Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Damsel

Published

on

Damsel

Elodie (Millie Bobby Brown) agrees to marry a handsome prince, but the nuptials don’t go according to plan when she’s betrayed in order to pay off an ancient blood debt. Thrown into a cave against a fire-breathing dragon, the new bride is forced to fend for herself as she fights to survive.

Weddings are stressful at the best of times — but your dragon of an in-law is nothing compared to the actual dragon pitted against Elodie (Millie Bobby Brown) in Damsel. Much has been made of how Brown’s Netflix return subverts the damsel-in-distress trope — the title even repositions this feminine cliché in a heroic light — and it’s good to see the film strive to overcome stereotypes. The problem, though, is that this path to victory is paved with clichés of a very different kind, slightly undermining the point Damsel is trying to make.

The delivery — and those accents — prove as lifeless as the dragon’s victims.

Advertisement

The first half-hour leading up to the wedding ‘twist’ feels especially drawn out for anyone who’s seen the trailer or has even an inkling of the premise. When Elodie is — shock! — thrown into a dragon-filled cave, it almost comes as a relief. There are some striking visual flourishes courtesy of 28 Weeks Later director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, and the dragon (voiced vengefully by Shohreh Aghdashloo) is convincingly rendered; you really believe Elodie is in constant danger. But it seems that came at the expense of the budget for other world-building elements, including some questionable wigs and rather conventional production design.

Brown is no stranger to a hero’s world that’s been turned upside-down, and in this regard, the Stranger Things star ably grounds Elodie’s struggle. The same can’t be said of the supporting cast, however, despite the involvement of big names like Ray Winstone, Angela Bassett and Robin Wright. There’s nothing wrong with going hammy if it serves the tone, but the delivery — and those accents — prove as lifeless as the dragon’s victims. Unfortunately, that’s also true of the various plot-turns, which are predictable right up to the end. Damsel wants us to take it seriously, but the central message and generic fairy-tale trappings are far too simplistic for that.

Too childish and shallow for adults, yet too brutal and gory for kids, this is one Damsel that really does need saving, after all.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Brett Ratner’s ‘Melania’ movie has an emotional disconnect – Review

Published

on

Brett Ratner’s ‘Melania’ movie has an emotional disconnect – Review


New documentary offers a flattering view of Melania Trump without shedding any light on who the first lady is.

play

Advertisement
  • “Melania,” an unprecedented new documentary about first lady Melania Trump, is in theaters now.
  • Director Brett Ratner returns from Hollywood exile to helm the film.
  • The movie covers the 20 days leading up to President Donald Trump’s 2025 inauguration.

When is a documentary not a documentary? When the subject is Melania Trump.

That’s not quite a riddle, but the first lady is quite the enigma in “Melania” (★½ out of four; rated PG; in theaters now and streaming later this year on Prime Video), director Brett Ratner’s less-than-revelatory look at the life of the former fashion model and wife of President Donald Trump. The film, which follows the 20 days leading up to the 2025 presidential inauguration, is part reality show and part White House historical video, as Melania Trump narrates a behind-the-scenes glance at her personal and private lives.

“Melania” doesn’t quite work as a documentary, though that doesn’t matter: People who don’t like the Trumps won’t go near the theater, and those who love the Trumps probably will. Just don’t expect much insight either way: While it does offer an extremely flattering view of all things Melania, outside of a few candid glimpses, you’re not really going to learn a lot about who she really is.

The film begins with the first lady in her element: in heels and on the move. With the Rolling Stones playing in the background, Trump jets from Mar-a-Lago in Florida to Trump Tower in Manhattan, ready to navigate the “complexities of my life” leading up to her return to Washington.

Advertisement

She meets with her longtime stylist about her inauguration coat and an interior designer about redecorating the White House. Over the next three weeks, she also attends the funeral of President Jimmy Carter; meets with French first lady Brigitte Macron and Queen Rania of Jordan about her “Be Best” campaign; and finally partakes in inaugural parties and balls on what her husband calls the “big day.”

“Melania” marks Ratner’s first feature film since 2014, following a period of Hollywood exile after sexual harassment allegations. No criminal charges were filed and Ratner denied the allegations.

Throughout the movie, Ratner peppers in bits and pieces of Melania Trump’s personality: In one scene, she sings along to her favorite Michael Jackson song, “Billie Jean,” and is also caught doing the “Y.M.C.A.” dance after an inaugural ball. The camera even captures a few interesting moments that aren’t really the focus along the way, like a worried tailor skeptical of a change Trump wants in her inauguration outfit and then-Vice President Kamala Harris looking at her watch backstage with seeming annoyance during the swearing-in ceremony.

But overall those moments showing real personality – especially in regard to the title subject – are few and far between. There’s a long sequence where Trump memorializes her mother Amalija Knavs, as the first anniversary of her death coincides with Carter’s funeral. However, instead of old pictures being shown of Melania and her mom, or a close-up interview with the first lady, the first lady speaks over footage of herself visiting St. Patrick’s Cathedral. In that moment, and others, she talks about being emotional but doesn’t immerse the audience in what she’s feeling. In one case, Melania is seen watching cable news footage of California’s deadly 2025 wildfires and the camera zooms in for tears that never come.

Advertisement

Because she doesn’t address the camera, “Melania” suffers from a brutal disconnect. Trump speaks about son Barron, but he doesn’t speak about his mom. (Barron, by the way, is low-key the most compelling person in the entire movie because you’re dying to know what this teenager thinks about these events he’s going through.) She talks about a reverence for the military, but Ratner doesn’t show her conversations with soldiers. It’s a strange filmmaking choice for a documentary, though maybe one that’s by design: Melania Trump produced the movie through her new Muse Films company and this is definitely her show.

Everything surrounding “Melania” is political but the movie itself isn’t, for the most part. The president pops up sporadically: His first appearance is as a bobblehead in Melania Trump’s pilot’s cockpit, with “Terminator”-style sunglasses and machine gun. He grumbles about why the national college football championship is the same day as the inauguration (“I think they did that on purpose”), but he’s mainly there to say how great and influential his wife is.

The film ends with the first lady having her official black-and-white photograph taken, and this cinematic portrait, which could have shown insight into a rather unknown public figure, isn’t much more colorful.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Valavaara’ movie review: Sutan Gowda’s debut feels like a warm hug

Published

on

‘Valavaara’ movie review: Sutan Gowda’s debut feels like a warm hug

A still from ‘Valavaara’.
| Photo Credit: Morph Productions/YouTube

Moments before the intermission of Valavaara (meaning favouritism), the movie’s lead character, Kundesi (Vedic Kaushal), lets out a huge cry of desperation. The scene is a testament to debutant director Sutan Gowda’s control over the craft, as he ensures we are as anxious and stressed about the film’s central plot point as the little boy, Kundesi. We then see a subtle yet “mass” interval bang, as Kundesi breaks the fourth wall with a smile.

Just like the scene, Valavaara maintains a nice balance of tension and hope throughout its nearly two-hour runtime. Kundesi’s trouble arises when his cow goes missing. Without the cow, he can’t think of going back to his house to face his father, whom he hates and fears in equal measure.

Kundesi often wonders why his father (Malathesh HV) is disgusted with him. The little one’s disappointment grows manifold when he sees his father showering his younger brother, Kosudi, with unconditional love. Kundesi’s biggest respite is his mother, who means the world to him. The bonding reimagines Kannada cinema’s familiar trope of mother sentiment with several poignant moments.

One of the film’s strong suits is the comedy; the humour is drawn from hilarious situations and funny dialogue, mostly involving a carefree, aimless youngster, Yadhu (a charming Abhay), who often secretly meets his girlfriend to make love. Yadhu’s arc blends nicely with Kundesi’s pursuit of getting back the cow.

Advertisement
Valavaara (Kannada)

Director: Sutan Gowda

Cast: Vedic Kaushal, Shayan, Abhay, Malathesh, Harshitha Gowda

Runtime: 113 minutes

Storyline: A young boy’s quest to find a missing cow that ties into his familys struggles.

A heart-warming film, Valavaara reminds viewers how the Kannada big screen had missed the feeling of tenderness. The slow-growing friendship between Yadhu and Kundesi is fleshed out beautifully. The writing triumphs, as despite tonal shifts, we are never detached from the proceedings. Every plot point leads to Kundesi’s search for his cow, and every time he messes up, we sigh in disappointment.

Advertisement

ALSO READ: ‘Landlord’ movie review: Duniya Vijay and Raj B Shetty lift Jadeshaa K Hampi’s rustic drama

Director Sutan Gowda’s economical storytelling ensures the film isn’t pulled down by melodrama. Valavaara has the spirit of a show-burner, but it never forgets to entertain and engage. The captivating cinematography by Balaraja Gowda and Manikanth Kadri’s moving score elevate the movie.

Some dialogues sound philosophical. The film also slightly overstays its welcome. These are minor shortcomings that can be easily ignored, for Valavaara has several moments that shine thanks to the commendable performances of the lead cast.This is a film that feels like a warm hug.

Valavaara is running in theatres

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Filipiñana’ Review: Rafael Manuel’s Riveting Feature Debut Knows Where the Bodies Are Buried

Published

on

‘Filipiñana’ Review: Rafael Manuel’s Riveting Feature Debut Knows Where the Bodies Are Buried

Both everything and nothing happens in “Filipiñana,” the cutting, confident, and ultimately formally captivating feature debut from writer-director Rafael Manuel. The everything in question is the way structures of power are both maintained and reintrenched at a golf and country club outside Manila, Philippines, that serves as a synecdoche for the country itself. The nothing is the way everyone else just keeps going through the motions despite the continual sense that something is profoundly out of balance. 

One feeds the other as collective inaction allows for the inertia of a quietly sinister status quo to continue unrestrained in each beautiful yet haunting visual the film brings to life. This ensures that when action against this status quo is taken, no matter how small it may be, the ripple effects shake you out of the reverie in which it seems most of the other characters remain trapped.

Playing out almost as one grim extended fever dream over the course of a single stiflingly hot day, the film accompanies the 17-year-old girl Isabel (Jorrybell Agoto) on a seemingly insignificant journey to return a golf club. She’s meant to give it to the president of the club where she works, but her journey takes on a far more slippery significance just as she realizes she can’t continue down the same path she has been on until now. 

There are some other characters making their way through the purgatory-esque golf course, such as a rich industrialist and his niece, who is returning from America, as well as Isabel’s fellow workers who serve as effective contrasts to the absurdly wealthy club members. They all embody the contradictions and cruelties of their little world, with the visiting young expat proving to be most critical to revealing how easily supposed values can be compromised on. However, the film primarily hinges on the actions of Isabel as she begins to subtly disrupt the natural order of the club.

Michelle Mao in "zi"

She’s a character of few words whose actions are no less critical as she increasingly takes more and more quietly radical action. She seems driven by an unspoken yet powerful desire for something more for herself than merely setting up the tees for wealthy men. There is a grounding, deeply emotional care to how Manuel observes Isabel as she attempts to make sense of what exactly is going on in her world and how she can make it a better one.

Advertisement

Beautifully shot by cinematographer Xenia Patricia, who also worked on last year’s spectacular “Zodiac Killer Project,” “Filipiñana” frequently consists of largely static tableaus that are so perfectly, poetically rendered that they almost resemble paintings. Be it when a figure is standing alone in the tall grass looking down at the world with a slightly tormented expression, or the fantastic final shot that lingers for several unbroken minutes, Manuel takes his time in letting everything unfold before you. Life moves at a different, more intentionally laborious pace in his film just as the specter of death seems to increasingly be lurking just out of frame.

Though the film has drawn comparisons to Michael Haneke and David Lynch, Manuel also cites the late, great Jacques Tati, and it’d be easy to make the case for “Filipiñana” as the more reserved, mirror image of Tati’s classic “Playtime” in how it holds the rhythms of modern life up to the light. One other comparison that felt most relevant was the sublime recent “Universal Language,” both in the similarly wonderful way it was shot and in how it shifted into being a reflection on home and memory in his final act.

“Filipiñana” ends up being much more about displacement where the ongoing yet unseen violence has become just another part of the operations of the club. In one unexpectedly affecting monologue near the end, it makes explicit that the workers keeping things moving at the club are those who have been removed from their lives and histories. Just like the uprooted pine trees that keep getting brought in after the one before them died, life seems perpetually out of reach in this place.

Joe Bird stands alone in a dark forest looking at something out of frame in a still from "Leviticus."

It’s all part of the artificiality of the club that makes it feel like a simulacrum of life. We only begin to see reality for ourselves closer to the end, with Manuel pointedly holding us at a distance just as Isabel begins to get closer to seeing the cracks forming in this faux, oddly frightening world. That she is not always certain about what exactly is amiss only makes it that much more disquieting.

A still from Filipiñana by Rafael Manuel, an official selection of the 2026 Sundance Film Festival. Courtesy of Sundance Institute.

The way this unfolds will likely test the patience of those not accustomed to what can be broadly called “slow cinema,” but it was on a second watch that I found myself utterly and completely riveted by the deliberate, devastating way “Filipiñana” unfolded. It’s a film of restrained, yet no less shattering, unease that, for all the artificial beauty that exists in the club, also invites you to look closer and ponder what ugliness lies beneath that all have grown accustomed to.

It holds a potent, petrifying and poetic power that culminates in a breaking of the poisonous spell that, until this moment, had held the entire film in its grasp.  In these flooring final moments, it movingly ponders what it means to take a leap of courage and swim upstream against the casually cruel waters everyone else is swimming in. Everything and nothing has changed in the world of the film, though it remains a work of art that may change those watching it just as Isabel herself does in the end.

Advertisement

Check out all our Sundance coverage here

only-living-pickpocket-new-york

Continue Reading

Trending