Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Repeat Telugu Movie Review

Press Room



Launch Date : December 1 , 2022 Score : 2.75/5

Starring: Naveen Chandra, Madhoo, Achyuth Kumar, Mime Gopi, Smruthi Venkat, Satyam Rajesh, Pooja Ramachandran

Director: Arvindh Srinivasan

Producer: Ramanjaneyulu Javvaji


Music Director: Ghibran

Cinematography: PG Muthaiah

Editor: Arul E Siddharth

Associated Hyperlinks : Trailer

Disney Plus Hotstar has now give you a thriller thriller, Repeat starring Naveen Chandra and Madhoo in outstanding roles. The movie is streaming on the platform at the moment, and let’s see how it’s.




A novelist named Subramanyam (Achyuth Kumar) seeks the assistance of the police because the characters in his imaginary tales threaten him by coming to life. The police don’t consider in him, however issues grow to be surprising when the DGP Asha Pramod’s (Madhoo) daughter will get kidnapped in the identical manner the novelist penned the story. The police consider Subramanyam is behind DGP’s daughter lacking, however they will’t get the required breakthrough. Therefore an undercover cop Vikram Kumar (Naveen Chandra) is, dealt with the job. Did Vikram resolve the thriller? Is the DGP’s daughter protected? How come the novelist’s tales transform true? Watch the movie to know the solutions.


Plus Factors:


Naveen Chandra is nice because the undercover cop, and he carried out the given function with ease. His physique language and mannerisms completely swimsuit the cop’s function. From his entry, the movie picks up the tempo, and the actor carries the movie on his shoulders all through.

The second hour of the movie is nice, with the twists unraveling one after the other. The movie will get fairly attention-grabbing because it nears completion and the ultimate twist is strong. These twists are exhausting to guess, and the style by which the dots are linked is sweet. The storytelling is taut on this second hour with a fast-paced screenplay.

The comedy in locations is respectable, which comes based on the scenario. Madhoo, because the DGP, is respectable in her function. Achyuth Kumar’s pure efficiency brings a pleasant depth to the movie. Others like Satyam Rajesh, Pooja Ramachandran, Mime Gopi, and Smruthi Venkat are ample of their respective roles.



Minus Factors:

For any thriller to work effectively, the institution of the plot is the important thing, and that is the place Repeat didn’t succeed. The movie’s primary premise is just not established effectively, and therefore the movie fails to achieve a brand new degree. First, the tense ambiance and the thriller issue have to be created effectively, after which the movie has to take off, giving the solutions. In Repeat, the latter half is offered properly, however the former isn’t.

As well as, the opening sequences lack readability, and there isn’t a correct connection between the person scenes. The movie’s unique model Dejavu photographs are used principally right here, and therefore we don’t really feel the authenticity of watching a Telugu movie.


Apart from Naveen Chandra’s parts, nothing was reshot, which majorly affected the viewing expertise. As well as, there are a number of logical errors within the movie that ought to have been taken care of by the writing group. Because the director went forward with the remake, he ought to have corrected these logical errors on this model to distinguish it from the unique.


Technical Points:

The background rating by Ghibran is nice and completely fits the temper of against the law thriller. The cinematography by PG Muthaiah is respectable. The manufacturing values are nearly okay. Nonetheless, the enhancing work is just not so nice. The place the movie needs to be fast-paced, there it isn’t, and when the twists reveal one after the other, the proceedings give us a rushed really feel.

Coming to the director, Arvindh Srinivasan, he, did an okay job with the movie. Whereas the idea appeared superb on paper, the execution wasn’t that nice, matching the content material. Therefore the movie simply stays an okay flick regardless of having extra potential. The director ought to have designed the primary hour in a greater manner. He succeeds with the second hour, although.




On the entire, Repeat is a satisfactory movie with good twists within the second hour. The performances and the twists work effectively however the issue lies with the below-par first hour and logical errors. Nonetheless, crime thriller lovers can nonetheless give it a do this weekend. Score: 2.75/5


Reviewed by 123telugu Group

Click on Right here For Telugu Evaluate

Articles that may curiosity you:


Advert : Teluguruchi – Study.. Prepare dinner.. Benefit from the Tasty meals


TAGS:  Achyuth Kumar, Madhoo, Mime Gopi, Naveen Chandra, Pooja Ramachandran, Repeat Telugu movie on Hotstar, Repeat Telugu Film Score, Repeat Telugu Film Evaluate, Repeat Telugu Film Evaluate and Score, Satyam Rajesh, Smruthi Venkat

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Family Review: Don Palathara’s Film Is Mellow, Incisive And Attentively Chiselled

Press Room



A nonetheless from Household.

Solid: Vinay Forrt, Divya Prabha, Mathew Thomas, Nilja Ok Child, Jolly Chirayath

Director: Don Palathara

Ranking: 4 and a half stars (out of 5)


The movie premiered on Saturday on the ongoing Worldwide Movie Competition of Rotterdam 2023

A delicate, penetrating and austere portrait of a rural group over which the Church holds sway in ways in which alternate between the important and the intense, Household, writer-director-editor Don Palathara’s sixth function movie, is an affidavit to his eager eye for element, agency grasp on the medium and talent to handle intricate, demanding themes with sensitivity.

The Malayalam movie, that includes Vinay Forrt and Divya Prabha in key onscreen roles, had its world premiere on Saturday within the Harbour part of the 52nd Worldwide Movie Competition of Rotterdam (IFFR, January 25 to February 5, 2023). That is Palathara’s second movie to make the IFFR lower. His Cinema is All the pieces was on the pageant in 2021.

Whereas Household marks a return to the Catholic setting of his first two movies, Shavam (The Corpse, 2015) and Vith(Seed, 2017), additionally it is a step ahead within the evolution of his refined craft and singular cinematic language. Within the span of eight years, Palathara has constructed a considerable physique of labor exceptional for its consistency. Household is a worthy addition to his oeuvre.

Household displays a posh actuality that doesn’t reveal itself both in its entirety or with absolute transparency. It’s a magnificently layered however minimalist depiction of the place and ethos that Palathara grew up in. His visible and narrative approach – restrained, tangential and loaded with which means – serves to deepen the drama of reality and obfuscation on the movie’s core.


Couched within the movie’s unerring cultural specificity are common truths about human behaviour. The underlying details and sides of the story and the characters emerge via solutions and indirect, passing references reasonably than with assistance from direct verbal means. On the floor, there may be repose, even one thing akin to stasis. Beneath it lies a posh net of ethical misgivings and manipulations.

Produced by Newton Cinema and scripted by Palathara and Sherin Catherine, Household performs out in a small village the place the minutest of transgressions are usually amplified by gossip, prurient curiosity and collective censure whereas essentially the most grievous of misdemeanours are quietly willed away by a society adept at closing ranks to guard its perception programs.

Shot in heat, muted colors, the movie focuses the ambiguities and angularities inherent within the socio-religious panorama. IT employs episodic encounters to disclose the best way the group capabilities. Innocuous conversations conceal insidious details or comprise intimations of hazard. Nonetheless, nothing that the script spells out has the texture of mere chilly data.

The movie probes the human capability to deflect consideration and activate a defence mechanism when the household faces a menace. As a girl who has devoted herself to the service of God factors out, a household is not only a organic entity. It’s a social assemble that hinges on loyalty to the parish and on the unifying energy of prayer and repentance.

The central determine in Household, apart from the Church, the nerve-centre of all exercise, is Sony (Forrt), a do-gooder and busybody who’s at all times at hand to assist the villagers. He’s a person that the village and the Church can’t appear to do with out. “He is sort of a son to all of us,” says a nun.


A graduate who as soon as ran a tuition centre and is now looking out for a proper job, Sony provides faculty youngsters classes in topics they’re weak in, takes the lead in voluntary initiatives, helps village ladies with their day by day chores, provides firm to the previous and ailing, attends youth league conferences and by no means misses holy mass.

Everyone – properly, nearly everyone – loves Sony. And Sony loves everyone. He’s a person who can do no improper. Or can he? Within the idyll that the village is on the face of it, there’s a leopard on the prowl. However the wild predator is not the one supply of unease and worry. The village has its share of different mishaps that set off alarm bells (however not in a literal sense as a result of the main target, in step with Palathara’s model, is on understatement).

An elopement has gone improper. The stigma triggers a dying by suicide. A rash schoolboy faces the results of a slipup. Different acts and secrets and techniques threaten to upset the fragile steadiness that has been fastidiously struck and sustained by the Church. Everyone is below scrutiny right here. Some pay the worth, others stroll free.

Because the darkness hiding beneath the floor creeps out from a void, the response from people who maintain the reins is swift and dependable. A self-willed pregnant younger lady, Rani (Divya Prabha, not too long ago seen within the 2022 Locarno title Ariyippu) is an unintended witness to what she has purpose to consider is a grave offence. However might she be imagining issues and leaping to conclusions? Gaslighting follows because the dominant forces take over.


Early within the movie, a cow falls right into a pit constructed to entice a leopard. The villagers swing into motion to rescue the animal. A lot later within the movie, it’s a human who’s in a metaphorical gap. It’s the flip of the Church to stage a rescue act. However who must be saved and from whom and what are questions that stay enveloped in a haze.

The pacing of the narrative and the character of the framing by director of images Jaleel Badusha recommend each detachment and intimacy. The digicam by no means will get too near the characters and views the panorama, the village and its denizens from a calculated distance. It nonetheless reveals a whole, acutely etched world in all its width and depth.

Vinay Forrt fleshes out a personality with a number of conflicting shades with numerous effort to spare. The underplaying, which an integral a part of the design and the pitching of the movie, enhances the affect of the efficiency.

Divya Prabha, whose character represents a voice of purpose in a local weather the place appearances and artifices are of paramount significance, delivers a efficiency of nice emotional depth.

Household is a mellow, incisive, attentively chiselled movie that critiques the human obsession with self-preservation it doesn’t matter what the ethical value could also be. Each as a bit of cinema and a chronicle of the leopards that lurk in our midst, it’s a powerful accomplishment.


Featured Video Of The Day

Reward For Shah Rukh Khan’s ‘Pathaan’ Pours In From Pakistan

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Sundance movie review: ‘Talk to Me’ cleverly conjures evil spirits –

Press Room



Mia (Sophie Wilde) is afraid of what she’s unleashed in “Discuss to Me.” Picture courtesy of Sundance Institute

Jan. 29 (UPI) — Discuss to Me, which premiered on the Sundance Movie Competition, invents a daunting new mythology for conjuring up evil spirits. At its coronary heart, they’re nonetheless the useless making an attempt to scare the dwelling, however these really feel extra trendy and palpable.

After a stunning introduction with unexplained violence, Discuss to Me introduces Mia (Sophie Wilde), her buddy Jade (Alexandra Jensen) and Jade’s brother Riley (Joe Chook). They attend a celebration the place Hayley (Zoe Terakes) and Joss (Chris Alosio) introduce a mystical artifact.

Joss is in possession of a ceramic hand that is a portal to the afterlife. It will get to be a bit extra particular than the typical ouija board.

In case you maintain the hand and say, “Discuss to me,” the spirits seem. In case you say, “I allow you to in,” they are going to possess you till you launch the hand. The host by no means is aware of what spirit will seem, and it is completely different every time.


The looks of spirits produces well-earned leap scares. The sensible make-up actually conveys a myriad of various deaths and grotesque decompositions.

The process Joss and Hayley have developed creates dramatic build-up to the possession. Joss straps the participant to the chair to allow them to’t get away when possessed.

Hayley instances it for 90 seconds, as a result of apparently after 90, the spirits will not depart. Effectively, throughout Mia’s first time, round 83 seconds the spirit Mia connects with will not let go of the hand.

Wilde acts the hell out of the spirit’s persona which may be very completely different from Mia’s.

Joss explains the place he acquired the hand. A buddy gave it to him, and Joss by no means questioned why that buddy might need needed to eliminate it.


Each Hayley and Joss heard completely different tales about what the hand is and the way it connects to the spirit world. So its legend is ambiguous which makes it far scarier.

It is all enjoyable and video games at first because the youngsters experiment with this energy. Jade’s boyfriend, Daniel (Otis Dhanji) experiences a sexual and humiliating spirit.

A few of the spirits get so private, it confronts the characters with actually juicy revelations. However, it quickly escalates into brutal self-harm which leaves the host’s physique within the hospital.

After that escalation, Discuss to Me settles right into a extra acquainted story of a religious curse. Mia and Riley expertise probably the most with spirits after their encounter with the hand, however the movie stays intense and graphic because the characters attempt to undo the curse that has adopted them.

The characters are all clever teenagers exploring this highly effective however harmful alternative. They don’t seem to be caricatures to be killed off one after the other, although they nonetheless cannot keep away from violence.


Discuss to Me may even match into the current development of horror motion pictures about grief and trauma. Mia is processing grief over her mom’s loss of life, which she believes was an unintended overdose.

Don’t be concerned, it is also completely about demon spirits and whether or not or not they’re telling the reality. However, grief is without doubt one of the points with which the characters are coping.

In success, the hand might proceed to trigger bother for brand new teams of teenagers in Discuss to Me sequels. The film has sufficient shocks and an total unsettling tone to depart horror followers craving extra.

A24 will launch Discuss to Me.

Fred Topel, who attended movie college at Ithaca School, is a UPI leisure author based mostly in Los Angeles. He has been knowledgeable movie critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001 and a member of the Tv Critics Affiliation since 2012. Learn extra of his work in Leisure.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Left Behind: Rise of the Antichrist’ Review: Kevin Sorbo Steps Into Nicolas Cage’s Shoes for Sequel, After Rapture of Previous Movie’s Entire Cast

Press Room



Should you see only one thriller this yr during which a climactic automobile chase is adopted by the director-star breaking character to ship a five-minute sermon straight into the digicam — adopted by three extra minutes of Mike Huckabee main viewers in prayer to simply accept Jesus into their hearts, earlier than the tip credit roll — then make it “Left Behind: Rise of the Antichrist,” the newest in a collection of apocalyptic movies primarily based on the bestselling Christian ebook collection.

Though “Rise” is the sixth characteristic derived from dozens of rapture-iffic novels and spinoff novellas printed beneath the “Left Behind” banner within the mid-’90s by means of mid-2000s, it’s the primary within the movie collection to have Kevin Sorbo as a number one man in addition to director. The place previous installments had been comparatively coy about their evangelistic function, Sorbo opts so as to add a literal come-to-Jesus epilogue. Chances are you’ll recall that the final actor to painting heroic pilot Rayford Steele was Nicolas Cage, in 2014’s “Left Behind” (a reboot to which the brand new movie serves as a direct sequel). Cage didn’t finish his flip within the franchise by breaking the fourth wall for an altar name, one thing the actor’s fervent cult might now have a look at that as a missed alternative.  

Halfway by means of “Rise of the Antichrist,” Sorbo’s Steele, a non-believer who’s lastly beginning to see the sunshine, consults with pastor Bruce Barnes (Charles Andrew Payne) a couple of biblical prophecy that’s about to return true, within the model of “pre-trib,” premillennial theology that first grew in recognition amongst many Christians within the twentieth century. On a whiteboard, the minister — who acquired left behind as a result of he was, on the time, a phony believer — addresses a prophetic query that the filmmakers think about necessary: whether or not the clock on the seven-year Nice Tribulation begins with the Rapture, or whether or not it actually received’t start till an awesome temple is rebuilt on the Temple Dome in Jerusalem. Eschatalogically inquiring minds wish to know.

This precise schedule of the protracted apocalypse isn’t actually a significant plot level, but it surely does get you pondering extra about timelines, not only for the Finish Occasions however for movie productions. Like: the place within the heck are we within the chronology of “Left Behind” films? Kirk Cameron starred within the first three movies, beginning in 2000 and ending with 2005’s “Left Behind: World at Warfare,” earlier than producer/co-writer Paul Lalonde, the one fixed in all the productions, began afresh with the 2014 remake of the unique, starring Cage. (In between, there was a little-noticed 2016 spinoff, “Left Behind: Subsequent Technology,” primarily based on the 40 “Left Behind: The Youngsters” books.) The brand new sequel begins off six months after the occasions portrayed within the reboot, albeit with not a single forged member coming back from the earlier movie.

On this sequel, we’re advised the world is rapidly going to hell, following the disappearance of all of the world’s true Christians, though there’s not a lot filmic proof of that past the sight of trash luggage adrift within the streets on the uncommon events the Canadian shoot ventures open air. The chaos is established by way of CNN-style newscasts carried out by the movie’s different main man, chiseled, cocky TV anchor Cameron “Buck” Williams (Greg Perrow), who, having been established because the one principled newsman alive, begins trying into the nefarious forces making an attempt to seduce and topic the United Nations and whole globe.


In actual life, Sorbo is a polarizing sufficient persona that there may very well be a number of non-evangelicals sneaking into showings for the aim of a hate-watching. (The actor is so devoted to right-wing trolling that, on launch weekend, he made one more sneering joke in regards to the hammer assault on Paul Pelosi.) However anybody exhibiting up in quest of unintended laughs, due to his participation or as a result of they’ve fond recollections of snickering at no-budget Christ-sploitation films like 1972’s “A Thief within the Night time” at church camp, could also be upset to search out that “Rise of the Antichrist” not often rises to pure camp.

It sports activities enticing lensing, dialogue that sometimes has a little bit snap to it, and even some first rate directing of some of the performances … together with Sorbo’s personal. That’s very true in a single properly low-key, church-set scene the place the actor performs alongside his real-life spouse (Sam Sorbo, excellent), each taking part in characters who misplaced their spouses within the rapture. His display presence right here has a naturalistic sweetness that feels at shocking odds with the snarky meanness of Sorbo’s social media persona as God’s Indignant Man.

A lot of the movie is spent implicitly or explicitly portray the federal government’s and information media’s pandemic-era insurance policies or reporting as hoaxes, establishing public concern or gullibility that supplied a pleasant setup for Devil to essentially do his factor in end-times to return. (On this universe, there’s not even a Newsmax or an OAN left behind to query, not to mention personal, the libs.)

When the principal antagonist, within the type of Romanian big-wig Nicolae Carpathia (Bailey Chase), lastly reveals up for what quantities to solely about 10 minutes of display time, we all know he’s the Antichrist as a result of a thrilled tv reporter tells viewers he’s getting probably the most enthusiastic greeting of anybody since Obama. (Boo, hiss.) Truly, Carpathia doesn’t seem to have any of the charisma anticipated of a man who’s going to seduce the world; he resembles a way more hard-assed Ron DeSantis, crossed with a Bond villain.   

One of the apparent issues with how skinny “Rise of the Antichrist” is on any sort of film rapturousness is the way it denies audiences from spending very many minutes with the man within the title, and even secondary baddy Jonathan Stonogal (Neal McDonough, taking part in the chief of the world’s greatest social community, in a manufacturing filmed nicely earlier than such a determine turned a significant hero to conservatives). The assumption, in all probability, was that moviegoers’ everlasting souls will profit extra from hanging with its godlier characters. It’s all the time simpler to scare audiences with the sight of empty fits, in spite of everything, than to face the horrifying prospect of arising with a price range for the Battle of Armegeddon.


Continue Reading


Subscribe To Newsletter
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Stay Updated
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.