Connect with us

Culture

He Dissected Trump. Now Michael Wolff Performs an Autopsy on Fox News.

Published

on

He Dissected Trump. Now Michael Wolff Performs an Autopsy on Fox News.

As we wait for those shoes to drop, Murdoch’s fourth marriage, to the former model Jerry Hall, is coming to an end, and his relationships with the children from his second marriage — James, Lachlan and Elisabeth — are in a state of perpetual churn. There isn’t quite enough drama to be wrung out of the month-by-month narrative of a year and a half, so Wolff rehashes earlier episodes of palace intrigue and family dysfunction and offers a pocket history of Fox in the Trump era.

Apart from the ascendance of Trump himself, those years saw the ouster of Roger Ailes and the sale of Murdoch’s movie and non-news television holdings to Disney. In Wolff’s telling, Ailes, who had run Fox as a toxic, highly profitable personal fief within Murdoch’s empire, was brought down not by the women he had harassed and demeaned, but by Rupert’s sons, who, along with their other siblings, each pocketed $2 billion in the Disney deal.

The source of their vendetta was the dissonance between their genteel liberal values and Fox’s bellicose conservatism. James, portrayed here as a blustering idealist, is quoted as wanting to make the channel “a force for good.” Wolff treats this sentiment almost like a punchline, as evidence that the Murdoch children are “comically at odds with the Fox brand.”

That’s true of Rupert, too, whose politics Wolff characterizes as Reagan-Thatcherite boilerplate: “generally anti-left, pro-business, suit-and-tie stuff.” Under Ailes, Fox News turned into something else, a volcano of cultural paranoia and racial resentment often euphemized as populist. Wolff’s pages on Carlson, while often insightful, tend to skate over how heavily Carlson’s appeal leans on overt white supremacist language. But he isn’t wrong in noting that, by firing Carlson in the wake of the Dominion settlement, Fox “effectively accepted the liberal case against itself.”

Throughout these pages, Murdoch is quoted heaping scorn on Trump (“an idiot,” a “fool,” “plainly nuts”); the real subject of “The Fall” is the schism between the former president and the network that had served as his de facto propaganda arm. “Who was bigger? The Fox monopoly backed by the will (and money) of the most powerful man in the history of media, or the former president and television personality who had become the most famous man on the planet?”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Culture

Interview: Patrick Stewart

Published

on

“I acted Macbeth for exactly 365 days,” says the actor, whose new memoir is “Making It So.” “The role got into me so deeply it dominated my life at the time and caused me to drink too much alcohol after the performance was over. No other role I have played has affected me so profoundly.”

Continue Reading

Culture

Can You Connect These Memorable Characters With Their Novels?

Published

on

Can You Connect These Memorable Characters With Their Novels?

Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s multiple-choice quiz designed to test your knowledge of books and their authors. This week’s installment asks you to identify memorable characters from mid-20th-century novels. After the last question, you’ll find a list of books highlighted in the quiz.

The Book Review Quiz Bowl appears on the Books page every week with a new topic. Click here for the archive of past quizzes.

Continue Reading

Culture

Modern Masculinity Is Broken. She Knows How to Fix It.

Published

on

Modern Masculinity Is Broken. She Knows How to Fix It.

With the arrival of her part memoir, part manifesto “How to Be a Woman” in 2011, Caitlin Moran established herself as one of her generation’s funniest and most fearless feminist voices. Moran, who is 48 and who first made her mark in the early 1990s as a wunderkind music journalist for British publications, has published four ribald and emotionally honest books of nonfiction and two novels since then and has continued to work as a columnist at The Times of London. Now, with her new book, “What About Men?” Moran turns her eye to what she sees as the limited and limiting discussions around modern masculinity. It’s a book she felt duty-bound to write. “All the women that I know on similar platforms,” Moran says, speaking about fellow writers, “we’re out there mentoring young girls and signing petitions and looking after the younglings. The men of my generation with the same platforms have not done that. They are not having a conversation about young men. So given that none of them have written a book that addresses this, muggins here is going to do it.”

There’s a lot of generalizing in your book when it comes to men: They’re obsessed with band T-shirts and emotionally inarticulate and constantly talking about their balls. Is it possible that relying so heavily on those kinds of jokey stereotypes and clichés risks undercutting the deeper points you’re trying to make about the need to open up possibilities for how we think and talk about masculinity? I’m a mainstream writer. If I’m going to start talking about a difficult idea, I want to approach it in the most successful way possible. You need to start with a generalization that is going to get people to go either, “Yes, I recognize myself in that,” or, “No, I don’t agree.” Maybe a lot of people are going, “Men are emotionally literate, they can talk to each other,” but I sat down to watch “The Bear,” which has been lauded everywhere, and it’s about men who can’t talk about their emotions. I see that as a far more clichéd depiction than anything that I’ve done in this book.

Part of the framing of your book is that there’s not enough discussion about young men’s struggling to adapt to changing ideas about masculinity. I feel as if that’s a big topic of conversation these days. So what is the fresh thinking that you’re bringing to it? Feminism has a stated objective, which is the political, social, sexual and economic equality of women. With men, there isn’t an objective or an aim. Because there isn’t, what I have observed is that the stuff that is getting the most currency is on the conservative side. Men going: “Our lives have gotten materially worse since women started asking for equality. We need to reset the clock. We need to have power over women again.” We are talking about the problems of women and girls at a much higher level than we are about boys and men. We need to identify the problems and work out what we want the future to look like for men in a way that women have already done for themselves.

Beanie Feldstein in the 2019 film “How to Build a Girl,” adapted from Caitlin Moran’s semi-autobiographical novel.

IFC Films, via Everett Collection

Advertisement

You used to write a lot of celebrity profiles. Can you tell me a good anecdote about a famous person that you’ve never told before? The New York Times would never publish it. Absolutely filthy.

Try me. [Moran tells an epically filthy story about a British one-hit wonder from the 1990s.] You’re not printing that, are you?

Moran onstage in London during a 2014 book tour.

WENN Rights Ltd/Alamy

How do you think the public discussion of feminism has changed since “How to Be a Woman”? I think the younger generation of feminists are even more open-minded and openhearted and sincere in what they do. But the downside is that a lot of the humor and the lightheartedness and the ability to ask a question about an idea has gone. The thing that I observe in younger women and activists is that they’re scared of going online and using the wrong word or asking the wrong question. As a result, we’re not having the free flow of ideas and questions that makes a movement optimal. We appear to have reinvented religion to a certain extent: the idea that there is a sentient thing watching you and that if you do something wrong, it will punish you. God is very much there in social media. I feel that having been born in an era before social media, I grew up godless, and it made me a lot freer than my daughters’ generation.

Advertisement

What’s an idea that people are afraid to talk about more openly? Trans issues. In the U.K., you are seen to be on one of two sides. It’s the idea that you could be a centrist and talk about it in a relaxed, humorous, humane way that didn’t involve two groups of adults tearing each other to pieces on the internet.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity from two conversations.

David Marchese is a staff writer for the magazine and the columnist for Talk. He recently interviewed Alok Vaid-Menon about transgender ordinariness, Joyce Carol Oates about immortality and Robert Downey Jr. about life after Marvel.

Continue Reading

Trending