Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Barber (2023) – Movie Review

Published

on

Barber (2023) – Movie Review

Barber, 2023.

Directed by Fintan Connolly.
Starring Aidan Gillen, Steve Wall, Desmond Eastwood, Liam Carney, Gary Lydon, Rúaidhrí Conroy, Ailbhe Cowley and Nick Dunning.

SYNOPSIS:

Val Barber, a private investigator, is hired by a wealthy widow to find her missing granddaughter. Set in Dublin against the background of a global pandemic, Barber’s initial investigation into Sara’s disappearance quickly darkens. Before too long, Barber finds himself entangled with powerful men of shady morals determined to thwart his investigation…

Advertisement

Viewers of a certain generation will see this and remember the days of Covid-19. Barber was produced and filming during the global pandemic of 2020/2021 and it shows. We have characters using face-masks and being reminded of their importance, reminding others about social distancing, reminding others we can’t shake hands, reminding why we need hand sanitiser, and using video calls to conduct meetings. If there is a film that acts as a historical document to how the film industry kept turning during Covid, this is it.

Away from that, Aidan Gillen leads us around a rainy, often gloomy Dublin as a private investigator searching for a missing young girl. While it is initially a bread-and-butter job for our mop-haired sleuth, he crosses paths with those willing to use blackmail, bribery, assault and intimidation to steer him away from the truth. All the while he juggles his own private life, such as forbidden romances and caring for his daughter in rehab. He’s one of the many private eyes we have seen in TV and film who do a dark and dangerous job because they love the thrill of a chase, even if it pushes them to their limits at times.

Gillen is a talented actor, and leads a cast of native Dubliners for a very authentic crime drama. Yet it’s a story that’s not very exciting to warrant a big-screen outing. It deals with very current themes that are most popular in the genre – corruption, abuse and mental trauma. Powerful men in powerful positions prey on the weak and naïve. Barber doesn’t walk the line between good and evil, he’s not that style of investigator, but he’s certainly seen and experienced enough to know when evil rears its ugly head. And like all good P.Is, he has a small team around him to help crack the case such as a desk-bound researcher, an old colleague who drowns in a pint glass helping him solve clues, and a tech-geek who bends the rules for cash in hand.

It’s the sort of crime drama that you would see on Sunday night television in a six-part series. Conversations take place in warmly lit pubs, small offices by a busy street, dark streets, cars (usually whilst holding a long lens camera). You know the drill; all on location and all practical, which is decent at least.

Director Connolly tries to inject as much character development for Barber as possible away from the crime to get you to care, and while he is a likeable chap, there’s not enough meat on the bones except him bouncing from character to character who help or hinder him. Forrest Gray provides a familiar soundtrack of chilling piano and slow-brooding strings, again making this feel like some TV drama (when you learn he composed Bridgerton, you can see the dots connecting in how he writes for the small screen).

Advertisement

You’ve seen this all before, and it is strange to see this attempt to break the big screen. Much more suited for small that could easily expand the characters, and give Gillen more juicy plots to follow in future, rather than this slightly lacklustre and overlong “pilot” feature.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★

Chris Gelderd

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Beyond Fest review: ‘Caligula’ naughtier than ever in Ultimate Cut – UPI.com

Published

on

Beyond Fest review: ‘Caligula’ naughtier than ever in Ultimate Cut – UPI.com

1 of 5 | Malcolm McDowell and Helen Mirren star in “Caligula.” Photo courtesy of Vitagraph Films

LOS ANGELES, Sept. 30 (UPI) — Caligula: The Ultimate Cut, which screened at Beyond Fest in Los Angeles, is unlikely to win over critics of the original film. But, fans of the notorious Penthouse production will be treated even more debauchery in a more focused narrative.

The film charts the rise and fall of Roman Emperor Caligula (Malcolm McDowell). The empire’s excesses involve the carnal delights that Penthouse magazine specialized in.

However, producer Bob Guccione took the film away from director Tinto Brass and added hardcore sex to the film’s orgy scenes. The Ultimate Cut is comprised entirely of alternate takes of scenes or footage that has never appeared, and none of Guccione’s additions.

It remains the story of Caligula, though. Caligula’s predecessor, Cesar Tiberius (Peter O’Toole) already had a harem of sex slaves performing for him or fulfilling his needs.

Advertisement

So any take chosen is still full of background actors naked, writhing and simulating sex. Some sex acts are even suggested in shadow.

Once Caligula becomes Cesar, he enjoys the abuse of power. He makes light of the actual duties of the position.

Some absurdity remains in the nature of the material and is not necessarily out of place in an epic of decadence.

Caligula dances and prances around. In the rain his palace becomes a Slip N Slide. With his short kilt, McDowell inadvertently moons the camera every time he turns around.

The most memorable scenes from the film are still in this cut. Those would be the execution by decapitation machine, and the assault on newlyweds Proculus (Donato Placido) and Livia (Mirella D’Angelo).

Advertisement

Much of the film’s last hour is restored for the first time, which gives Caligula an actual arc. It explores Caligula’s insatiable madness to its inevitable conclusion.

McDowell plays the megalomania of speaking in dramatic declarations like, “If only all Rome had just one neck” and declaring himself a god.

The third hour also restores much of Helen Mirren’s role as Caligula’s wife, Caesonia. Considering the softcore sex scenes she shares with McDowell in this section, it’s surprising Guccione would have ever omitted erotic material with his lead actors.

Caligula is never boring. It can be exhausting, so at three hours plus an intermission, one might have taken the opportunity to hone the cut down to a more manageable running time. Perhaps Caligula is destined to be excessive by its very nature.

The only excess that feels out of place is the decision to open the film with more than five title cards explaining the circumstances of the original production. That is too much information to read at the beginning of a film.

Advertisement

This version of the film should just be presented either for people to discover afresh, or for fans to explore further before or after the film.

At that, even without Guccione’s interference, there are plenty of orgies and taboos in this edition of Caligula. Even without the hardcore sex scenes Guccione added, Caligula will never be tame.

Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Reptile Review – IGN

Published

on

Reptile Review – IGN

Some thrillers coast on mood. Reptile slowly drowns in it. For nearly two-and-a-half hours, this plodding murder mystery sustains a single note of hushed unease. Every scene has the same vibe, a pinprick of vague dread amplified by the low hum of what the Netflix subtitles refer to as “tense music.” A man walking into a building? Ominous. A couple dancing at a bar? Ominous. A detective admiring an automatic kitchen faucet? Believe it or not, that’s ominous too. Because the film never strays from this atmosphere of impending doom, it quickly loses its persuasiveness, like a boy crying wolf one too many times.

For a little while, though, it’s an effective approach. The opening minutes have a seductively sinister pull, efficiently drawing you into the apparent New England dream life of two young real estate agents, Summer Elswick (Matilda Lutz) and her boyfriend, Will Grady (Justin Timberlake). It’s not just the overcast lighting scheme that clues us to storm clouds forming on the horizon. There’s also the way Juice Newton’s timeless “Angel of the Morning” rises triumphantly on the soundtrack, only to be swiftly cut off by an opening door. The movie’s first and arguably only true shock arrives just as abruptly, as Will comes home to find Summer brutally stabbed to death. The title slams dramatically across the whole screen, obscuring our view of her mutilated body.

Seasoned detective Tom “Oklahoma” Nichols (Benicio del Toro) catches the case and works it, very gradually. The pool of suspects is small but almost comically filled with plausible psychos. We can’t rule out the boyfriend, thanks to how close to the chest Timberlake plays his emotions. There’s a dirtbag ex-husband (Karl Glusman) who looks like a police sketch personified, with his pencil stache bracketed by sharp cheekbones. And what gumshoe wouldn’t turn his magnifying glass on Eli Phillips (Michael Pitt), a townie who pulls the classic serial-killer move of appearing among the gaggle of onlookers outside the crime scene and holds a grudge against Grady’s local real-estate dynasty? Eli also has the misfortune of being portrayed by Pitt, the frequent onscreen creep who gave TV’s Hannibal and the English-language Funny Games remake some additional notes of distress; how obvious the movie will become hinges partially on whether he’s the culprit or an easily profiled red herring.

Making his feature debut, director Grant Singer fits a profile, too. He stages scenes just like a guy who cut his teeth on music videos: obsessed with surface effect, less so with how well his story tracks from one carefully composed image to the next. The clipped editing, seedy overhead illumination, and periodic plunges into file cabinets mark Reptile as another entry, like The Little Things or Prisoners before it, on the growing log of David Fincher imitations. In fact, the movie often plays like the work of someone who caught Zodiac or Gone Girl on cable years earlier and is trying to recreate it from memory, getting some of the sickly sleekness down but remaining foggy on the specifics.

This movie could really use a Gillian Flynn pass. It has the veneer of a Fincherian procedural, but not the density of clues or complications or studiously observed lead-chasing. Singer, who also cowrote the screenplay, portentously stretches out his ho-hum mystery, which gets less interesting the closer the detective comes to solving it. (The biggest revelation, the one that cracks the whole case, is uncovered thanks to laughable carelessness on the guilty party’s part.) Padding out the protracted runtime are scenes of the detective’s intersecting personal and professional lives. That his wife, played by Alicia Silverstone, is an encouraging, unofficial partner is a nice subversion of police-movie convention. A more playful thriller might have some fun with their dynamic instead of folding it into the general gloom.

Reptile’s ho-hum mystery gets less interesting the closer the detective comes to solving it.

There’s some craft to admire at least. The cinematographer, Mike Gioulakis, supplies some of the same creeping menace he previously lent films by Jordan Peele, David Robert Mitchell, and M. Night Shyamalan. He has an expert eye for the evil lurking in the cracks and crevices of suburban life. Beyond the polished imagery, it’s the performances that prop Reptile up. Del Toro, especially, draws you close with his understatement. He downplays everything, raising an eyebrow but never his voice, even when threatening the man flirting with his wife. Is that lawman strategy or essential temperament? There’s much more intrigue in the actor’s carefully subdued delivery than what the whodunit provides.

Then again, maybe he’s just drowsy. The audience probably will be. Reptile drones through its mystery, almost daring viewers to zone out, perhaps in hopes that we might miss a few key details and walk away thinking we’ve seen something more suggestive and complex than we have. The film has no ups or downs, just a flatline of disquiet connecting one identically inflected moment to the next. It’s the detective thriller as foreboding white noise machine.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review: In ‘PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie,’ a well-funded dog army saves the day

Published

on

Review: In ‘PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie,’ a well-funded dog army saves the day

If you happen to have little to no familiarity with the “PAW Patrol” universe (like this critic), the canine-based quirks of Adventure City are initially alarming. Ryder (voiced by Finn Lee-Epp), a small child, and his private platoon of puppies have their own aircraft carrier? And a skyscraper? Where is this funding coming from? It can’t all be from merch sales. Also, are the dogs cops?

But the tone of this animated world is so pleasant and guileless, it’s easy to accept. Sure, the PAW Patrol could easily take over Adventure City and turn it into their own autocracy with the armada of planes, trucks and all-terrain vehicles they wield with their tiny paws, not to mention the absolute subservience they’ve instilled in the citizenry. But that’s another movie, and they have far too many kooky villains to vanquish.

They’re like furry, adorable little Batmen, Adventure City their Gotham, and the mysterious Ryder a Bruce Wayne of sorts, except there are no secret identities with which to tangle, just megalomaniacal mayors and colorful mad scientists, such as their latest foe, Victoria Vance (Taraji P. Henson), cut from the Riddler’s cloth. She steals an electromagnet from the junkyard in order to snag a meteor out of the sky during a shower, for vaguely nefarious power-mad reasons.

But when the magnet malfunctions, the meteor crashes right into the PAW Patrol tower. They quarantine the space rock aboard their ship to run tests (again, I beseech, where are Ryder’s parents?), and ultimately keep the loot that’s inside the meteor: glowing crystals that impart each dog with unique superpowers. These aren’t just regular pups, they’re mighty pups, which is a big boon for the diminutive Skye (Mckenna Grace), the petite pilot who hasn’t gotten over her experience as the runt of the litter.

A scene from “PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie.”

Advertisement

(Spin Master / Paramount Pictures)

“PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie” is directed and co-written by Cal Brunker, who did the first installment, 2021’s “PAW Patrol: The Movie.” The filmmakers use the cute pups to play with aspects of classic superhero lore — from “Batman,” of course, and “Superman,” with some dashes of “Power Rangers” and other easily recognizable tropes.

In “The Mighty Movie,” Skye is centered as the character who gets to work through her puppyhood trauma and prove herself as a worthy member of the team. Truthfully, the only cruelty on display is a gut-wrenching flashback sequence to a baby Skye struggling through a snowstorm, her Barbie-pink eyes fluttering against the cold, set to an original Christina Aguilera ballad. (That’s a low blow, Brunker.)

Throw in a whole heck of a lot of puns and sand all the edges down so everything is gently charming, inoffensive and just silly enough but not too silly to be annoying. The kids around you will shout when the pups are in peril, and cheer when they emerge triumphant. It’s actually a pleasant experience, but here’s hoping the third movie features an audit of the Adventure City government.

Advertisement

Walsh is a Tribune News Service critic.

‘PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie’

Rating: PG, for mild action/peril

Running time: 1 hour, 35 minutes

Playing: In wide release

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending