Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro sues the Trump administration over funding freeze

Published

on

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro sues the Trump administration over funding freeze


Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro sued the Trump administration on Thursday over its broad freeze of federal funding, saying in a lawsuit that the effort has “jeopardized at least $5.5 billion that has been committed to Pennsylvania” in federally appropriated money.

In the lawsuit, the Shapiro administration said Trump is in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and conducting “an unconstitutional withholding of funds.” The law allows judges to throw out federal agency actions that are “arbitrary and capricious” on various grounds and has commonly been cited in lawsuits targeting elements of Trump’s efforts to rapidly remake the government.

Follow live politics coverage

“Neither the President nor any executive branch agency has the power to unilaterally enact, amend, or repeal any statute. That is as true of a statute appropriating funds as it is any other statute,” the lawsuit reads, adding, “The President and executive branch agencies have an obligation to execute the laws that have been properly enacted. Defendant agencies’ withholding of appropriated, obligated funds violates these fundamental constitutional tenets and is therefore unconstitutional.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, is the Democratic governor’s most significant step to counter Trump so far in his second term. Shapiro is widely seen as a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate. That it was Shapiro himself suing the president, too, was notable because such a lawsuit would typically be filed by a state’s attorney general. In Pennsylvania, that office is now in Republican control.

The Shapiro administration sued the Interior Department, Transportation Department, Energy Department, Environmental Protection Agency and the Office of Management and Budget as well as the leaders of those agencies: Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and OMB Director Russ Vought.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is widely seen as a potential 2028 presidential contender.Hannah Beier / Getty Images file

“The federal government has entered into a contract with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, promising to provide billions of dollars in Congressionally-approved funding that we have committed to serious needs — like protecting public health, cutting energy costs, providing safe, clean drinking water, and creating jobs in rural communities,” Shapiro said in a statement. “With this funding freeze, the Trump Administration is breaking that contract — and it’s my job as Governor to protect Pennsylvania’s interests.”

Both in the lawsuit and in his statement, Shapiro framed his administration’s move on Thursday as a last resort that followed two weeks of trying to restore the frozen funding to his state.

“While multiple federal judges have ordered the Trump Administration to unfreeze this funding, access has not been restored, leaving my Administration with no choice but to pursue legal action to protect the interests of the Commonwealth and its residents,” he said.

Advertisement

A person familiar with the lawsuit told NBC News that the litigation was evidence Shapiro is willing to “go toe-to-toe with the president here and say ‘this is not a way to run government.’”

“This is not a vanity lawsuit [or] virtue signal,” this person said. “This is real. Things aren’t getting done. Key priorities of the governor’s agenda are close to pausing. There’s jobs at stake. There’s key initiatives in public health and human safety that are at stake.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump and his administration have argued for the funding freeze as necessary to root out what they see as wasteful and abusive, even fraudulent spending. But judges have said Trump lacks the authority to unilaterally pause the funds.

Much of the frozen federal funding Shapiro highlighted in his lawsuit stemmed from former President Joe Biden’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act, which was frozen under a Trump executive order that broadly called for funding appropriated by that legislation to be paused. The first paused-initiative Shapiro highlighted was a $3 billion grant over 15 years allowing Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection to repair abandoned mine lands in the state. Cleaning up abandoned mines was a major pledge of Shapiro’s 2022 gubernatorial campaign.

“It was a campaign promise — it’s a big deal,” the person familiar with the lawsuit said. “There’s [about] 300,000 orphaned and abandoned wells in the state of Pennsylvania. It’s like the second or third biggest emitter of greenhouse gasses. It’s a climate initiative. It’s a safety thing. It’s a union jobs. It’s mostly in western, rural Pennsylvania. This is 10s of millions of dollars up in the air of work that is struggling to proceed because no one has any idea what’s going on.”

Advertisement

Two federal judges have temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s funding freeze. But Shapiro’s lawsuit says that the federal government is continuing to withhold the funds to his state. 

“Specifically, Commonwealth agencies cannot draw from federal accounts, which means that agencies are stuck incurring debts and obligations in ongoing projects that cannot be reimbursed,” the lawsuit reads. “While agencies have some reserves and discretionary dollars to cover small unexpected debts, the scope of the federal freeze will far exceed those reserves.”



Source link

Pennsylvania

Federal government sues Pennsylvania, others over SNAP data

Published

on

Federal government sues Pennsylvania, others over SNAP data


(WHTM) — Pennsylvania is one of four states facing a lawsuit from the federal government over SNAP applicant data.

The U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Michigan, and Minnesota. They are seeking the last five years of SNAP applicant data in the respective states.

The DOJ alleges that the four states refused to turn over data to the U.S. Department of Agriculture “so that USDA could ensure that states are properly administering and enforcing their determinations of residents’ eligibility.”

“The American people deserve a government that is transparent about how it spends their hard-earned tax dollars,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “These four states are thwarting USDA’s efforts to ensure that the billions of dollars in SNAP benefits they distribute every year are not lost to fraud.”

Advertisement

“Stopping the rampant theft of taxpayer money demands a whole-of-government response, including strong participation at the state level,” said Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division. “These states are happy to take hundreds of millions of federal tax dollars—much of which is exploited by fraudsters—but want zero transparency over how those tax dollars are spent.”

Get the latest Pennsylvania politics and election news with abc27 newsletters!

The Department of Justice said 28 states promptly provided data and such indicated “there are billions of dollars per year in SNAP funds going to overpayments and fraud.”

The USDA has been seeking data for the past year or so, leading to a legal battle over concerns about how the data would be used.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

House Republicans stall activity, Pennsylvania Rep. Meuser calls tactics ‘foolish’ | Fox Business Video

Published

on

House Republicans stall activity, Pennsylvania Rep. Meuser calls tactics ‘foolish’ | Fox Business Video


House Speaker Mike Johnson sent representatives home early as hardline Republicans stalled floor activities, demanding action on the SAVE America Act. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, urging House Republicans to unify and avoid giving power to Democrats. Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA) labels the stalling tactics ‘foolish,’ emphasizing the need for legislative progress and appropriations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Measles detected in two more counties in Pennsylvania as health department recommends early vaccination

Published

on

Measles detected in two more counties in Pennsylvania as health department recommends early vaccination


Pennsylvania health officials have now detected measles cases in York and Northumberland Counties as cases in Lancaster County, the center of an ongoing outbreak, continued to rise.

And the state health department is now recommending early measles vaccinations for infants beginning at 6 months in affected areas in an effort to protect them against the spread of the highly contagious disease, which is particularly risky for young children. The same precautions should be taken by families with infants traveling to these areas.

Six Pennsylvania counties have now seen measles cases since an outbreak was first confirmed in Lebanon County in April. In all, the state has reported 81 measles cases across eight counties in 2026, more than five times the cases reported in 2025.

State health officials said it was too early to tell how the latest cases in York and Northumberland Counties are connected to others in the region, but that contact tracing investigations are continuing. All cases were among people who had not received at least two doses of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) or whose vaccination status was unclear.

Advertisement

As of Wednesday, six cases had been confirmed in Northumberland County, to the north of Dauphin County, and one case had been detected in York County, along Lancaster’s western border.

Lebanon County has reported 20 cases and Dauphin and Berks Counties have reported two cases each.

Lancaster County has seen 38 cases of measles since late April, with health officials confirming seven cases in the last two weeks. The area was at the center of a prior measles outbreak in January, when state health officials confirmed eight cases in Lancaster County and an additional four between Chester and Montgomery Counties.

Vaccination rates among kindergarteners have decreased across Pennsylvania in recent years, and some counties affected in the current outbreak have particularly low rates, including Lancaster, where about 88.5% of kindergarten students are vaccinated. Health experts say that 95% of a community must be vaccinated to prevent the spread of the disease.

Health officials have been conducting contact tracing to detect as many cases as possible. In the current outbreak, they have twice warned Lancaster residents that they could have been exposed to measles.

Advertisement

Shoppers and employees at a local Kohl’s were potentially exposed to the virus over four days after a staffer tested positive in late May, LancasterOnline reported. And a person with measles visited the Lancaster County Courthouse on June 3.

But doctors in Lancaster County say they fear some measles cases are going unreported, either because patients don’t understand the importance of tracking measles cases or because they fear repercussions.

No cases have been confirmed in the Philadelphia region during this outbreak. But Delaware County health officials said last week that they had detected measles in two wastewater samples, indicating that someone with measles had used a bathroom connected to the county’s public water supply. It was unclear if that person lived in the county or was passing through.

Early vaccination recommended

On Wednesday, a statewide health alert urged physicians to accelerate vaccination schedules to protect children against measles. Officials had said they were considering the measure earlier this month as cases continued to rise.

Advertisement

Measles can infect nine in 10 unvaccinated people who are exposed to it, and can linger in the air for up to two hours and incubate in patients for three weeks. The disease typically presents with a fever and a rash but can cause brain inflammation and pneumonia in serious cases.

Typically, children receive the first of two MMR vaccines at 1 year old, then a second between 4 and 6 years old.

But children as young as 6 months can receive an additional “dose zero” to protect them from the disease amid an outbreak. In its alert, the state health department said parents should vaccinate infants between 6 and 11 months with the “dose zero” if they live in affected areas or if they’re planning to travel there.

Those children should then receive additional MMR doses at 12 to 15 months and 4 to 6 years.

This “dose zero” is less effective than doses given at 1 year old, officials cautioned. But it’s 58% effective against measles when given at 6 to 8 months, and 83% effective when administered at 9 to 11 months.

Advertisement

“Early MMR vaccination is safe and provides modest protection when measles is spreading,” officials wrote in the alert.

Children older than 12 months who haven’t been vaccinated should get an MMR dose immediately, and a second 28 days later, health officials said. Unvaccinated adults, or those without evidence of immunity, should also get two MMR doses.

And anyone who has received one dose of the MMR vaccine in the past should get a second at least 28 days after their first, officials said.

Usually, children who received a first dose at around 12 months wait to get their second dose until they’re 4 to 6 years old. But in an outbreak situation, those children should get their second doses early — at least 28 days after their first shot.

Adults born before 1957 are typically considered immune, but healthcare workers in that age group who don’t have lab evidence of immunity or prior infection should consider getting vaccinated, state officials said.

Advertisement

Adults who received an inactivated measles vaccine between 1963 and 1967 are considered unvaccinated during an outbreak, and should also get two doses of the current MMR vaccine.

Pregnant people, people with severely weakened immune systems, and people who have a history of experiencing severe allergic reactions, like anaphylaxis, to a vaccine ingredient or to a previous dose of MMR cannot receive the vaccine.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending