Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: ‘Dario Argento: Panico’ is a Reverent Snapshot of the Giallo Maestro’s Life and Career – Awards Radar

Published

on

Film Review: ‘Dario Argento: Panico’ is a Reverent Snapshot of the Giallo Maestro’s Life and Career – Awards Radar

The setup for this documentary about Italian director Dario Argento, one of the most legendary filmmakers to ever work in the horror genre, is undeniably compelling. The structure introduced by Simone Scafidi (who previously helmed a similar biography on director Lucio Fulci in the form of Fulci for fake) is that Argento has been set up in an isolated countryside hotel to work on his latest screenplay. Though he has often chosen hotels in order to focus on his creativity and avoid distraction, the key difference in Dario Argento: Panico is that he will be accompanied by Scafidi’s film crew to speak to him about his life and career.

To this end, there is good news and bad news. The bad news is that any potential insight into how the man responsible for introducing the “giallo” subgenre to international cinema goes about his writing process ends up falling short. We never actually see Argento doing any writing. We never learn anything about his current project (it could be his 2022 film Dark Glasses, hailed as something of a return to form, but the timeline is fuzzy). The entire framing device is largely left in the background, and when we see Argento turn in a supposedly completed script near the end of the doc, it feels almost like an afterthought. Indeed, outside of a few scattered shots featuring Argento and a few other interview subjects walking through hallways and gardens, there’s little else to distinguish this from your standard “talking heads”-style career documentary.

Now for the good news: the career documentary that we get isn’t half-bad. Scafidi clearly has a lot of love for Argento’s films and their influence, and has assembled a commendable array of family members and former collaborators to speak about his journey from up-and-coming screenwriter to the kind of horror maestro compared favorably to the likes of Alfred Hitchcock and Brian De Palma. We learn about how his fascination with the female form came from his mother, former model and fashion photographer Elda Luxardo, and from watching her work with her subjects while supposedly doing his homework after school. We learn about his family-first relationship with his father, already famous producer Salvatore Argento, who backed a number of his son’s early directorial outings.

Argento himself is a willing interview subject, speaking eloquently about his early influences (among them Hitchcock and Sergio Leone, with whom he collaborated on the screenplay for Once Upon a Time in the West), as well as the distinction he makes between instilling feelings of fear and of panic in his audiences. The major milestones are all suitably represented, from his initially controversial debut The Girl with the Crystal Plumage which wound up putting him on the map, to cinematic high points like Deep Red, Opera, and Suspiria, to his collaborations with writer/actress Daria Nicolodi and composer Claudio Simonetti of Goblin fame.

At times, the doc seems interested in exploring the less-savory aspects of Argento’s life, such as in his frank discussions about suicidal ideation that would occur even when his career was going well, or in his increasingly complicated relationship with daughter Asia Argento, who acted in several of his films through the ‘90s before moving on to become a director herself. These darker moments are relatively fleeting, however, and longtime Argento fans may have to fill in some of the gaps in storytelling themselves. For the most part the film is mainly focused on exploring the director’s genius, his unique inspirations, and the legacy that his filmography has left behind. To this end, prolific modern filmmakers like Guillermo del Toro, Gaspar Noé, and Nicolas Winding Refn are on hand to lavish praise upon his work, as well as to provide context for where it sits in the overall history of cinema.

Advertisement

While it may fall short of the possibilities suggested by its enticing logline, Dario Argento: Panico remains a thoroughly watchable, if overly reverent documentary that should appeal to both diehard and casual Argento fans, as well as providing a decent education on how his work has left a mark on the horror genre worldwide. Even if it’s ultimately unwilling to push too hard against its legendary subject, it’s a breezy watch at just 98 minutes, and easy to recommend to anyone who would like to know more about the history of one of Italy’s most iconic filmmakers.

SCORE: ★★1/2

Dario Argento: Panico is now streaming exclusively on Shudder.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

8News Reel Talk: ‘Toy Story 5’ movie review

Published

on

8News Reel Talk: ‘Toy Story 5’ movie review

RICHMOND, Va. (WRIC) — In this episode of 8News Reel Talk, Julia Broberg sits down with Hekla Petursson and Catori Ryan to talk about “Toy Story 5.”

The hosts gave their reviews and provided the following star ratings:

Catori: ★★★★

Hekla: ★★★★★

Julia: ★★★★.2

Advertisement

To watch more livestreams and digital video content, head to the WRIC+ Originals page. You can also watch full on-demand videos on your smart TV using the WRIC+ app.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Mark Jenkin’s ‘ROSE OF NEVADA’ – Movie Review – PopHorror

Published

on

Mark Jenkin’s ‘ROSE OF NEVADA’ – Movie Review – PopHorror

Rose of Nevada is a genuinely poetic movie that pushes the boundaries of the Groundhog Day-style time-travel narrative while carving out an identity completely its own. Rather than relying on the familiar mechanics that audiences have come to expect from the genre, the film approaches the concept through a more reflective and emotional lens. The result is a movie that feels thoughtful, ambitious, and surprisingly moving.

It makes a huge on-screen presence felt through its cast, particularly George MacKay and Callum Turner, who both deliver performances that elevate the material beyond a simple science-fiction premise. Combined with breathtaking visuals and a strong directorial vision, Rose of Nevada becomes something far more memorable than many of its genre contemporaries.

George MacKay continues to prove why he is one of the most compelling actors working today. Following his acclaimed work in 1917, he once again demonstrates an ability to carry a film through sheer presence and emotional authenticity.

Every scene feels grounded because of his performance, even when the story ventures into more abstract territory. Alongside him, Callum Turner delivers what could easily be viewed as a breakout performance. The chemistry between the two leads helps anchor the film, allowing audiences to connect with the characters even as the narrative challenges conventional storytelling expectations.

Advertisement

One of the film’s greatest strengths is its visual presentation. The cinematography is nothing short of earth-shattering. Nearly every frame looks like a carefully crafted painting, capturing both the beauty and mystery of the world these characters inhabit. There is a dreamlike quality to the imagery that perfectly complements the film’s themes of time, memory, and destiny.

The camera lingers on landscapes just long enough to allow viewers to soak in their beauty without ever slowing the pace. It’s the kind of cinematography that demands to be appreciated on the largest screen possible.
Director Mark Jenkin continues to establish himself as one of the most distinctive voices in modern British cinema. Following the atmospheric and haunting Enys Men, Jenkin once again crafts a story that feels deeply connected to folklore and place.

The British backdrop becomes a character in itself, with rugged coastlines, open landscapes, and isolated locations contributing to the film’s unique atmosphere. His direction never feels showy or excessive; instead, he trusts the audience to absorb the experience and interpret its deeper meanings.

What makes Rose of Nevada especially fascinating is how it recalls classic time-travel films without simply copying them. There are moments that evoke the spirit of The Final Countdown, particularly in the sense of wonder and uncertainty surrounding the temporal elements.

Advertisement

Yet the film remains firmly rooted in its own identity, focusing more on emotion and introspection than spectacle. It invites viewers to engage with its ideas rather than simply consume them.

This is also one of those rare films that benefits from reflection after the credits roll. It is not a movie designed to provide easy answers. Instead, it lingers in the mind, encouraging discussion and interpretation. The more time you spend thinking about it, the more rewarding it becomes. Much like a fine wine, Rose of Nevada continues to improve with age, revealing new layers and details upon reflection.

Overall, Rose of Nevada is a beautiful, ambitious, and visually stunning piece of filmmaking that deserves to be experienced on the big screen. Powered by exceptional performances, remarkable cinematography, and confident direction, it stands as one of the more unique takes on time travel in recent memory.

Overall Grade: 4/5 Stars

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Supergirl’ review: DC Studios serves up a second less-than-super movie

Published

on

‘Supergirl’ review: DC Studios serves up a second less-than-super movie

James Gunn isn’t exactly crushing it.

Named co-chairman and chief executive officer of the newly formed DC Studios in 2022, the “Guardians of the Galaxy” filmmaker wrote and directed the division of Warner Bros. Discovery’s largely disappointing “Superman,” released last year.

This week, DC Studios’ second big-screen affair, “Supergirl,” lands in theaters with similarly underwhelming results.

‘Superman’ review: James Gunn gets DCU off to rocky, overstuffed start

Starring Milly Alcock as the movie’s namesake Kryptonian heroine — who also goes by Kara Zor-El and is the cousin of David Corenswet’s Superman/Clark Kent/Kal-El — “Supergirl” isn’t distractingly zany the way its 2025 sister film was. Instead, it’s tonally boring, a chore of a movie chock full of thinly drawn characters and increasingly bombastic and violent.

Advertisement

To be clear, Gunn isn’t at the helm for “Supergirl.” Instead, it’s the typically dependable Craig Gillespie (“I, Tonya,” “Cruella”), working from a script by Ana Nogueira, making her less-than-impressive feature-writing debut.

This planet-hopping adventure in the new DC Universe isn’t a complete space wreck, however, thanks largely to the spunky performance by Aussie Alcock, best known for portraying the younger Rhaenyra Targaryen in the early episodes of HBO’s “House of the Dragon.”

When we catch up with Kara, she’s basically as we left her late in “Superman”: a super-sized mess. She’s out with her beloved, rambunctious dog, Krypto — the peppy and powerful pup having already been a major player in “Superman” — and enjoying a 23rd-birthday pub crawl among planets under a red sun. (Quick reminder: Supergirl, like Superman, draws her incredible powers from a yellow sun, like Earth’s, so she’s at least vaguely normal under a red sun and, importantly, can become intoxicated. The color of suns is a major factor throughout “Supergirl,” and it’s the movie’s most inventive narrative element.)

It is on such a world where a drunken Kara encounters 13-year-old Ruthye Marye Knoll of the Danastia Clan (Eve Ridley), whose family has just been brutally slain by the ruthless Krem of the Yellow Hills (Matthias Schoenaerts). Understandably, Ruthye wants revenge against Krem — leader of the Brigants, a band of male pirates and traffickers — and can think of little else.

Advertisement

She’s offering anyone who will help a sword made by her family of skilled weapons makers. The beyond-buzzed Kara isn’t interested, but she gets involved when a scumbag type tries to take the sword. She continues to do her best to fend off Ruthye’s subsequent pleas for assistance in her quest to kill Krem, but when the baddie — in the process of stealing her floating RV of a spaceship — shoots a charging Krypto with a poison dart, Kara has designs on punishing him, too. In fact, she needs to retrieve the specific antidote Krem carries with him to save her four-legged bud.

Milly Alcock, left, as Kara Zor-El, and Eve Ridley, as Ruthye Marye Knoll of the Danastia Clan, appear in a scene from “Supergirl.” (Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures)

And so the gals are off to other worlds, initially traveling via the space equivalent of a beat-up Greyhound bus, on which they run into a trio of pillaging Sklarian Raiders. The sequence in which Kara retrieves stolen possessions and extracts information from them is as zany as “Supergirl” gets.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending