Connect with us

Massachusetts

BetMGM Massachusetts Bonus Code SBWIRE | $1500 Promo for Patriots-Jets Odds & NFL Week 18

Published

on

BetMGM Massachusetts Bonus Code SBWIRE | 00 Promo for Patriots-Jets Odds & NFL Week 18


We may earn a fee if you make a purchase through one of the links in this article.  The USA Today Network newsroom and editorial staff were not involved in the creation of this content.

This Sunday could be the end of an era, as there is speculation that the Jets at Patriots matchup may be the last game Bill Belichick coaches for the New England Patriots. Belichick’s squad hasn’t lost its effort level and that is part of why New England opened this week as a 2.5-point favorite over its division rival. This circumstance will cause this game to see a lot more betting action than it might otherwise see, and if you want to get a wager on this game, you can do so with the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE that will also give you a $1,500 first bet offer.

Click one of the BET NOW buttons on this page to create a new BetMGM Massachusetts account, claiming up to $1,500 in bonus bets in the process.

The first bet offer with the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE refunds an opening wager loss up to $1,500 with a bonus bet of identical value. You could also place this opening wager on one of the NFL’s Week 18 Saturday games, as the Steelers face the Ravens in the early matchup, then the Texans and Colts play a game that will deliver an AFC playoff spot to the winner.

The BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE grants you access to all major sports betting markets, so you can also begin your betting this evening with the Celtics-Jazz matchup at TD Garden.

Advertisement

BetMGM Massachusetts Bonus Code SBWIRE Unlocks $1,500 First-Bet Offer

📱 BetMGM Massachusetts Bonus Code SBWIRE
🤑 BetMGM Massachusetts Promo First-Bet Offer Up to $1,500; losing wager of $50 or more refunded with 5 equal bonus bets (single bet for less than $50)
✅ Terms and conditions New customers 21 and older in MA; bonus bets expire after 7 days; 1X playthrough requirement
✔️ Last verified January 5

You can place your initial wager fast with the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE by just completing the following steps.

  • Click a BET NOW button.
  • When the BetMGM Massachusetts sign-up page appears, fill it out and then type code SBWIRE in the bonus code box.
  • Go through a GPS verification that you are in Massachusetts when signing up, then confirm you are at least 21 years of age.
  • Make an opening deposit of $10 or more.

That opening deposit will also allow you to place the opening wager that is covered by the first bet offer through the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE.

How to Claim the $1,500 BetMGM Massachusetts Bonus Code SBWIRE

To detail how that first bet offer works, we’ll go with an example of a $50 bet on the Patriots -2.5 points over the Jets.

If New England wins by three or more points and thus covers, you get your opening stake and profits, but if the Jets prevent the cover, the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE then sends you a $50 bonus bet refund. Any opening wager loss of $50 or more gets this through five equal bonus bets (or five $10 bonus bets here), while a loss below the $50 mark gets a single bonus bet.

Use these bonus bets within seven days, as they cannot be used beyond that. Get a win with any of those bonus bets and you will receive withdrawable profits in your account.

NFL Week 18 Betting at BetMGM Massachusetts

You can bet on the entire Week 18 NFL slate with the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE.

Advertisement

This includes the Cowboys-Commanders and Eagles-Giants matchups that will decide the winner of the NFC East or the Sunday Night Football battle of Buffalo and Miami that will determine who is the AFC East champion.

If you want to wager on games after they have started, you can do so via live in-game betting at BetMGM Massachusetts. You can begin placing those wagers in minutes if you click on a BET NOW button and sign up for the BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code SBWIRE.

Gannett may earn revenue from sports betting operators for audience referrals to betting services. Sports betting operators have no influence over nor are any such revenues in any way dependent on or linked to the newsrooms or news coverage. Terms apply, see operator site for Terms and Conditions. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, help is available. Call the National Council on Problem Gambling 24/7 at 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ, OH), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN). Must be 21 or older to gamble. Sports betting and gambling are not legal in all locations. Be sure to comply with laws applicable where you reside.



Source link

Advertisement

Massachusetts

Massachusetts man indicted on murder charge in child’s 2017 death

Published

on

Massachusetts man indicted on murder charge in child’s 2017 death


WORCESTER, MA (WGGB/WSHM) – A Massachusetts man has been indicted in connection with the death of a child.

Laura French, spokesperson for the Worcester County District Attorney’s Office, said 35-year-old Steven Stuart of Auburn was indicted by a grand jury on a murder charge. The charge stems from the 2017 death of seven-year-old Jayden Carlson.

Stuart was convicted in September 2015 on a charge of assault and batter on a child causing serious bodily injury in connection with an August 2012 incident involving Carlson, who was two years old at the time. Stuart was sentenced to six to eight years in state prison for that conviction.

French added that Carlson suffered serious, “life-altering injuries and subsequently experienced ongoing medical complications” following the 2012 incident. Carlson died in December 2017 as a result of those injuries.

Advertisement

Stuart has been arraigned on the indictment and is being held without bail. His next court date is scheduled for July 20.

Copyright 2026 Western Mass News (WGGB/WSHM). All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Rent control question tossed from ballot, SJC cites religious exemptions

Published

on

Rent control question tossed from ballot, SJC cites religious exemptions


Massachusetts voters will not have the opportunity to decide whether to end a decades-long ban on rent control after the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled Tuesday that it must not appear on the November ballot, citing the exemptions for religious organizations included in the question.

The SJC ruled that the initiative petition “impermissibly” relates to religion and religious institutions – something the Massachusetts Constitution states cannot be involved in the initiative petition process.

It’s the second ballot initiative struck down by the SJC in less than a week where the high court cited errors made by Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office, with justices issuing an opinion in May on a third ballot initiative regarding legislative stipends they said should not have been certified the AG’s office.

Last week, the SJC struck from the ballot a measure that would have gradually lowered the state income tax, citing a “misleading summary” authored by Campbell’s office. The SJC sided with Campbell on three other challenges to ballot initiatives certified by her office.

Advertisement

But even with the Attorney General’s office committing errors on three of six ballot initiative certifications, Campbell is defending her staff, and even calls it a “great record.”

“We have 47 (ballot initiatives) that we approved, we have 44 we certified. We had six challenges, and we got three wrong. I think that’s a great record,” Campbell said when asked by the Herald if the her qualifications, as well as those of her staff, should be called into question.

“That just tells me we have more to do to be better. Any institution, whether it’s media outlets or any industry, if they can get it 100% right every time…that doesn’t happen. We own these mistakes, I own these mistake, and now we’ll move forward to improve our process to get it right the next time,” she said.

When it comes to the rent control decision, Campbell had certified the question for the ballot. She reacted to the court’s ruling to block it shortly after it was posted by the SJC .

“We got the rent control initiative, we certified it. But we, of course, have to respect the court’s decision which was against us, and we got that wrong,” Campbell admitted during her monthly appearance on GBH radio Tuesday morning.

Advertisement

Campbell went on to say that her office attempted to explain in its summary, which appeared on the petition used to gather required signatures to qualify for the ballot, that religious institutions would be exempt from the law, if it were to pass.

The exemption for religious organizations controlling rental units was part of the language of the original petition.

“The court disagreed and said that even a minor reference to religion was not appropriate for a valid initiative, and we were just reviewing this. Obviously the decision just came out, and I think it was only the second time that the court has broken this standard, so it’s not like it happens frequently,” she said.

The plaintiffs, whom the SJC sided with in its ruling, claimed the petition should be disqualified because “religion is a factor in the application of the law,” citing a legal precedent that is key to the court’s ruling.

“The petition … concerns a generally secular subject matter — rent control. But, by including an express exemption for facilities operated solely for religious purposes, the petition impermissibly makes religion “a factor in [the petition’s] application.” And in order to enforce the proposed law, the exemption would require the government to determine if a facility is “operated solely for . . . religious . . . purposes,” and then make an enforcement decision based on the facility’s religious purpose (or lack thereof),” Justice Frank Gaziano in the SJC decision. “Further, the petition would confer preferential treatment on religious institutions by allowing them to increase rent prices, while limiting rent increases for secular facilities.”

Advertisement

The AG’s summary of the proposal stated that the rent control measure “would not apply to … units operated for educational, religious, or non-profit purposes.” Campbell had certified the question for the ballot, using a process that she has called “stupid” and said needs to be “revamped.”

Several other organizations involved in the fight for and against rent control are weighed in on the ruling, with rent control proponents calling it  “disappointing,” and opponents celebrate.

“This decision is a massive disappointment after all the work that thousands of volunteers and advocates in every corner of the state put into qualifying our rent control initiative for the ballot, but it’s far from the end of our campaign to protect Massachusetts renters from excessive rent hikes,” said New England Community Project Executive Director, who also chairs the Keep Massachusetts Home campaign, adding that the plaintiffs were financed by  “equity-backed real estate investment corporations.”

Housing for Massachusetts – a nonprofit organization against the rent control initiative, called it “the nation’s most extreme” rent control proposal in a statement celebrating the ruling.

“Today the Supreme Judicial Court confirmed that the nation’s most extreme rent control proposal was unconstitutional. While we firmly believe that Massachusetts voters were prepared to vote ‘no’ in November, today’s decision puts the issue to rest and protects our housing pipeline and our communities from the proven damage that rent control inflicts,” the organization said. “We are incredibly grateful to the countless small property owners, real estate professionals, elected officials, and community leaders who supported our coalition, and we look forward to working together to create more homes and tackle affordability through real policy solutions.”

Advertisement

The rent control question was the last of this year’s ballot questions still pending with the SJC.

Meanwhile, the SJC also ruled this week to allow a question to move forward that would switch the state’s primary election system to an all-party primary, proving to be a significant influence on what voters will decide on in the November election.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Westboro police officer crowned Miss Massachusetts – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News

Published

on

Westboro police officer crowned Miss Massachusetts – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News


WESTBORO, MASS. (WHDH) – A Westboro police officer became the first officer to ever be crowned Miss Massachusetts over the weekend.

Ashlyn Mercier, who is from Worcester, highlighted her community service initative “Nick’s Courage: One Smile Goes A Mile.” It’s named after her younger brother Nick, who is a two-time pediatric cancer survivor.

“I created this initiative really just to give back to the community, and to provide hope for children who are battling critcal illnesses,” Mercier said.

Mercier said her fellow officers at the Westboro Police Department have been nothing but supportive of her win. She said she’s proud to represent police officers on a national stage.

Advertisement

“The department has been so supportive, and it’s just really filled my heart with so much pride, and and so much joy on the Miss America stage, and also to represent law enforcement officers across the country,” she said. “I’m super thrilled and just honored to represent Miss Massachusetts 2026.”

She said pageantry and policing skills have crossover.

“The ability to perform on the spot as you are in pageantry, and in my job, responding to calls that require me to act quickly and respond with a calm, cool level-minded head,
these are all things I do in my role as Miss Massaschusetts, and my role as Officer Mercier,” she said.

Mercier is also set to compete in the Miss America pageant in September.

(Copyright (c) 2026 Sunbeam Television. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)

Advertisement
Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending