WYOMING COUNTY, W.Va. (WSAZ) – The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) said they are responding to another transformer oil spill at an Appalachian Power substation in the Clear Fork area of Wyoming County.

In a press release, WVDEP said, “A transformer at the facility was observed leaking oil that escaped the concrete containment pad and entered Reedy Branch of Clear Fork. WVDEP received a spill report shortly after 8 a.m. Friday and immediately dispatched inspection staff to the site. While initial responses captured most of the material, some of the oil has migrated beyond containment and into a nearby stream.”

They said remedial actions are ongoing.

The WVDEP also said Appalachian Power has environmental contractors onsite conducting cleanup operations, including the use of vacuum equipment, additional containment structures and absorbent materials to recover the oil.

The transformer is listed as containing approximately 14,000 gallons of oil, and the containment pad is designed to hold more than 15,000 gallons, WVDEP said.

The WVDEP’s Homeland Security Emergency Response personnel has also been dispatched with additional equipment to assist.

The West Virginia Department of Health has been made aware of the spill and has made additional notifications to public water systems further downstream.

WVDEP says its inspection staff are currently investigating the spill and assessing impacts. They will remain onsite to oversee clean-up activates.

A similar issue is happening in Wayne, West Virginia, where many residents have been without running water for two weeks. For that related coverage >>> WSAZ Investigates | Mayor provides update on Wayne water crisis

Copyright 2026 WSAZ. All rights reserved.

The state Supreme Court has agreed to halt a circuit court order about West Virginia’s charter schools system while the case is reviewed.

A majority of justices granted a motion to stay. The order notes that Justice William Wooton would have refused the stay.

Justices are reviewing a permanent injunction order by Kanawha Circuit Judge Jennifer Bailey about how charter schools are established in West Virginia. The circuit judge had also issued a 60-day stay of her own order in case of appeal.

The plaintiffs in the original legal challenge contended that the state’s Professional Charter Schools Board created charter schools without the constitutionally required voter consent.

The court challenge was based on a section of the state Constitution that says “no independent free school district, or organization shall hereafter be created, except with the consent of the school district or districts out of which the same is to be created, expressed by a majority of the voters voting on the question.”

Judge Bailey’s order was to halt the authorization of new charter schools in West Virginia without voter consent. But it provides some latitude.

First, the judge enjoined the West Virginia Professional Charter Schools Board from authorizing any new schools without the consent of affected county voters. But this first step would not affect the operations of the eight charter schools already approved by the state oversight board, avoiding disruption to current students, families and educators.

Second, the order provides time for the Legislature and governor to respond by having special elections to get the consent of voters with charter schools proposed for their communities. The annual 60-day legislative session is underway, and so far there has been no movement on anything like that.

Third, if the Legislature and governor don’t act, then the judge would consider yet another permanent injunction to enjoin the West Virginia Professional Charter Schools Board from permitting continued operations of the eight charter schools already authorized without voter consent.

Lawyers for the state’s Professional Charter Schools Board, appointees of the governor who oversee the system, appealed and said the circuit court ruling risks the goals of the schools to improve student learning, promote higher student achievement and expand parents’ choice.

The Supreme Court has laid out a scheduling order with written briefs from both sides due late this winter and into the coming spring. After that, the appeals court would take steps to decide the issues in the case.