Connect with us

Connecticut

ACLU of Connecticut calls for video release in prisoner wrongful death lawsuit

Published

on

ACLU of Connecticut calls for video release in prisoner wrongful death lawsuit


The ACLU of CT urged the Appellate Court to release the video of J’Allen Jones’ death during a hearing on Thursday morning. Jones died in 2018 when he was forcefully restrained by correctional officers.


Maia Nehme

12:36 am, Oct 25, 2024

Staff Reporter

Advertisement


Maia Nehme, Contributing Photographer

On March 25, 2018, J’Allen Jones died after he was forcefully restrained by multiple correctional officers at Garner Correctional Institution. Six and a half years later, attorneys at the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut are fighting to get the video of Jones’ death released to the public.

Shortly after Jones’ death, his family filed a lawsuit against correctional officers and a nurse who were in Jones’ vicinity when he became unresponsive. The defendants submitted the video footage to the court in March of this year, as part of an attempt to prevent the case from going to trial. Jones’ family then requested the video’s release to the public this month — a condition the defendants did not explicitly prohibit

Advertisement

The ACLU of CT, which is not involved in the lawsuit, also requested the video’s release but was denied by the Superior Court, which said that the video was sealed. In response, the ACLU of CT filed a petition for the video’s release with the Appellate Court on Oct. 7.

“As the sole evidence of what happened to Mr. Jones at the hands of the Department of Correction, and as a court filing that has never been sealed, the public should have access to the video as guaranteed by state law and the First Amendment,” ACLU of Connecticut Legal Director Dan Barrett said in a press release. “It is imperative the people know what is being done in our names behind prison walls.”

During a hearing on Thursday, Barrett and Assistant Attorney General Terrence O’Neill — who represents the defendants in the lawsuit — each had ten minutes to state their case to the Appellate Court. Barrett and O’Neill also fielded frequent questions from Appellate Court Judges Nina Elgo, Robert Clark and Dawne Westbrook.

Barrett emphasized the distinction between a protective order, which was placed on the video, and a sealing order. Though protective orders are used to manage the dissemination of sensitive legal documents, they do not prohibit all public access to those documents. 

O’Neill argued that the question of whether to seal the video should be returned to the Superior Court. He also expressed confusion about how the Superior Court had secured a CD of the video, stating that he and his fellow attorneys had collected both CD copies they brought to court.

Advertisement

“With respect, we have no idea how it got there, Your Honor,” O’Neill said. “We don’t know where this third disc came from.”

The judges then adjourned the court, setting the next session for Tuesday, Oct. 29.

Requests for video release reignite community backlash to Jones’ death

The calls from the ACLU of CT and Jones’ family to release the video have sparked more community awareness of and outrage over Jones’ death.

On the day he died, Jones – who was diagnosed with schizophrenia – was slated for a transfer to the prison’s psychiatric ward for treatment. Garner Correctional Institution is the DOC’s designated mental health facility. 

Advertisement

After Jones refused to comply with a strip search, multiple correctional officers pepper-sprayed him in the face, punched him and forced him onto a bed over a nearly half-hour period. The correctional officers and a nearby nurse did not administer CPR or call 9-1-1 for seven minutes after Jones fell unconscious. 

The state Office of the Chief Medical Examiner classified Jones’ death as a homicide.

Ashley McCarthy, the DOC’s director of external affairs, declined the News’ request for comment on Jones’ family’s lawsuit, noting that the DOC does not comment on matters of active litigation.

On Oct. 18, more than 20 people rallied outside the DOC’s headquarters in Wethersfield, Connecticut to call for the video’s release and a more transparent criminal justice system.

Stop Solitary CT, a group that advocates for improved conditions and the elimination of solitary confinement in prisons, organized the “Justice for J’Allen” protest. Other attendees included members of Black Lives Matter 860 and the New Britain Racial Justice Coalition, as well as state Rep. Anne Hughes.

Advertisement

Barbara Fair, a community organizer with Stop Solitary CT, later told the News that Jones’ death underscores the importance of halting prison strip searches. 

“They serve no purpose but to demean, degrade and dehumanize human beings just because [DOC staff] have the power to do it,” Fair said.

The DOC’s strip search policy states that these searches are always required in certain situations, such as when a person is first admitted to a prison. Staff can also conduct strip searches if they have “reasonable suspicion” that an incarcerated person is hiding contraband like drugs or weapons. 

“We are focused on the health and well-being of everyone in our facilities,” McCarthy wrote to the News when asked about the DOC’s use of strip searches.

McCarthy also noted the DOC submitted a proposal earlier this year to the state legislature for the use of body scanners in prisons, which would reduce the need for strip searches. If funding for body scanners was made available to the DOC, she said, the agency would install the scanners throughout its prisons.

Advertisement

The lawsuit is scheduled to go to trial on Feb. 20, 2025.


MAIA NEHME

Advertisement




Maia Nehme covers cops, courts and Latine communities for the News. She previously covered housing and homelessness. Originally from Washington, D.C., she is a sophomore in Benjamin Franklin College majoring in History.

Advertisement





Source link

Connecticut

The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery

Published

on

The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery


People in Westport have the chance to pick the best thing between sliced bread.

The Westport Weston Chamber of Commerce held a kick-off event at Old Mill Grocery on Monday for The Great Westport Sandwich Contest.

The contest runs throughout March with 21 restaurants, delis and markets competing in 10 categories to be crowned the best sandwich maker.

Residents can vote in the following categories: Best chicken, best steak, best vegetarian, best combo, best club, best NY deli, best pressed sandwich, best breakfast sandwich, best wrap, and best fish/seafood sandwich.

Advertisement

After people sample sandwiches, they can vote for their favorites in each category on the chamber’s website. They will also be placed into a drawing to win a free sandwich from one of the 10 winners.

“Of course, the goal is to have people come to Westport and check out restaurants, our markets and our delis. This is a great promotion. I mean it is a competition, but mostly it’s to bring people to the restaurants. It also gives a great community activity because they are the ones who get to vote who makes the best one,” says Matthew Mandell, the chamber’s executive director.

Winners will be announced in April and receive a plaque.

The chamber has held similar contests to determine what establishment has the best pizza, burger, soup and salad.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels

Published

on

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels


Connecticut lawmakers are again looking to restore Shore Line East rail service to its pre‑pandemic levels, a proposal that could add about 90 more trains per week.

Lawmakers are also weighing a separate cost‑saving proposal to shift the line from electric rail cars back to diesel.

The plan comes as ridership remains well below 2019 numbers, though state data shows those numbers have begun to climb.

The Department of Transportation provided the General Assembly’s transportation committee with the following data:

Advertisement
  • 132 trains per week today versus 222 trains per week in 2019, according to the CTDOT commissioner.
  • In 2019, most weekday SLE trains traveled between New Haven Union Station and Old Saybrook. This allowed SLE to operate with only five train sets in the morning and four train sets in the afternoon.
  • It should be noted that 2019 SLE service levels were very different due to constrained infrastructure; 2019 service levels had a reduced number of SLE trains serving New London (13 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today), while other stations had increased service (36 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today).

“2019 levels beyond Old Saybrook to New London would require more crews and more train sets than were used in 2019, requiring significantly more financial resources,” the department wrote in its written testimony.

The department said the governor’s FY2027 budget does not include funding for a full restoration. In other words, even if the legislature requires additional trains, the funds are not included in the current financial plan.

Governor Lamont said on Monday to remember that the state subsidizes the line more than any other rail right now.

“There’s not as much demand as there are for some of the other rail services in other parts of the state, so that’s the balance we’re trying to get right,” Lamont said.

At a public hearing on Monday, concerns about the line’s reliability and schedule were a central focus in the testimony.

“We’re making the line less attractive, some would say. The schedules are very, very difficult to manage,” said Sen. Christine Cohen of Guilford, the co-chair of the committee.

Advertisement

The current schedule for eastbound morning commuters is difficult. The train either arrives in New London just after 7 a.m. or after 9 a.m.

“So obviously not really … conducive to a typical workday,” Cohen said.

Cohen, who represents communities along the line, said she continues to reintroduce the bill to expand service year after year, pushing the state to do more with the line.

She thanked the department for the work it was able to do with the recent funding to establish a through train to Stamford.

“What do we need to do, and what are the challenges that you face in terms of expansion at this time?” Cohen asked.

Advertisement

Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto responded that the biggest hurdle is the cost of labor and access fees to Amtrak, which owns the territory.

“The cost to provide rail service is very expensive,” Eucalitto said.

He said CTDOT knows the current schedule is “not ideal,” but the economics of a work-from-home society are difficult.

“People expect 100% of the trains that they had in 2019, but they only want to take it two days a week,” Eucalitto said.

Asked about the eastbound schedule, the commissioner explained Shore Line East still operates on a model that sends trains toward New Haven in the morning rather than toward New London.

Advertisement

Changing that would require more equipment, more crews, and a second morning operations base, as well as negotiations with Amtrak, which owns the tracks.

Amtrak is “protecting their slots to be able to run increased Northeast Regional service as well as increased Acela service,” Eucallito said. “They’re going to look at us and question, ‘Well, how does that impact our need for Amtrak services?’ They’ll never give you an answer upfront, it’s always: ‘show us a proposal and then they’ll respond to it.’”

Cohen, who chairs the Transportation Committee, touted how a successful Shoreline East benefits the environment, development along the line, and reduces I-95 congestion.

“We need to start talking about how much money this costs us and think about all of the ancillary benefits,” Cohen said during the hearing.

Cohen said there is multi-state support for extending the line into Rhode Island.

Advertisement

“We will need some federal dollars. But as you say, there are other businesses up the line in New London,” Cohen said. “We’ve got Electric Boat. We’ve got Pfizer up that way. If we can get those employees on the transit line, we’re all the better for it.”

Rider advocates said the issue is familiar.

“I’d rather see solutions, and not things that are holding it back,” said Susan Feaster, founder of the Shore Line East Riders’ Advocacy Group.

She said she worries the line is facing a transit death spiral, with reduced service leading to lower ridership and falling fare revenue.

“They have to give us the money,” Feaster said. “It shouldn’t have to be profitable.”

Advertisement

Like other train lines across the country, Shore Line East relies on subsidies.

“We’re not asking for everything to be done overnight, but just incrementally,” Feaster said.

The line received $5 million two years ago, which increased service levels.

The proposal comes as the state reviews whether to return to diesel rail cars that are more than 30 years old.

The state says the switch would save about $9 million, but riders have said it would worsen the passenger experience.

Advertisement

NBC Connecticut asked Cohen whether she’ll ask DOT to reverse that proposal.

“I really want to,” Cohen said. “I appreciate what CTDOT was trying to do in terms of not cutting service as a result of trying to find savings elsewhere. This isn’t the way to do it.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections

Published

on

Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – Thousands of Connecticut families with ties to Iran are watching and waiting as their home country undergoes a historic change.

Among them is Ramin Ahmadi, a Yale doctor, human rights activist and founder of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. He has spent decades advocating for freedom in Iran from his home in Connecticut.

Ahmadi moved to the United States when he was 18. On Saturday morning, he learned of military strikes in Iran and the death of the country’s supreme leader.

Ahmadi said protests for democracy and human rights in Iran intensified in December, drawing millions of participants — including his own family and friends.

Advertisement

“The situation in Iran was a humanitarian emergency and it needed an intervention,” Ahmadi said.

He said he celebrated when he heard the news Saturday morning.

“I was celebrating along with all other Iranians inside and outside the country,” Ahmadi said. “I do regret that we cannot bring him to a trial for crimes that he has committed against humanity.”

Ahmadi said he spoke with his sister in Iran after she celebrated in the streets. She was later told to return home for her safety.

He shared a message she relayed from those around her.

Advertisement

“They said do not let our death be exploited because worse than that is having to live with the criminals who have done this to us for the rest of our lives,” Ahmadi said. “We do not want to do that.”

For those questioning whether the conflict was America’s to engage in, Ahmadi offered a direct response.

“We will all be affected,” he said. “And to those that tell you that the U.S. and Israel are beating the drums of war in Iran, one has to remind them that it was not like before this Iranian people were listening to Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 in D minor. We had a war already declared on us by this regime. We were being slaughtered on a daily basis.”

Ahmadi said he believes the path forward begins with young military officers forcing out what remains of the regime, followed by free elections.

“Everyone’s life will be safer in the future and not just Iranians,” Ahmadi said.

Advertisement

Connecticut lawmakers are also responding to the U.S. strikes on Iran.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending