Connect with us

Movie Reviews

G.D.N Movie Review – Gulte

Published

on

G.D.N Movie Review – Gulte

2.5/5


02 Hrs 27 Mins   |   Biographical Drama   |   07-08-2026


Cast – R. Madhavan, Teejay Arunasalam, Sathyaraj, Jayaram, Priyamani, Sheela Rajkumar, Dushara Vijayan, Vinay Rai, Aditi Balan, Kaniha, Karunakaran and others

Advertisement

Director – Krishnakumar Ramakumar

Producer – Varghese Moolan, Vijay Moolan, R. Madhavan & Sarita Birje

Banner – Tricolour Films & Varghese Moolan Pictures

Music – Govind Vasantha

Advertisement

Rocketry: The Nambi Effect, The Railway Men (web series), Kesari Chapter 2, Dhurandhar, Dhurandhar: The Revenge, and now G.D.N. R. Madhavan has been doing quite a few biopics or movies based on real incidents in the last few years. The authenticity of these films may be debatable, but most of them serve as a medium to inspire the current generation. The latest biographical drama film from Madhavan, is based on Gopalswamy Doraiswamy Naidu Aka G. D. Naidu Aka G.D.N, the manufacturer of the first electric motor in India and a renowned entrepreneur. Apart from playing the lead role, Madhavan was involved in developing the screenplay and also acted as one of the producers for the film. Notable actors like, Sathyaraj, Jayaram, Priyamani and Dushara Vijayan, played crucial roles in the film. The Tamil and Telugu versions of the film were released in theatres. Did Madhavan come up with yet another inspiring biographical drama film? Who is G.D.N and what is his story? Let’s figure it out with a detailed analysis.

What is it about?

Advertisement

Gopalaswamy Doraiswamy Naidu Aka G.D. Naidu Aka G.D.N (the young role was played by Teejay Arunasalam and the middle and elder age roles were played by R. Madhavan) in British-ruled India in the early 1900s, is a motorcycle enthusiast. How did he buy his motorcycle? How did he end up manufacturing India’s first electric motor? How did he become a successful entrepreneur? What challenges did he face during the British Raj? What challenges did he face after India gained independence in 1947? How did he overcome those challenges? Forms the rest of the story.

Performances:

R. Madhavan is excellent in the role of G.D. Naidu. As always, he delivered a very restrained and likeable performance. He looked very believable in all the getups while portraying the various stages of G.D. Naidu’s life. During the climax of the film, he came up with a very emotionally driven heart-touching performance. Teejay Arunasalam in the role of young G.D. Naidu did well. He came up with a commendable performance.

Senior actors Sathyaraj and Jayaram got crucial roles and both of them made their experience count and delivered very good performances. Priyamani in a limited role made her presence felt. Dushara Vijayan in the role of the second wife to G.D. Naidu, delivered a good performance. Vinay Rai as the antagonist did his part well. Aditi Balan in a crucial role came up with a balanced performance. She did well during a very good payoff sequence in the climax.

Technicalities:

Advertisement

Govind Vasantha came up with a standard template-driven score for the biopic. His songs and background score served the purpose but there’s nothing special to talk about the music in particular. Cinematographer, Aravind Kamalanathan and the art department did a good job in replicating the bygone era well. Editing by Bijith Bala was good during the first half but it could have been much better in the second half.

Positives:

1.⁠ ⁠Inspirational Story of G.D. Naidu
2.⁠ ⁠Actors Performances
3.⁠ ⁠Motivational Moments

Negatives:

1.⁠ ⁠Overtly Commercialised Screenplay
2.⁠ ⁠One-Sided Narration

Advertisement

Analysis:

In earlier days, people used to read about well-known personalities across the world in books, later through the internet and through other news publishing agencies in various forms(i.e., print media, electronic media, etc.). Now, we are living in a generation where people use AI agents(ChatGPT, Grok, etc.), and then there is a large section of people who consume news about famous people tbrough instagram reels and YouTube Shorts. The question is – How authentic are these sources? The authenticity depends on the political affiliation, caste, religion and various other factors of the content provider or content creator. G.D.N maybe a biopic of a renowned personality but at heart, it intends to question the credibility of the source of the information we consume daily. A book or movie or an article or an Instagram reel or a YouTube short about a famous personality, is only the perspective of the content creator. More often than not, they tend to manipulate the facts or tend to exaggerate. So, it is up to us to select the right source to consume news or information. This is exactly the point, the director, Krishnakumar Ramakumar and Madhavan, tried to convey through, G.D.N.

Gopalswamy Doraiswamy Naidu(G.D.N) is known as the ‘Edison of India’. He was a school dropout but ended up becoming the manufacturer of India’s first electric motor. He was known as a technical redesigner and is also known as one of the wealth creators of Coimbatore in the early 1900s. Not just in the industrial sector but he contributed to the growth of electrical, mechanical and agricultural sectors in India. He inspired young people during the early and mid-1900s to focus on practical learning. He also started polytechnic colleges to let students study practical engineering in two years instead of four years. The film takes us through the inspirational journey of G.D. Naidu. It talks about the innovations he came up with, the challenges he faced not just from the British-ruled government in India but also from the politicians in independent India. The then British government, a few politicians in independent India and a section of the media projected him as a Tax dodger and a traitor. But did he really evade Tax? Was he really a traitor? The director of the film engagingly addressed these questions. At quite a few places, the film makes you feel inspired and your respect for G. D. Naidu will surely go a touch higher by the end.

It may be a biopic about G.D. Naidu but it also talks about Ambalapara Krishnan, an Income Tax Officer(ITO). Through the film, the director tried to show us the integrity of both individuals. The sequence between the two at the climax makes us get very emotional and we start to appreciate the integrity and self-imposed ethics by which both of them lived their lives. ‘As an income tax officer, I did my duties with utmost honesty and sincerity and always followed the rules mentioned in the book. I may have gone against you in fulfilling my duties but deep down I always respect you for what you did for the betterment of our country’, says Ambalapara Krishnan to G.D. Naidu. ‘As you said, I would have paid the penalties imposed by the British Raj and achieved my goals but had I done that, I would have become a bad example to the future young generations who dream to become entrepreneurs’, replies an emotional G.D. Naidu. This entire sequence serves as an inspiration to all the people who dream of becoming entrepreneurs. The film has quite a few such inspirational episodes which make you feel very motivated.

On the flip side, the screenplay of the film gives a feeling of watching a commercial entertainer. Both Krishnakumar Ramakumar and Madhavan as screenplay writers seemed to have put in a conscious effort to give commercial payoffs at regular intervals. A few of those payoffs appread run off the mill and exaggerated. The entire divorce episode during the pre-climax looked over the top. And, there were quite a few episodes where the director tried to deliver ‘playing to the gallery’ moments. These episodes may work very well in commercial entertainment, but in a biographical drama, they appeared exaggerated. Another drawback of the film is its seemingly one-sided narrative. Also, just like most of the biopics, the film suffers from an inconsistent pace. Especially, the drama during the initial hour in the second half unfolds at a very leisurely pace.

Advertisement

Overall, the subject matter which G.D.N dealt with is very inspirational and the message it tried to convey is also commendable. However, a bit more care would have been taken to tone down the one-sided narration and commercial elements. The possibility of you liking it depends on your definition of a biopic. If you like biographical dramas which only deal with the positive side of the individual, the chances of you liking G.D.N. are very high. You may slightly get disappointed if you prefer to watch a biographical drama with balanced narration.

Bottomline – Inspirational But Overtly Commercialised

Rating – 2.5/5

Advertisement



Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Girl Group’ Review: Rebel Wilson’s Bawdy Pop Comedy Is All Fizz and Little Substance

Published

on

‘Girl Group’ Review: Rebel Wilson’s Bawdy Pop Comedy Is All Fizz and Little Substance

Toward the end of Rebel Wilson’s “Girl Group,” a fizzy, gaudy clone of “Pitch Perfect” sculpted from the mentor formula of “Bad News Bears,” the movie spirals into an interminable sequence of pop music performances. The song-and-dance numbers are so awkwardly endless that they call to mind the denouement of a very different pop spectacle: Brady Corbet’s “Vox Lux,” in which Natalie Portman’s megastar becomes a tragic emblem of the emptiness of the celebrity industrial complex.

“Girl Group,” which follows a band of misfits competing to become signed music artists, could not be further removed from that type of cynicism if it were set on a different planet, and Wilson, starring as the group’s coach, seems hardly to know the meaning of the word. A comedy whiz who became famous for playing — as she wrote in her memoir — “the fat funny girl,” Wilson has little on her mind here beyond sparkly merriment, and “Girl Group” is an accordingly flamboyant extravaganza designed to have audiences humming and nodding along without thinking a single thought.

There are occasions that call for this sort of broadly comforting trifle, on airplanes or in late-night popcorn sessions. “Girl Group” seems even to nod to its position on the feel-good shelf when, after a trying day, a character suggests to her sister that they head home to snuggle and rent “Pitch Perfect.” This movie — despite performances from a veritable diva corps d’elite, including Nicole Scherzinger and Ashley Roberts of The Pussycat Dolls, the Spice Girls’ Mel C, and All Saints’ Shaznay Lewis — never reaches the emotional heights of that rewatch-ready franchise, nor does it really strive to. It’s instead at ease as a second-stringer, a congenial romp that exists only as it unspools before you, then dissipates like stage fog the moment it’s over.

The story opens in 1997, as five friends at a London girls’ school prepare to perform in their auditorium. Backstage, a member of the crew frets to her teacher (a brief but keen Sally Hawkins) about the pressure, before the pals — who perform under the name Gurlfriends — head onstage and bring the house down. The overture gives way to a whirlwind montage of the group’s ascent, culminating with a member named Tassie (played in the present day by Wilson) ditching the gang to try and make it as a solo act. The effort fails, and Tassie sinks into an alcoholic stupor from which she emerges, years later, to find that she’s been replaced for the reunion tour by a warbling prima donna.

Advertisement

This is where the real story starts, and where Wilson might have been better off centering the movie all along. Sentenced to community service at a youth center, Tassie meets a group of Gen Z-ers whom she’s assigned to mentor ahead of an upcoming competition. The washed-up star sees their talent as a chance to rehabilitate her own image, but the peppy, ambitious teens have aspirations of their own, and as Tassie sets about molding them into a glossy vision of millennial pop stardom, her narcissism increasingly becomes a liability to their success.

There are feeble gestures at a generational divide over female sexuality and pop-star image, as when one of the younger crew exclaims that Gurlfriends were “totally playing into the male gaze.” But such moments are so few and far between that it feels as if Wilson forgot about the theme halfway through, or, more likely, found it too thorny to properly unpack. Fair enough: prickly questions about how famous women can or should display themselves are unlikely to be settled by a broad comedy more interested in cramming in mile-a-minute jokes.

Much of the film’s humor consists of bawdy clowning, with a handful of contemporary reference-laden jokes thrown in for good measure. And despite Wilson’s frank discussions of weight and weight loss in her memoir, there’s a curious abundance of size-related gags. At one point, a child accuses Tassie of looking like she “ate” Sabrina Carpenter. Elsewhere, Jennifer Coolidge, gamely playing Gurlfriends’ manager, encourages Tassie to promote Splurt, a nutrition bar with a laxative effect. Its potential to induce sudden bowel urgency in front of a crowd does not go unnoticed.

Amid the slew of tired gags, the harmony among the younger cast is the film’s greatest asset, and their easy rapport and naturalism help cut against the run-of-the-mill story. The standouts are Chabely Ponce, as an acoustic guitar-slinging crooner, and Lilah Pate, who excels as the group’s leader, despite having to suffer through one ill-conceived scene involving an aggressive, nonconsensual kiss.

Their enthusiasm as an ensemble suggests a warmer movie, one in which the nonconformists take center stage as they blossom into more confident versions of themselves. But lost in the surrounding muddle and often eclipsed by Wilson’s relentless mugging, their stories wind up playing second fiddle. Their vivacity may be enough to break through Tassie’s vanity, but it can’t wholly elevate the movie around them.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Surgeon’ Review: Michelle Yeoh Plays a Kidnapped Doctor Trying to Outwit Her Captors in Deliriously Fun Genre-Bender

Published

on

‘The Surgeon’ Review: Michelle Yeoh Plays a Kidnapped Doctor Trying to Outwit Her Captors in Deliriously Fun Genre-Bender

Roshan Sethi has a résumé that could make the most accomplished among us feel like underachievers. His three previous features include the thoroughly charming 2024 rom-com A Nice Indian Boy. Two months ago his novel, The Simp, a funny Hollywood satire, was published. He was the co-creator of the Fox series The Resident. And as if that’s not enough, for a couple of months a year he still works as a radiation oncologist at a Boston hospital.

He puts all those experiences to good use in The Surgeon, a genre-bending swirl that is part The Pitt (but gorier), part tense crime thriller, part action movie and part midnight movie, all infused with witty touches. It is wildly entertaining.

The Surgeon

The Bottom Line

Advertisement

Ready for cult-classic status.

Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Centrepiece)
Cast: Michelle Yeoh, Martin Freeman, Laurie Davidson, Yuri Kolokolnikov, Joseph Mydell
Director and writer: Roshan Sethi

1 hour 32 minutes

As clever as Sethi’s screenplay is, the film’s greatest asset is Michelle Yeoh as Eliza Lim, a recently retired surgeon who is kidnapped by criminals and forced at gunpoint to operate on one of their colleagues. No one else could have brought the same serene presence, quiet intelligence and flair for action, a combination that is ideally suited to the character. Sethi’s film is perfectly in sync with Yeoh’s strengths.

Advertisement

The film swiftly establishes Dr. Lim’s character in a few brief scenes that chart her single-minded dedication to her job and the boring, empty retirement she has reluctantly entered. The Surgeon isn’t a character study, but we instantly know who that character is.

Out of nowhere, it seems — but actually for reasons revealed much later — she is abducted and finds herself in an abandoned hospital, surrounded by men with guns. An operating room is ready for her, and the patient’s face is covered. The operating scenes are not for the squeamish, but it’s worth covering your eyes to get to the real action. Lim realizes the kidnappers have no reason to keep her alive after the surgery, so she has to outwit them using her mind, medical knowledge and a few hidden scalpels.

Sethi often holds the camera on Yeoh’s face, expressive even at its most passive. Lim speaks softly as she proves the thugs are no match for her. “You can stop pointing that gun at me,” she tells one of her minders after the surgery. “I’m an old woman, half your age, half your weight. There’s nothing I can do to you.” Part of the fun of watching is that we can guess that line is a ruse, but we don’t know what she’s planning.  

Yeoh, of course, started out in martial arts films, but that is not the kind of action displayed here. Lim knows just where on the body to attack her kidnappers and goes for their most vulnerable spots with swift jabs and great precision. As in the best action films, we never lose sight of how the hero’s personality drives it. “You’ll never shoot a gun again,” she calmly tells one of her captors after severing some cartilage in his wrists. “That’s not snot, that’s your brain fluid dripping out,” she says to another after ramming an instrument up his nose. One of the weirdest, wittiest touches is that whenever she attacks, we see the body beneath the skin, viewing the bones she’s breaking or tendons she’s cutting as if a medical textbook had come to life.

Sethi loads the film with noir tropes, including a ticking clock that counts down how much time the patient has to live after Lim threatens to kill him. What has she got to lose? But even at its most noirish, visually the film is filled with light and color. A major action scene takes place in the former hospital’s chapel, full of bright stained glass. And she lives in a spacious, light-filled house with a large garden, which we see before and after the kidnapping. The Surgeon is taut and suspenseful, but never claustrophobic. The editing smoothly keeps the momentum going and the genre touches blend easily.

Advertisement

Martin Freeman enters the film fairly late in a supporting role as the crime boss who masterminded the scheme. As always, he is expert at looking meek while sounding deadly. And Joseph Mydell adds a welcome, sweet touch as a man who brings warmth and emotion to Lim’s life.

With a nod to genre conventions, the final shot leaves room for a sequel. But wherever Sethi’s varied career takes him, he has already established himself as one of the most exciting filmmakers around.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Back to Buenos Aires’ Review: A Brooding Drama Revisits the Violent Days of Argentina’s Dictatorship, and the Traumas That Remained in Its Wake

Published

on

‘Back to Buenos Aires’ Review: A Brooding Drama Revisits the Violent Days of Argentina’s Dictatorship, and the Traumas That Remained in Its Wake

The dark days of Argentina’s dictatorship return to haunt a man 30 years later in Back to Buenos Aires (Ritorno a Buenos Aires), director Marco Bechis’ brooding portrayal of the deep wounds left by a military junta that tortured and killed thousands of people during its brutal reign over the country. Powerful and well-played, if sometimes lacking in tension and plausibility, this Venice competition premiere should find additional slots in festivals and arthouses throughout Europe, as well as in Latin America.

Inspired by the Chilean-Italian filmmaker’s own personal histroy as one of the rare desaparecidos (victims of forced disappearance) to survive kidnapping and imprisonment in Argentina after the military coup of 1976, the movie is bolstered by a psychological and historical verisimilitude that reflects how intimately Bechis knows his subject. Where Buenos Aires occasionally falters is in a narrative that slowly but surely moves ahead without much suspense, while losing its way in a few unnecessary plot contrivances.

Back to Buenos Aires

The Bottom Line

Advertisement

A somber historical drama marred by some contrivances.

Venue: Venice Film Festival (Competition)
Cast: Adriano Giannini, Ana Celentano, Verónica Gerez, Olivia Nuss, Adrian Fondari
Director: Marco Bechis
Screenwriter: Marco Bechis, in collaboration with Vijaya Bechis Boll

1 hour 45 minutes

The film begins in Torino in 2008, during which we see 50-something paramedic Mariano (Adriano Giannini) working hard to save the life of a patient, then floundering at home afterwards. Solitary and taciturn — the man barely utters a full sentence until the third act — he keeps receiving messages on his answering machine about a court appearance back in Argentina. We soon learn that he’s been asked to fly to Buenos Aires and testify against members of the junta who, 30 years after the fact, are finally facing criminal prosecution. Reluctant at first to accept, Mariano decides to hop on a plane and return to the site of his torments.

Advertisement

The rest of the movie takes place in the confines of a worn-down Buenos Aires courthouse, where Mariano and a handful of former captives are waylaid while waiting for the trial to begin. It’s immediately apparent that the other survivors regard Mariano with a fair amount of disdain, and we begin to understand why when a series of chronological flashbacks takes us back to the coup of 1976. There, we see young Mariano (Eduardo Hoy) going from armed rebel on the run with other student leftists to being a prisoner held and tortured at Buenos Aires’ notorious Garage Olimpo (also the subject and title of Bechis’ 1999 award-winning feature, which played in Cannes’ Un Certain Regard sidebar).

Why the others hold Mariano in such contempt becomes clear when we learn he was something of a kapo in the infamous prison, surviving for years as both the in-house medic and a pawn for guards who practiced torture and rape on a regular basis. The film’s standout sequence has him returning to the location of his internment along with Evelyn (Verónica Gerez), the daughter of one of his former comrades, wandering through a massive empty garage in which tiny individual cells are still marked off on the ground.

During this and other scenes, Mariano looks physically sick from the guilt he holds vis-à-vis the others, as well as the scars he still bears after being tortured and humiliated for over two years. Giannini is strong in a role that has him drenched in sweat and silently suffering for most of the movie, although a little more dialogue might have helped round his character out. A love affair that Mariano has with fellow survivor Amalia (Ana Celentano) adds something extra to the plot, while another thread involving an evil doctor (Adrian Fondari) feels a bit phony, lacking the realism of the main storyline.

The film’s most disturbing moments make reference to some of the horrific acts of the junta, including the “death flights” during which captives were drugged, loaded onto a plane, stripped naked and tossed into the sea from high altitudes. The pain of that period seems like too much to bear for Mariano, who also risks prosecution if the court determines he was a willing participant in the barbaric regime, even if he was a prisoner himself.

In its last act, Back to Buenos Aires settles into a courtroom drama in which Mariano faces the demons he’s been harboring for decades. If the film’s ending ties things up in ways that don’t quite reflect the complexity of what’s happening, Bechis earnestly tries to show how someone like Mariano could perhaps find a way forward — not necessarily by getting past his traumas, which will always be there, but by learning how to live with them.  

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending