx-born attorney — who first came to prominence prosecuting Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for espionage, then served as chief counsel to Sen. Joseph McCarthy during his anticommunist witch hunt — took Trump under his wing in the 1970s, handing the ambitious real-estate developer’s son a fiendish playbook for success. Attack, attack, attack. Deny everything. Never admit defeat. By the time of his disbarment and death from AIDS complications in 1986, however, the roles were reversed, and Cohn lost sway with his erstwhile mentee as Trump stepped out of his shadow.

Throughout “The Apprentice,” Cohn comes across not only with his renowned ferocity, but also with uncommon empathy, courtesy of actor Jeremy Strong.

Advertisement

“If Roy Cohn walked into this room right now, I don’t think I would want to shake his hand,” says Strong, 45, seated in a bar off the sun-dappled courtyard of the San Vicente Bungalows on an early fall afternoon. “But from the distance of a piece of work and trying to understand him — humanistically and creatively — I had to find, for lack of a better word, love. Which is a bit of a grenade to say out loud.”

Fresh off a silent meditation retreat in upstate New York, the “Succession” star folds the same circumspection into nearly all of his stacked, erudite sentences, which are peppered with literary allusions (Kafka’s “The Zürau Aphorisms”) and film-industry names (Danish director Tobias Lindholm). At times Strong pauses so long that I launch into my next question, only to be interrupted by the continuation of an apparently unfinished thought. He denies being “gun shy” about press since the publication of a viral 2021 New Yorker profile in which a number of his collaborators — some named, others anonymous — looked askance at the lengths to which he’ll go to embed himself in a character.

“I think I’m a fairly earnest person, and that’s gotten me in trouble,” Strong insists, “but I’m not interested in camouflaging or disguising myself. Life is too short.”

Strong, left, as Roy Cohn, with Sebastian Stan as Donald Trump in “The Apprentice.”

(Festival de Cannes)

Advertisement

The topic at hand isn’t just the life and times of Roy Cohn, of course. When “The Apprentice” premiered earlier this year at the Cannes Film Festival, the Trump campaign swiftly threatened a lawsuit, calling the film “pure malicious defamation” and suggesting it “should not see the light of day.” Then, as if the former president’s wish had come true, the project languished for months without a distributor. Despite repeated reassurances from Abbasi, Strong, writer Gabriel Sherman and actor Sebastian Stan, who plays Trump, that “The Apprentice” was not a political polemic but a character study, it seemed plausible, as recently as August, that the film would remain on the shelf until after next month’s election, if not indefinitely. (It was ultimately picked up by Briarcliff Entertainment.)

“We sort of narrowly escaped the jaws of being effectively censored in this country,” Strong says. “That’s something that happens in Russia, North Korea. Not democratic countries. I think people in Hollywood were really wary of touching this, and that was disheartening.”

In theaters Friday, “The Apprentice” arrives in the home stretch of a bruising, chaotic presidential election campaign, sure to be scrutinized as closely as any film of the fall. Supporters of the Republican nominee will likely follow the Trump camp’s lead in calling the movie — in which Trump rapes first wife Ivana (Maria Bakalova) and undergoes multiple cosmetic surgeries — a hit piece, while his most ardent opponents may see any attempt to humanize Trump or Cohn as beyond the pale.

Given the fraught political environment, Strong strains to frame his approach to the character as a historian might, decoupling understanding from endorsement. Although he uses words like empathy, kinship and love to explain how he got under Cohn’s skin, he also describes the attorney as a “cancerous conundrum” and a “demonic Peter Pan.”

Advertisement

“God, it’s really dangerous,” Strong says. “I feel like I could get in trouble for saying anything positive about him. When I say these things, I only really mean them in a creative arena, because creatively a character like Roy is like Iago. You don’t want to say anything nice about Iago. But as an actor, Iago is one of the great roles. This feels like one of the great roles.”

Strong is not alone in his estimation. As a key character in Tony Kushner’s Pulitzer-winning 1991 play “Angels in America,” Mike Nichols’ 2003 HBO miniseries adaptation thereof, the 1992 TV movie “Citizen Cohn,” last year’s miniseries “Fellow Travelers” and numerous documentaries, Cohn has inspired more major films and TV series than even Harvey Milk. His many portrayals have resulted in two Tonys, an Emmy and a Peabody. I ask Strong if he thinks there’s any merit to the criticism about straight actors playing gay characters, and receiving acclaim for doing so, when such opportunities and plaudits remain a rarity for out gay actors.

“Yes, it’s absolutely valid,” Strong says. “I’m sort of old fashioned, maybe, in the belief that, fundamentally, it’s [about] a person’s artistry, and that great artists, historically, have been able to, as it were, change the stamp of their nature. That’s your job as an actor. The task, in a way, is to render something that is not necessarily your native habitat. … While I don’t think that it’s necessary [for gay roles to be played by gay performers], I think that it would be good if that were given more weight.”

Then, as I begin to follow up, he interjects, “What do you think?”

I think it’s complicated, if I’m being honest. I think it might be passé of me even to ask about it. At least for cis, white gay men, who have consistently dominated LGBTQ+ representation in film and television, the flagrantly stereotypical performances — the ones that treat the character’s sexuality as if it were another layer of hair, makeup or wardrobe — are now few and far between. It’s hard to muster one’s revolutionary fervor for Cohn, the man the “Bad Gays” podcast once labeled “the polestar of human evil.”

Advertisement

And yet that is exactly what makes this real-life character — a closeted, self-hating homosexual who helped launch the Lavender Scare and remained silent about the AIDS crisis even as it killed him — an ideal test case. The fact remains that no out gay man has ever won an Oscar for playing a queer character in the 96-year history of the Academy Awards. Meanwhile, this season alone could conceivably add two more names — Strong and Daniel Craig for “Queer” — to the list of nine straight men who’ve previously done so. (The numbers for women, and nominations, are scarcely any better.) In light of the disproportion, one can’t help but draw the conclusion that pundits and voters still understand playing gay as one mark in the column for “outstanding performance.” Which raises the question: Might a gay actor get more credit if he opted to play our community’s most notorious supervillain, instead of another tragic hero we’re determined to uplift? Would that appear, to the film academy’s approximately 10,000 members, a little more like “acting,” and less like life?

Compared with Pacino’s outraged and outrageous Cohn, spraying a vulgarian’s spittle across Nichols’ magisterial “Angels,” Strong’s performance is a model of white-knuckle control, swaggering when Cohn exerts his power, wilting when he can’t. When Cohn learns that Trump has gifted him fake-diamond cuff links for what will turn out to be his final birthday, Strong invests the petty indignity with pathos, as a man who would step over anyone to get ahead realizes he’s subject to the same ruthless forces. Along with Will Brill’s turn in “Fellow Travelers,” painting Cohn as practically lovesick for his partner in anticommunism, G. David Schine, “The Apprentice” is the closest any screen actor has come to reflecting the description of the attorney on the AIDS Memorial Quilt: “Bully. Coward. Victim.”

“What I do feel, whoever plays any part ever, is that you have to take these things as seriously as you take your own life, and it is not a game, and that these people and their struggles and the experiences you’re trying to render are not a plaything,” Strong says. “If I didn’t believe that I could understand on some deep level his anguish and turmoil and his need, and the sort of Gordian knot that every character has but Roy has particularly — if I didn’t believe that I could understand it or connect to it in a way that is faithful or voracious, I wouldn’t have done it. I certainly don’t do these things just for my own self-aggrandizement.”

An actor in a hat looks into the lens.

“You have to take these things as seriously as you take your own life,” says Strong of diving into the role of Roy Cohn. “And it is not a game.”

(Marcus Ubungen / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Strong has become an almost scholarly fount of biographical information about Cohn, littering our conversation with enough details about the man’s home decor (porcelain frog figurines), taste in poetry (Joaquin Miller’s “Byron”) and dinner order at Le Cirque (Bumble Bee tuna, off-menu) to give Cohn‘s biographers a run for their money.

When Abbasi offered the role to Strong, the actor was already familiar with Cohn, not only from “Angels in America,” but also from the research he did after being approached to play Cohn in another film project about five years ago. Signing on to “The Apprentice” sent Strong’s prep work into overdrive, including studying video of Cohn to learn his “sui generis” voice — a hectoring New York sneer that’s authoritative but rarely loud — and interviewing Cohn profiler Ken Auletta. Strong says Cohn also represents his most dramatic physical transformation.

“I haven’t had to alter my body in that way,” says Strong, who underwent a doctor-supervised “starvation diet” and a regimen of tanning booth visits and biweekly spray tans to match Cohn’s notoriously leathery look. “He was obsessed with his physical appearance. He had a tremendous amount of vanity.”

With an Emmy for “Succession” and a Tony for this spring’s revival of Henrik Ibsen’s “Enemy of the People” under his belt, and Oscar buzz for his performance in “The Apprentice” already building, Strong’s own motivations are evolving. While career disappointment once spurred him, he is now just “looking for a limb to go out on.” I liken it, during the course of our conversation, to gymnast Simone Biles developing never-before-attempted vaults to challenge herself.

“I no longer feel thwarted in that way and I can pay my rent,” Strong says. “And I don’t take any of that for granted because it happened late for me. I have the luxury of choice and the luxury, more importantly, of getting to choose things that matter most to me, things that feel meaningful. I want to keep pushing myself — that Simone Biles thing of finding new ways to find the frontier and work that kind of requires a radical courage to do. Which for me is most things, because I find it all pretty fearful.”

Advertisement

After we’ve parted ways, Strong texts me a quote by Bruce Springsteen — “The pressures of the business are powerless in the face of what is real” — from music journalist Fred Goodman’s history “The Mansion on the Hill,” which Strong is reading to prepare to play Springsteen manager Jon Landau in the upcoming biopic starring Jeremy Allen White. I, too, am a collector of quotations, and after joking that newspaper stories should have epigraphs, I suggest one, from Wallace Stegner, that seems apropos to our conversation about Cohn: Present your subject in his own terms, judge him in yours.

“That’s a good one,” Strong texts. “For actors too.”

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Psychosis is an absurd Aussie experiment that defies categorization – The AU Review

Published

on

Film Review: Psychosis is an absurd Aussie experiment that defies categorization – The AU Review

A film like Psychosis is a difficult one to review.  Whilst there’s never a shortage of features that prove wildly divisive (the Joker sequel says hello), Pirie Martin‘s ambitious debut defies categorization as it blends technique and genre, submitting to an extreme eccentricity that, as off-putting it may be to some, is difficult to not be impressed by.

An Australian experiment of sorts, this no-budget, square aspect-ratioed, black-and-white absurdist mystery is a noirish nightmare – complete with BBC-like narrator – about a criminal fixer, Cliff Van Aarle (Derryn Amoroso), who, thanks to a psychological condition, has a multitude of voices in his head fighting for prominence as he goes about cleaning up the many criminal world messes he’s assigned to.

A difficult film to follow (perhaps intentionally so), Psychosis adds even more obscure flames to its fire by introducing the notion of potential zombies, which a duo of amateur drug dealers claim they were attacked by; this ultimately explained by the fact that a drug lord is doping up his lackeys to the point of near-hypnosis.  With the voices continually conversing in Cliff’s head, as well as the constant narration, Psychosis does run the risk of being over-explained to the point that any of the film’s intended mystery is underwhelming, but such is the charm of Martin’s clear love of all the genres this film touches on, the surreal flourishes of it all become oddly enamoring.

Not unlike what Rian Johnson accomplished with Brick, mixed with another of this year’s black-and-white farcicalities, Hundreds of Beavers, it’s the pure cheek of Martin that pushes Psychosis past the point of audience detachment.  It can’t be stressed enough that this film has been made with a very specific target viewership in mind, and it’s mainly earning points here for the sheer fact that Martin had the gall to create such a film that takes glee in pushing against the usual grain.

Advertisement

It can’t always escape its amateurish mentality, but Psychosis‘ retro-midnight-movie-madness personality will indeed win it the attention and respect it deserves from the type of audience who find glory in the gonzo.

TWO AND A HALF STARS (OUT OF FIVE)

Psychosis is now available to rent and/or buy digitally through Prime Video in Australia.  It’s now available on Tubi in the United States.



Peter Gray

Seasoned film critic. Gives a great interview. Penchant for horror. Unashamed fan of Michelle Pfeiffer and Jason Momoa.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kamala Harris to appear on 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert,' 'Call Her Daddy' and 'Howard Stern'

Published

on

Kamala Harris to appear on 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert,' 'Call Her Daddy' and 'Howard Stern'

As she heads into the final stretch of the presidential campaign, Vice President Kamala Harris will make a flurry of media appearances this week.

On Tuesday, she will visit “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert,” marking her first late-night appearance since President Biden dropped out of the race and she secured the Democratic nomination.

It will be her seventh overall visit to “The Late Show” and is one of many interviews she will be giving this week in both traditional and more unconventional forums.

Harris also recently sat down with the hugely popular podcaster Alex Cooper for an episode of “Call Her Daddy,” which is expected to be released Sunday. Topics of the conversation are said to include reproductive rights and other issues important to women voters, according to the Washington Post. The show has gained a vast following, particularly with young women drawn to Cooper’s take on sex, dating and relationships, but it also tackles current events and features interviews with people in the news.

On Monday, Harris will also appear on “60 Minutes,” broadcast TV’s most-watched news program, along with her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. They will speak to correspondent Bill Whitaker from the campaign trail for a special episode of the CBS news magazine. According to CBS, Her Republican rival, Donald Trump, and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, initially accepted an invitation to speak with Scott Pelley in the “60 Minutes” special but then backed out last week.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, Harris will also appear live on “The View” on ABC and will visit “The Howard Stern Show.” She will also take part in a town hall for Univision on Thursday.

Walz, meanwhile, will visit “Jimmy Kimmel Live” on Monday.

Former President Obama was known for making frequent late-night appearances and for trying to reach younger voters through unusual channels — once making the case for the Affordable Care Act on the spoof web series “Between Two Ferns.”

Both Harris and Trump have increasingly sought to mobilize specific voting blocs through targeted appearances on podcasts and social media platforms, rather than traditional journalistic outlets. Last week Harris appeared on “All the Smoke,” a podcast hosted by retired NBA players Matt Barnes and Stephen Jackson. Trump has focused on influencers popular with young men, including Adin Ross.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending