Connect with us

News

Trump tariffs could push US inflation to 4% this year, warns top Fed official

Published

on

Trump tariffs could push US inflation to 4% this year, warns top Fed official

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump’s tariffs will send US inflation soaring to as high as 4 per cent this year, push unemployment higher and hit economic growth amid “pervasive” uncertainty, a top Federal Reserve official has warned.

New York Fed chief John Williams said in prepared remarks on Friday that a “pervasive sense of uncertainty is becoming increasingly evident, especially in so-called soft data such as surveys and information from business contacts”.

He added that there had been “a sharp decline in consumer sentiment, and business sentiment measures have weakened, too”.

Advertisement

Williams said that he expected inflation to reach 3.5 to 4 per cent this year as a result of Trump’s tariffs, much higher than the Fed’s 2 per cent mandate and far above the 2.5 per cent February reading for the central bank’s preferred PCE inflation measure.

He also said that he expected growth to “slow considerably from last year’s pace, likely to somewhat below 1 per cent”, while unemployment could rise from 4.2 per cent currently to 4.5 to 5 per cent.

The gloomy assessment from one of the Fed’s most prominent officials comes as US financial markets have been rocked over the past week by Trump’s announcement of ultra-protectionist trade policies that he only partially rolled back.

Last week, Jay Powell, the Fed chair, had warned that the tariffs proposed by the administration had been larger than expected and the result was likely to be higher inflation and slower growth. But Williams’ comments are more dire and more specific, and are far gloomier than the projections posted by Fed officials during their March meeting, which had inflation rising by 2.7 per cent and GDP expanding at a rate of 1.7 per cent.

Despite the gloomy outlook, Williams said “the current modestly restrictive stance of monetary policy is entirely appropriate given the solid labour market and inflation still above our 2 per cent goal”.

Advertisement

The comments from Williams came as data showed US consumers’ inflation expectations surging to their highest reading since 1981 in April, as sentiment fell sharply for a fourth consecutive month.

Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index fell to a preliminary reading of 50.8 in April, its fourth successive drop and the lowest reading since June 2022, according to LSEG. Economists polled by Reuters had estimated a fall to 54.5 from 57 in March. 

News

Video: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

Published

on

Video: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

new video loaded: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

transcript

transcript

Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

The Los Angeles Police Department was investigating what it described as “an apparent homicide” after the director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were found dead in their home.

“One louder.” “Why don’t you just make 10 louder and make 10 be the top number and make that a little louder?”

Advertisement
The Los Angeles Police Department was investigating what it described as “an apparent homicide” after the director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were found dead in their home.

By Axel Boada

December 15, 2025

Continue Reading

News

BBC Verify: Videos show impact of mass drone attacks launched by Ukraine and Russia

Published

on

BBC Verify:  Videos show impact of mass drone attacks launched by Ukraine and Russia

How has the UK government performed against its key pledges?published at 11:18 GMT

Ben Chu
BBC Verify policy and analysis correspondent

Around a year ago Prime Minister Keir Starmer launched his “Plan for Change” setting out targets he said would be met by the end of this Parliament in 2029.

Advertisement

So ahead of Starmer being questioned by senior MPs on the House of Commons Liaison Committee this afternoon, I’ve taken a look at how the government has been performing on three key goals.

House building

The government said it would deliver 1.5 million net additional homes in England over the parliament.

That would imply around 300,000 a year on average, but we’re currently running at just over 200,000 a year.

Ministers say they are going to ramp up to the 1.5 million target in the later years of the parliament – however, the delivery rate so far is down on the final years of the last Conservative government.

Advertisement

Health

The government has promised that 92% of patients in England will be seen within 18 weeks.

At the moment around 62% are – but there are signs of a slight pick up over the past year.

Living standards

The government pledged to grow real household disposable income per person – roughly what’s left after taxes, benefits and inflation.

Advertisement

There has been some movement on this measure with the Office for Budget Responsibility forecasting 0.5% growth in living standards on average a year.

However that would still make it the second weakest Parliament since the 1970s. The worst was under the previous Conservative government between 2019 and 2024 when living standards declined.

Continue Reading

News

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Stance on Epstein Testimony Nov. 3

Published

on

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Stance on Epstein Testimony Nov. 3

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
Hon. James Comer
Hon. Robert Garcia November 3, 2025 Page 2

compel Attorney General Bondi to release what you have stated is a large trove of unseen files, which the public to date is still waiting to see released.

Your October 22 letter does not provide a persuasive rationale for why deposing the Clintons is required to fulfill the mandate of your investigation, particularly when what little information they have may be efficiently obtained in writing.

You state that your investigation into the “mismanagement” of the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and prosecutions requires the depositions of three individuals: former President Clinton, former Secretary of State Clinton, and former Attorney General William Barr – who was serving in the first Trump Administration when Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in federal custody. Compounding this inexplicable choice of deponents, you also have chosen not to depose the dozens of individuals whose links to Mr. Epstein have been publicly documented.

My clients have been private citizens for the last 24 and 12 years, respectively. President Clinton’s term ended six (6) years before allegations surfaced against Mr. Epstein. Former Secretary of State Clinton’s position was in no way related to law enforcement and is completely afield of any aspect of the Epstein matter. While neither of my clients have anything to offer for the stated purposes of the Committee’s investigation, subpoenaing former Secretary Clinton is on its face both purposeless and harassing. I set forth in my October 6 letter the facts that she did not know Epstein, did not travel with him, and had no dealings with him. Indeed, when I met with your staff to learn your basis for including former Secretary Clinton, none was given beyond wanting to ask if she had ever spoken with her husband about this matter. Setting aside the plainly relevant consideration of marital privilege, this is an entirely pretextual basis for compelling former Secretary Clinton to appear personally in this matter.

It is incumbent on the Committee to address the most basic questions regarding the basis for singling out the Clintons, particularly when there is no obvious or apparent rationale for it, given the mandate of the Committee’s investigation. Your October 22 letter does not provide such a justification. And your previous statements, belied by the facts, that President Clinton is a “prime suspect” (for something) because of visits to Epstein’s island betokens bias, not fairness. You said, on August 11:

“Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island, and we’ve all heard reports that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor there, so he’s a prime suspect to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee.”

“1

Regrettably, such statements are not the words of an impartial and dispassionate factfinder. In fact, President Clinton has never visited Epstein’s island. He has repeatedly stated that, the Secret Service has corroborated that denial, Ghislaine Maxwell’s recent testimony to Deputy Attorney General Blanche reconfirmed this, as did the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre in her

Fields, “Comer: Bill Clinton ‘Prime Suspect’ in Epstein Investigation,” The Hill (Aug. 12, 2025).

Continue Reading

Trending