Maryland
Maryland’s Sustainability Chief Reflects on a ‘Difficult’ Year of Legislative Setbacks – Inside Climate News
When Meghan Conklin became Maryland’s first-ever chief sustainability officer in 2024, the state seemed poised for rapid climate progress. With billions of dollars in federal funding available under the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law), decision makers were preparing to meet statutory mandates to cut emissions 60 percent by 2031 and reach net zero by 2045.
But the political and economic terrain shifted fast. And implications have been dire.
This year, Maryland delayed its zero-emission vehicle mandates, softened building decarbonization rules, cracked open the door to new fossil gas plants and redirected clean energy funds to cover budget holes. All this came in the wake of the Trump administration’s aggressive moves to gut federal climate programs and freeze key grants.
A year after Inside Climate News last spoke with her, Conklin—who reports directly to Gov. Wes Moore and oversees interagency climate coordination—defended the administration’s approach, acknowledged tough tradeoffs and insisted the state has not backtracked on its long-term climate goals.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
AMAN AZHAR: How has your role changed since we spoke in March of last year?
MEGHAN CONKLIN: This has been a challenging year with the Trump administration’s continued attacks on energy, the environment and climate mandates. It was also a challenging legislative session in Maryland. But I feel we made progress towards our climate goals. I feel lucky to serve with a great team around me, including our secretaries of natural resources and the environment, and the Maryland Energy Administration.
AZHAR: Do you think your office now carries more authority over interagency climate decisions, or are you still building that internal leverage?

CONKLIN: I wouldn’t say authority. It’s a partnership. My approach is to work in tandem with other members of the cabinet and their agencies. I’m a member of the governor’s executive team, which helps me speak directly to the governor and some of his senior team. A key mechanism for our interagency coordination is the climate sub-cabinet, which I co-chair along with the Maryland Secretary of the Environment. I’ve been able to form strong relationships across agencies, helping them move forward.
AZHAR: Last year you said your main goal was to ensure Maryland meets its bold climate goals. A year later, do you still believe Maryland is on track?
CONKLIN: That’s still our main mission. But we face unprecedented federal challenges. President Trump’s budget proposes historic environmental cuts, and we’ve had a challenging legislative session. Still, Gov. Moore signed one of Maryland’s most comprehensive climate executive orders, establishing a climate sub-cabinet and requiring agencies to produce climate implementation plans. Those were completed on time, and we’ve made real progress, including $100 million in state funding—half for solar projects on state property, half for local clean energy initiatives.
AZHAR: This year’s General Assembly session saw clean car mandates delayed, the Better Buildings Act stalled and up to 10 new gas plants authorized. Advocates say Maryland is retreating on its climate commitments. Do you agree?
CONKLIN: Legislation rarely emerges exactly as proposed. There were some provisions in the energy package legislation on natural gas, driven by Maryland’s presiding officers, not our administration. Still, there were some important gains, including removing trash incineration from our renewable energy portfolio and reducing red tape around solar deployment. Overall, I believe some valuable progress was made despite compromises.
AZHAR: How does opening the door to new gas plants align with Maryland’s climate goals?
CONKLIN: The governor is committed to 100 percent clean electricity. Those gas provisions were not in his bill, which was the ENERGIZE Maryland Act. The administration is focused on clean energy, not just wind and solar, but all the other types of carbon-free electricity, like nuclear.
AZHAR: Environmental advocates said they felt blindsided by the gas and nuclear provisions, and that Maryland is opening doors to fossil fuels under the guise of reliability. Did you share these concerns?
CONKLIN: Advocates, including Maryland’s League of Conservation Voters, shifted their stance from opposition to neutrality because of the climate-positive elements we added to the energy package. Legislative process often involves difficult compromises, especially under challenging conditions like we have under the Trump administration. Even if it wasn’t ideal, we saw overall gains.
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate Now
AZHAR: One of your key roles is to help secure and track federal climate funding. Did state leadership anticipate funding upheavals and did your office prepare budget models?
CONKLIN: Gov. Moore anticipated a potential political shift months ahead. I lead our federal investment team, tracking federal funding closely. We’ve aggressively pursued IRA and Infrastructure Law funding and successfully defended some grants in court. For example, the $62 million that Maryland received under the Solar for All grant is now unfrozen as a result of litigation. We also secured $130 million under the Climate Pollution Reduction Grants, and those are continuing as well. But challenges remain and litigation is ongoing.
AZHAR: Which specific climate programs are directly impacted by federal disruptions?
CONKLIN: Many, but notably our National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure funds have been frozen. We’re also very concerned about offshore wind projects. Maryland recently joined Massachusetts in suing over Trump’s permitting restrictions on offshore wind.
AZHAR: The state diverted money from the Strategic Energy Investment Fund into the general budget. Did you support that move?
CONKLIN: Gov. Moore faced an unprecedented budget crisis, forcing tough trade-offs. Still, $100 million of that went to climate programs. I don’t anticipate this becoming a regular occurrence.
AZHAR: Moore initially called climate action an “all-of-government priority.” But some advocates now say that economic pragmatism has taken over climate action. Has there been a recalibration?
CONKLIN: We’re committed to climate action. Protecting the climate and economy aren’t mutually exclusive. The energy legislation streamlined solar deployment in Maryland, which will help climate and economy, reflecting the governor’s continued commitment.
AZHAR: Were environmental justice reviews conducted for the delayed mandates, weakened standards or new gas projects?
CONKLIN: Environmental justice remains a priority. Post-session, we’re reviewing potential executive actions on climate and environmental justice issues. So stay tuned. It’s at the forefront of my mind.
AZHAR: Given the delays, diversions and shifting ground, does Maryland still have a credible claim to national climate leadership?
CONKLIN: We’re still among the leaders. I’ll soon meet with other states through the U.S. Climate Alliance. Despite that it was one of the most challenging sessions I’ve experienced, we continue making progress toward our goals.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Maryland
Maryland governor vows special session to redraw congressional maps after election
MARYLAND (WBFF) — Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said he plans to call a special session in Annapolis to redraw the state’s congressional district maps, reviving a contentious redistricting fight that stalled earlier this year.
“The status in Maryland is we are going to have a special session,” Moore said in an interview on CNN. Asked, “You are going to do it?” Moore replied, “We are going to do it.”
Moore told CNN the goal is for lawmakers to return to Annapolis and produce a new map. “Our House and our Senate will get together. They will come up with a resolution and bring it to my desk,” Moore said. “But the core criteria I’ve laid out is…doing nothing is not an option.”
It would be Moore’s second attempt at redistricting. Earlier this year, an advisory commission appointed by the governor proposed a map that would stretch the mostly Republican 1st Congressional District into largely Democratic Howard and Anne Arundel counties. The change would put Maryland’s only Republican member of Congress into a district with more Democratic voters.
The proposal drew sharp criticism during a hearing. “Governor Moore and Democrats in Annapolis, you are stealing our voice and our vote,” one speaker said. Moore responded, “It’s an important question of what’s the value of one vote and I think the answer to that is ‘what’s the value of democracy.’” Del. Kathy Szeliga said, “How can you ask us to trust democracy when you are taking it so lightly.”
ALSO READ | Gov. Wes Moore selected as Democratic nominee for Maryland’s next governor: AP
The measure passed in the House but never came to a vote in the Senate. In Annapolis today, Senate Democrats gathered to discuss what to do next.
“I think they’re meeting to figure out what can we do to make sure the judges don’t get involved and overturn what they’re trying to do,” said political analyst John Dedie.
A UMBC poll last year found only a fourth of Maryland voters considered redistricting a priority, with crime, education and health care viewed as more important.
Szeliga criticized Moore’s push, saying, “It’s unfortunate Wes Moore is doing the bidding of Democrats in Washington and not paying attention to the residents in the great state of Maryland.” Dedie said, “In many ways what he’s pursuing is future aspirations.”
Maryland’s last attempt to redraw congressional lines four years ago ended up in court, where a judge threw out the proposed maps, finding they were the product of “extreme partisan gerrymandering.” Szeliga, who successfully fought that court battle, said she is prepared to challenge another effort. “If they try to illegally change the constitution to make it unconstitutional we will challenge that,” she said.
Dediesaid a special session now appears likely. “The train has left the station. It’s just a matter of when it will arrive in Annapolis for special session,” he said.
Maryland
Navy ship USS Marinette arrives in Maryland for Sail250:
One of the most unique ships featured in Sail250 Maryland and Airshow Baltimore can be found docked at the Baltimore Peninsula.
USS Marinette LCS25 is one of the most functional ships in the Navy fleet. At 370 feet long with 80 crew members, the ship has a helicopter landing pad and hangar, two rib boats in the belly of the vessel, and heavy artillery, including a cannon.
The ship has four engines, two of which are like jet engines, meaning it can sprint ahead of other vessels to intercept watercraft. It can also truck side to side and spin 360 degrees with controllable reversing and steering deflector buckets attached to the stern of the jet propulsion system. It can also traverse the littoral zones, water close to shore, and navigate waters as low as 15 feet deep.
“Where we shine is our ability to operate where other ships can’t,” said Cdr. Brian Sims, the ship’s executive officer. “For a 370-foot ship, one of the smallest in the fleet, it packs a punch. We can go 40 plus knots.”
The ship is used in counternarcotics missions primarily on the East Coast and in the Caribbean.
It is based in Jacksonville, Florida, but was built in Marinette, Wisconsin, which is where the ship gets its name. It began operating in 2023 and has yet to deploy. The ship can be out on the water for weeks or even months.
“We go out and find drug trafficking individuals and intercept, and the Coast Guard then takes over and arrests,” Sims said.
The pilot house is where the ship truly shines. An officer and junior officer monitor the radar and navigation, while another sailor sits at the helm and oversees steering the vessel and monitoring the engines.
“This is a very unique design for Navy ships,” Sims added.
The ship also hosts several heavy artillery pieces, including a cannon on the bow with different types of rounds to combat different threats. It can fire 220 rounds in a minute.
With its rich Naval history, Baltimore is playing host to some of the Navy’s finest, and the crews are equally as excited to be here in Maryland, the backbone of the Navy, celebrating 250 years of American history.
“Baltimore is a fantastic city, steeped in maritime tradition. Of course, we have Fort McHenry that we sailed past and rendered honors to when we arrived,” Sims said. “Having the ability to be in this role in this position on board this ship to celebrate the nation’s 250th, it’s an absolute honor, and one that, one that gives us all pause, and lets us reflect on where we’ve come as a nation.”
Maryland
Maryland families are paying the price for failed energy policies

Higher energy bills are not coming by accident. They are the predictable result of years of poor planning and a continued refusal by Democratic leadership in Annapolis to confront the real issue facing our state: Maryland does not produce enough electricity to meet its own growing energy needs.
Instead of seriously addressing that challenge during this year’s legislative session, Democratic leaders celebrated passage of the so-called Utility Relief Act (House Bill 1532), which offers Marylanders roughly $12 in savings per month. At a time when families are facing soaring energy costs driven by a massive shortage of reliable in-state power generation, that is not meaningful relief. It is a political talking point designed to avoid the larger conversation Maryland desperately needs to have.
Our state imports nearly half of the electricity it uses. Nearly half of the power keeping homes cool, businesses operating and communities functioning every day comes from outside our borders. Yet even as demand for electricity continues to rise, Maryland continues falling behind on building the reliable generation capacity needed to support our future.
That is not a serious long-term strategy.
Families across Maryland are already struggling with inflation, rising housing costs and economic uncertainty. Energy bills are becoming another major financial burden for working families, seniors and small businesses. But instead of focusing on increasing reliable power supply, meaning fully lowering consumer costs, and strengthening Maryland’s long-term energy security, Annapolis continues offering temporary fixes that fail to address the underlying problem.
The reality is simple: Maryland needs more power generation, and every responsible energy source should be part of the conversation. Natural gas, nuclear, renewables, battery storage, clean coal and emerging technologies all have a role to play in creating a more reliable and affordable energy future for our state.
Maryland also needs a broader conversation about the role experienced infrastructure providers and utilities can play in strengthening reliability and supporting future generation needs. These are organizations that already manage the systems Marylanders depend on every day and understand the long-term planning required to maintain dependable service.
Reliable and affordable energy is not a partisan issue. It is a basic requirement for economic growth, business investment and everyday quality of life.
As summer begins and air conditioners start running around the clock, Maryland families will once again be reminded that energy policy decisions made in Annapolis have real world consequences.
Unfortunately, they are paying for those consequences every month.
Del. Jason Buckel is the Minority Leader of the Maryland House of Delegates and represents Allegany County in the Maryland General Assembly.
-
Movie Reviews3 minutes agoMovie review: Hero of folklore worse off in ‘The Death of Robin Hood’
-
World15 minutes ago‘Eddie Cochran: Don’t Forget Me’ Director Kirsty Bell on How Legendary Musician Influenced New Generation of ‘Rock Stars’ Like Yungblud
-
Lifestyle53 minutes ago‘Supergirl’ has a solid hero but could use a better villain : Pop Culture Happy Hour
-
Technology1 hour agoOf course Meta thinks gambling is the future
-
World1 hour agoDeath toll from Venezuela earthquakes rises to at least 589, with thousands reported missing
-
Politics1 hour agoMcCarthy says Trump will use ‘everything he can’ to force Senate action on SAVE America Act
-
Health1 hour agoSwitching from cigarettes to vapes linked to higher risk of major eye diseases, large study finds
-
Sports1 hour ago2026 World Cup Odds: Which Nations are Favored to Reach Semifinals?
